Feeling sorry for Louis C.K., and the Powerful Female Roles his TV Shows Created.

One of the most tremendous scripted television interactions DailyPUMA ever witnessed occurred between female actors Pamela Adlon and Emma Stone on the TV show "Lucky Louie" in the 2006 episode called "Get Out". 

What a true loss if the "Get Out" episode is buried because of verified accusations against Louis C.K which apparently do not include being held against one's will or facing future punishments if the people or person had left, meaning there accusations against Louis C.K. are nowhere close to what others have been accused of.

The amazing interaction in the "Get Out" episode between Pamela Adlon and Emma Stone was not a cutsy 30 second back and forth, it was a deftly written scene that lasted several minutes and with each passing minute just became more and more intense. While women may see the success of Wonder Woman as a clawback for women actresses everywhere, lets not forget how society continually belittles episodic series that don't use physical violence or gun play, otherwise the scenes between Pamela Adlon and Emma Stone in Get Out would be held in the same Accord as Wonder Woman.

Behaving badly or inappropriately shouldn't be the only benchmark used for ending or disrupting a successful person's career. DailyPUMA is going to go out on a very fragile limb and state the following, there IS a difference between being held against one's will versus being an unwitting witness to another person's inappropriate behavior, and there is a difference between being exposed to another person's inappropriate behavior while that same witness is both completely free to leave at any time AND would not be punished in any way for leaving, including the loss of future work opportunities, and of course the witness would need to know that. Think of someone yelling at Larry David's character in Curb Your Enthusiasm after a typical Larry David anti social outburst because they know they don't have to be afraid of a Larry David repercussion in the future.

If someone hoping to get lucky behaves in a manner not deemed appropriate, and the other party is of course of legal age and free to leave at any time with no present or future repercussions, then lets not equate that with a rapist or holding someone against their will because the two scenarios are not equivalent.

Whenever DailyPUMA sees Louis C.K.'s work, DailyPUMA just instantly finds that the women in the scenes are on equal and many times on superior footing to the males, and that the real tragedy going forward will be the loss of female roles in Louis C.K.'s productions. 

If you get a chance, watch the Lucky Louie episode "Get Out" for the scenes involving Pamela Adlon and Emma Stone, they are truly remarkable.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Trump Supporters on Edge that Barack Obama was never accused of Racism while Trump is being accused of Racism on a Daily Basis.

There are many voters outside of the major cities who believe that Barack Obama was racist against whites during his term in office. These primarily Trump supporters may be outraged, befuddled, or perhaps just frustrated that the mainstream media never accused Obama of harboring racism towards White America because of the News media's own political correctness while now Trump Supporters hear daily racism accusations leveled at Donald Trump.

Remember this Barack Obama comment from April of 2008, "They (The Rust belt and West Plains people) get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."  -Barack Obama.

Or, Barack Obama could have said...."Just like the Indians who came before us, the people who settled into Rural America suddenly are losing their jobs and their homes and they don't understand why when their work ethic remains strong."   - Not Barack Obama

Both sentiments basically tell the same story, yet Barack Obama could not connect with his primarily white constituency in a complementary and Truthful way, yet the mainstream media did not accuse Barack Obama of being racist, or even obtuse, about Middle America.

When Barack Obama quickly jumped into the fray after a College Professor was confronted outside of his own home by a police officer who had been called to the scene by an African American female witnessing an African American male attempting to get inside a home without use of a key, Obama's goal with his White House Share a Beer Conference was to heal racial divides. It was as if Obama wanted to show how great of a healer he was by always taking the side that racism existed whenever a confrontation between different races made the news. In DailyPUMA's opinion, it was a poor choice to use to illustrate racial divides as the police officer was acting completely correctly.

Let not forget Obama's penchant for apologizing for past American Behavior, something that any one president cannot truly own. When visiting foreign dignitaries Obama would bow to foreign leaders which many in America felt was an affront to the standing of all U.S. Presidents.

