DeSantis knocks it out of the Park with his description of Russia with Putin in charge, or was it John McCain's quote?

Quick update: Monday Mar 27, 2023: About a week ago The View mentioned that DeSantis's "gas station with a bunch of nuclear weapons" comment was actually first said by John McCain around 2014. If this is true, then shame on DeSantis for plagiarizing someone else's comment, that's what Joe Biden did back in the 90's when he plagiarized several speeches from British Politicians. 
end of Monday, Mar 27, 2023 update:

After calling the Russia-Ukraine war a 'territorial dispute,' DeSantis says Putin is a 'war criminal' and 'basically a gas station with a bunch of nuclear weapons'

Desantis's quote about Putin is pretty accurate specifically because of when Putin decided to go to war. After two consecutive budget surpluses, the second surplus bigger than the first, and with Europe and India lapping up all the petro and natural gas products Russia can export, Putin decided to start a war of destruction.

An imbalanced leader of the largest territorial country on the planet, twice as large as the next largest country, sees no value in having a highly successful economy that was running surging budget surpluses with no end in sight.

If Putin had not gone to war, Russia would probably be heading towards its fourth consecutive budget surplus. Instead, 20,000 to 80,000 Russian families have lost a son and there is no end in sight for this war. 

Viewing Russian Soldiers in Syria and Turkey helping with the Earthquake recovery while other Russian Soldiers are launching missiles doing the same type of physical damage as the earthquake, is surreal, and brings home De'Santis's point. Putin has turned Russia into a Gas Station with Nuclear weapons.

 

 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

2017 Los Angeles County has over 800,000 Permanent Vote by Mail voters and an ever increasing percentage of Mail In Voters.

DailyPUMA was surprised to discover that there such a thing as a Permanent Vote by Mail designation for Los Angeles City.

  LA City Council Voter Counts.

 

Over 800,000 Permanent Vote by Mail voters are on the Voter Rolls. (see above illustration) as of 2017.

  

 

L.A. Almanac Link

Above are yearly tallies showing the remarkable rise in vote by mail as the percentage of total votes. Sure seems odd that it takes a week to count mail in votes that are locally mailed in. Local mail is supposed to pretty much be overnight, maybe 2 nights max.

Please feel free to review the links and leave a comment regarding your observations.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

L.A. Registrar's Office required 2022 George Gascon Recall Petition Drive to collect an extra 68,000 valid signatures than were lawfully required.

According to the LA Times, To put Gascon's job on the ballot, the campaign seeking his ouster needed to gather 566,857 valid signatures by mid-July (2022); the figure reflects 10% of the people who were eligible to vote in the election cycle when he won office in November 2020. The L.A. County registrar-recorder/county clerk's office said about the 520,000 of the signatures submitted were valid.

According to Breit Bart discussing the Judicial Watch Lawsuit,

In its statement, Judicial Watch noted the lawsuit alleged several key facts, which included, the following:

• Los Angeles County has more voter registrations on its voter rolls than it has citizens who are old enough to register.  Specifically, according to data provided to and published by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Los Angeles County has a registration rate of 112 percent of its adult citizen population.
• The entire State of California has a registration rate of about 101 percent of its age-eligible citizenry.
• Eleven of California’s 58 counties have registration rates exceeding 100 percent of the age-eligible citizenry.  

 According to the Judicial Watch Lawsuit

• 1.2 million inactive voters removed from Los Angeles voter rolls, more than half haven’t voted in 10 years 

What does all of this mean? It could mean that when the LA county registrar mandated that the Recall George Gascon Petition drive needed 566,857 votes to qualify, it was based on falsely inflated voter registration rolls of 5,668,570. 

According to Breit Bart

• Judicial Watch, along with co-plaintiff the Election Integrity Project of California, filed a lawsuit in federal court back in 2017 (Judicial Watch Inc., v. Dean C. Logan) on behalf of several lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County, which alleged that both the State of California and Los Angeles County have failed to comply with the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which was passed in 1993.

If Los Angeles and California have been routinely not cleaning up voter rolls since the National Voter Registration Act was passed in 1993, the non compliance has helped insulate elected officials from voter recalls by artificially inflating the number of valid petition signatures needed to place a recall of an elected official on the ballot.  

It seems plausible that a judge would prefer to rule in favor of a retroactive reduction in the number of valid petition signatures needed to recall George Gascon, or, it would incentivize non-compliance of Federal Law such as NVRA with the worst penalty being nothing but, compliance? How would that be fair to the Voters who were thwarted from being heard due to bloated petition signature requirements?

I am not sure how a lawyer for the recall George Gascon Petition would argue in court for a retroactively assessing a lower number of required signatures, but there may be an argument waiting to be made in court that would make the 2022 George Gascon Recall Effort instantly valid and whole.

If a judge did nothing more than agree that an instant reduction from 112% to 100% of all LA adult age voters as a way to establish a new, lower Gascon Valid Signature number, the 2022 George Gascon Recal petition would have passed! When we subtract 12% from 5,668,570 overinflated LA Voter Rolls it would decrease LA Voter Rolls by 680,228 voters. This would make the NEW 100% total voter rolls in LA 4,988,342. 10% of 4,988,342 equals 498,348 valid signatures needed for the Gascon Recall to go through. The "failed" 2022 Gascon Recall netted 520,00 valid signatures! The 2022 George Gascon Recall should be declared as having reached the proper signature total, AS IS!

