Trump Supporters on Edge that Barack Obama was never accused of Racism while Trump is being accused of Racism on a Daily Basis.

There are many voters outside of the major cities who believe that Barack Obama was racist against whites during his term in office. These primarily Trump supporters may be outraged, befuddled, or perhaps just frustrated that the mainstream media never accused Obama of harboring racism towards White America because of the News media's own political correctness while now Trump Supporters hear daily racism accusations leveled at Donald Trump.

Remember this Barack Obama comment from April of 2008, "They (The Rust belt and West Plains people) get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."  -Barack Obama.

Or, Barack Obama could have said...."Just like the Indians who came before us, the people who settled into Rural America suddenly are losing their jobs and their homes and they don't understand why when their work ethic remains strong."   - Not Barack Obama

Both sentiments basically tell the same story, yet Barack Obama could not connect with his primarily white constituency in a complementary and Truthful way, yet the mainstream media did not accuse Barack Obama of being racist, or even obtuse, about Middle America.

When Barack Obama quickly jumped into the fray after a College Professor was confronted outside of his own home by a police officer who had been called to the scene by an African American female witnessing an African American male attempting to get inside a home without use of a key, Obama's goal with his White House Share a Beer Conference was to heal racial divides. It was as if Obama wanted to show how great of a healer he was by always taking the side that racism existed whenever a confrontation between different races made the news. In DailyPUMA's opinion, it was a poor choice to use to illustrate racial divides as the police officer was acting completely correctly.

Let not forget Obama's penchant for apologizing for past American Behavior, something that any one president cannot truly own. When visiting foreign dignitaries Obama would bow to foreign leaders which many in America felt was an affront to the standing of all U.S. Presidents.

An example of Obama's penchant for Obtuseness or just plain White Indifference, or perhaps even White Racism would be his reaction to the banking solution for the housing market crash of 2008. The solutions put forth in the Dodd / Frank bill basically put the House Flipper and the Family struggling to hold onto their home in the same category, which was an affront to the millions upon millions of homeowners who had lived in their home for the past few decades and now were in danger of losing it due to Wall Street Investment Shenanigans that encouraged many to take equity out of their home or to become House Flippers.

Obama basically allowed the banks to humiliate anyone asking for Mortgage help by only acknowledging the possibility of a program to help them keep their home AFTER the struggling homeowner had defaulted on their present home loan. Obama basically allowed the tenet of "No Loan Restructuring could occur without the declaration of Default" first being branded on the Deadbeat Homeowner's forehead." This coming from a man who had nefarious help in purchasing his own first home.

The banking procedure that Obama's administration apparently supported or looked the other way involved Parallel Foreclosure also known as Dual Tracking.

Once a homeowner had been instructed to fall behind on their mortgage payments so they could then apply for Home Mortgage Relief, the banks could simultaneously begin foreclosure proceedings even as the same bank began the application process for Home Mortgage Modification. Meanwhile the banks seemed to conveniently lose paperwork on the home modification program. 

The practice of simultaneously foreclosing (Parallel Foreclosure) on a home owner who had to first default on their mortgage before being eligible for a home modification program went on for YEARS before a half hearted attempt was made to reign in this anti-homeowner madness. 

While these banking shenanigans affected all races, it also affected white america most since white america owned the most property. Obama was never accused of racism through the Dodd / Frank bill even though if one stood back far enough, the impalement of white, middle class home ownership at a greater rate than other races sure looked racist.

DailyPUMA supported Hillary Clinton in 2008 and is 100% sure that Hillary Clinton would have taken a more measured and reasonable approach so as not to disenfranchise so many homeowners in the Rust Belt States, the States she was blamed with losing in 2016. The irony being once Hillary Clinton accepted Barack Obama's support, she could no longer publicly feel the pain of the Rust Belt States during the 2016 presidential campaign without it being seen as a direct impugnment of Barack Obama's legacy.

It is likely that Americans who support Trump now and continue to support Trump see a racist mainstream media that continually calls Trump a racist while having kept quiet about policies that Obama signed into law that could be viewed as racist against white america.

Meanwhile, the scant 30% to 35% that still support Trump could still win against a Democrat Party that is split between Moderates and Progressives. 

For proof look at the ridiculous Progressive assault against Hillary Clinton put on by The Young Turks, Move on Dot Org, Bernie Sanders Supporters, and Donna Brazile in her new book, in which Brazile first claimed that Hillary Clinton bullied the DNC and rigged the Primaries in her favor. This accusation was then followed by the Young Turks accusing Hillary Clinton's campaign of money laundering through the DNC. But suddenly Brazile back off when she actually appeared on TV to hawk her new book and instead said there was no Primary Collusion between Hillary Clinton and the DNC. 

However, the Damage was already done. DailyPUMA recently saw the repetitive scrolling headline banner on a Mexican News Channel that basically stated Hillary Clinton and the DNC fixed the primaries against Bernie Sanders, a claim which Brazile now denies. However Brazile's retraction most likely won't appear in future Mexican News Scrolling Banners. Just who is plotting to alienate the Mexican vote against Hillary Clinton? Could it be whomever plotted to alienate the Union vote from Hillary Clinton in 2016, aka Bernie Sanders?

So we now have 35% for Trump, 40% Moderates and 25% Progressives for Democrats, but if the Moderates and Progressive don't get along, don't be surprised if the 2020 Presidential Candidate for the Republicans wins, even if it is not Trump. 

