Republican Politicians need to up their game and offer FREE Voter Photo ID Locations to all U.S. Minority Citizens.

The ridiculousness of accusing the Republican Party of racist voting laws because of photo ID requirements needs to be buried in one fell swoop by offering FREE photo ID Voter Registration to all minorities who are in the U.S. legally.

The issue of granting former felons voting rights needs to be addressed as well. I would suggest a free in four solution. Any felon who is released from jail and goes four years without a new infraction can vote.

The United States is mired in too many repetitive arguments and it is a surefire recipe for something very big and very bad to happen that could have been prevented if not for the political in fighting over the same darn issues, over and over and over again.

Free Voter Photo ID Centers would also give both parties and independent parties equal and fair access to all who are registering to vote, what could be fairer than that?

I'd separate the DMV from the Free Voter Photo ID Centers because both processes in the same place would ultimately turn into a very long wait. Lets spend money on Americans for American issues.

Free Photo Id is the kind of program that needs priority over the funding of the Undocumented who require anywhere from 10 to 77 times more funding to do the same thing that U.S. Citizens need and are not getting. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Alessandro Machi: Diversity Madness has taken over without consulting those over 50 years of Age.

Is the Mainstream Media guilty of Presumptive Treason regarding the 2020 Presidential Election?

There were several chain reactions that were sparked by two huge events in 2020, COVID-19 and George Floyd. Both were politicized by the media against Donald Trump. However Trump felt about either issue, the Media went oppo. 

The media was able to make People think Trump was a buffoon for asking at a Press Conference what could be done to fight Coronavirus early on, before it had a chance to manifest and become lethal inside of a person.

To this day, Fauci, the Medical community nor the media has encouraged people who are already in Home Quarantine to be involved in various types of home based COVID-19 trials involving natural products and remedies to see if they might kill off COVID-19 before it has spread throughout the body. This to me is a red flag of either a medical conspiracy or a hate of Donald Trump and his dangerous practice of asking questions at Press Conferences. The media has so brainwashed people they think Trump committed a crime because he asked a question about how COVID-19 could be stopped in its early, home quarantine stage.

Then, George Floyd happened and every incident that involved a Police shooting after George Floyd was immediately categorized as a reason to defund the Police. I understand that without the continued protesting it is possible things would have returned to Police Officers virtually never being under the microscope and never having a Grand Jury agree on charges being filed, but the result was an extraordinary media bias that as time goes on will reveal that most of the split second decisions were not Police Brutality.

The ongoing Summer protests and COVID-19 created the panic needed to do a never been done before “sending virtually everyone in the country a mail in ballot” decision while acting like it was no big thing, normal as normal can be.

The Media finished off Donald Trump by always using certain mocking phrases like “widespread ballot fraud” before the election when we all know highly targeted ballot fraud encompassing sanctuary cities would be enough to turn the election if necessary, and then universally using the words “baseless” and “false” in front of any Donald Trump comment about the 2020 election after the election. The fact that the two words were so universally used clearly shows behind the scenes meetings occurred among ALL mainstream media. I think the media is already guilty of an insurrection for deciding before election day they would not investigate signs of ballot harvesting or ballot fraud. And by constantly deriding any mention of ballot fraud or ballot harvesting and constantly using the word baseless and false when discussing the possibility of the 2020 election being compromised, have actually presumptively committed treason if ballot fraud is found in the future regarding 2020 Presidential election.

Yes, regardless of the outcome of the latest ballot recounts, the media committed presumptive treason by refusing to investigate various types of potential ballot fraud.

The latest indication that 2020 may have been stolen is the incessant nit picking and gaslighting about the Maricopa recount that has gotten so desperate among the mainstream media they mock the putting of the ballots up to the light. Seriously? Why does the media care so much if ballot counters are putting the ballots up to the light? I feel like I tumbled into a Star Trek or Twilight Zone episode where a 6 year old is actually in charge and is getting nervous over a secret of theirs being exposed and begins to freak out as his secret becomes undone as ballots are held to the light. “You stop that right now or I’ll turn you into a rock”.

Detective shows always mention how people will look away when someone is trying to find a piece of evidence that is hidden in the room is near the hot spot where they have hidden something, then the person will calm down when the investigator moves away from the hot spot. That is how it feels with all the attention being given to Maricopa county by the mainstream media and the holding up of the ballot to a light.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Media falsely pushes there was no 2020 Election Controversy and hides that it costs 77 times more to Foster an Undocumented Child than a U.S. Citizen Foster Child.