The 2022 George Gascon Recall Petition netted 21,500 more valid signatures than were legally required based on 100% of all LA Adult Voters!

Put another way, the L.A. Registrar's Office required 68,000 additional valid signatures than were legally required for the George Gascon Recall Petition Drive to have been approved.

Wed. Mar 22, 2023 5:51 am, Update:  This is a link to the LA Vote total Almanac pictured below.

 End of Wed. Mar 22, 2023 5:51 am, Update.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The 2022 George Gascon Recall Petition netted 21,500 more valid signatures than were lawfully required based on 100% of all L.A. Adult Voters!

According to the LA Times, To put Gascon's job on the ballot, the campaign seeking his ouster needed to gather 566,857 valid signatures by mid-July (2022); the figure reflects 10% of the people who were eligible to vote in the election cycle when he won office in November 2020. The L.A. County registrar-recorder/county clerk's office said about the 520,000 of the signatures submitted were valid.

According to Breit Bart discussing the Judicial Watch Lawsuit,

In its statement, Judicial Watch noted the lawsuit alleged several key facts, which included, the following:

• Los Angeles County has more voter registrations on its voter rolls than it has citizens who are old enough to register.  Specifically, according to data provided to and published by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Los Angeles County has a registration rate of 112 percent of its adult citizen population.
• The entire State of California has a registration rate of about 101 percent of its age-eligible citizenry.
• Eleven of California’s 58 counties have registration rates exceeding 100 percent of the age-eligible citizenry.  

 According to the Judicial Watch Lawsuit

• 1.2 million inactive voters removed from Los Angeles voter rolls, more than half haven’t voted in 10 years 

What does all of this mean? It could mean that when the LA county registrar mandated that the Recall George Gascon Petition drive needed 566,857 votes to qualify, it was based on falsely inflated voter registration rolls of 5,668,570. 

According to Breit Bart

• Judicial Watch, along with co-plaintiff the Election Integrity Project of California, filed a lawsuit in federal court back in 2017 (Judicial Watch Inc., v. Dean C. Logan) on behalf of several lawfully registered voters in Los Angeles County, which alleged that both the State of California and Los Angeles County have failed to comply with the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which was passed in 1993.

If Los Angeles and California have been routinely not cleaning up voter rolls since the National Voter Registration Act was passed in 1993, the non compliance has helped insulate elected officials from voter recalls by artificially inflating the number of valid petition signatures needed to place a recall of an elected official on the ballot.  

It seems plausible that a judge would prefer to rule in favor of a retroactive reduction in the number of valid petition signatures needed to recall George Gascon, or, it would incentivize non-compliance of Federal Law such as NVRA with the worst penalty being nothing but, compliance? How would that be fair to the Voters who were thwarted from being heard due to inaccurate petition signature requirements?

I am not sure how a lawyer for the recall George Gascon Petition would argue in court for a retroactively assessing a lower number of required signatures, but there may be an argument waiting to be made in court that would make the 2022 George Gascon Recall Effort instantly valid and whole.

If a judge did nothing more than agree that an instant reduction from 112% to 100% of all LA adult age voters as a way to establish a new, lower Gascon Valid Signature number, the 2022 George Gascon Recal petition would have passed! When we subtract 12% from 5,668,570 overinflated LA Voter Rolls it would decrease LA Voter Rolls by 680,228 voters. This would make the NEW 100% total voter rolls in LA 4,988,342. 10% of 4,988,342 equals 498,348 valid signatures needed for the Gascon Recall to go through. The "failed" 2022 Gascon Recall netted 520,00 valid signatures! The 2022 George Gascon Recall should be declared as having reached the proper signature total, AS IS!

The 2022 George Gascon Recall Petition netted 21,500 more valid signatures than were legally required based on 100% of all LA Adult Voters!

Put another way, the L.A. Registrar's Office required 68,000 additional valid signatures than were legally required for the George Gascon Recall Petition Drive to have been approved.

 

 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Southern California 50 dollar Natural Gas refund is not enough.

To anyone who may normally pay 100 to 200 dollars a month for natural gas, suddenly getting a 250 dollar to 575 dollar gas bill, followed by a 50 dollar rebate a month later, is a Cruel JOKE. If it were me, I would consider taking a 50 dollar bill and burning it in front of the Gas company headquarters to show them how insulting the $50 dollar rebate was.

All the Gas company had to do was take the hit themselves for one month of really high natural gas prices, and then be more frugal with their own executive bonuses in the upcoming year. All gas paying customers who normally have a 100 dollar or higher gas bill, are STILL OWED MONEY (in my opinion). The credit to their natural gass account should be equal to HALF of the record billing amount of their January 2023, bill.

Perhaps the Gas company is relying on someone filing a class action lawsuit so they can kick their problem down the road a few years by stalling the lawsuit. Call District 12 City Council Member John Lee's office and demand a 50% rebate from your January gas bill. 

If the Gas company is not held accountable this time, and if their executives receive their normal bonuses going forward, then where is their incentive to do better the next time?

 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

L.A. County Registrar and the Missing Mayoral Election Vote Update Links.

Please look at this LA country Nov. 8, 2022 thirteen Vote count update image, should not every vote update in the first column be linkable? Do not click on the image below. Click here for the link to the actual page this image appears on.

Here is the link to the above image. 

