In honor of Geraldine Ferraro, Daily PUMA is listing all the PUMA blogs with articles about Geraldine Ferraro in the right hand column.
Daily PUMA Column - Commentary by Alessandro Machi
Showing posts with label Daily PUMA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daily PUMA. Show all posts
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Bill Clinton's 64th Birthday Wish, how you can help.
Daily PUMA encourages you to check out the PUMA blogs located on the right two columns of this page who will be posting articles all week long about both Bill And Hillary Clinton, including Bill Clinton's 64th birthday wishes.
Learn how you can help make Bill Clinton's 64th birthday wishes come true this August 19, 2010.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Up to the minute news about Chelsea Clinton's wedding, please check DailyPUMA and the many blogs that are writing about it, all on one page!
Look to the right of this article for two full blog columns of up to the minute stories about Mark Mevzinsky and Chelsea Clinton's wedding. DailyPUMA proudly supports the Clintons, even if the corrupt 2008 news media did not.
Friday, May 28, 2010
PUMA anniversary coming up? Anybody know when PUMA ground zero actually was?
I'm curious as to when ground zero was for PUMA's? Was it around May 30th of 2008, or did it happen prior to that date? I did some google research but was not able to find anything definitive.
If anybody wants to give their opinion please do so in the comments section. There are about three or four versions of PUMA ground zero out there. When contributing an answer, please consider the possibility that there may be other versions out there as well that could be just as valid.
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Girls on Water, Three Young woman crossing the oceans solo at the same time.
So that makes three young women crossing the worlds oceans all on their own and at the same time. Jessica Watson's blog can be found here. Abbey Sunderland's blog can be found here.
Then there is a third young woman who is ROWING across the Atlantic named Katie Spotz and her blog can be found here. All three of these blogs are presently on Daily PUMA.
Labels:
Abbey Sunderland,
Daily PUMA,
Jessica Watson,
Katie Spotz
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Daily PUMA is making it easier to track many important blogs at the same time.
The Daily PUMA page format is crammed with PUMA blogs, plus some environmental, key economic and banking blogs, plus several blogs by independent women as well. I am constantly discovering new, important stories that I might otherwise miss if I didn't regularly check in to Daily PUMA.
What makes DailyPUMA useful to many is that not only can one check the latest stories from literally a hundred different blogs, but DailyPUMA is auto updating all the blogs as well, so if you check back a few hours later, the newest stories are on the top of the right two columns.
DailyPUMA makes it easier to keep in touch with a blog that may be temporarily not writing new material. A blog may go two weeks without a new post, but the moment they post a new article, it should appear at the top of a DailyPUMA column within an hour.
For those who take a moment to check the left side of the blog, besides important links at the top of the left column, there are several dozen blogs lower on the left column page that cover the full political spectrum.
The "PUMA movement" started over how Hillary Clinton was mistreated by her own party in the 2008 presidential elections. However, the PUMA movement has now grown into separate groups that realize it is important to question the mainstream media on a regular basis while still supporting Hillary Clinton.
The center column features new columns every day or two. DailyPUMA gives out many more hits than it receives and is happy to assist in increasing hits for the blogs that appear on here. Hopefully you will see the time saving value that all blogs that are found on DailyPUMA contribute to you as you access their articles in a quick manner.
Daily PUMA is free. If over time you come to have a favorite blog or two that appears on Daily PUMA, donations directly to the blog you want to contribute to may go a long way in ensuring that particular blog continues to operate. Bloggers may put hundreds of hours into their blogs every year, and a little bit can go a long way.
Friday, November 6, 2009
DailyPUMA is ONE YEAR OLD, and in case you wondered what the mission statement was, here it is.
DailyPUMA is now one years old, Yippee!
In just the past couple of weeks it has dawned on me that it has become very, very important to keep reminding readers that...
1. ...there is unfinished business from 2008 involving Barack Obama and his people CHEATING in the caucus contests.
2.....Barack Obama accepting money that he KNEW was fraudulently donated to him via the use of fake names,
3.....Identifying the democrats that went out of their way to support Barack Obama and diss Hillary Clinton when they just could have easily as waited on the sidelines and let the democratic voters decide at the ballot box,
4.....Exposing the intertwined relationship that Barack Obama has with Wall Street Bankers at the expense of middle, "bitter: america,
5.....Spotlighting lazy, conceited, men in suits who profit from making fun of woman or diminishing them in the media,
6.....Spotlight women who are doing things and women who are being ridiculed and ignored when they should be congratulated for doing the right thing.
7.....Be a conduit that connects PUMA blogs in a fast and efficient manner so that we can get the most information in the fastest possible time so we can keep in touch more easily with more PUMA blogs.