If somehow Bernie Sanders is the nominee for 2020 for the Democrat Party, I will protest vote Republican because of the BS the Democrat Progressives have put Hillary Clinton through for over a decade now, and continue to do so with their Axis of Evil known as Move on Dot Org, The Young Turks, Bernie Sanders, and fueled by Donna Brazile.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA revisits Donna Brazile's email comments with Taylor Marsh from 2008.

DailyPUMA went to the blog Hillary-Wins, also by Alessandro Machi, to reveal what Donna Brazile was saying in 2008 about the Clintons in her emails with Taylor Marsh.

Amazing how Donna Brazile "saved their asses" (The Clintons  asses), and when you talk to a conservative, they will tell you that it was the Republican congress that made the 90's great, not the Clintons.

It's truly a sad state of affairs for the Moderates from both parties because of their loonier counterparts known as Neo cons and Progressives.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Republicans want you to believe that their People paying for Dirt on Hillary Clinton is no different than Steele Dossier that was first funded by a Republican, then the DNC & the Clinton Campaign, and eventually the FBI.

The Republicans want to know why is it not ok for Jared Kushner or others in Trump Land to pay a foreign source for dirt on Hillary Clinton, yet it is ok for the Clinton Campaign to purchase or initiate dirt Intel on Trump for foreign sources.

So focusing on whether or not the Clinton Campaign funded the intel is important, However the distinction between the Steele Dossier and what the Trump Campaign set out to do are so different that DailyPUMA will list them  below. 

If it's true that the Steele Dossier was initially funded by a Republican Operative, and then taken over by the Democrats or the Clinton Campaign, that is WAY less of a controversy since there is a Republican at the root of the original search. Without the original Republican, there would be no Steele Dossier. The Washington Post tried to infer that the Democrats and Hillary Clinton created the Steele Dossier in the twisted headline used with their article, yet in their own article they admit the Democrats and the Clinton Campaign did not initiate the Steele Dossier, a Republican did. But hey, let's blame Hillary Clinton.

The Democrats have a second firewall in terms of the radical difference between the Trump Campaign soliciting dirt on Hillary Clinton and the Steele Dossier, Trump refused to disclose his Income Tax Returns, making Trump the first presidential candidate in DailyPUMA doesn't know how long to refuse to release their tax returns, so even as Sander's was blasting Clinton over the release of her Income Taxes and her Wall Street Speeches, Trump was hiding his own Income Taxes, and STILL is hiding his own income tax returns.

Speaking of Sander's, Sander's and Trump were using Political Operatives who both worked in Eastern Europe for a decade at the same time and were most likely in contact with each other, so that would be a third firewall to do research on Trump versus simply looking for Dirt on Hillary Clinton as was done in Trumpland.

Then throw in Trump's BLATANT LYING about Trump Products over the airwaves. Trump alleged that a table full of Trump Productions were in production at his Press conference after his Michigan Primary Win when it was all FICTION. The Democrats had every right to Investigate Trump over what other lies he was telling, thus a fourth firewall. 

A Fifth Firewall of difference between Kushner paying for dirt on Clinton versus the Steele Dossier would be that the Dossier went to the FBI who reviewed the Intel and wanted more, and the FBI was going to pay for more intel, until Steele was exposed. 

There is a Sixth Firewall as well. The FBI Director and Republican James Comey managed to twice disclose in public that Hillary Clinton was under investigation, yet the FBI Director Republican James Comey never disclosed if Donald Trump was under investigation for Income Tax Irregularities, lying over the airwaves regarding Trump Products, Deliberately lying over the airwaves for political gain, such as stating that Hillary Clinton was a criminal when she had never been convicted of a crime.

DailyPUMA suggests further discussion be focused on how the Steele Dossier PALES in comparison to simply paying foreign governments for "Dirt" on Hillary Clinton as the Trump Campaign did. 

More Importantly, DailyPUMA continues to wonder why the FBI either refused to Investigate Donald Trump over the myriad of issues mentioned above, or why the FBI refused to publicly acknowledge that Donald Trump was also under Investigation during the 2016 Presidential Election.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump is Probably Clueless about how easy it has become to disable another country's economy through nuclear warfare in the upper atmosphere.

Back on March 12, 2017 DailyPUMA's sister blog, AlexLOGIC, warned that the disabling of a country's satellites could produce crippling and deadly results on the ground below.

CannonFire has just released it's own warning about an EMP Attack from North Korea. If North Korea were able to do incomparable damage to our Electronics, Satellites and Electrical gird, Trump's only counter move would be to annihilate North Korea, assuming our missiles could still be accurately launched.

What would result is a small country playing mayhem with our "satellites and things", while we in turn would be killing, maiming and destroying millions of North Korean lives instantly, because Trump's only counter move would be to drop nukes on North Korea.

Who would get the rest of the world's sympathy in the above scenario, the country that played a very dangerous prank, or the country that simply nuclearized tens of millions of people.

The reason we know that Trump is not up to the challenge at hand is TRUMP DEFUNDED, or let lapse, the department that actually studies defending against Electro Magnetic Weapons, as Cannonfire has pointed out.     

North Korea's bluster over launching a nuclear weapon into the U.S. may very well be a real threat, but exploding a nuclear weapon high up in the sky, where it will decimate satellite transmission and possibly our entire electronic and electrical gird could be North Korea's stealth plan.

One wonders how many satellites it would take to re-establish a satellite network and one wonders how many replacement satellites the U.S. has ready to relaunch at a moment's notice. Probably nowhere near enough.

