Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Clinton Foundation Supporting Houston during their crisis, you can too via their suggested links.

Please support the Clinton Foundation and their provided links located here if you would like to donate to help Houston. The Clinton Foundation links pin point ways you can help rather than just giving generically.

Three lunatics have left Clinton Derangement Syndrome comments in the comment section. If you are on facebook you can leave a more positive response by using your facebook ID to log in and comment.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Saturday, August 26, 2017

Has anyone been pardoned by a president as quickly as Joseph Arpaio was by Donald Trump?

The pardon of Joseph Arpaio by Donald Trump is not the issue here. The issue is just how quickly should a president pardon a lawbreaker? Did Arpaio spend time in an actual jail cell? Mr. Arpaio actually held prisoners in tents in over 110 degree temperatures, and he doesn't spend any time in jail for the actions that he was found guilty by a judge?

Has any other president ever pardoned a lawbreaker so quickly? DailyPUMA presumes no, but could not find an answer as to the fastest pardon ever by a president. Trump's  premature Pardon of Joseph Arpaio seems like abuse of power. To not even wait at least six months to one year before pardoning Arpaio seems outrageous.

DailyPUMA wonders if what Mr. Trump did was actually a "pre-pardon" since Mr. Arpaio had not been sentenced yet. DailyPUMA wonders if Mr. Trump ejaculated prematurely with his presidential pardon. The judge should go ahead and sentence Mr. Arpaio because what Mr. Trump did was pardon a person who had not been sentenced yet, so the sentencing phase should still go on, and if common sense prevails, Mr. Trump should not be allowed to pardon Mr. Arpaio more than once, therefore Mr. Arpaio would still have to do his time.

If Mr. Trump ever faces impeachment charges, this entirely too fast pardon of Arpaio should be added to the Impeachment list. It's an abuse, pure and simple. What a self indulgent egomaniac we have as president, it's beyond comprehension. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Friday, August 18, 2017

Progressive Media stepped in and on everyday person's toes with their ongoing racism accusations against Donald Trump.

Update, August 26, 2017, 7:35 pm) Please read this link and you will see just what a poor job the media did in their coverage of the Charlottesville March and Protest.

The Progressive led media would have us believe that "Jews won't replace us" is the same as "Kill all …." Sadly, everyone else is following this ridiculous missive. Don't fall for it. DailyPUMA has railed against Donald Trump on many issues, but on Charlottesville, Trump was not that far off, and certainly does not deserve the relentless bashing he is getting.

So some misguided white people wanted to hold a rally. They wanted to beat their chest and say "I am White Man, hear me roar". Who really gives a shit? The Progressive Media never presented any timeline that showed the Marcher's starting attacking others first. Nor can the Progressive Media state that only the marchers committed violence. Obviously the idiot who murdered Heather Heyer with his car is in another realm and happened after violence had already commenced.

Sadly, the media appears to be led by some faction that has over reacted to a bunch of white marchers, many who probably don't have jobs and might live in the basement of their parent's home.

The answer the world needs is not from the Progressive Media which has its own ongoing axe to grind against Donald Trump's prior mistreatment of them. 

Yet the Progressive media is keeping the pressure on Trump and in the process de-emphasizing the voices and actions of the public at large. The answer my friend is blowing in the wind. The answer was in Los Angeles where thousands showed up hoping to grab a few 10 dollar tickets for Hamilton. The answer was in the Charlottesville candlelight vigil for Heather Heyer, and perhaps other vigils may sprout up as well, such as the one in Akron Ohio. The answer was in the identifying of the marchers by their own Tiki Torch lit faces,  and then being fired from their job.

DailyPUMA predicts that in less than 10 years time as many as ten thousand jobs a day will be lost to robotics and automation. And when the chants of "Robotics will not replace us" are heard in marches all over the country by people of all races, remember it was the Progressive Media that first coined the concept of "_ _ _ will not replace us" as being racist and fascist. The issue of being replaced has been neutered by the Progressive Media. Heaven help us if it turns out that the majority of the looming robotics economic take over are owned by anyone group.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Not all Nazi / KKK Protests are the same, unless one is bigoted against them.