8......Exposing the republican conservative frauds and their blogs who simply hate all things democrat while pretending to be supporters of PUMA
9......Reveal and expose the conservative younger blogs that are nothing more than retreads of their older predecessors and simply hate on Hillary Clinton every chance they get.
10......Hope to be around when the wrongdoers publicly admit they acted unethically in the 2008 democratic race and want to apologize to Hillary Clinton.
11.....Would like to see Barack Obama resign one day with an incredibly eloquent speech that actually allows him to keep his political career going as a changed, humbled man.
12....Hillary Clinton has grown by leaps and bounds as a person and a politician and would make the finest next president of anybody out there from either party.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Are PUMAs Major League Baseball World Series Fans? DailyPUMA seems to get a noticeable increase in readers after the World Series games ends.
It is claimed that during the intermission of the super bowl game that fans literally overload the water system with bathroom breaks. It can also be said that PUMA's seem to stream to DailyPUMA after the baseball world series game ends.
Labels:
bathroom break,
Daily PUMA,
end of game,
intermission,
Super Bowl,
World Series
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Robert Reich is Wrong about Government OVERSPENDING, and once again comments are not enabled on his Blog.
It seems whenever Mr. Reich has to give a Pro Obama, pro government spending article, the comments section for his blog are turned off.
I am flummoxed at how EVERYBODY wants the consumer to be enslaved and indebted as they continue to try and predict when the economy will recover. Rather than mildly assisting consumers who want to pay down their credit card debt by waiving future interest rate charges on their existing credit card debt, Mr. Reich proposes that the goverment go farther and farther into debt providing "stimulus jobs".
I had no idea how insulated people in the media are when it comes to actually coming up with solutions to problems that were caused by uncontrolled profiteering by Wall Street. Wall Street and the Government would rather you default on your credit card debt than mildly assist you in paying it down by waiving additional credit card interest rate charges.
Every month, law abiding citizens, many who saw their net worth plunge by 50% over the past couple of years, are still required to pay ridiculously high interest rates on OLD CREDIT CARD DEBT to the tune of 15 to 25 BILLION DOLLARS IN INTEREST RATE CHARGES EACH AND EVERY MONTH.
When you compare that kind of money to the 2 BILLION DOLLAR cash for clunkers program, do you start to see how the economy could easily be stabilized in a very short amount of time if a mild assist were giving in the paying down of credit card debt?
The irony is that 15-25 billion dollars per month that is currently going to the banks in interest rate charges WILL STILL END UP WITH THE BANKS, the difference is it will FIRST go through the consumers hands, who in turn can use more of their own money to pay off their debts. As those consumers respend their "extra money" every month, other consumers will reap the benefit of money first spreading between consumers. The recipients of this money will ironically enough, send it off to the banks to pay down their own debts!
The dynamic act of allowing a consumers paycheck to first circulate among their peers BEFORE it goes to the banks is the best of all stimulus packages.
These are troubling times when simple solutions are avoided and complex, Rube goldberg plans are implemented instead.
Monday, September 28, 2009
A REQUEST/DEMAND regarding NOT publicizing Michael Moore's Movie on your blog unless you also mention Moore's betrayal of Hillary Clinton last year.
(Edit update Oct. 6th, 2009). It dawned on me a few days ago that it is easier to just leave a comment in the comments section reminding us all of Michael Moore's "past". Daily PUMA is however beguiled that a couple allegedly pro Hillary blogs don't put a dailypuma link on their blogs yet do put links to blogs that have shown very tepid "support" for Hillary Clinton.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DailyPUMA is asking/requesting/demanding/notifying that any PUMA doing an article about Michael Moore's new movie that does not also devote some time in the same article to Michael Moore's betrayal of Hillary Clinton last year, will have their blog removed from Daily PUMA for 60 days. And it will be up to you to ask to be re-added, and of course, you will be, as long as you ask after 60 days. (Edit note, change in plans, your blog will probably be moved to the far left column of DailyPUMA)
If you are a PUMA and jump on the Michael Moore bandwagon while pretending he was not one of the reasons Hillary Clinton did not get the nomination last year, you are an idiot. If you don't care that Michael Moore helped prevent Hillary Clinton from getting the democratic nomination in 2008, then you're not really a PUMA anyways.
If PUMA's don't mobilize now and boycott Michael Moore over his supremely idiotic reasons for not just staying on the sidelines last year, but his actually actively campaigning against Hillary Clinton in 2008, being a PUMA will simply have little meaning.
PUMA's won't have any real political influence if they don't exercise it when it needs to be exercised.