When Trump talks of InfraStructure, Trump visualizes big heavy dump trucks pouring asphalt, when DailyPUMA thinks of InfraStructure, Images of triple the number of satellites needed to maintain an economy and buildings being built round so they can withstand hurricane force winds while also being elevated to prevent flood damage.

Trump is so outmatched right now it truly scares DailyPUMA.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Has the U.S. ever launched missiles towards itself to see if they can shoot them all down?

DailyPUMA is wondering if the U.S. Military has ever fired off dozens of missiles at the same time from different locations, at the U.S., to see how many they can effectively shoot down without detonating. Simply having a bunch of military ding a lings say they are ready for any incoming missile attack is WORTHLESS. PROVE IT.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders was big on Coal, Global Warming, and Pot for all, now his own State of Vermont wants to proceed with caution regarding Pot, Just like Hillary Clinton advocated during the 2016 Presidential Campaign.

It's really important to keep reminding the World how full of shit Bernie Sanders really was during his 2016 Presidential Campaign. And I say this with the acknowledgement that Bernie Sanders is a fine speaker and a solid thinker. 

But when a 2016 presidential candidate can be for Coal yet acknowledge Global warming at the same time, we basically have a rope a dope candidate who did nothing more then alienate a few million Democrat Voters who would have voted for Hillary Clinton until Bernie's B.S. began to propagate for far too long.

Speaking of Dope, Bernie Sanders was for Pot for all, yet now his own State of Vermont has taken a cautionary approach regarding the free and easy use of Pot. Vermont has has taken exactly Hillary Clinton's position in 2016, that the States that had already legalized Marijuana should be studied for a couple of years to see what the cumulative effects of legalized pot were producing.

So to repeat, Bernie Sander's own state of Vermont is basically giving Bernie Sanders a no confidence vote in regards to Sander's position on marijuana while giving Hillary Clinton's 2016 position of caution on marijuana a super big thumbs up.

If anyone out there wants to blog, DailyPUMA would encourage a Bernie's Bullshit blog that would go back in time and point out how Bernie kept going to the left of Hillary Clinton so that he could paint her as a Washington Insider, yet how foolish many of his going to the left of Hillary screeds really were. DailyPUMA will even give you a top spot on one of the DailyPUMA columns for free. (Ok, their all free but a top spot is even better than free).

And if someone were take on this Bernie's Bullshit Blog, don't forget to take a few shots at the Bern Report as well.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Did 60 Minutes Hide Harvey Weinstein's reputation over 2 decades ago when they Interviewed Joel Thurm for a piece on Hollywood?

DailyPUMA recalls Joel Thurm once state during a Sixty Minutes interview back in either the 80's or early 90's about how Hollywood Actors and Actresses were treated, "One Actress had to masturbate in front of an executive in exchange for a part in a movie", he stated. I think that ended the 60 Minutes Segment.

DailyPUMA wonders, what if it was Harvey Weinstein that Joel Thurm was talking about? If it was, would that not make 60 Minutes somewhat responsible for not going further and finding out who it was that Joel Thurm was talking about?  Would not 60 Minutes be responsible for Mr. Weinstein's additional 20 years or more as head of a Production Studio?

Everyone is wondering how Mr. Weinstein got to flourish as a successful Producer and possible sexual predator for so long. Well, if 60 Minutes had the goods back in the 80's or early 90's, and did nothing, then we have our answer, don't we?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Pence denies leaving NFL game was a publicity stunt, but something does not make sense about Pence's Denial.

On Sunday, October 8, 2017, Mike Pence not only went to watch the Indianapolis Colts play the San Francisco 49's, Mr. Pence also claims he went to the game to watch the half time festivities honoring former Colts QB and future Hall of Famer Peyton Manning. Mike Pence ended up leaving soon after the National Anthem when some of the San Francisco 49's players kneeled during the National Anthem. 

However, there has been no reports that the Indianapolis Colts football players kneeled during the playing of the national anthem.

So lets review, Mike Pence went to the Colt's Home Game vs 49's game in particular so he could witness the honoring of Colt's great Peyton Manning at halftime. The Hometown Indianapolis Colts players did not kneel during the National Anthem, only some of the visting 49's players knelt.

So basically, Mike Pence punished the home team for the actions of the visiting team, when Mr. Pence was there primarily to witness the honoring of a Hall of Fame player who had played in the past for the Home Team. For DailyPUMA, that equals, WOW.

Punishing one team, the home team, and the man being honored by the home team for a tremendous CAREER, Peyton Manning, for the one time actions of the visiting team is what Mike Pence did, and DailyPUMA thinks that stinks and that Mr. Pence owes Peyton Manning an apology.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Warning, Rush Limbaugh Radio Ad Promotion for Monday, October 9, 2017 claims Democrats want to take all of your guns.

It seems beyond belief that a goofball like Rush Limbaugh will actually expouse the narrative Monday morning in his diarrhea laced radio talk show that the democrats will use the killing of 59 people and the maiming of over 500 people via several modified semi automatic guns as an excuse to take all the guns away from Gun Owners.   

Die idiot, die.

Should gun owners really retain all the same rights regarding their guns when their guns are kept on their own property, versus when those same guns are taken off of their property?

If a gun owners owns 20 guns, does that mean they have the right to transport those 20 guns off of their own property at any time and for any reason?

Maybe we need to start the discussion of gun control with the rights of gun owners when their guns are kept on their own property versus the transporting of those same guns off of their own property. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA's biggest gripe about Progressives, Immigration, Immigration, Immigration, when do they ever talk about our seniors?