The Mainstream Media claims there were no controversies about the 2020 election and that it is ok to deprive 1.5 million Foster kids from having their Grandparent's Foster them at 10 dollars a day. 

Instead of providing 10 dollars a day to Foster 1.5 million U.S. Children with their Grandparents,  20,000 Undocumented are being Fostered at 770 dollars a day.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

1.5 million American Kids could be Fostered with their Grandparents for what it costs to fund 20,000 Undocumented Kids.

You can do the the math yourself if you like.  

It costs 770 dollars per day to safely house an Undocumented child. In Ohio, Ma'Khia Bryant was driven insane by a system that would not pay her grammy 10 bucks a day to be her Foster Parent when Mom, who is single, could not hold down a full time job and also be there for her kids full time. Ironically, Single Mom, if she was working regularly, was paying into the system that could have then backed her up by letting Grammy be there for her kids if necessary.

Crazier still, Grammy has to wait 6 months and then maybe she gets paid 10 bucks a day to be a caregiver for each grand child. But how can Grammy provide for her grand kids for those first six months if she isn't being paid and has to work during those first six months and once again, not be around for her grand kids. 

The U.S. system presently is funding 20,000 Undocumented Kids an amount of money that could fund 1.5 million Foster Kids in the U.S. to live with their grandparent or grandparent.

This is the kind of statistical factoid that goes untold by Democrat Politicians who are against the Wall, while Republican Politicians don't seem to know enough about family values to want to make sure that Grandma can be a Foster Parent with minimal red tape.

Instead the two Political sides bicker and fight when the math is there for everyone to see.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Does Black Lives Matter know Democrat Politicians are Spending 77 times more per Undocumented Child than is being spent on African American Foster Children who are U.S. Citizens?

It costs 770 dollars per day to take care of one Undocumented Child at the border. One can presume the new cost to house many undocumented children in large facilities like convention centers or smaller more localized centers within California, is most likely similar, or more.    

Ma'khia Bryant died in large part because Ohio could not afford to pay her grandma 10 dollars a day to be her full time foster mother. Yet the Democrat led Federal Government is paying 770 dollars a day for daily caregiver services and facilities for each Undocumented Child. 

Even more astounding, Democrat Politicians WILL PAY a Foster parent who is NOT related to African American 10 dollars a day or more to take care of an African American child, just not the child's grandparent. This is how Democrat Politicians keep African American families together, by paying a stranger to separate African American Kids from their own grandparents by not paying the Grandparent? This is the party that Black Lives Matter is supporting?

Is Black Lives Matter aware of the discrepancy? Does BLM approve of the Democrat led Federal Government paying 77 times more per day to take care of an undocumented child versus making an African American Grandmother wait six months before paying her just 10 dollars a day to Foster her own Grandchildren?

Why is BLM upset with Republican Politicians when it sure seems like it is Democrat Politicians who value Undocumented Lives more than Black Lives, 77 times more.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Police could reduce shooting deaths of suspects who try to get back in their car, by getting into the car first.

Suspects who feel fear and try to flee the scene of a Police stop may, or may not be a threat to the police or the public at large. No one knows the true intent of the fleeing suspect. The problem for Police is they cannot just let someone flee the scene just because the suspect is afraid.  

If a fleeing suspect gets in their car and races away and crashes into another car, a pedestrian, or a building, the Police can be sued by whomever the suspect victimized since the victims can sue that they were needlessly injured, or worse.

It may be time for Police policy to change. Upon a suspect exiting from their own vehicle one of the Police Officers should immediately sit in the driver's seat of the car and observe the encounter from that vantage point. This does several positive things all at the same time.  

• the suspect accepts they can no longer use their car to "getaway".
• the suspect also realizes that once the Police Officer vacates the car, they are free to leave and cannot be fired upon.
• the suspect's willingness to leave their car for the encounter can be cited in a favorable way should a court appearance to required.

A suspect who feels an overwhelming sense of fear may instinctually gravitate back to their own car. If a Police Officer is in the driver's seat observing the suspect approaching, the suspect will see they are surrounded on more than one side and will most likely not try and occupy a space that is already occupied. If the suspect does try, then they are assaulting a Police Officer rather than attempting to get away, and a shooting at that point is much more justified, yet probably less likely.