The Progressive media has managed to blast Trump over the Charlottesville conflict to the point where even spineless Republicans won't defend Trump's comments.

Question number one, are KKK and Nazi's allowed to hold a march? The Progressive Media has never answered this question. DailyPUMA will answer it. If the march does not have, any signs that threaten, banners that threaten, or verbal threats or taunts that advocate the harming of any group of people, and the marchers are not recruiting new members, then yes,  even Nazi's and KKK's can march if they have a permit. The Progressive Media has conveniently sidestepped these guidelines.

The Progressive Media first blamed Trump for taking two days to condemn the violence in Charlottesville, then blamed Trump when Trump claimed that both sides were guilty of violence. The Media, rather than prove Trump's statement wrong, simply ganged up on him for defending groups that most of America dislikes and wishes did not exist.

Don't be suckered by a Progressive Media power grab against the Executive Branch of our country. First the Progressive Media must answer when and how a group like the Nazi's and KKK can march. Then the Progressive Media needs to show a timeline that the KKK and Nazi's attacked others first and that others responded to defend themselves. PROVE this before condemning the president of the United States for his comments. So far, the president has been condemned without any proof that the marchers started the violence.

DailyPUMA sees these Media power grabs from time to time, Marco Rubio was the victim of a power grab to get him out of the 2016 Republican Presidential nomination race, all because he repeated a meme three times in the same debate. Football genius coach Pete Carroll was victimized by  a same social media frenzy because he called a pass on third down (the right call by the way) with the clock winding down and Seattle at the one yard line in the Super Bowl. Howard Dean was drummed out of the 2004 democrat nomination race because the second audio track of the audience responding to his own speech filled with whoops and cheers was blunted, making him sound insane since no audience could be heard cheering in response to his words and over the top actions. And of course, the month long assault against Hillary Clinton during Oct. 2016 was probably the longest and largest media power grab against a leading presidential candidate from any era.

DailyPUMA once again asks the progressive media, SHOW ME THE CHARLOTTESVILLE TIMELINE that proves the KKK and Nazi Protestors actually started the violence, or shut the fuck up.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Charlottesville March of the intolerants reveals both sides have issues.

DailyPUMA is confused. Did the Krazy KKK's and white supremacists attack others first, or were they impeded from marching first? 

Obviously the idiot who used his car to mow down several dozen protestors and kill one person can pretty much plead insanity as their action was indefensible by any measure of civility, but what about what happened before?

Were the groups advocating their own views of pride and intolerance of others, blockaded by others, or not? 

If the intolerants opponents had let the intolerants march, what would have happened? The intolerants would have been all over social media. Isn't that the best course of action, to actually let those be seen who have views that are most likely intolerant and unacceptable to the majority? Do we really want the intolerants of the world to scurry around in the dark and not be known?

If 100 intolerants march, and there are 10,000 people on the sidelines with their thumbs down, booing them, and capturing the intolerants on social media, would it be such an awful thing to show that the vast majority disagree with the intolerants?

Are intolerants supposed to assemble in private, or in public, because to say Intolerants cannot ever assemble (this rule would not apply to pedophiles, hackers, serial killers, drug dealers or murderers) is to become even more intolerant than the intolerables.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Sunday, August 13, 2017

DailyPUMA wonders if Shooting down a nuclear warhead may be next to impossible.

Think about all the obstacles one would have to overcome to shoot down a nuclear warhead. What if a nation says they will launch a nuclear warhead against another country. The other country scrambles all of their defensive methods and makes sure they shoot down the incoming weapon.

But what if the incoming warhead was a decoy? Just how much muscle should the military use to down one incoming warhead? If too few attack missiles are deployed and the warhead slips through how could the military justify not using massive defensive strategies to down that first incoming warhead, especially after being warned.