If PUMA's discuss Michael Moore's new movie without mentioning his betrayal of Hillary Clinton last year, then PUMA's have become posers who cry victimhood about Hillary Clinton while doing nothing to stop the several idiots that stole the nomination from Hillary Clinton in 2008.
Unacceptable.
Daily PUMA has already removed one blog, (Edit note, change in plans, blogs that clearly show they are PUMA-lite or less will probably just be moved to the left column) but I'm sure the blog owner does not care since they haven't had the courtesy to ever put up a Daily PUMA link anyways.
Just in case some of you are chuckling because Daily PUMA only gets a few hundred hits a day...The real reality is that Daily PUMA gives out 10 to 20 times more hits than it receives.
That means up to 4,000 hits a day get "shared" among DailyPUMA blogs because of DailyPUMA, perhaps that means 100,000 hits a month are being doled out by Daily PUMA to other PUMA blogs, one million hits a year that come FROM DailyPUMA to other PUMA blogs.
It would be nice to be listed on all the blogs DailyPUMA supports but that is up to the blog owners. Just beware that the few blogs that don't carry a DailyPUMA blog are helping to suffocate your own PUMA blog.
As the library of DailyPUMA articles grows, DailyPUMA receives a significant amount of non PUMA's to its sites every day. As a result, all of these first time readers get exposed to all the other PUMA blogs.
Let's not forget why PUMA's were founded. They were founded because of the blatant mistreatment Hillary Clinton received from the media and the many who had no business taking a position, and who may have taken a position against Hillary Clinton specifically to gain financially or politically from the ill gotten financial endless pit Barack Obama attached himself to.
Do the right thing, don't let Michael Moore get away unscathed.
Labels:
betrayal,
boycott,
Daily PUMA,
Hillary Clinton,
Michael Moore,
new movie
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Time for MEDIA MATTERS to allow people to respond to their propaganda.
(Edit update - Sept.30, 2009) lol, apparently media matters does have a blog. Not once in the time I have received email from them can I recall a blog ever being mentioned, whenever I clicked on their article links, it always takes me to a Media Matters page that has no place to comment)
Media Matters style of slinging out their own version of the truth, but having no place for us every day folk to respond, has kind of become old school, has it not?
I would consider the legitimacy of their points of view more often if I knew we all could at least have an opportunity to add our own comments, in a comments section, at the bottom of their articles, somewhere on the internet.
Isn't it time, Media Matters, to come out of your ivory tower and actually allow people to respond to your viewpoints?
Labels:
Daily PUMA,
Media Matters,
no comments section,
old school
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
My condolences to Atlanta and to Georgia on their 100 year rain that has caused massive and unexpected flooding.
Insurance companies and the media tend to take the position that people who don't buy flood insurance in flood regions sort of get what they deserve. However, what about when a flood happens in an area that is not deemed a flood risk, such as Atlanta?
Maybe you live in an area that has never been flooded before.
What if a flood hit and you didn't carry flood insurance? Are you totally at fault? Or, were you being a responsible homeowner by carrying other types of insurance that were more likely to hit in your area, such as fire, quake, theft, perhaps you were even damage from high winds and rain storms.
But what if you just weren't covered for non-stop raining that went on for a week and then caused massive flooding?
What if the damage was not caused by the rain falling on your home, but by the massive runoff that then flooded your home?
What if the flooding was exacerbated because the area where you live had "flourished" and the additional cement and roadways that covered more and more soil caused rain runoff to not get as easily absorbed into the ground thus reducing the risk of flooding?
Is it "fair" if an insurance company happily ensures denser and denser population growth but then denies responsibility for the resulting greater and greater flood probability from rain running off of paved over earth?
Or, can the insurance company argue that because an area was absolutely considered not likely to flood, that the flood insurance policy was soooo cheap it was affordable by all?
If you have a flood insurance experience please contribute an answer in the comments section.
Maybe you live in an area that has never been flooded before.
What if a flood hit and you didn't carry flood insurance? Are you totally at fault? Or, were you being a responsible homeowner by carrying other types of insurance that were more likely to hit in your area, such as fire, quake, theft, perhaps you were even damage from high winds and rain storms.
But what if you just weren't covered for non-stop raining that went on for a week and then caused massive flooding?
What if the damage was not caused by the rain falling on your home, but by the massive runoff that then flooded your home?
What if the flooding was exacerbated because the area where you live had "flourished" and the additional cement and roadways that covered more and more soil caused rain runoff to not get as easily absorbed into the ground thus reducing the risk of flooding?
Is it "fair" if an insurance company happily ensures denser and denser population growth but then denies responsibility for the resulting greater and greater flood probability from rain running off of paved over earth?