An example of Obama's penchant for Obtuseness or just plain White Indifference, or perhaps even White Racism would be his reaction to the banking solution for the housing market crash of 2008. The solutions put forth in the Dodd / Frank bill basically put the House Flipper and the Family struggling to hold onto their home in the same category, which was an affront to the millions upon millions of homeowners who had lived in their home for the past few decades and now were in danger of losing it due to Wall Street Investment Shenanigans that encouraged many to take equity out of their home or to become House Flippers.

Obama basically allowed the banks to humiliate anyone asking for Mortgage help by only acknowledging the possibility of a program to help them keep their home AFTER the struggling homeowner had defaulted on their present home loan. Obama basically allowed the tenet of "No Loan Restructuring could occur without the declaration of Default" first being branded on the Deadbeat Homeowner's forehead." This coming from a man who had nefarious help in purchasing his own first home.

The banking procedure that Obama's administration apparently supported or looked the other way involved Parallel Foreclosure also known as Dual Tracking.

Once a homeowner had been instructed to fall behind on their mortgage payments so they could then apply for Home Mortgage Relief, the banks could simultaneously begin foreclosure proceedings even as the same bank began the application process for Home Mortgage Modification. Meanwhile the banks seemed to conveniently lose paperwork on the home modification program. 

The practice of simultaneously foreclosing (Parallel Foreclosure) on a home owner who had to first default on their mortgage before being eligible for a home modification program went on for YEARS before a half hearted attempt was made to reign in this anti-homeowner madness. 

While these banking shenanigans affected all races, it also affected white america most since white america owned the most property. Obama was never accused of racism through the Dodd / Frank bill even though if one stood back far enough, the impalement of white, middle class home ownership at a greater rate than other races sure looked racist.

DailyPUMA supported Hillary Clinton in 2008 and is 100% sure that Hillary Clinton would have taken a more measured and reasonable approach so as not to disenfranchise so many homeowners in the Rust Belt States, the States she was blamed with losing in 2016. The irony being once Hillary Clinton accepted Barack Obama's support, she could no longer publicly feel the pain of the Rust Belt States during the 2016 presidential campaign without it being seen as a direct impugnment of Barack Obama's legacy.

It is likely that Americans who support Trump now and continue to support Trump see a racist mainstream media that continually calls Trump a racist while having kept quiet about policies that Obama signed into law that could be viewed as racist against white america.

Meanwhile, the scant 30% to 35% that still support Trump could still win against a Democrat Party that is split between Moderates and Progressives. 

For proof look at the ridiculous Progressive assault against Hillary Clinton put on by The Young Turks, Move on Dot Org, Bernie Sanders Supporters, and Donna Brazile in her new book, in which Brazile first claimed that Hillary Clinton bullied the DNC and rigged the Primaries in her favor. This accusation was then followed by the Young Turks accusing Hillary Clinton's campaign of money laundering through the DNC. But suddenly Brazile back off when she actually appeared on TV to hawk her new book and instead said there was no Primary Collusion between Hillary Clinton and the DNC. 

However, the Damage was already done. DailyPUMA recently saw the repetitive scrolling headline banner on a Mexican News Channel that basically stated Hillary Clinton and the DNC fixed the primaries against Bernie Sanders, a claim which Brazile now denies. However Brazile's retraction most likely won't appear in future Mexican News Scrolling Banners. Just who is plotting to alienate the Mexican vote against Hillary Clinton? Could it be whomever plotted to alienate the Union vote from Hillary Clinton in 2016, aka Bernie Sanders?

So we now have 35% for Trump, 40% Moderates and 25% Progressives for Democrats, but if the Moderates and Progressive don't get along, don't be surprised if the 2020 Presidential Candidate for the Republicans wins, even if it is not Trump. 

If somehow Bernie Sanders is the nominee for 2020 for the Democrat Party, I will protest vote Republican because of the BS the Democrat Progressives have put Hillary Clinton through for over a decade now, and continue to do so with their Axis of Evil known as Move on Dot Org, The Young Turks, Bernie Sanders, and fueled by Donna Brazile.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA revisits Donna Brazile's email comments with Taylor Marsh from 2008.

DailyPUMA went to the blog Hillary-Wins, also by Alessandro Machi, to reveal what Donna Brazile was saying in 2008 about the Clintons in her emails with Taylor Marsh.