What if after the decoy warhead was launched and destroyed, 40 minutes later another warhead is launched? What if the country defending itself overused its defense just to down the lead dud warhead and suddenly a couple more warheads are launched? What if the few warheads are all downed, does the second country then retaliate if they successfully downed a couple of warheads they were forewarned about?

What if several dozen warheads are launched all at once, but each travels at a different speed, pace and direction? What if the speed demon of the group is a dud but because it leads the pack it attracts massive amounts of firepower to make sure it is destroyed? It seems like a giant rubik's cube puzzle to figure out how much firepower can be used to destroy each and every incoming warhead along with the priority as to which missile should be destroyed first. Dare the military ignore the closest, fastest but smallest warhead to make sure they get a slower moving, larger warhead that is among a group of secondary warhead, but more likely to carry an actual nuclear warhead?

It seems like the fastest warheads would attract the most firepower, possibly leaving too little remaining firepower to down the slower moving warheads that may actually have a nuclear weapon. And if it turns out that one of the fastest warheads actually has a nuclear weapon, and it detonates, the ability to then destroy other targets may be compromised as well.

And what about where the defensive missiles are stored that can be loaded onto our own fighter planes. They are stored in bunkers mere yards apart. It seems line one or two well placed bombs could destroy all the bunkers as the first bunker epically explodes upon being struck.

What if nuclear warheads and dud warheads are sent in all directions, how does the U.S. prioritize which missiles to shoot down? What if duds are sent to the U.S. but real warheads are sent to Australia, Guam and Japan? Does the U.S. scramble additional firepower to down warheads headed at locations not within the U.S. ?

If Kim Jong-Un successfully launches a nuclear warhead and due to errors on all sides the warhead detonates, what are people to think that a mad man can pre announce his nuclear launch desires, and then see them fulfilled?

If Kim Jong-Un were to be assassinated, does that not send a message to other dictators with nuclear weapons to never announce their intentions ahead of time? Assassination would make Kim Jong-Un a martyr and possibly create splinter groups within North Korea who will want to carry on Jong's wishes.

If Kim Jung-Un is not assassinated, he cannot stay in power AND keep his nuclear arsenal. And that leads back to a suggestion that DailyPUMA has made on a few occasions in the past. Reward Kim Jung-Un for his countries advances in nuclear weapons technology by welcoming North Korea as a  Major non Nato Ally in exchange for the dismantling of North Korea's nuclear weapons program.

It appears that a MNNA Invitation for North Korea regarding their public statements about an inevitable launching of nuclear weapons is preferable to simply kicking the nuclear can down the road.

For Kim Jong-Un to stay in power, he would have to give up his nuclear weapons. Assassinating Kim Jong-Un would simply prove he was right about America as being a threat to North Korea. Kim Jong-Un would have to be promised his own safety and acceptance as a Major non Nato Ally might be the safest course of action for the rest of the world.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Dishonor, Disrespect, Destroy Diplomacy is not an acceptable solution in regards to North Korea by the rest of the world, DailyPUMA proposes another Option.

DailyPUMA believes in backwards engineering solutions to grave political situations such as the present Nuclear Weapons proliferation by North Korea versus most of the rest of the world.

Backwards Engineering requires we start at the result we desire, and work our ways backwards to either achieve that result, or prevent a result we do not want.

