How Putin can end his war with Ukraine with his pride intact, ask Donald Trump to intervene as a Peace Broker in the Russia / Ukraine conflict.

If Vladimir Putin wants to end his war in Ukraine, he should have Donald Trump broker a peace deal. If Trump can pull off a Russia / Ukraine peace accord, Putin can take satisfaction knowing he will cause massive discord in the U.S. between the Mainstream Media, the Democrat Progressives with the American People by having Trump prevent World War III.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Sheila Kuehl Obstructing Sheriff Alex Villanueva's desire to Police LA Metro Rail may be the underbelly that leads to criminal charges against Kuehl.

Sheila Kuehl really stepped in it, and the local media does not know what to do with the biggest story of 2022 regarding L.A. Crony, Insider Politics.

Kuehl was able to win no bid contracts for a friend that was supposed to assist those who were assaulted on the LA rail system, through a phone hot line service.

However, while Kuehl was creating the questionable business model of bidding just below the no bid contract threshold, Kuehl was also preventing L.A. Sheriff's division from policing the L.A. rail system.

But it's even worse than that, much much worse. Kuehl and her friends on the LA County Supervisor's board, plotted, threatened, and avowed to remove Head Sheriff Alex Villanueva without any type of public vote or initiative.

Respecting women in politics requires calling a woman out when she likely broke the law and used her political position of power to do so. Sheila Kuehl's role in finding no bid contract awards totaling approximately $800,000 for her best friend's non-profit hot line for rail system assault victims resulted in a cost per legitimate phone call that may have run into the thousands of dollars per phone call.

Shiela Kuehl believes she did nothing wrong, illegal, or to personally enrich her friend at the taxpayer's expense and safety. Kuehl allegedly participated in a scheme to...

• create a method for reporting rail system assaults that already existed in other forms, 
• use her insider knowledge and skills so her friend could win no bid contracts, 
• prevent Alex Villanueva and his Sheriffs from policing the Metro Rail System because of an alleged toxic relationship between law enforcement and law violators using the metro rail system.  
• unilaterally collude to remove Alex Villanueva from power through a Board of Supervisors vote who apparently were in favor 4-1 to remove Mr. Villanueva without the public voting on the matter.
  

The criminality and insider dealing appears palpable and should include the four Board of Supervisors who approved of a plan to have Mr. Villanueva removed from office without a public vote in what remarkably looks as a way to keep Kuehl's Friend's Metro Rail phone hotline gig eligible to continue to win no bid contracts.

District Attorney Gascon immediately denounced the criminal investigation as being specious. Gascon's public comments can be viewed as obstruction of an ongoing investigation that appears to place Ms. Kuehl center stage to the worst kind of cronyism that most likely endangered the public while also enriching one of Ms. Kuehl's friend.

Karen Bass, what do you say about the matter? 

 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Media screamed when Trump went "Digging for Dirt" in Ukraine regarding Joe Biden's son. That same media cheers Biden's digging for dirt on Donald Trump.

Imagine Obstructing a sitting President from doing a deep dive into the possible illegal activities of his Political Rival's son as being illegal and therefore worthy of that President's Impeachment. Some might consider that an insurrection, no?

Imagine ripping up a copy of the President's State of the Union Address, in full view of cameras, many would consider that an act of sedition.

Now imagine the successful obstruction of additional evidence, that was LEGALLY OBTAINED weeks before the 2020 Election, helps bring about the defeat of the standing President, some might consider that a second insurrection, no?

Now imagine the former President being deeper dived than the person he was accused of digging for dirt, by that same person? Seems like a third cause of action for an insurrection against those who obstructed Donald Trump over the past several years.

 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Gavin Newsom just broke the law of common sense when it comes to mandating 33% of all new cars sold be EV in California by 2026.

When Legislation gets passed that basically says you will consume what we want you to consume, it is imperative that the Government not be engaging in the game of attrition called Jenga.