If there are others in the car an assessment has to be made before the Police Officer places themselves inside the car such. Back-up would need to called before the Police Office enters the suspect's car.

If Fleeing the Scene is going to be meant with deadly fire, then the Police must provide an intermediate step that more likely prevents the suspect from attempting to get back in their car. 

The Police occupying the driver's seat is clearly an option that needs to be considered and most likely implemented sooner rather than later since the alternative is leading to riots and massive destruction of property of those who have done nothing wrong.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

How the Rich and Famous force their hand and make a Blogger's Post disappear from Google Search in the age of Cancel Culture.

Not only did the linked column's hits flatline to zero, hits to Daily PUMA have now dropped by 75% overall.

To fully understand the reason why I wrote this satirical article about Arianna Huffington over 12 years ago,  here is the message I left yesterday in the comments section from the above link.

Somebody from on high did something to this article. First, it used to get a lot of hits, which I never understood how that happened. Then suddenly around April 1 of 2021, this article gets zero hits AND DailyPUMA's total hits have dropped precipitously by over 80%,

Lack of full disclosure when these types of technocracy shenanigans go on is a big threat to society. I originally wrote this article because Huffington Post MERCILESSLY backed Barack Obama and made Hillary Clinton look like the Devi on a DAILY BASIS during the 2008 Democrat Nomination race. 

And yet, after Obama was selected over Hillary Clinton for the 2008 Democrat Nomination and then was elected President, this same Huffington Post labeled Barack Obama a BANKCENTRIC PRESIDENT, which was the EXACT REASON why I wanted Hillary Clinton over Barack Obama back in 2008. 

In 2008 Hillary Clinton was still a Moderate with Conservative budget concerns, the PERFECT BLEND to run the country. Since then, Hillary Clinton has been driven so far left she is no longer the Political Candidate who I used to admire greatly.

Huffington Post played a trigger role in Hillary Clinton losing the 2008 Democrat Nomination, and that is why I wrote this scathing but satirical article about Ms. Huffington. By the way, our own family suffered because of Obama and his Bank Centric policies. While it can be argued that Obama's Bank Centric policies helped stabilized over aggressive house flippers, it also ended up resulting in unknown quantities, perhaps in the millions, of homes WITH EQUITY STILL IN THEM, ending up in the hands of the ultra rich who gobbled up that equity while putting the foreclosed upon victim in perpetual, zombie debt and that is why I wrote this article.

Other than that, I have met Arianna Huffington and I liked her.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

2004 TV show "Strong Medicine", episode "Quarantine", discusses the Dangers of Coronavirus.

If the Coronavirus has been around for decades, why was COVID-19 represented as some type of new virus when the world was first shut down?

In a 2004 episode of Strong Medicine, called "Quarantine", there is a scene where the Coronavirus is succinctly explained and that it is dangerous. So why did it take another 16 years before serious work on a Coronavirus vaccine was completed?

The 2004 scene from Strong Medicine where Coronavirus is explained is CHILLING for anyone watching the scene who is unfamiliar with, or never saw the show before, because they would just assume that the episode was recently made.

And if it "just took that long" to develop a Coronavirus Vaccine, why didn't the Medical Community do ongoing clinical trials to see what could be given, even if it was a natural remedy, to reduce the overall impact of Coronavirus when the symptoms were caught early enough?

Update June 13, 2021:  Sometime in early May of 2021,  Strong Medicine was REMOVED from the StartTV line-up, about 4 to 5 weeks after this article was written? Coincidence?  Who knows.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Can Shark Tank Raise money for Charity by auctioning off their Shark Tank scribbles?

I was watching a Lori Grenier Instagram Post and it dawned on me that the scribble notes the Sharks write during their Tank investment interviews might be worth something to respectful fans of the show.

If the Sharks and the Shark Tank show are amenable to the idea, why not auction off the various Shark's scribbles / notes that they write during their Tank investment Interviews and donate the proceeds to charity?