  • Backwards Engineering Scenario Number One. North Korea is decimated by weapons of mass destruction to ensure they have no ability to return fire, probably not a desirable option since it means the death of millions and makes the U.S. look like the bully who blinked first. The world condemns the U.S. for the use of Nuclear Weapons that kill millions of people all because of one apparently deranged or motivated world leader.
  • Backwards Engineering Scenario Number Two. The U.S. keeps waiting and waiting and suddenly the U.S. is faced with the actual launch of a North Korea nuclear weapon, except that along with the actual nuclear weapon duds are launched at the same that must also be tracked and attacked just to make sure. The U.S. scores a remarkable 80% destruction of dozens of missiles, but the dilution caused by the fake missiles launched at the same time allow the nuclear weapon to make it through and destroy either Japan, Hawaii, Guam, or the U.S Western Coastline. This of course results in a massive annihilation of North Korea and condemnation of the U.S. for not coming up with a peaceful solution.
  • Backwards Engineering Scenario Number Three. North Korea agrees to dismantle their entire Nuclear Weapon's research program and the key North Korean people in the nuclear program agree to come to live in the U.S. as "friendly" captives where they can live out their lives in an amenable fashion while being monitored in a non-aggressive manner. In exchange for dismantling their nuclear weapon's program, North Korea would be granted MNNA status, Major Non Nato Ally, with NATO.
(Updated August 12, 2017, 10:32am, DailyPUMA apologizes for leaving out the final sentence in Backward's Engineering Scenario Number three, it has now been added.) end of update.

Of the three Scenarios above, clearly number three would be the most appealing to probably a very high majority of level headed people. While Scenario number one or Scenario number two appear to be the world's destiny (which is unacceptable to DailyPUMA), Scenario number three cannot be achieved by Dishonoring, Disrespecting or Destroying Kim Jong-Un's reputation or that of the country he leads, North Korea.

If Dishonoring, Disrespecting, or Destroying North Korea are not ideal solutions, then what is left? DailyPUMA believes the answer is to convert North Korea's petulant Nuclear Weapon's Launch threats and rantings into some form of acknowledgement that can be seen as honorable and crediting of the North Korea regime. Otherwise, the Dishonoring, Disrespecting and Destroying scenarios presently in play by the rest of the world towards North Korea, were they to work for now, could simply delay an inevitable Nuclear Weapons Launch at a later date as those who were under Kim Jong-Un's spell vow to make the U.S. pay sometime in the future. 

The key here is come up with a North Korea solution for now that does not simply kick the Nuclear Weapons can down the road for a future North Korean leader or rogue group within North Korea to follow through with their prior leader's goals. The other key goal is to not make Kim Jong-un into a martyr since most rogue groups thrive on having a martyr to inspire their vengeance.

All this leads to the same conclusion, Kim Jong-un and North Korea MUST be credited for their Nuclear Weapon's research and development accomplishments BEFORE they actually launch or detonate a nuclear weapon in a method that kills people either in North Korea or any other country. This type of diplomacy, crediting the squeaky wheel leader when the squeaky wheel leader has already behaved in a manner that some would find reprehensible, rather than "Sanctioning" that leader's country economy, is a method that needs to be seriously considered.

So far, no one has thanked or respected Kim Jong Un's nuclear weapon's research and development, and the longer the world goes without speaking well of Kim Jong Un, perhaps the nuclear option looks more feasible to him.

It may actually be easier to not have to deal with stock piling and storing nuclear weapon, it may actually become more cost effective to actually use their darn nuclear weapons for a country like North Korea that is struggling economically. So the rest of the world should be warned that once built, the maintenance and upkeep of North Korea's Nuclear weapons could prove economically bothersome to Kim Jong-Un and his advisors.

North Korea and Kim Jong-Un should be approached with a "rewards" package. Since economic sanctioning has already been initiated DailyPUMA believes that diplomacy has already started down the wrong road, the road of Dishonor, Disrespect, and the Destruction of North Korea that could also boomerang and adversely affect the rest of the world.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Sunday, August 6, 2017

The Russia, China, North Korea Nuclear Weapon Collusion the Press won't discuss.

There are similarities to Donald Trump's desperate desire to be president (Trump apparently owes Russian Oligarchs 3 billion dollars), and Kim Jong-un's desperate need to successfully develop a nuclear weapon that can reach the U.S. 

Kim Jong-un most likely owes Russia and China tens of billions of dollars, maybe even hundreds of billions of dollars, and apparently so does Donald Trump.

Enough pieces for a Russia, China, North Korea Nuclear Weapon collaboration fit together that the possibility of collusion among the three nations must be considered.