If you click on the link, try clicking on any of the "updates" numbered 1 through 13 in the first column. The Updates numbered 1 through 13 don't link to anything! This seems to be an act of omission in which necessary data for transparency purposes, is omitted from the record. Those Update totals exist, and since I like statistics, I want to study the updates. Where are the linkable updates? I won't claim the omission is intentional, but the omission needs to be "updated" and linked to actual vote totals that match the time and date of the update.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Using Math to prove the 2022 Recall Gascon Petition gathered enough Valid Signatures.

Judicial Watch has pulled the scab off of a very serious situation involving Registrars who do not keep their voter rolls current. It becomes increasingly difficult to remove an elected official through a recall petition drive because the 10% Petition signature threshold fraudulently inflates as the number of no longer valid voters kept on the voter rolls keeps rising.

A 2017 Judical watch lawsuit results in over 1.2 million voters being removed from the 2023 L.A. registrar voter rolls.  

However, the 1.2 million L.A. voters being removed opens up a Pandora's box of issues related to what is the correct number of valid signatures needed for a Recall Petition campaign.

According to the LA Times, To put Gascon's job on the ballot, the campaign seeking his ouster needed to gather 566,857 valid signatures by mid-July (2022); the figure reflects 10% of the people who were eligible to vote in the election cycle when he won office in November 2020. The L.A. County registrar-recorder/county clerk's office said about the 520,000 of the signatures submitted were valid.

When the L.A. Registrar's office attempted to quantify how many total signatures the Recall Gascon Petition needed to gather, what L.A. Voter roll total were they using? Was the L.A. Registrar's office using a 2020 voters roll that had minimally removed voters from their voter's rolls going back a decade or longer, or were they using an updated 2020 voters roll that included subtracting a significant percentage of the 1.2 million voters that were recently removed from the LA voters roll?

When the LA Registrar gave the Recall Gascon Committee a signature goal of 566,857 signatures they needed to collect, how many of the 1.2 million no longer valid voters were still being counted to inaccurately inflate the Petition Signature Requirement? 

The difference in Recall signatures needed to remove an elected official before and after 1.2 million voters has been removed is statistically astounding. 5,668,570 total L.A. voters requires 10%, or 566,857 valid petition signatures for the recall to be approved. However, since we know that 600,000 L.A. voters had not voted in 10 years or longer as of 2022, we can at the very least remove 60,000 petition signatures from the total needed for the Gascon recall to have had enough signatures.

The properly updated number of petition signatures needed to qualify would have been at the most 10% of 5,068,570, or 506,857. The Gascon Recall Committee produced 520,000 valid signatures, also known as 13,143 signatures MORE than what should have been the 2020 Gascon Recall Petition minimum needed to qualify. 

The 600,000 L.A. voter roll reduction is a VERY CONSERVATIVE AMOUNT. As of 2020 when Gascon ran for office, the actual number of L.A. voters who should have been removed from the L.A. voter's rolls was probably closer to 650,000 to 750,000, which would have meant 65,000 to 75,000 less valid petition signatures than the L.A. Registrar's office had mandated.

The question that a court needs to decide is what is a fair estimate of the total L.A. voters roll as of 2020 when Gascon was elected. I doubt any court would claim the increasing numbers of L.A. voters who were no longer eligible in 2020 was zero, nor would the court agree that all 1.2 million voters should be subtracted from the L.A. Voters roll in 2020. Clearly a number in the middle would be a fair result, and if that number is 400,000 or higher out of 1.2 million, the Gascon Petition recall already has enough valid signatures. Considering that 600,000 voters had not voted since 2012, 650,000 to 750,000 sure seems like a conservative estimate, which is well above the 400,000 threshold needed for the Recall Gascon Petition to have been accepted, AS IS.

No matter how one slices it, it looks like the Gascon Recall petition already has enough Valid signatures with at the very least, 13,143 petition signatures to spare. 

This is the follow up article to the 1.2 million voters removed from the L.A. Voters Roll could reverse the failed 2022 George Gascon recall.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The 1.2 million voters removed from Los Angeles County Voter Rolls could reverse the failed George Gascon Recall.

The George Gascon recall drive may have been thwarted by bloated Los Angeles voter rolls that most likely inaccurately raised the recall signature threshold needed to recall George Gascon.

The recent removal of over 1 million, 2 hundred thousand voters from the LA voter Rolls may, or may not, have inflated the number of petition signatures required for the George Gascon recall vote. And, even if the argument is made that that was then, this is now, we would then have to ask how long was the voter roll reduction stalled before it came to be. 

Voter Roll Removal could become a quid pro quo in which LA Officials were stalling before the voters were removed from the voter rolls, thus inflating the number of signatures needed to recall George Gascon. 

Stay tuned as Daily Puma attempts a calculation to see how many less signatures the George Gascon recall actually needed.

 

Update: This excerpt is from the LA Times...To put Gascon's job on the ballot, the campaign seeking his ouster needed to gather 566,857 valid signatures by mid-July; the figure reflects 10% of the people who were eligible to vote in the election cycle when he won office in November 2020. The L.A. County registrar-recorder/county clerk's office said about the 520,000 of the signatures submitted were valid.

  

On first glance this would mean the recent removal of 1.2 million voters from the rolls has no standing in regards to the Gascon recall. However, lets backwards engineer the numbers. From a claimed 5.67 million LA voters, the new numbers reflect a drop of 1.2 million voters, meaning there are now 4.47 million voters. This would mean only 447,000 votes would now be needed to recall George Gascon. 