How much is that investment scribble worth to a Shark Fan for charity?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Has Citi Credit Card bait and switched millions of their credit card customers during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

(Update: Friday, March 19, 2021 2:15 am). I thought I had a good talk with the Citi Executive representative who called me, but when their PDF arrived it basically stated nothing would change and Citi is doing nothing wrong, so I have doubled down on my belief that Citi is wrongly posting to the credit bureaus the total amount owed by waiting until a new bill is generated which automatically amplifies the customer's borrowing amount by several hundreds of dollars. Once a new bill is posted a customer has 20 days to pay down the amount owed and what should be being reported to the credit bureaus is the amount owed just prior to a new bill being generated, NOT the amount owed as soon as the new bill is generated. And, the additional overage charges when a new bill is generated are illegal in my opinion since they are not allowing the customer to pay down their debt even though the customer has 20 days to do so and was actually under the credit limit just prior to a new bill being generated. (End of Friday, March 19, 2021 2:15 am update).

(Update: Wednesday, May 17, 2021, 2:42 am) I filed a complaint with the CFPB and yesterday I received a call from Citi's Executive Office. I agreed to recuse my claim of a "pre-ordained conspiracy in which Citi overcharges on their monthly minimum payment which leads to a chain reaction in which the customer calls in to ask why their monthly bill is radically higher than normal...and without asking the customer who called in is then offered a lower interest rate for 6 months which in turn triggers a reduce customer's credit line "trap" the next the time the customer makes a large payment" if.... the executive assistant would forward my request to the powers that be that Citi customers be given their "real" credit limit (which is actually approximately 1.5% lower than the written credit limit) so the customer knows approximately how far below the actual credit limit they need to be so they don't suddenly incur an inflated monthly minimum bill even when they were actually below the credit limit just prior to their new credit card bill being generated.  (End of Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:42 am update).

I had called Citi customer service asking why my monthly credit card bill which is normally a certain amount, was suddenly 160 dollars higher.   

The customer service rep seemed to instantly know, as if many customers were experiencing the same situation. Without my even asking, the customer service rep offered me a six month, 7.99% percent interest rate. I was shocked, I was humbled. I felt like I was in a Honda Commercial where they perform a Random act of Kindness. Silly, foolish, Alessandro Machi. This is a credit card company, any kind hearted move has to have an ulterior motive.

"But it's the pandemic, it must have softened the hearts of the Credit Card companies, that has to be it".  Gasp. Silly, foolish, Alessandro Machi. Are you really trying to see the good when it comes to a credit card company?  Really?

I had called simply asking why I was being charged an extra 160 dollars for my monthly Citi Credit Card bill and instead of giving me an answer, my interest rate was lowered to 7.99% for six months, which could save me several hundred dollars in lower interest rate charges. How could I be so fortunate?

When a short time later I had the chance to do a zero percent balance transfer offer from a different credit card, I chose to pay down my Citi credit card because having some elbow room on the card would be of benefit to me.

The moment the balance transfer went through, Citi gobbled it all up by lowering my credit line an almost equivalent amount to the balance transfer. Now, this is not necessarily a bad thing since a lower credit limit means I have lower monthly payments and less going towards interest rate charges. However, in this particular instance it would mean I would now lose some of the 7.99 low interest savings I had just been awarded for six months, by at least one hundred dollars, maybe more.

However, specifically because of the pandemic I needed my credit limit and the gap I had just created through a balance transfer from another card. I needed the credit line max to remain as is. Once the 6 month, 7.99% offer had expired, if Citi wanted to lower my credit line that would be totally fine by me.

So as I retrace my steps what basically happened was this...

I called before my credit card due date to see if I needed to make any payments to ensure I was below my credit limit. I followed the automated information I was given over the phone and made two small payments to put me below my credit line limit. However, my next credit card bill triggered that I was over my limit even though I had made the payments necessary to get below the credit limit and had made them before the due date and they were credited before the due date. Instead of being hit with the standard 1% of what is owed, plus interest, I was hit with 2% of what was owed, plus interest AND my account was flagged as making insufficient payments even though I made the payments as suggested when I called in to check if I was below the credit line limit. Afterwards, when I called in to ask why my bill was 160 dollars higher than normal my call triggered an offer by the Citi rep to lower my interest rate for six months to 7.99%, which in turn triggered an AUTOMATIC lowering of my credit line the moment I made a large enough payment to do so.

I have no problem with Citi wanting to lower their credit line, I do have a problem with Citi giving out false information as to how much one should pay to avoid inflated payment due amounts that  also create a red flag scenario of insufficient payments being made that was caused by incorrect info Citi is giving their customers.  