Based on a lifetime of observing people, places and things, DailyPUMA believes that most Progressives care more about strangers than their own Parents. However, DailyPUMA believes that Moderates from both parties care MOST about their Parents than either Conservatives or Progressives.

Progressives and Conservatives can deny it all they want, but the truth is on the internet. Heck it's on DailyPUMA, where DailyPUMA can count. Thousands of RSS links to Trump's racism and his immigration issues, and perhaps there have been 25, yes, 25 headlines about screwing over the elderly.

DailyPUMA does not quite understand the unbridled passion for immigration at the expense, yes, at the expense of our seniors. Maybe its a relevancy issue. Progressives and Conservatives care more about people close to their own age, who they better connect with, than their own parents. Progressivism tends to skew younger, so perhaps Progressives view their own parents as still being in charge and in their own spotlight and don't need their children's help in any way. If anything, able parents who are not seniors yet may be found helping their children. 

There is probably a higher percentage of gays among progressives than any other political group, and most adult gays probably harbor some resentment against their parents who probably wished their children would marry the same way they did, and perhaps having to hide their being gay makes gays connect more with immigrants than with seniors.  

DailyPUMA was at a Townhall meeting just yesterday with their senior adult parent. The Townhall was specially designed for seniors, and the Townhall timing was amazing as the post card announcement arrived literally 3 to 4 days after DailyPUMA had complained to their local political office that too much energy was being put on the issue of immigration at the EXPENSE of seniors. DailyPUMA is sure the Townhall was already planned when the complaint was made, so the timing was amazing in DailyPUMA's book.

One senior woman stood up and stated, "Los Angeles plans to spend money on more shelters for the homeless, will you please make sure that some of that money is spent on seniors only shelters"? The idea floored the politician, who thankfully recognized a good idea when he heard it and immediately said so. 

But it also points to how easily seniors are being forgotten by the immigration first edict that California has adopted. Governor Jerry Brown, who never had to care for a parent and has no children, tried to end the MediCAL / In Home Supportive Services program several years ago during a budget crisis that he inadvertently may have helped cause the first time he was governor, when he helped hand out what turned out to be very lavish pensions for State Employees. 

Now California is a Sanctuary State, perhaps the first in the country. DailyPUMA just finds it arrogant how Progressive politicians are so fixated on immigration over elderly issues.
This may shock progressives, but some seniors are also immigrants. Progressives claim that Conservatives only care about the unborn and once born, its every baby for themselves. But Moderates also see that Progressives basically do the same thing, fight for immigration and gay rights, but once immigrants and gays become seniors, its every senior for themselves. 

DailyPUMA brought some literature to the Townhall for the politicians and was pleased to see some genuine interest in issues like why can't seniors deduct their home property tax payments from their annual stated income when applying for the MediCAL / In Home Supportive Services program.

So maybe there's hope. DailyPUMA is not yet a senior and maybe therein lies the problem, those who should be championing senior causes before they themselves become seniors are too few and far between, whereas immigration issues are all around us, all the time sucking up some of the attention that should be going to our Seniors.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA Believes Donald Trump is probably not a Racist but most likely a Below Average Business Whore who only values people with Wealth.

It's hard to say how successful Donald Trump has been as a businessman. Donald Trump's business career reminds me of the Buster Keaton / Charlie Chaplin character who keeps walking around the same block, stepping onto an open sidewalk grate and falling through, but then popping back up a minute later as the hydraulic lift (his bankruptcies, IRS questionable deductions, possible money laundering or  Russian loans or both) elevate him back up to street level so he can keep circling the same block again and again, falling into the same open grate, and then popping up via a lift of some sort all over again with all the same rescuers there to help him out of the financial abyss he just can't seem to keep revisiting. 

It seems inconceivable that the FBI allowed a debtor to run for president without revealing his income tax returns, and even more inconceivable that FBI's James Comey chortled twice about Hillary Clinton being under investigation while saying nothing about investigations going on during the 2016 presidential campaigns regarding Trump and his associates. 2016 sure seemed to be a guys versus gal theme all over again, just as 2008 was as well.

If we all just look the other way as to how Mr. Trump gets back up on his feet, he can be considered a successful business man. But if we don't look the other way, the issue of whether Donald Trump is a racist or just a shoddy businessman comes into play.

DailyPUMA is leaning towards Trump is a shoddy businessman who relies on the mistakes of others to get temporarily ahead, only to lose whatever he has gained from an "artful deal" because of the gaudy lifestyle he feels he must exude to keep his celebrity edge, including getting two scoops of ice cream for his pie while his political guests only get, one, gasp.

Most shady businessman generally don't like dealing with POOR minorities because they probably feel they will be gamed by the poor before they can game the poor, and even if the shady businessman games the poor first, there is just less to take and it takes a lot more effort.

A perfect example is Puerto Rico. People are saying Trump showed his racism card when he had to throw in his "of course, Puerto Rico owes a lot of money to Wall Street that must be paid back", comment. Sane people were confounded that Mr. Trump had brought debt into a life and death situation, and therefore Trump must be racist since Puerto Rico has more non-whites than whites on it.

When Donald Trump stated that Puerto Rico would have to pay back Wall Street for already accrued debts, it may have looked like he was racist in creating a quid pro quo between prior Wall Street Debt and Puerto Rico now receiving Natural Disaster aid, but DailyPUMA believes there is another explanation. 