 

Is it fair to just suddenly jettison 1.2 million voters and claim it had no effect on recent recall attempts? DailyPUMA believes the 1.2 million votes that were removed would have to be charted on a graph as if the voter rolls were actually being cleaned up every year. Just because 1.2 million voters were removed from the voter rolls does not mean they all "rolled off" this year. A calculation would have to be made going back at least 10 years and the 1.2 million removed voters could be calculated at 120,000 per year.

2012 to 2020 equals 8 years x 120,000 per year voter attrition. That would mean 960,000 thousand more voters were on the roll in 2020 than actually existed. Instead of 5.67 million voters, the argument can be made that when Gascon was elected, there were only approximately 4.71 million voters. This in turn means the Gascon recall only needed 471,000 votes to qualify, NOT the mandated 567,000.

This also raises the issue that by not updating voter rolls, local Governments are engaging in a power grab in which voters ability to recall an official diminishes the more bloated the voter rolls actually are. This also means vote percentage totals have been significantly inaccurate, which in turn can demoralize voters into thinking their city is apathetic because of inaccurately lower voting percentage totals.

 

If I were involved in the Gascon Recall effort, I would be in court demanding the petition total required to recall Gason was based on voter rolls that were not in compliance with FEDERAL LAWS, and that a new calculation needs to be retroactively applied that would instantly make the Gascon recall valid. 

Please see the follow up to this article, "Using Math to Prove the 2022 Gascon Recall had the necessary valid signatures to be approved".

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

What is the exact difference between Russian invading Ukraine and the U.S. possibly invading Mexico to curtail the Drug Cartel's influence?

What is the exact difference between Russian invading Ukraine and the U.S. possibly invading Mexico to curtail the Drug Cartel's influence? Daily PUMA has no answer. 

Comparing Russia invading Ukraine for reasons I don't know, with the U.S. invading Mexico to reduce the footprint of the Mexican Drug Cartels are two scenarios that perplex Daily PUMA no end because maybe they have equivalence? If one is not allowed, then why allow the other one?

DailyPUMA wonders how deeply Russia is embroiled in both Central America and Mexico. By attacking Ukraine and having several nations oppose the move, did Russia also make it more difficult for the U.S. to go into at the very least, Northern Mexico to tamp down the drug cartel?

Besides the over one hundred local political candidates who are assassinated every election cycle in Mexico, apparently Avocado farmers have to have Police escorts to get their Avocado crops to market. Donald Trump had proposed the possibility of having to go into Mexico to stop the Cartel's undocumented safe passage charges, tamp down the fentanyl trade, and make it safe for Mexican citizens to run for local political office without being assassinated.

But if the U.S. were to intercede into Mexico, it would most likely be without support from Mexican Political leaders who would have no choice but to oppose such an intervention or risk being assassinated themselves.

What I don't understand about Russia's incursion is Russia is already the largest country on the planet by a 2 to 1 margin over the next largest country. Russia also had two budget surpluses in as row and were probably headed for a record high and third in a row budget surplus. Seems like Russia was already set up well with or without Ukraine under its control. Meanwhile, Europe is pretty much built out, there is not that much room left to grow. Ukraine makes an excellent buffer between Russia and Europe. Putin's unflinching willingness to destroy cities that have nothing to do with the military is pretty much proves Ukraine is needed as a bumper between Russia and Europe. 

The Mexican Drug Cartel constant warring among each other is probably causing the smaller Cartels to try and take out the number one Cartel by growing laterally into other regions. The result is ever increasing U.S. fentanyl drug deaths and ever increasing Undocumented crossing into the U.S. who have to pay a hefty fee for safe passage through Cartel controlled land, and an ever increasing encroachment into the farming industry.

Is our entire Political Structure influenced by the Mexican Drug Cartel? I think in California, some politicians, possibly even our Governor and those around him, are influenced by the Drug Cartel. I have yet to hear Gavin Newsom ever call out the Cartels on any issue. 

It makes one wonder if both the FBI and the CIA are freaked out about a second Trump Presidency because Donald Trump may actually pull the scab off of Mexico's Drug Cartel and their lethal influence on Americans through the Fentanyl trade and the Undocumented corridor they profit from. Maybe the FBI and CIA, are either compromised by the Mexican Drug Cartel, or have determined pulling the scab off is worse than letting things stay as they are.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Hunter Biden and his laptop and Los Angeles City council members caught on tape, both attempt to search out their whistleblowers and either charge them with a crime or sue them!

When I was a lifetime Democrat, I always felt that it was Democrats who supported Whistle blowers. Apparently new age Democrat Politicians only believe in whistle blowing when the whistle blows against Republican politicians or Republican allies.  

But now a new issue emerges involving those who try and evade their own crimes or misdeeds while being enriched by Government wages and access. Laws have been passed throughout the U.S. in which any alleged suspecgt who then harms others while trying to escape from their own crime scene, can be charged with additional crimes.

So just what is Hunter Biden and a small cluster of Los Angeles City Council members thinking?  both Biden and Los Angeles City council members want to sue or criminalize whistle blowers for exposing their private acts that were not in accordance with U.S. Laws and Regulations.

The irony is both Hunter Biden and three Los Angeles City Council members were Politically immersed and were either receiving enrichment or poised to be enriched because of their outside of the law activities. So while a search warrant is needed to search a person's home, why should whistleblowers be "brought to justice" by Politically driven litigants for copying data that exposes plans, agendas or deeds for personal enrichment?