Citi, it's this easy, when customers call in to check their credit card balance to make sure they are under their credit limit, use the following recording when giving out credit limit information, "To avoid a higher monthly payment due amount, please pay down your account by the amount of ____________ before your due date", and then actually give the CORRECT AMOUNT needed to ensure the credit card balance remains below the credit limit even when the new bill is assessed.

What Citi basically did was give inaccurate credit balance info so that a higher payment due amount would be triggered, which is then used to DOWNGRADE a customer's payment history and assess the customer as a risk, even if the customer has NEVER been late with a payment.

If Citi used bait and switch strategies against their own customers during the COVID-19 pandemic, something should be done about it by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Australia Media Freeze by Facebook exposes the selfishness of both Mark Zuckerberg and Rupert Murdoch.

It seems as if behemoth companies like Rupert Murdoch's Media Empire and Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook Empire are thriving by depriving the every day mere mortal.

Zuckerberg employs minimal real time customer assistance other than sometimes access to chat. Meanwhile Murdoch refuses to prop up broadcast television news with a conservative slanted evening and nightly news show. Nor is there a late night conservative talk show that could dovetail off of the evening and nightly news conservative talk show.

Australia is turning out to be the petrie dish by which we can judge how out of touch both Facebook and Murdoch's Media empire have become with the viewers of their product. While both Murdoch and Zuckerberg probably did the right thing from their own perspectives, their inability to see they are throwing the proverbial baby out with the bathwater is somewhat alarming.

If Facebook employed a cadre of people running into the several thousand whose job it was to actually talk to the public, the present situation would either have been avoided, or at the very least, there would have been Facebook employees already up to speed who could have literally one by one determined which sites from Australia could do what and with whom and be manually notated so the proper Facebook department could implement a new rewiring of what is allowed and what is not allowed.

Not to be outdone, Murdoch's insistence regarding new legislation that forces Facebook to pay a fee for news links that appear on Facebook should have also come with a mandate that Murdoch creates a free tv broadcast TV conservative evening, nightly news and conservative late night talk show program. In the United States, people have become so polarized over Donald Trump not because of Trump, but because of a one sided nightly news that portrayed anything that Trump did in a bad light.

Of course, Murdoch has no obligation to do something that might prove positive. Thus Murdoch becomes another Zuckerberg (Zuckerberg could be providing thousands more jobs making Facebook more interactive with the public but instead makes machiavellian decisions on the spur of the moment and more profits as a result) by eating the top of the muffin (his non broadcast, non free tv, cable empire), while discarding the muffin stumps (the hard work; a nightly, free tv conservative evening and nightly broadcast news show and late night conservative talk show).

We are in a time and a space where triangulation is needed to solve problems in which the third side is an outsider who is thinking about the bigger picture rather than choosing sides.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Biden signs bill paying Refugees high wages to be Nurses instead of expanding cost neutral In Home Supportive Services program that pays American Families to keep their Parents out of Nursing Homes.

This is the type of Progressive hyperbole that kills Americans and demoralizes the Family. The favoring of Paid Refugees over Americans struggling to get by and who could be getting by as a paid live-in caregiver for their own parent instead of having them whisked away to a barricaded Nursing home is ramping up now that Biden is in charge.

Biden's plan to let more refugees into the country is a great way to solve the COVID recession

As industries are struggling to find enough workers, Biden has a chance to undo the Trump administration's strict policy on refugees.

https://www.businessinsider.com/refugees-economy-jobs-business-immigration-biden-congress-recession-2021-2?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+businessinsider+%28Business+Insider%29

Now more than ever I.H.S.S. could have been EXPANDED to keep Seniors in their own home with their own family member as a PAID caregiver.

I.H.S.S. is considered a revenue neutral Government program because it LOWERS overall Medicare Costs for all Americans. The link above champions the idea of more refugee Nurses so our Seniors can live out their lives away from their families in what for many seniors becomes the saddest time of their lives because they have been ripped away from all they knew and all who knew them.

Family members who could not split their time between work and caregiving for their parents are now out of work and their parents have been forced into Nursing Homes and then barricaded from visits.

This is the typical, destructive, Progressive mentality that breaks apart the family unit and replaces it with higher healthcare costs, more taxes for Americans, and grateful Refugees who then vote Democrat. It is sinister beyond comprehension that Dems are focusing and prioritizing those outside of our borders while our own families struggle at everything because of all the work restrictions put in place by DEMOCRAT Politicians and Policies.