Amazing how Donna Brazile "saved their asses" (The Clintons  asses), and when you talk to a conservative, they will tell you that it was the Republican congress that made the 90's great, not the Clintons.

It's truly a sad state of affairs for the Moderates from both parties because of their loonier counterparts known as Neo cons and Progressives.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Republicans want you to believe that their People paying for Dirt on Hillary Clinton is no different than Steele Dossier that was first funded by a Republican, then the DNC & the Clinton Campaign, and eventually the FBI.

The Republicans want to know why is it not ok for Jared Kushner or others in Trump Land to pay a foreign source for dirt on Hillary Clinton, yet it is ok for the Clinton Campaign to purchase or initiate dirt Intel on Trump for foreign sources.

So focusing on whether or not the Clinton Campaign funded the intel is important, However the distinction between the Steele Dossier and what the Trump Campaign set out to do are so different that DailyPUMA will list them  below. 

If it's true that the Steele Dossier was initially funded by a Republican Operative, and then taken over by the Democrats or the Clinton Campaign, that is WAY less of a controversy since there is a Republican at the root of the original search. Without the original Republican, there would be no Steele Dossier. The Washington Post tried to infer that the Democrats and Hillary Clinton created the Steele Dossier in the twisted headline used with their article, yet in their own article they admit the Democrats and the Clinton Campaign did not initiate the Steele Dossier, a Republican did. But hey, let's blame Hillary Clinton.

The Democrats have a second firewall in terms of the radical difference between the Trump Campaign soliciting dirt on Hillary Clinton and the Steele Dossier, Trump refused to disclose his Income Tax Returns, making Trump the first presidential candidate in DailyPUMA doesn't know how long to refuse to release their tax returns, so even as Sander's was blasting Clinton over the release of her Income Taxes and her Wall Street Speeches, Trump was hiding his own Income Taxes, and STILL is hiding his own income tax returns.

Speaking of Sander's, Sander's and Trump were using Political Operatives who both worked in Eastern Europe for a decade at the same time and were most likely in contact with each other, so that would be a third firewall to do research on Trump versus simply looking for Dirt on Hillary Clinton as was done in Trumpland.

Then throw in Trump's BLATANT LYING about Trump Products over the airwaves. Trump alleged that a table full of Trump Productions were in production at his Press conference after his Michigan Primary Win when it was all FICTION. The Democrats had every right to Investigate Trump over what other lies he was telling, thus a fourth firewall. 

A Fifth Firewall of difference between Kushner paying for dirt on Clinton versus the Steele Dossier would be that the Dossier went to the FBI who reviewed the Intel and wanted more, and the FBI was going to pay for more intel, until Steele was exposed. 

There is a Sixth Firewall as well. The FBI Director and Republican James Comey managed to twice disclose in public that Hillary Clinton was under investigation, yet the FBI Director Republican James Comey never disclosed if Donald Trump was under investigation for Income Tax Irregularities, lying over the airwaves regarding Trump Products, Deliberately lying over the airwaves for political gain, such as stating that Hillary Clinton was a criminal when she had never been convicted of a crime.

DailyPUMA suggests further discussion be focused on how the Steele Dossier PALES in comparison to simply paying foreign governments for "Dirt" on Hillary Clinton as the Trump Campaign did. 

More Importantly, DailyPUMA continues to wonder why the FBI either refused to Investigate Donald Trump over the myriad of issues mentioned above, or why the FBI refused to publicly acknowledge that Donald Trump was also under Investigation during the 2016 Presidential Election.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump is Probably Clueless about how easy it has become to disable another country's economy through nuclear warfare in the upper atmosphere.

Back on March 12, 2017 DailyPUMA's sister blog, AlexLOGIC, warned that the disabling of a country's satellites could produce crippling and deadly results on the ground below.

CannonFire has just released it's own warning about an EMP Attack from North Korea. If North Korea were able to do incomparable damage to our Electronics, Satellites and Electrical gird, Trump's only counter move would be to annihilate North Korea, assuming our missiles could still be accurately launched.

What would result is a small country playing mayhem with our "satellites and things", while we in turn would be killing, maiming and destroying millions of North Korean lives instantly, because Trump's only counter move would be to drop nukes on North Korea.