This would be like a suspect who is trying to evade a crime scene suing anyone who tried to stop them or causes them not to get away with their illicit activities!

Of course, it's just not as simple as I am claiming it is. The elephant in the room is why not just record Politicians and family members of Politicians at all times. If they have done nothing wrong, then they have nothing to worry about, and if they have done something wrong, then they deserve what they have coming to them. The problem with that rationalization is the snooper has no reason to NOT document or copy data of a second party as long as the party being snooped is a celebrity or politician.

Digging deeper there is a distinction with a difference when comparing Hunter Biden and the Los Angeles City Council trio with other snooping scenarios. In the case of Hunter Biden, Hunter left his lap top at the store for quite a while. Eventually the store owner has a right to copy the data just to protect themselves against any accusation that might suddenly transpire because time has lapsed. Biden could claim the store owner purposely held onto the lap top, and without any evidence of what was done, the store owner could be put in a bad situation. As for the City Council members, they were on city property conducting city business and the people have a right to know how they think behind closed doors.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

If Tucker Carlson's video segment about Richard Nixon and the CIA is preposterous, why can DailyPUMA only find the responses to the video segment, but not the original segment?

I found Tucker Carlson's screed about Richard Nixon and the CIA intriguing. I found not being able to find the original Fox News segment by doing a google search beguiling. When I did a google search for Tucker Carlson's commentary about Nixon and the CIA, other entities talking and mocking Tucker Carlson's segment appeared, but not the original that aired on Fox News.

How is it possible that a Tucker Carlson video segment about Richard Nixon and the CIA cannot be found via a google search, but pundits mocking the Tucker Carlson video segment about Richard Nixon and the CIA can be  found via a google search? 

When do the rich conservatives get in the act and follow Elon Musk's lead. NOT by starting new social media platforms, but by fighting for the ones that got here first and are still the go to for the majority of Americans.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Freedom of Speech ends when it is an adult interacting with a minor without Parental or Guardian Consent, this includes Drag Queen Shows.

All I had to do was read the title of this commentary about Drag Queens and Freedom of Speech to know it was disrespecting Parents and Guardians of Minors. 

 

The article headline is Drag Shows are Free Speech. Not when it is an adult interacting with a minor without Parental or Guardian consent.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

2023 Republican House of Representative Majority should reopen January 6th Investigation.

Would like to see the 2023 House Republicans reconvene the January 6th hearings and put into the record all the evidence that was purposely left out by the unselect committee.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Judge allows strange interpretation of misprinted Arizona ballots in the Kari Lake / Katie Hobbs 2022 Governor's Race...

Quoting Forbes magazine...Thompson allowed two of her (Kari Lake) claims to stand: that officials did not follow the proper chain of custody requirements for hundreds of thousands of ballots in Maricopa County and that officials intentionally caused ballot printers to malfunction in order to skew the election results. end Forbes article quote.

The "intentionally caused ballot printers to malfunction in order to skew election results" ruling is somewhat perplexing.  The fact that Secretary of State Katie Hobbs had jurisdiction over Katie Hobbs the Gubernatorial candidate seems to have been ignored by the Judge. Why does it matter if the mistakes were "intentional" or not? 

It seems to DailyPUMA that it is quite possible to make an intentional error look like an accident, and therefore proving the errors were intentional seems like too high of a bar to have created.

There were misprinted ballots that wreaked havoc and ballot vote delays that apparently would have affected Kari Lake voters moreso than Katie Hobbs voters due to the location where the ballot counting mishap locations were occurring.

Did anyone take responsibility for the misprinted ballot errors?

As for not following the proper chain of custody regarding the ballots, how can such a claim be proven when no one has impartial standing to ensure that chain of custody is not broken?

But getting back to the ballots that were printed in the wrong size causing the ballot machines to reject them, this is such a big deal I can't fathom the judge eventually ruling the discrepancy did not influence a contest that was won by only a .67% margin, especially when one of the Gubernatorial candidates was actually in charge of the ballot and could personally benefit from such a mishap.

 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

One America News Network and Real America's Voice continue to disrupt Republican Solidarity with their views on Abortion and Ukraine..

I have the pleasure of viewing One America News Network, Real America's Voice, and NewsMax II on free TV. I cringe whenever I see the male pundits on OANN and Real America's Voice both chortling about Abortion and that a woman does not have a right to choose her destiny.

When the Supreme Court Trump helped select struck down Roe B. Wade Trump was concerned he would be "blamed" by a coalition of "woke" voters who normally don't vote or are willing to look at the bigger picture before voting, or even deciding to vote.

Trump's future resurgence in popularity will happen when Order 42 is finally ended by an insane Biden administration that just has to go oppo on everything Trump stood for. However, Texas seems to be the burr in Trump's butt that continues to plague Trump's resurgence.

First, it was Texas's Abortion bounty law in 2021 which kicked into high gear in 2022 as Roe B. Wade was being dismantled and given back to the States. While OANN and RAV attempted to convince their base that Texas's bounty law and the brief Abortion time span other States were coming up with were topics that should be avoided, they were NOT being avoided in the real world. Trump was blamed for the Red Puddle wave when it was actually Texas and other ultra Conservative states coming up with Abortion restrictions that would have outraged all Men, if Men could get pregnant.