DailyPUMA believes Mr. Trump was actually mirroring his own quagmiresh situation with the Russian Oligarchs that he allegedly owes a few billion dollars to. "Donald, we don't care what you do or how you do it, but we expect to be reimbursed for your prior debts with us"…The Russian Oligarchs might have recently said to Mr. Trump. And there was Donald Trump, basically parroting the same message about and to Puerto Rico. Donald Trump may be the Puerto Rico of the Russian Oligarch's world, "we'll grudgingly keep helping you now, Donald, but we expect to have your prior debts with us paid off sooner, rather than later".

So while every Progressive continues to see Donald Trump as a Racist, a Moderate sees the signs of a Below Average Entrepreneur who likes to keep his foot on the gas pedal while the brakes are locked up. The Trumpmobile moves forward, tires spinning a mile a minute, the burning smell of rubles, er rubber spewing and engulfing every one in its wake. The burnt rubber smell so suffocating we all have to stand back and let the slash and burn Trumpmobile screech on by lest we be poisoned by the toxicity of his trajectory. This is Trump, hear him roar. If Donald Trump ignores you and you are a minority, it's probably because he can't make a dime off of you as quickly as he can off of the middle class whites, and that could possibly be because of past discrimination issues that have given some minorities less economic opportunities going forward into the present. Trump cares less about past oppression and more about profiteering in the present.

DailyPUMA believes that even Barack Obama kept the knife a little too close to Middle America when he was president, keenly making new banking rules that were just too stiff and did not take into account a Home Owner's prior Home ownership longevity and past reliability while placing refinancing cuffs on those trying to save their homes. 

The insult of having to go into default before the government would offer Homeowner's help was an indignity primarily felt by White America. While no Progressives or Moderates accused Obama of being a racist for the economic bitch slap he gave to middle white america, there were conservatives who saw Obama's constant apologizing for past U.S. behaviors in other part's of the world and his banking guillotine as its own form of reverse racism. This would explain why some of Hillary Clinton moderate supporters from 2008 shifted to Trump for 2016. It wasn't Hillary Clinton's fault, but once she accepted Obama's support for her Presidential run, she was put in the position of not being able to say anything negative about Obama's eight years in office and that offended just enough of Middle America to tilt the race to Trump, assuming of course we don't find more suspicious acts regarding the 2016 presidential race results.

Trump could just be one of those rare instances where it can look like a duck, walk like a duck, talk like a duck, but actually be about profiteering and what produces the best bang for the buck, rather than being about racism. Any time Trump is accused of racism, ask yourself what is the economic agenda that Trump was trying to actually move forward and see if that matches better than the racism label. In the case of Puerto Rico, Trump was probably helping out his rich billionaire buddies who probably have invested in loans to Puerto Rico and are freaked out they may not make any more profit off of their prior loans.

Can a president be both a racist and an economic whore who only values people who he can make the most money off of, sure. But to prove Trump is a racist, either prove that Trump never does business with rich, affluent minorities to prove the racism accusation, or, and we can thank NBC's The Blacklist and their first episode of the 2017 fall season for this, prove that Donald Trump looks the other way when racist skinhead drug cartels distribute drugs throughout the U.S., then DailyPUMA would wholeheartedly agree that Donald Trump is racist. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Is Donald Trump Avoiding Puerto Rico after their Hurricane Devastation?

Is Donald Trump ignoring Puerto Rico, also known as an unincorporated territory of the United States in which those born in Puerto Rico are considered Natural Born Citizens of the United States? The reason people are wondering probably has to do with Mr. Trump's disability, as in ability to dis some prominent group in the U.S. so that he can create high drama.

Seems strange to being taking on Professional Sports while Puerto Rico drowns in Hurricane Soup.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

When will James Comey be indicted for Political Favoritism during the 2016 Presidential Election?

The Mueller investigation reveals that Paul Manafort and Donald Trump were being investigated by the FBI during the 2016 presidential campaign season. Yet James Comey chose to only publicize the Hillary Clinton email story, twice.

It appears that Mr. Comey, a Republican and former head of the FBI, practiced Political Favoritism during the 2016 Presidential Campaign season when he chose to expose Hillary Clinton to public scrutiny, twice, while saying nothing about the Donald Trump / Paul Manafort Investigation.

As Daily PUMA has previously stated on numerous situations, Mr. Comey needs to explain himself and it appears one sure way to make Mr. Comey explain himself would be if he were indicted by Mr. Mueller for political favoritism by the FBI.

You can still sign the ReAUDIT Donald Trump petition at change dot org by clicking here.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Young Turks in Denial that they helped Donald Trump win.

The Young Turks goes on and on about how Hillary Clinton didn't take responsibility for her loss. It was the Young Turks that fought for Sanders so long and hard they damaged Hillary Clinton to millions of Sander's voters who then voted for someone else, or didn't vote at all.

If Bernie Sanders is leading the Progressive Movement, them  maybe its time to be a Moderate Democrat? Can you still be a Progressive after listening to this clown?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Yeah, Hillary Clinton Supporters finally lose their calm, threaten idiot Pharma Scumbag Munchkin Martin Shkreli with death for offering money for a strand of Hillary Clinton's hair.

Back in 2014, DailyPUMA warned that Hillary Clinton supporters were too passive when it came to supporting their candidate. When a shoe was thrown at Hillary Clinton during a 2015 speech In Las Vegas, the passive but pro Hillary Clinton audience, just watched. The offending shoe thrower was not pummeled, which is what probably should have happened. Instead, Clinton Derangement Syndrome'd neo cons accused Hillary Clinton of staging the event. Absolutely incredible.
  
The women who met Hillary Clinton in the woods a short while after the 2016 elections received death threats from the fringe loony neo cons for allegedly staging the encounter. 