During the time of COVID-19 when Democrat Politicians demand we all stay home, the ONE Program that could have provided income for families while also LOWERING HEALTHCARE COSTS FOR TAXPAYERS is the I.H.S.S. Program.

Although the paid live-in caregiver income is at a VASTLY LOWER amount because the overhead for being a live-in caregiver is much, much lower than having to go to an office by car to work and in home caregivers are not required to be as skillful as a certified nurse, I.H.S.S. has been shunted aside by the same Political Party that always has to help itself first and foremost before helping the people they swore to serve.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

63 Hydroxy Clinical Trials, 23 of which are focusing on the potential preventative aspect of COVID-19.

My research shows as of January 25, 2021 there are 63 Hydroxy Clinical Trials. Of those 63, there have been ZERO peer reviewed Hydroxy Studies that did not use Hospital Patients. 

Presently there are 23 Hydroxy Clinical trials that are focused on preventative aspects of Hydroxy. Of those 23, only 2 use Zinc even though Hydroxy proponents have been stating for the past 7 to 8 months that zinc is an essential component of Hydroxy when used as a preventative against COVID-19. 

None the less, at least the focus is on preventative aspects of Hydroxy instead of it failing as a super cure for those on their COVID-19 Hospital Death Beds.

Hysteria breeds hysteria. We can credit Andrew Cuomo with his hysteria engorged proclamations early on, "We need 40,000 ventilators" when improper and over use of ventilators was actually killing patients. Cuomo's refusal to use the Trump provided Mercy ships as a way to evacuate healthy seniors from their nursing homes so the Nursing Homes could house COVID-19 Seniors only may have been well hidden disaster.

Cuomo's zero philosophical discussion about what could prevent or reduce the impact of COVID-19 if treated early enough may have thwarted an intelligent analysis regarding how to use anti malaria drugs as a preventative against COVID-19. 

Lagos, Nigeria has 4 million more people than Los Angeles, CA. Lagos, Nigeria had less total COVID-19 deaths in the entire year of 2020 than Los Angeles has had in ONE day in 2021. Lagos, Nigeria supplies anti malaria drugs to its citizens and sells them over the counter.

Below is my research on Preventative Hydroxy Clinical Trials that do not use COVID-19 Hospital Patients since those Patients are already sick from COVID-19.

61 Clinical Trials…

As of January 25, 2021,ALL peer reviewed Hydroxy clinical trial results used hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. 

Below are 23 Hydroxy Clinical Trials that do not involve COVID-19 Hospital Patients or those who are already infected with COVID-19 but instead focuses on preventative measures using Hydroxy. 

Only 2 of 23 Hydroxy Clinical Trials are using Zinc, which is an alarmingly low number.   

Use of Zinc in Hydroxy Clinical Trials….https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987720306435

———————————————————————————————

ACT: Asymptomatic COVID-19 Trial

A Study of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo to Prevent COVID-19 Infection in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy

CROWN CORONATION: Chloroquine as COVID-19 Prevention in Healthcare Workers

HCQPreP: Hydroxychloroquine as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers

HELPCOVID-19: Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and Zinc for the Prevention of COVID-19

HERO: HEalth Care Worker pROphylaxis Against COVID-19

Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc With Either Azithromycin or Doxycycline for Treatment of COVID-19 in Outpatient Setting

Hydroxychloroquine as Chemoprevention for COVID-19 for High Risk Healthcare Workers

Hydroxychloroquine COVID-19 PEP for Household Contacts

Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 PEP

Hydroxychloroquine in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pneumonia Trial

Hydroxychloroquine in the Prevention of COVID-19 Infection in Healthcare Workers

Hydroxychloroquine PrEP for SARS-CoV-2

Hydroxychloroquine to Prevent COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers

Military COVID-19 Hydroxychloroquine Pre-exposure and Post-exposure Prophylaxis Study

Novel Agents for Treatment of High-risk COVID-19 Positive Patients

PATCH: Prevention And Treatment of COVID-19 With Hydroxychloroquine

PATCH 2 & 3: Prevention & Treatment of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) With Hydroxychloroquine

Treat Now: Trial of Early Therapies During Non-hospitalized Outpatient Window for COVID-19

WHIP COVID-19: Will Hydroxychloroquine Impede or Prevent COVID-19

(COVID-19 PEP Canada) Preemptive Therapy for SARS-Coronavirus-2

Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine Prophylaxis for Health Care Workers at High Risk for COVID-19

A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Aerosolized Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate in Healthy Adult Volunteers

-Alessandro Machi. January 25, 2021 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Pence pulled and tugged from both sides while Mainstream Media shirks responsibility for their one sided newscasts.