"Don't even bring up abortion when you talk to others", became the rallying cry at both OANN and Real America News Network. "Bring up gas prices, the economy, inflation, higher and higher taxes, higher and higher interest rates, all the money being sent to Ukraine, just don't bring up the issue of abortion." 

I warned about Abortion being the deathknell of the alleged Republican Red Wave on several LinkedIn comments I made throughout the summer, unfortunately Technofascist LinkedIn censors have canceled my 13 year LinkedIn membership without even letting me give my side of the story, but that is an article for another day.

Texas's second burr in Trump's butt is Order 42. Instead of Texas letting Order 42 lapse, which would have instantly given Trump the Political center stage again, Texas stepped in and filed a lawsuit that has extended Order 42. As long as Order 42 is enforced, Trump doesn't get credit for the millions who have NOT entered the U.S. even as the deceitful Biden Administration and mainstream media angles all sorts of ways they can blame Trump for the Undocumented Border problem.

Meanwhile, the pundits at OANN and RAV have doubled down on the issue of Abortion restrictions and not funding Ukraine. OANN and RAV continue to be the debt that keeps on taking from Trump's political future. Wow.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Late arriving mail in ballots, the new normal that is not normal.

Lost among all the controversy over 2020 ballot counting was the Post Office refusing to honor their subpoena's to appear in court regarding strange goings on related to ballot deliveries made by the Post Office. There was the apartment address that did not exist where dozens of ballots were dropped off. There was someone driving around with dozens of ballots that didn't belong to them. Discarded ballots, duplicate ballots, and so on.

All of these scenarios appear related to the delivery of ballots by the Post Office. 99% of all Postal Employees can be as honest as anyone on the planet, it only takes a few Union Loyalists who hated Trump (and they had their reasons based on Post Office Budget cuts) and unwitting Postal carriers being given blank ballots falsely obtained to deliver, to harvested ballots delivered by unsuspecting postal carriers to voting centers with no knowledge they were delivering ballots not signed by the voter the ballot was addressed to.

One thing I never saw over the mainstream media gaslighting hyperbole regarding possible ballot fraud was actually showing a ballot from when it was received at a voting center all the way through the final step. I did read about people in cubicles who would batch upload the paper ballots tallies to a central voting location, and that the batch uploaders had some type of mysterious power to "determine" if a ballot had been properly filled out. There were allegations that a ballot batch uploader, who worked alone in their own cubicle,  could "correct" voting errors.

During a 60 minutes interview immediately after the 2020 elections, the head of the 2020 Voting Security, Christopher Krebbs, admitted there were some voting discrepanices on the day of the election but that they did not involve outside forces from other countries manipulating the vote totals. Ok, so instead of China, Russia, Germany, or Venezuela affecting the vote, Mr. Krebbs appeared to be admitting the cubicle people could have sway over vote totals.

How much time did the mainstream media devote to investigating either the Post Office's role in how ballots were delivered or how much influence the cubicle people had when tallying vote totals? How about ZERO.

Vote tampering stories seemed to always focus on the number of paper ballots being input equaling the number of paper ballots that were submitted with little research regarding all the steps that occur before the ballot actually being tabulated.

The news stories always focus on legitimate paper ballot tallies. The conversion process of provisional ballots to legitimate paper ballots is never discussed.

There are claims that some precincts had more votes than voters, an issue that also was never really addressed.

And then there are the ballots that arrive days after the actual day of voting that are not being inspected. Trailing Los Angeles Mayoral Candidate Karen Bass received 160,000 votes AFTER polls had closed while Rick Caruso received only 98,000 mail in ballots, catapulting Bass to a come from behind vote to determine the two Mayoral Candidates.

The problem with not scrutinizing where the Postal Delivered Ballots are coming from is all other vote tallies have already been counted and made public so it is KNOWN how much a candidate is trailing by BEFORE mail in ballots stream in for several days after the election. 

I asked the County Registrar how many mail in ballots came in on a day by day basis after the Los Angeles Primary Mayoral Race had ended, and they had now answer because they were not tabulating daily mail in ballots received after the voting polls had officially closed.

Are we to believe that it is impossible to back date a mail in ballot? Did the Mainstream News Media ever cover the possibility of back dating mail in ballots? 

Is it really so impossible to simply add a couple of boxes worth of additional ballots to a vehicle that is delivering the votes to a voting center after the final voting day to ensure the right candidate wins, and to do this day after day since mail in ballots can arrive up to a week after the last day to vote has occurred?

Why do ballots trickle in up to a week after the postmark date? Seems that with just a bit of effort one truck could be assigned to each city to pick up all ballots from the ballot boxes and bring them straight in to the voting centers.

As for those who use the actual post office to mail their ballots, why not do a straight delivery to the Voting center, why does it take up to a week for ballots to arrive at the voting center? 

In Los Angeles, we may see Rick Caruso with a 75,000 vote lead at the end of election day that magically gets cut into as mail in ballots stream in for up to a week after the polls close until suddenly Karen Bass wins the Mayoral election by 10,000 votes.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Why voting Democrat for the 2022 Elections is the most selfish thing you can do.

As a former life long Democrat, Democrat Politicians of today are remarkably different from the Democrat Politicians of the 1990's. Move on dot org helped destroy the Democrat Moderate base and in turn forced Hillary Clinton so far left she is a shell of who she was in her prime. 