DailyPUMA is excited and pleased to report that idiot moron scumbag Pharma price hiker Martin Shkreli has received death threats after offering $5,000 for a strand of Hillary Clinton's hair. Munchkin Shkreli basically violated his parole by putting a bounty on Hillary Clinton's head, literally. 

What infuriates DailyPUMA even more than the bounty, was how cheap the bounty was. Fuckface Shkreli, just another in the long line of jackarse males who think its cool to ridicule prominent, intelligent women who they presumably don't fear from a physical point of view, truly need to start feeling their own pain rather than heaping it on prominent females.

Drop Shkreli a line on his facebook page. Hundreds of Clinton Supporters already have visited and liked comments from other Clinton supporters on the page.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Support the Change dot org Petition asking Credit Card Companies not to charge interest on Natural Disaster Donations made by their own customers in good standing.

Please sign the Change dot org petition asking the credit card companies to not charge interest on donations made by their customers in good standing. The Petition Results will be sent to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton so they can negotiate with the Credit Card Companies.

It is difficult to know for sure how much the credit card companies will ultimately profit from the Hurricane Harvey Natural Disaster and other Natural Disasters occurring as this is being written but it could be anywhere from 10% to 50% equivalent amount as to what is being donated over the span of the next five years.

Even if someone uses a debit card instead of a credit card, if that same person has any kind of credit card or student loan debt than their Natural Disaster donation still creates interest rate charges on the other debt that was ignored in favor of making a payment to a Natural Disaster cause instead.

This is really a serious issue. Imagine that 20 billion dollars is raised in donations, and that 10 billion came via credit card donations.  Five years from now that 10 billion dollars might end up generating another 5 billion dollars in interest rate charges for the credit card companies.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Apparently 2 people die everyday in Texas while under custody and have for the past 11 years.

Is this level of death, 2 per day while in custody in Texas, common in all fifty states? Or is everything, including dying while in custody, just bigger in Texas?

Click here to go to Texas Justice Initiative

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

While DACA dominates the news, several dozen thousand California senior homeowners may have lost their homes because they can't deduct their home property tax payment from their annual stated income, and Christopher Columbus is stripped of Holiday status by spineless LA City Council.

First DailyPUMA had to listen to some really deranged commentary from the Los Angeles City Council members over why Christopher Columbus's holiday had to be burned at the stake and replaced with an Indigenous Holiday. DailyPUMA favors both having holidays rather than one replacing the other, alternating the Holidays is workable as well.

Columbus is being blamed for the decimation of the Indian population in the North American Continent. This is classic blaming the messenger syndrome. Christopher Columbus helped prove the world was a lot bigger than anyone realized and that the world was most likely not flat. 

Since Columbus never reached Asia, he couldn't say for certain the earth was round, but he put other people's money where his own mouth was and commanded three ships full of sailors who became less loyal with each passing day. Columbus was a scientist who actually walked the walk by being part of the scientfic premise he created.

In case you wonder what is next, the day will come when our beloved astronauts of our era will be bedeviled for having landed on other heavenly bodies, which ultimately led to those heavenly bodies being colonized and eventually harvested for resources for Planet Earth.

Now DACA will take center stage. And while DACA is taking center stage, nothing will be done to help the ever shrinking eligibility California senior homeowners have when it comes to qualifying for MediCAL and In Home Supportive Services.

In Home Supportive Services is one of the most cost effective home health services in the nation yet it continues to be attacked by Republicans, and even Democrats such as Jerry Brown, who even tried to can the IHSS program a few years back. The I.H.S.S. program is so disrespected by Brown that over half of the recent raise given to caregivers was actually the money they were owed because of the 7% pay cut caregivers were forced to endure during the California budget crisis.

Even though Democrats are more likely to support MediCAL / MediCAID and In Home Supportive Services than Republicans are, Democrats keep pushing IHSS to the back of the bus while hiding behind H.I.I.P.A. regulations that prevent the true level of devastation they have caused among senior citizens who own homes but cannot deduct their home property tax payment from their annual stated income, making them ineligible for help.

Many California Senior homeowners are NOT RICH. They purchased their California home 30 to 60 years ago when homes were still affordable. Because these impoverished California Homeowners have such small social security income, they do not qualify for any kind of a loan other than Reverse Mortgages. Reverse Mortgages  takes a chunk of money upfront as a processing fee and then tacks on mortgage insurance and interest rate charges on all related debt to the Reverse Mortgage. Reverse Mortgages only allow one spouse on the plan so if the responsible party passes first, everyone in the house has to leave and the home has to be sold off if the interest accruing reverse mortgage debt cannot be paid off within a year.

MediCAL and I.H.S.S. is home healthcare at a FRACTION of the cost of assisted living centers. But when all the costs are factored in regarding owning a home that are NOT considered deductible, more and more seniors are ineligible because the poverty levels have not been changed for OVER 25 years. There are seniors who end up with zero income per month when their basic home expenses such as home property taxes, home insurance and share of cost are added in, yet if they could just deduct their home property tax payments, they might actually get to keep 700 dollars every month because they would no longer have a share of cost.

The Democrat pricks in charge who are more concerned about DACA and Immigration issues than helping their own elderly who have lived in California and paid all kinds of taxes for the past 30 to 60 years are in essence Democrat Gentrifiers with no opposition because the idiotic Republicans simply reject almost all public funding, it's incredible isn't it?