The mainstream Media has done massive damage to themselves and half of the Country with their spiteful reporting over the past four years. Rather than take any responsibility, the Mainstream Media has quintupled down that it is all Trumps fault. EVERYTHING is Trump's fault, the MSM chortles. 

I wonder if one of the rich elite has secretly died and unbeknownst to anyone a 10 year old with a dictionary has taken their place, or their offspring regularly hacks into their email account and sends out the most idiotic instructions that are baselessly followed by their MSM minions.

Words like Baseless, False, Falsely, and phrases like "Falsely Accused" and "Growing Outrage" are used by the Media to attack any one who thinks differently than they do all in an attempt to manufracture news rather than fairly report it.  

The mainstream media continues to do with their word droppings what they can't do in real life, which is actually investigate issues and present well rounded perspectives rather than TRUMP BAD, Media Good. How many Thousands of Peaceful Protestors were at Capitol Hill while the Legislators mocked them by  ignoring them?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Pelosi Plan to Impeach Trump will Demoralize Republican Voters into not voting for the next TWO Presidential Cycles.

If Republicans cave and vote for impeachment of Donald Trump, they will have in essence burned down their own return path to the Presidency for the next EIGHT YEARS! 

If Trump is impeached and therefore cannot run for President again, it will disenfranchise tens of millions of Republican Voters whether or not Trump decides to run in 2024, thus giving the Democrats a pathway to an 8 year Presidential Path.  

The Democrats plan to Prematurely Euthanize millions of Seniors while simultaneously opening the door for tens of millions of undocumented to stream into the U.S. and receive Instant entitlements meant for Seniors who spent decades working to EARN their own entitlements.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Alessandro Machi: Petition to give Eagles Draft Pick to the New York Giants for the gutless 4th quarter quarterback substitution.

Sign and Share Petition to take a draft pick from the Philadelphia Eagles and give it to the New York Giants.

Alessandro Machi: Trump 2,000 dollar COVID-19 Relief Check Demand snidely berated by corrupt News Media.

Major Barrett gets in his shot at Donald Trump, making it seem as if Trump is the bad guy for wanting 2,000 dollars COVID Relief Checks for Americans as top priority. Barrett actually makes it sound as if Americans would rather have their 600 dollar check now then a 2,000 dollar check in a few more days.

"If he wants to", CBS Evening News ends the year with one more snide, anti Trump comment that makes no sense.

Twitter Tyranny on display. Twitter screws up story about Dec. 24, 2020 vote on Trump's 2,000 dollar check demand for the American People, no way to report Twitter Tyranny.

While Twitter will censor others, when they get it wrong, there is no option to notify Twitter they got it wrong. Twitter Tyranny lives on.

The Twitter generated lead story below is WRONG because it only tells half the story. 

                              Twitter Tyranny on display as they only post one half of the Story.

Twitter Tyranny leaves out that Pelosi refused to reconsider the other funding that was included with the COVID relief bill. The link to this Twitter Tyranny generated story has no report this tweet option because it is Twitter Generated, therefore there is no way to report it, aka Twitter Tyranny.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Alessandro Machi: Christopher Krebbs "I have seen some auditing that was not up to Snuff."

Isn't it time to start interviewing Christopher Krebb's field workers about 2020 U.S. Vote Tampering? 

Alessandro Machi: 60 Minutes Word Salad Defense of the 2020 Election EXPOSED.

60 Minutes Interview with Christopher Krebs refuses to mention Ballot Harvesting, the core issue that may have flipped the Election to Joe Biden.

2020 Presidential Vote Manipulation used Voter Registration with Unapologetic Democrat Political Bias.

Edit update: Nov. 22, 2020. I just want to clarify that while I personally believe it is entirely ethically wrong to designate a voter registration location for only one political party, I most definitely think it is unethical, wrong, and possibly illegal to enlist first time voters under these types of one sided conditions.  End of Nov. 22, 2020 update.