The reaction to Musk taking over Twitter is hilarious. He's barely owned it for less than a week and the amount of crying among Democrats just proves how brainwashed Dem loyalists have become. 

The inability to even look at conservative news sites without pretending they are kryptonite is palpable. I could list several dozen moments during Trump's presidency where the mainstream media completely misrepresented and even would switch around Trump's words to create the polar opposite meaning. 

News Media loyalty is the quickest way to rot one's brain. It took the repeated EMTALA violations that led to my Mother's premature demise at West Hills ER Hospital and the absolute complete indifference from the Democrat Political stranglehold for me to wake up. 

I feel sorry you don't know the truth. $777.00 a day to house one Undocumented child. Over $600,000 to medically care for a premature birth to one Undocumented couple. Meanwhile our government can't even come with a Kinship Fostering program that might pay grandma or grandad 20 bucks a day to help Single Mom or over worked parents to watch their kids when they can't be home. 

With each passing year government programs dilute their resources for Americans so they can accommodate the Undocumented and the drug addicts being given one way tickets to California, who are then being fed their drugs through mules hidden among the 2.5 million Undocumented coming into our country every year under Biden. 

Then when Americans say America first, they are called fascists by media brainwashed Democrat followers. 

Instead of spending $600,000 per apartment to house a homeless person in California, our State could buy a home for $100,000 in another State and give it to a homeless person to live in with incentives towards eventually owning the home. 

I can tell who is a Democrat so easily, Democrat voters have an excellent health insurance policy and a well funded retirement pension. 

Voting Democrat in 2022 is the most selfish thing one can do. My mother's death spiral image with embedded words at West Hills Hospital ER is provided below. 

If you are offended by this post, how do you think I feel witnessing my Mother's repeated medical abuse at West Hills Hospital ER that directly led to her death in my arms at home 2 days later. Then discovering that NOBODY cared among a Political Democrat Centric Los Angeles County, along with a Democrat Mayor and Democrat Governor. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

In Praise of Moms with Amazing Parenting Skills and Ideas.

Perhaps the best article you will ever read about Parenting, and it is short!

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Gay Wedding Cakes and Civil Unions.

The battle wages on regarding whether or not a cake maker can be forced to make a wedding cake depicting a gay couple. In this latest round, the cake maker won the right to deny service to a gay couple.

History seems to have forgotten the rapidly growing popularity of civil unions before gay marriages became legal. The irony of groups of people who did not want to be scorned or denied their right to be legally recognized as a couple because of their sexual preferences also demanding to be just like those they viewed as close minded and prejudiced seemed to be lost on everyone, yes, everyone, but me.

Paraphrasing..."I can't stand your rigid, judgemental, prejudiced ways....but I want to be just like you when it comes to marriage". It's such an oxymoronic position it defies logic.

Another oxymoronic position is the steadfast belief that a gay marriage is identical to a heterosexual marriage in which the couple can conceive children. The two are not the same. The reality of a fertile heterosexual marriage is the couple has to remain vigilant at all times regarding when and how many kids they plan on bringing into the world. Fertile heterosexual marriages actually have to alter their sexual practices routines. Do gay marriages ever alter their sexual practices out of fear of having an unplanned pregnancy?

So there is a distinct wedge between what a fertile heterosexual and a gay marriage is. The gay movement's demand that they be allowed to have the exact same term applied to their unions was from my point of view, embarrassing and sad.

What might have happened if the gay movement had stayed the course and popularized civil unions while also fighting for the right to have all the same government related benefits that a conventional marriage is given? 

I think a civil union alliance comprised of non-fertile heterosexual couples, couples with different religious beliefs, civil rights advocates,  progressive minded heterosexual couples, gay couples, bi-sexual couples would have combined to create a civil union majority in which perhaps 60% to 70% of all unions would be civil unions and only 30% to 40% would prefer to have a conventional marriage.

Pioneers do not follow a path already taken, they make their own, and when it came to forging a path for civil unions to become the dominant form of recognized coupling, the ball was dropped.

On a personal level, were I to ever marry someone of a different religion, or if we could not conceive a child, I would be quite fine with having a civil union instead, as long as all the same government rights were granted.

As it stands now, the perpetual battle between gay marriages and cake makers wages on, creating perpetual hostility and anger that is all so unnecessary.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

I guess I should be grateful that Google hasn't shut down my blog for some made up reason, but these new article stats are almost just as bad.

When I wrote my previous article about the Los Angeles City Council hidden audio recordings, I decided to post it on various sites of mine on the web. Over the first couple of hours I had over 170 views and I ended up around 217 views over the first 24 hours. Usually when an article gets a higher hit count early on that tends to create a modest influx of hits over the next few weeks. 

However, since that first day and the 217 views,  the article about LA City Council has gotten NINE views total over the next 3 days. That is laughably low. Remember, out of the first 170 hits, I created those by posting a link on other sites of mine and they eventually created around 217 hits for the first 24 hours. In other words, Google literally provided ZERO VIEWS to my site.

Twice in the past year or two I have suddenly gotten hundreds of views for a spoof article I wrote 10 years ago about Arianna Huffington. After each visit by a few hundred visitors to the Huffington article, my daily total blog views suddenly dropped in half and stayed that way. The first time Huffington Bots arrived I was averaging around 250 to 300 views a day. Overnight my views were down to around 125. 

About a year later, the Huffington bots arrived again and now I average around 80 hits a day.