What is ultimately cruel about the game of Jenga is there is a physical limitation as to how many sections of a pieced together standing structure that can be removed before the entire structure, collapses.

Jenga, meet Gavin Newsom, Gavin Newsom, meet Jenga. 

 Before ANY EV edicts can be legislated, comparative analysis needs to be done in which the use of rare earth resources are quantitatively compared between different types of uses.

For instance, if the identical amount of lithium and other rare earth resources required for each 50,000 dollar EV car could also be used to create 500,000 dollars worth of I-watches, or 1 million dollar's worth of HD televisions, or 10 million dollars worth of memory cards, then it suddenly becomes both misguided and possibly illegal to demand that EV's suddenly become a mandated top priority.

So, where is the rare earth equivalency list that Mr. Newsom apparently forgot to consult when coming up with his EV mandate. And, where is the gasoline mandate that cars using gasoline become less of an alleged climate change issue when a new gas consuming car gets at least a certain amount of miles per gallon?

So many questions, too little mind.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

How the FED stole 8 trillion in Homeowner Equity and pocketed the Money.

A home that used to sell for 1 million dollars may soon sell for $800,000. 

But, the monthly mortgage payment will not be any less than it would have been before the drop in price because the FED has raised interest rate charges.

The Fed using existing and plentiful Homeowner Equity to back new mortgages while giving these Equity Rich homeowners some residual income every month is a win for all homeowners. 

Instead of rewarding Homeowners with significant home equity, the FED just stole 8 trillion dollars of Homeowner Equity that had accrued over the past few years, equity that could have been used to both back new mortgages and provide homeowners who have ample equity a way to create a modest amount of annual residual income.

It appears The FED has narcissism issues in which they refuse to consider Equity Rich Homeowners and their trillions in equity as a way to both back new mortgages and as an economy stabilizing option.

Further injurious to existing Homeowners, Home Sellers, and Home Buyers. The lower home prices, while not benefiting Homeowners, Home Sellers, or Home Buyers will benefit both the FED and Hedge Funds that do not require FED money to buy a home and have been set up to purchase homes and convert them into rentals.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Techno Fascism, the Real Menace of present day society.

My LinkedIn account has been doxxed. Turns out I was "warned" back in May of 2022 about content related to 2000 Mules that I had posted, and to not do it again. If only I had been warned! Linkedin's finest had first removed my content, then warned me. So when I went to see what LinkedIn had removed, it was no longer visible. 

I opened up a complaint with LinkedIn. My request was, "Can I see, see what you deemed offensive so I don't post something like it again". I went back and forth a few times with a LinkedIn representative who danced around the issue of my being able to see what had already been removed. Instead, the LinkedIn representative justified the blatant mistake the technology side of LinkedIn had made by claiming the content was so dangerous it could not exist in any form. But what was "it" that had been removed? I had no idea, and apparently neither did the rep since they were unable to show or tell me what LinkedIn had removed.

Fast forward 3 months and suddenly my account has been "restricted".  After a four day wait a customer service rep contacted me and presented three items related to 2000 Mules from 75 to 90 days earlier and that I must promise to never post fake news again before I would be reinstated.

As you can see in the image above, I now have 118 notifications I cannot view. Stranger still, my connections who happen to want to either message me or read my latest content, will not have access to anything I have ever done on LinkedIn, and may mistakenly assume I blocked them.

I replied to Linkedin's claim about my prior 3 violations that I had no idea about my prior violations and that it was unfair to suddenly say I had three violations when I never got the prior ones. And here is where Techno Fascism again rears its bass ackwards bullying.  Having first wiped clean my first two violations in such a manner that I could never see them, LinkedIn deemed those first two violations my warnings, warnings with no way to view what the content was that had been removed!

So when LinkedIn Techno Fascist software found a third violation, I was deemed me to be non compliant and I would have to admit to violating their agreement terms and that I would not do it again. Of course, I cannot do that. I cannot agree to self libel and self slander my own reputation when I was never given an opportunity to see the first or second posts they did not approve of.