A Moderate Republican could defeat the next Democrat candidate for Governor of California. All the Moderate Republican would have to do is draw a line between life long California residents who are not being protected because of a trillion dollar pension obligation set in motion ironically by Jerry Brown the first time he was governor, and immigration issues. Kind of explains Brown's willingness to try and end the I.H.S.S. program a few years back when the California State budget was in crisis. 

Unfortunately, the Republicans are as dumb as bricks and can't fathom a world where they actually back up their claim of being the party of family values by actually valuing the elderly in California.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Clinton Foundation Supporting Houston during their crisis, you can too via their suggested links.

Please support the Clinton Foundation and their provided links located here if you would like to donate to help Houston. The Clinton Foundation links pin point ways you can help rather than just giving generically.

Three lunatics have left Clinton Derangement Syndrome comments in the comment section. If you are on facebook you can leave a more positive response by using your facebook ID to log in and comment.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Has anyone been pardoned by a president as quickly as Joseph Arpaio was by Donald Trump?

The pardon of Joseph Arpaio by Donald Trump is not the issue here. The issue is just how quickly should a president pardon a lawbreaker? Did Arpaio spend time in an actual jail cell? Mr. Arpaio actually held prisoners in tents in over 110 degree temperatures, and he doesn't spend any time in jail for the actions that he was found guilty by a judge?

Has any other president ever pardoned a lawbreaker so quickly? DailyPUMA presumes no, but could not find an answer as to the fastest pardon ever by a president. Trump's  premature Pardon of Joseph Arpaio seems like abuse of power. To not even wait at least six months to one year before pardoning Arpaio seems outrageous.

DailyPUMA wonders if what Mr. Trump did was actually a "pre-pardon" since Mr. Arpaio had not been sentenced yet. DailyPUMA wonders if Mr. Trump ejaculated prematurely with his presidential pardon. The judge should go ahead and sentence Mr. Arpaio because what Mr. Trump did was pardon a person who had not been sentenced yet, so the sentencing phase should still go on, and if common sense prevails, Mr. Trump should not be allowed to pardon Mr. Arpaio more than once, therefore Mr. Arpaio would still have to do his time.

If Mr. Trump ever faces impeachment charges, this entirely too fast pardon of Arpaio should be added to the Impeachment list. It's an abuse, pure and simple. What a self indulgent egomaniac we have as president, it's beyond comprehension. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Progressive Media stepped in and on everyday person's toes with their ongoing racism accusations against Donald Trump.

Update, August 26, 2017, 7:35 pm) Please read this link and you will see just what a poor job the media did in their coverage of the Charlottesville March and Protest.

The Progressive led media would have us believe that "Jews won't replace us" is the same as "Kill all …." Sadly, everyone else is following this ridiculous missive. Don't fall for it. DailyPUMA has railed against Donald Trump on many issues, but on Charlottesville, Trump was not that far off, and certainly does not deserve the relentless bashing he is getting.

So some misguided white people wanted to hold a rally. They wanted to beat their chest and say "I am White Man, hear me roar". Who really gives a shit? The Progressive Media never presented any timeline that showed the Marcher's starting attacking others first. Nor can the Progressive Media state that only the marchers committed violence. Obviously the idiot who murdered Heather Heyer with his car is in another realm and happened after violence had already commenced.

Sadly, the media appears to be led by some faction that has over reacted to a bunch of white marchers, many who probably don't have jobs and might live in the basement of their parent's home.

The answer the world needs is not from the Progressive Media which has its own ongoing axe to grind against Donald Trump's prior mistreatment of them. 

Yet the Progressive media is keeping the pressure on Trump and in the process de-emphasizing the voices and actions of the public at large. The answer my friend is blowing in the wind. The answer was in Los Angeles where thousands showed up hoping to grab a few 10 dollar tickets for Hamilton. The answer was in the Charlottesville candlelight vigil for Heather Heyer, and perhaps other vigils may sprout up as well, such as the one in Akron Ohio. The answer was in the identifying of the marchers by their own Tiki Torch lit faces,  and then being fired from their job.

DailyPUMA predicts that in less than 10 years time as many as ten thousand jobs a day will be lost to robotics and automation. And when the chants of "Robotics will not replace us" are heard in marches all over the country by people of all races, remember it was the Progressive Media that first coined the concept of "_ _ _ will not replace us" as being racist and fascist. The issue of being replaced has been neutered by the Progressive Media. Heaven help us if it turns out that the majority of the looming robotics economic take over are owned by anyone group.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Not all Nazi / KKK Protests are the same, unless one is bigoted against them.

The Progressive media has managed to blast Trump over the Charlottesville conflict to the point where even spineless Republicans won't defend Trump's comments.

Question number one, are KKK and Nazi's allowed to hold a march? The Progressive Media has never answered this question. DailyPUMA will answer it. If the march does not have, any signs that threaten, banners that threaten, or verbal threats or taunts that advocate the harming of any group of people, and the marchers are not recruiting new members, then yes,  even Nazi's and KKK's can march if they have a permit. The Progressive Media has conveniently sidestepped these guidelines.

The Progressive Media first blamed Trump for taking two days to condemn the violence in Charlottesville, then blamed Trump when Trump claimed that both sides were guilty of violence. The Media, rather than prove Trump's statement wrong, simply ganged up on him for defending groups that most of America dislikes and wishes did not exist.

Don't be suckered by a Progressive Media power grab against the Executive Branch of our country. First the Progressive Media must answer when and how a group like the Nazi's and KKK can march. Then the Progressive Media needs to show a timeline that the KKK and Nazi's attacked others first and that others responded to defend themselves. PROVE this before condemning the president of the United States for his comments. So far, the president has been condemned without any proof that the marchers started the violence.