Questions that have not been answered about Russia, China and North Korea working together include…

  • Russia and China do not feel overly concerned about an errant North Korea missile launch. Isn't North Korea close enough to both Russia and China that either or both countries would frown upon North Korea's continued development of a nuclear weapon, unless Russia and China were somehow assisting in the development and launching of a North Korean nuclear weapon.

  • Russia and China also do not feel overly concerned about a U.S. hack into a North Korea nuclear launch that "accidentally" causes a missile launch to either return to where it was launched, or end up deploying in Russia or China. It would be an understandable response for the U.S. to hack into North Korea's launch platform and perform a "Return to Sender" missile launch accident, no? For Russia and China to not be concerned about the Return to Sender possibility seems to indicate they are more involved in North Korea's nuclear proliferation process then anyone knows about and they would know how to unhack the hack.
  • Kim Jong-un's ongoing rush to fulfill his Nuclear Weapon's program. Why? Nobody has directly threatened North Korea prior to his escalation in nuclear launch capability. In a similar matter, Donald Trump, in very late October of 2016, made a passing remark as he was getting on his Private Jet and with his back to the camera, "I am going to win this election"…(a slight pause and then), "I HAVE to win this election". It seems as if Kim Jong-Un and Donald Trump both have some type of personal mandate to achieve a goal, perhaps both may have huge debts with Russia, China, or both and in their own way have to do certain things to appease their debt holders.
Rather than the U.S threaten Kim Jong-un by publicly wondering if Kim Jong-un thinks he should be sleeping peacefully at night, DailyPUMA has suggested in the past that including Kim Jong-un as a NATO satellite in exchange for the dismantling of North Korea's nuclear weapon's program might be a better path to take. Plus, if Kim Jong-un refuses such an offer, then that too could be a signal that he is already in bed with Russia and China.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Is Russia already meddling in the 2020 race with the ridiculous Clinton Popularity poll and Sanders Concern Troll Articles?

There are plans a foot to quash Hillary Clinton and elevate Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris for the 2020 presidential election. 

From Hillary Clinton's Progressive media detractors who are actually Sanders Concern Troll supporters in disguise... 

         -end of Sanders Supporter Concern Troll quote.

Be it a Bernie Sanders supporter spamming 15 different Reddit forums with a pro Sanders propaganda piece that presents itself as a "which way" should the democrat party go forward thesis, to the Bloomberg Poll that claims Hillary Clinton is less popular than Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton supporters should be demanding she get back on her feet, dust herself off, and get in fucking cardio physical shape and stop talking, and be more physically active and involved in the world around her. 

The Bloomberg poll tried to make a big deal out of 20% of Clinton voters not liking her, or, also known as the Sanders Thug voters. Who cares about the 20% number, there are probably 50% of Hillary Clinton voters who won't vote for Sanders in 2020, but that data was conveniently left out of the Bloomberg poll.

Hillary Clinton has the Clinton Foundation she can access to actually do projects here in the U.S. There is a Girl Power movement afoot and it probably has some roots in watching an intelligent woman who is no longer aging gracefully but rather accepting her physically declining fate as if it is an inevitably. 

The Girl Power movement thrives as Donald Trump continues to use Hillary Clinton as a punching bag whenever he needs to deflect his attention away from his inevitable impeachment over owing Russian Oligarchs 3 billion dollars and thus being in their stead.

Hillary Clinton has to get out of victim mode, and I told you so mode, and this is why I list mode, and get it in gear. It will be interesting to see what she focuses on with her new book "What Happened" scheduled for release in the next couple of months.

In the meantime, don't be surprised if the "Clinton is Snowball" (from the book, Animal Farm) attacks probably have some connection to Russia.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Best Quality VHS to Digital Transfers

Best Quality VHS to Digital Transfers
Serious Customers Welcome.

Share Gadget

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from FABULOUSLY40.com

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from FABULOUSLY40.com
Would this be a good way to win funds for Louisa's Law ?