Imagine a stop sign has been knocked down in your local community and is no longer visible in any way shape or form, but a camera continues to monitor who does not stop. Would it be fair to assess several dozen did not stop tickets all at once when there was no sign present? Of course not. The person would need to be warned that although there is no stop sign, one must stop anyways. And that is all I ever asked for. Let me see what it is you deem a violation or I may end up doing it again and again because I have no idea what it was that was deemed a violation.

For the naysayers who are thinking, you must have known and are playing coy, I can 100% say I absolutely did not know which post of mine had been removed for a variety of reasons. I post numerous things every day, and the original warnings did not state a time or date stamp, but even if they had, I still would not know what post I had made without actually seeing it. 

LinkedIn also has a method where one can see what post might have been reported as objectionable, and a member can ask for a second opinion. But in these specific instances there was no way to view the posts because they had been permanently removed prior to my getting a warning, and therefore having no way to review the removed content.

Fortunately for me, I managed to stumble across my May 2022 LinkedIn complaint where I made it abundantly clear that I would like to learn what content I had posted that was considered a violation. I have now submitted that trouble ticket and am hopeful that the representative handling my case will see that I made a very legitimate effort to see what it was I had posted that was deemed a violation so I could learn and not do it again.

But, because this is techno fascism, the next issue I may be up against is the customer service representative not having the option to remove my second and third violations until I admit I did wrong, when I obviously had no idea since I was not allowed to see either my first or second violation.

The timing of this doxxing by LinkedIn may have had unfortunate consequences for me as I was working on multiple projects at the same time. And yet, I refuse to bow down to techno fascism, and you should to. Don't just assume you have no rights, make sure you always file a complaint when something happens that makes no sense, and hopefully a real live human will have the authority to over ride the latest brand of techno fascism that reminds me a lot of how truly authoritarian Governments around the world control their people.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Conservatives lack of concern for Lesbian Celebrities such as Ann Heche and Brittney Griner is disappointing.

As of Sunday, August 14, 2022, Morning time, Ann Heche's heart is still beating. However, the mainstream media's complete abeyance to the Medical Industry's narrative that Ann Heche is dead, is appalling.

The actual admittance that Ms. Heche is only being kept on life support to see if harvesting her organs is possible should be sending the alarm to Conservatives everywhere that all life is sacred, even a lesbian's life. But based on recent events, the life of a lesbian, be it Ann Heche or Brittney Griner, is not sacred to the vast majority of conservatives.

I oscillate between my frustration with holier than thou conservatives and the brain dead viewpoint of our completely complicit media that will accept Ann Heche is dead even though her heart is beating, and find both despicable.

The fact that a West Hills, CA Hospital facility is involved in Ann Heche rather sudden demise should be sending alarm bells out far and wide. After witnessing my Mother's brutal treatment at the West Hills, ER back in 2018, 

I have kept my eye on that location and without having any contacts embedded there, and even with HIPAA being a huge roadblock for doing research, I can still cobble together a few disturbing incidences that should have had reporters looking for clues to ensure Ms. Heche is getting fair and ethical treatment.

A few months ago I was contacted by a person who could not understand why she had been yelled at by Medical personnel at West Hills ER while her husband lay dying in his ER bed, UNTREATED for SEVEN HOURS, until he did die!

What I learned from my Mother's death DIRECTLY RELATED to her medical mistreatment at West Hills Hospital ER, in front of my eyes as her full time live-in Caregiver, was the sleaziest way imaginable to get around EMTALA rules while increasing profits.

More recently, Kourtney Kardashian's husband, Travis Barker was apparently RUSHED AWAY FROM WEST Hills to Cedar Sinai to receive the proper care, WITHIN HOURS! 