Study the stat hits below for my Los Angeles City Council article, it is basically impossible to have this kind of a stat flow for an article unless the views are being blocked by some outside, or, inside Google source. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Los Angeles City Council Redistricting Committee Engages in a Population Insurrection.

The recent discovery and publicizing of secretly made recordings over the Los Angeles City Council Redistricting committee's prejudiced and racialized comments have created such backlash that the underbelly may never be investigated.

What we apparently have in Los Angeles is a population insurrection. 

The use of population by Los Angeles City Council Politicians to demand more political power suddenly makes the drive to keep the borders porous collateral serious issue.

But the discussion will never go towards this being a Population Insurrection in which the same Politicians who demanded porous borders with Mexico are the same Politicians who verbally attacked those who wanted a Wall and portrayed those who wanted a wall as being prejudiced and racist. 

The underbelly of using ethnic population numbers to demand more political power while also enforcing a porous border is worthy of an insurrection investigation.  

Ironically, the drop in percentage of African Americans in the city of Los Angeles over the past few decades is related to the porous border with Mexico as most people being let in are generally considered to be of Hispanic origin. 

So, when the three Politicians can be heard on tape bemoaning that they only have 33% Latino representation when Latinos make up 52% of Los Angeles, the issue of a Population insurrection takes on new meaning. 

Los Angeles City Council Politicians who view their constituents as being nothing more than ethnic population numbers and percentages so they can extract more political power, while still greasing the wheels for MORE to enter California through California borders, is a far greater insurrection than what occurred on January 6th.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Atlantic Monthly obtusely gives over half a dozen reasons why the U.S. should build the wall without even realizing it.

This article in the Atlantic goes on and on about COVID and all the ways the U.S. is deficient when it comes to pandemic preparedness. Ironically, all the reasons the Atlantic gives can all be used to justify building Trump's Wall.

Progressive Obtuseness at its finest.

One other thing to consider, the 2017-2018 flu/pneumonia season had senior death numbers adjusted downward from 80,000 to 60,000, AFTER coroners were told in early January of 2018 to not list Senior Flu Deaths on the Senior's death certificate. Instead of death by flu or pneumonia, deaths to Seniors were to be listed as death by Natural Causes, Heart Failure, or Respiratory Failure. 

The result was an instant drop in Flu deaths spanning the final 3 weeks of January 2018 and going all the way through April of 2018. Clearly, if all Senior flu / pneumonia deaths had been properly recorded for the 2017-2018 flu/pneumonia seasons, the total would most likely have been 100,000 to 125,000. Which interestingly enough is where COVID has now nestled into on a yearly basis.

 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

How Putin can end his war with Ukraine with his pride intact, ask Donald Trump to intervene as a Peace Broker in the Russia / Ukraine conflict.

If Vladimir Putin wants to end his war in Ukraine, he should have Donald Trump broker a peace deal. If Trump can pull off a Russia / Ukraine peace accord, Putin can take satisfaction knowing he will cause massive discord in the U.S. between the Mainstream Media, the Democrat Progressives with the American People by having Trump prevent World War III.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Sheila Kuehl Obstructing Sheriff Alex Villanueva's desire to Police LA Metro Rail may be the underbelly that leads to criminal charges against Kuehl.

Sheila Kuehl really stepped in it, and the local media does not know what to do with the biggest story of 2022 regarding L.A. Crony, Insider Politics.

Kuehl was able to win no bid contracts for a friend that was supposed to assist those who were assaulted on the LA rail system, through a phone hot line service.

However, while Kuehl was creating the questionable business model of bidding just below the no bid contract threshold, Kuehl was also preventing L.A. Sheriff's division from policing the L.A. rail system.

But it's even worse than that, much much worse. Kuehl and her friends on the LA County Supervisor's board, plotted, threatened, and avowed to remove Head Sheriff Alex Villanueva without any type of public vote or initiative.

Respecting women in politics requires calling a woman out when she likely broke the law and used her political position of power to do so. Sheila Kuehl's role in finding no bid contract awards totaling approximately $800,000 for her best friend's non-profit hot line for rail system assault victims resulted in a cost per legitimate phone call that may have run into the thousands of dollars per phone call.

Shiela Kuehl believes she did nothing wrong, illegal, or to personally enrich her friend at the taxpayer's expense and safety. Kuehl allegedly participated in a scheme to...

• create a method for reporting rail system assaults that already existed in other forms, 
• use her insider knowledge and skills so her friend could win no bid contracts, 
• prevent Alex Villanueva and his Sheriffs from policing the Metro Rail System because of an alleged toxic relationship between law enforcement and law violators using the metro rail system.  
• unilaterally collude to remove Alex Villanueva from power through a Board of Supervisors vote who apparently were in favor 4-1 to remove Mr. Villanueva without the public voting on the matter.
  

The criminality and insider dealing appears palpable and should include the four Board of Supervisors who approved of a plan to have Mr. Villanueva removed from office without a public vote in what remarkably looks as a way to keep Kuehl's Friend's Metro Rail phone hotline gig eligible to continue to win no bid contracts.

District Attorney Gascon immediately denounced the criminal investigation as being specious. Gascon's public comments can be viewed as obstruction of an ongoing investigation that appears to place Ms. Kuehl center stage to the worst kind of cronyism that most likely endangered the public while also enriching one of Ms. Kuehl's friend.

Karen Bass, what do you say about the matter? 

 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.