The get out the vote campaign for younger voters worked remarkably well in 2020 and that is the real story of the 2020 Presidential Election. So why isn't anyone coming forward to claim credit or high five ing each other?

If what was reported about how voters registered to vote in Chicago was also happening in other battleground cities, especially in the densely populated Democrat centric cities, then what occurred was a violation of the spirit, and possibly the law, in terms of how people were encouraged and influenced when they registered to vote.

Unfortunately, any attempt to ensure that voter registration is done in a fair and impartial manner is most likely to be met with cries of voter suppression from the Mainstream media. 

So Republicans lose either way when it comes to Voter Registration. Either Republicans keep quiet and Democrats lure younger voters to register to vote and to fight "for hope and change," or Republicans shine a spotlight on Democrat voter registration influence peddling and the media accuses Republicans of suppressing people to register to vote.

I made this video around Oct. 16, 2020, about 18 days before the Presidential Election. I never posted it online until now, November 14, 2020 because I did not see any good coming from it as it would be viewed as more Republican attempts to stop voter registration among younger voters. 

But in retrospect my miscalculation was if voter registration partisan influencing was going on in Chicago, which contains a hot bed of Democrat supporters, then it possibly was going on in other Democrat centric cities located in Swing States.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

ABC News CONCERN TROLLS DONALD TRUMP SUPPORTERS. Take-1

This is Concern Trolling 101 of Donald Trump Supporters by ABC News 3 days after the 2020 Presidential Election.

Alessandro Machi: Stephen Colbert's monologue about Donald Trump's voting comments requires a Rebuttal.

Rebutting Stephen Colbert's Mr. Colbert goes to Washington moment regarding Donald Trump's 2020 voting comments.

Polling those who DID NOT VOTE in the 2020 Presidential Election may reveal Ballot Stuffing in specific precincts in contested States.

If a very high percentage of voters voted in specific precincts in the 2020 Presidential Election, then why not do a door to door poll in those particular districts to find out how many voters did not vote? 

If the amount of people who did not vote plus those who did vote is more than 100%, it would appear that Ballot Stuffing occurred in that particular precinct.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Could Undersampling of Landline Users cause Inaccurate 2020 Presidential Polls?

So many polls are showing Joe Biden with a stable and commanding lead it seems next to impossible that he could lose. Is there something that the pollsters missed? 

One issue that I think could create confusion is the rather remarkable difference in the Northeast, where Biden apparently holds a 56% to 32% advantage. If California and Illinois are running 2 to 1 for Biden while National polls show Biden with "only" a 5% to 6% national lead, one might wonder if Donald Trump can eeke out several close wins in key states while losing bigly in other States. 

There apparently is another issue, Trump may have improved his percentages with both Latinos and African Americans compared to 2016.

However, there is still another issue to consider....

I think there is something that the pollsters may have missed, and that is landline polling.

A quick google search claims that only 6% of homes have landlines only. However, 40% of all homes have both landlines and smart phones. Why does this matter?

The 40% landline users could be being undersampled by pollsters, here's why. The cable companies that control a significant percentage of the landline customers in the U.S. have developed possibly "over efficient" spam detectors that weed out spam calls either before the phone rings, or after one ring. Unfortunately, the landline spam blockers also weed out other calls that could include phone numbers from polling companies. I recall seeing on my TV caller ID a phone number claiming to be from Donald Trump headquarters zapped after one ring. This happened on at least two different days.

Smart phones offer similar spam block technologies as well but for some reason I don't think they are as aggressive as the land line spam blockers. Perhaps more importantly, land line users tend to need 3 to 4 rings, even 5 to 7 rings before they get to their phone. Many times the auto callers will either give up after 3 rings, or,   grab another auto call sent out at the same time that has already been picked up, thus disconnecting the landline call for being "too slow" to answer.

So, with no verifiable proof other than my own experiences with both landlines and an old cell phone, I think it is possible that a significant percentage of land line users are not being mathematically polled regarding how they will vote versus how smart phone users will vote.

So the next question is, are landline users more likely to vote for Trump, or Biden? That is the mystery question. If Trump wins the 2020 Presidential election, then perhaps it may be attributed to the forgotten landline community that still equals 40% of all households, and of course, an electoral college system that can produce a Presidential victory even if one candidate loses by 5 to 6 million votes.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.