Who would get the rest of the world's sympathy in the above scenario, the country that played a very dangerous prank, or the country that simply nuclearized tens of millions of people.

The reason we know that Trump is not up to the challenge at hand is TRUMP DEFUNDED, or let lapse, the department that actually studies defending against Electro Magnetic Weapons, as Cannonfire has pointed out.     

North Korea's bluster over launching a nuclear weapon into the U.S. may very well be a real threat, but exploding a nuclear weapon high up in the sky, where it will decimate satellite transmission and possibly our entire electronic and electrical gird could be North Korea's stealth plan.

One wonders how many satellites it would take to re-establish a satellite network and one wonders how many replacement satellites the U.S. has ready to relaunch at a moment's notice. Probably nowhere near enough.

When Trump talks of InfraStructure, Trump visualizes big heavy dump trucks pouring asphalt, when DailyPUMA thinks of InfraStructure, Images of triple the number of satellites needed to maintain an economy and buildings being built round so they can withstand hurricane force winds while also being elevated to prevent flood damage.

Trump is so outmatched right now it truly scares DailyPUMA.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Has the U.S. ever launched missiles towards itself to see if they can shoot them all down?

DailyPUMA is wondering if the U.S. Military has ever fired off dozens of missiles at the same time from different locations, at the U.S., to see how many they can effectively shoot down without detonating. Simply having a bunch of military ding a lings say they are ready for any incoming missile attack is WORTHLESS. PROVE IT.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders was big on Coal, Global Warming, and Pot for all, now his own State of Vermont wants to proceed with caution regarding Pot, Just like Hillary Clinton advocated during the 2016 Presidential Campaign.

It's really important to keep reminding the World how full of shit Bernie Sanders really was during his 2016 Presidential Campaign. And I say this with the acknowledgement that Bernie Sanders is a fine speaker and a solid thinker. 

But when a 2016 presidential candidate can be for Coal yet acknowledge Global warming at the same time, we basically have a rope a dope candidate who did nothing more then alienate a few million Democrat Voters who would have voted for Hillary Clinton until Bernie's B.S. began to propagate for far too long.

Speaking of Dope, Bernie Sanders was for Pot for all, yet now his own State of Vermont has taken a cautionary approach regarding the free and easy use of Pot. Vermont has has taken exactly Hillary Clinton's position in 2016, that the States that had already legalized Marijuana should be studied for a couple of years to see what the cumulative effects of legalized pot were producing.

So to repeat, Bernie Sander's own state of Vermont is basically giving Bernie Sanders a no confidence vote in regards to Sander's position on marijuana while giving Hillary Clinton's 2016 position of caution on marijuana a super big thumbs up.

If anyone out there wants to blog, DailyPUMA would encourage a Bernie's Bullshit blog that would go back in time and point out how Bernie kept going to the left of Hillary Clinton so that he could paint her as a Washington Insider, yet how foolish many of his going to the left of Hillary screeds really were. DailyPUMA will even give you a top spot on one of the DailyPUMA columns for free. (Ok, their all free but a top spot is even better than free).

And if someone were take on this Bernie's Bullshit Blog, don't forget to take a few shots at the Bern Report as well.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Did 60 Minutes Hide Harvey Weinstein's reputation over 2 decades ago when they Interviewed Joel Thurm for a piece on Hollywood?

DailyPUMA recalls Joel Thurm once state during a Sixty Minutes interview back in either the 80's or early 90's about how Hollywood Actors and Actresses were treated, "One Actress had to masturbate in front of an executive in exchange for a part in a movie", he stated. I think that ended the 60 Minutes Segment.

DailyPUMA wonders, what if it was Harvey Weinstein that Joel Thurm was talking about? If it was, would that not make 60 Minutes somewhat responsible for not going further and finding out who it was that Joel Thurm was talking about?  Would not 60 Minutes be responsible for Mr. Weinstein's additional 20 years or more as head of a Production Studio?

Everyone is wondering how Mr. Weinstein got to flourish as a successful Producer and possible sexual predator for so long. Well, if 60 Minutes had the goods back in the 80's or early 90's, and did nothing, then we have our answer, don't we?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.