Under staffing an ER causes scenarios to emerge in which if the initial medical readings are made to look better than they actually are, this then means the patient has to wait their turn, no matter how long that wait would be, before seeing if their baseline readings were stable or had gotten worse or better.  That long wait time can cause patients to either give up and leave, be transferred, or die. But since the last recorded medical levels were not dire, the ER has no liability! So the ER profits by under staffing and then by not doing follow up in a timely manner! This also allows the ER to hunt for out of network patients while their in network patients sit and wait!

Now, Ann Heche, within days of being in the care of a West Hills, Facility, not only allegedly has the worst outcome possible, but there seems to be no desire or will to give Heche's body a chance to fully recover from the various trauma's she received before thinking of her as an organ donor candidate.

This is what I find galling, based on the Ann Heche's situation, if a  medical mistake was made, it can be covered up by simply explaining what the medical mistake caused to happen, without admitting to making any kind of a medical mistake. 

When Conservatism is not blind to the type of person being afflicted or who may be in need of rescue or at the very least, a second opinion, Conservatism cements itself into never being a majority viewpoint among all Americans because of their own prejudices.

When Conservatism does not fight for Ann Heche's right to have a few weeks to see if maybe some miracle will happen, because she is a lesbian, the public should realize there is no side fighting for what is right. What both political parties fight for apparently is always based on what will directly benefit their own cause and the people they approve of.

There is another issue in play here. Should not an organ donor be allowed to state on their organ donor card how many days they wish to be kept alive to see if they are showing signs of recovery BEFORE their organs are harvested?

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Thing about Guns.

The thing about guns...
Anything I ever wanted to try, do, accomplish, learn, achieve, or master, first required I start at the bottom. Be it my first watermelon planting consisting of dropping an entire packet of watermelon seeds into one large outdoor planter and then later on learning why that was not a good idea, to my first bicycle that I rode with only the the left handle bar intact, thus giving me less of a chance to stop before crashing into brick garage wall, my first job; selling custom imprinted Christmas Cards door to door at a way too young age, my first...and only, tennis racquet, my first car, a red white and blue baseball glove that Dad bought for me as a surprise but probably was not the best choice for a glove, In every instance I was using either a hand me down or a very crappy version of the real thing. EVERY...TIME.
So why when it comes to guns suddenly it is any gun at age 18? Everyone one of those who says, "It's criminals that use guns illicitly, not me", why compare oneself to a criminal, that's a pretty low bar comparison in my opinion.
The path to responsible gun ownership can include not allowing anyone out there to buy a gun at age 18.
Just as any veteran of war who slogged through mud and rain in a foreign land, lost a body part, came back to the U.S. with PTSD that may never go away, hearing loss and loss of health; most likely did not go to all that trouble so someone new to the gun game could buy a gun relatively easily and effortlessly and kill others who were unarmed, not up close, hot eye to eye, but by using a scope, soft pull, once per second firing privilege.
Hanging one's hat on, "When guns are taken away from citizens is the first step to Government aggression towards its citizens", is ABSOLUTELY a valid argument to make. The over two dozen mass murders of people by the tens of thousands to well over a million around the world by their own government or a coup government proves that. But that is a far cry from the first time user of a gun who has been given approval to buy or purchase ANY gun.
First time purchasers of a gun should be limited to something that can't be used from a far distance with a scope, nor can rapid fire kill people they never knew or ever looked in the eye. Even the amount of ammo should be limited on a first time purchase.
I also question why someone who owns very little property of value is entitled to a gun at a young age. I also question why it is legal to take guns off of one's property.
So what is the underbelly to today's escalating use of fire arms to kill people they never met, or to mete out revenge against a specific place they had a bad experience with? I think Artificial Intelligence the developing of stronger and stronger drugs, having no complete Border Wall, social media, and a corrupt mainstream media are five significant issues driving more and more public gun use.

I will update this specific post in the near future to explain why Artificial Intelligence, stronger drugs, and no complete Border wall, social media, and a corrupt mainstream media are working hand in hand to escalate drug violence.

 Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.