DailyPUMA sees these Media power grabs from time to time, Marco Rubio was the victim of a power grab to get him out of the 2016 Republican Presidential nomination race, all because he repeated a meme three times in the same debate. Football genius coach Pete Carroll was victimized by  a same social media frenzy because he called a pass on third down (the right call by the way) with the clock winding down and Seattle at the one yard line in the Super Bowl. Howard Dean was drummed out of the 2004 democrat nomination race because the second audio track of the audience responding to his own speech filled with whoops and cheers was blunted, making him sound insane since no audience could be heard cheering in response to his words and over the top actions. And of course, the month long assault against Hillary Clinton during Oct. 2016 was probably the longest and largest media power grab against a leading presidential candidate from any era.

DailyPUMA once again asks the progressive media, SHOW ME THE CHARLOTTESVILLE TIMELINE that proves the KKK and Nazi Protestors actually started the violence, or shut the fuck up.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Charlottesville March of the intolerants reveals both sides have issues.

DailyPUMA is confused. Did the Krazy KKK's and white supremacists attack others first, or were they impeded from marching first? 

Obviously the idiot who used his car to mow down several dozen protestors and kill one person can pretty much plead insanity as their action was indefensible by any measure of civility, but what about what happened before?

Were the groups advocating their own views of pride and intolerance of others, blockaded by others, or not? 

If the intolerants opponents had let the intolerants march, what would have happened? The intolerants would have been all over social media. Isn't that the best course of action, to actually let those be seen who have views that are most likely intolerant and unacceptable to the majority? Do we really want the intolerants of the world to scurry around in the dark and not be known?

If 100 intolerants march, and there are 10,000 people on the sidelines with their thumbs down, booing them, and capturing the intolerants on social media, would it be such an awful thing to show that the vast majority disagree with the intolerants?

Are intolerants supposed to assemble in private, or in public, because to say Intolerants cannot ever assemble (this rule would not apply to pedophiles, hackers, serial killers, drug dealers or murderers) is to become even more intolerant than the intolerables.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA wonders if Shooting down a nuclear warhead may be next to impossible.

Think about all the obstacles one would have to overcome to shoot down a nuclear warhead. What if a nation says they will launch a nuclear warhead against another country. The other country scrambles all of their defensive methods and makes sure they shoot down the incoming weapon.

But what if the incoming warhead was a decoy? Just how much muscle should the military use to down one incoming warhead? If too few attack missiles are deployed and the warhead slips through how could the military justify not using massive defensive strategies to down that first incoming warhead, especially after being warned.

What if after the decoy warhead was launched and destroyed, 40 minutes later another warhead is launched? What if the country defending itself overused its defense just to down the lead dud warhead and suddenly a couple more warheads are launched? What if the few warheads are all downed, does the second country then retaliate if they successfully downed a couple of warheads they were forewarned about?

What if several dozen warheads are launched all at once, but each travels at a different speed, pace and direction? What if the speed demon of the group is a dud but because it leads the pack it attracts massive amounts of firepower to make sure it is destroyed? It seems like a giant rubik's cube puzzle to figure out how much firepower can be used to destroy each and every incoming warhead along with the priority as to which missile should be destroyed first. Dare the military ignore the closest, fastest but smallest warhead to make sure they get a slower moving, larger warhead that is among a group of secondary warhead, but more likely to carry an actual nuclear warhead?

It seems like the fastest warheads would attract the most firepower, possibly leaving too little remaining firepower to down the slower moving warheads that may actually have a nuclear weapon. And if it turns out that one of the fastest warheads actually has a nuclear weapon, and it detonates, the ability to then destroy other targets may be compromised as well.

And what about where the defensive missiles are stored that can be loaded onto our own fighter planes. They are stored in bunkers mere yards apart. It seems line one or two well placed bombs could destroy all the bunkers as the first bunker epically explodes upon being struck.

What if nuclear warheads and dud warheads are sent in all directions, how does the U.S. prioritize which missiles to shoot down? What if duds are sent to the U.S. but real warheads are sent to Australia, Guam and Japan? Does the U.S. scramble additional firepower to down warheads headed at locations not within the U.S. ?

If Kim Jong-Un successfully launches a nuclear warhead and due to errors on all sides the warhead detonates, what are people to think that a mad man can pre announce his nuclear launch desires, and then see them fulfilled?

If Kim Jong-Un were to be assassinated, does that not send a message to other dictators with nuclear weapons to never announce their intentions ahead of time? Assassination would make Kim Jong-Un a martyr and possibly create splinter groups within North Korea who will want to carry on Jong's wishes.

If Kim Jung-Un is not assassinated, he cannot stay in power AND keep his nuclear arsenal. And that leads back to a suggestion that DailyPUMA has made on a few occasions in the past. Reward Kim Jung-Un for his countries advances in nuclear weapons technology by welcoming North Korea as a  Major non Nato Ally in exchange for the dismantling of North Korea's nuclear weapons program.

It appears that a MNNA Invitation for North Korea regarding their public statements about an inevitable launching of nuclear weapons is preferable to simply kicking the nuclear can down the road.

For Kim Jong-Un to stay in power, he would have to give up his nuclear weapons. Assassinating Kim Jong-Un would simply prove he was right about America as being a threat to North Korea. Kim Jong-Un would have to be promised his own safety and acceptance as a Major non Nato Ally might be the safest course of action for the rest of the world.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.