Or, can the insurance company argue that because an area was absolutely considered not likely to flood, that the flood insurance policy was soooo cheap it was affordable by all?
If you have a flood insurance experience please contribute an answer in the comments section.
Labels:
Atlanta,
concrete,
Daily PUMA,
flood,
flood insurance,
insurance,
not covered,
run off
Monday, September 21, 2009
ZOMBIES MARCH on Iowa City!
One wonders if the 500 zombies spotted on Saturday in Iowa City were actually attendees to a political gathering of presidential wannabees.
There are unconfirmed and undefined allegations that presidential wannebees created cascading sound waves of incoherent babble that turned unsuspecting casual observers into marching zombies, either that or the march served as a tribute fundraiser to a gentleman who died from the flesh eating disease, necrotizing fasciitis, earlier in the year.
As was asked in the comments section, do zombies actually march, or do they just meander?
(lol, meander on Washington, that just sounds too funny).
HOW YOU CAN HELP! MAKE A DAILY-PROTEST.com sign and put it where others will see it. Daily-Protest.com signs can be placed in a storefront window, a bulletin board at work, or a countertop. Raise curiosity and awareness about how Chase Bank is harming a LOT of of their BEST customers by making a Daily-Protest.com sign.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Harold Ickes "Fair Reflection" comment misrepresented by the American Media.
Harold Ickes "Fair Reflection" comment misrepresented by the American Media, click anywhere on this sentence to go to the article.
Posted using ShareThis
Posted using ShareThis
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Dylan Ratigan: Americans Have Been Taken Hostage...
Dylan Ratigan: Americans Have Been Taken Hostage Posted using ShareThis
---------------My commentary below-----------
I think it is important to note that the Ratigan column appears on Huffington Post. Huffington Post has already called Barack Obama the "Bank Centric Kid".
Huffington Post is also the internet "news source" that blasted Hillary Clinton on a daily basis during the 2008 democratic primaries and PRAISED Barack Obama on a daily basis. Without Huffington Post's interference, Hillary Clinton most likely would have been the democratic nominee in 2008.
Yet Huffington Post posts the article above that basically blasts Barack Obama and his administration.
It is a shame that we can find three powerful women such as Arianna Huffington, Hillary Clinton, and Sarah Palin, and know that if we put them in a room, they would have virtually nothing in common and unable to build any kind of a consensus of any kind.
Yet if we put three powerful men in a room, the odds are that at least two of them would form some kind of alliance or allegiance on some level. (think back to George Bush Sr. and Bill Clinton and their tour around the world to raise money for Hurricane and Typhoon victims a few years ago. George Bush Sr. was OFFENDED and most likely DISGUSTED that he lost to Bill Clinton after only one term in office.)
Make it a game if you will, find three men in politics that completely annoy each other the way Palin, Clinton and Huffington do. I don't think it can be done.
Put Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Bill Richardson in a room, nope, some kind of alliance would happen between two of those fellows.
What about Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy (assuming he still were alive) and Jimmy Carter, Bill and Ted might work something out, maybe even Ted and Jimmy. Jimmy and Bill, definitely not.
What about Rush Limbaugh, Bill Clinton, and....Bill Mahrer in a room, would the three scorn each other the way Huffington, Palin, and Hillary Clinton most likely would?, Nope, Bill and Bill would get along. Heck, didn't Rush even have Bill on his show once?
It is just kind of galling to me how women seem to neutralize each other and in the process let under qualified men such as Barack Obama slip through to positions not earned.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Kanye West shows how Tuff he is at MTV Awards Show by Sparring against Taylor Swift. Should Kanye West be charged with Assault against Taylor Swift?
I don't like giving added publicity to this type of behavior by Kanye West at the MTV awards Show, but what if this had been a woman going on stage to upstage a man? How would the media have handled that?
Terrifying anybody on stage when they are getting an award is worthy of a huge lawsuit, and in my opinion is ASSAULT. I sure hope Taylor Swift sues Kanye West and MTV, otherwise, MTV and Kanye West win in the publicity department. Here is the article.
I also find it strange that the actual interruption has been conveniently blocked by a cut away to the audience. It makes me wonder if it was staged, or cosmetically covered over after the fact by MTV.
News should not be doctored by inserting cutaways after the fact, show the goof Kanye West walking up on stage, show the actual moment of assault when he grabs the microphone out of Taylor Swift's hands.
Show it, MTV, don't sanitize it you hypocrites.
This video clip is cut off right when the audience started chanting Taylor Swifts name to help re-sanitize the stage after Kanye West fled the scene of his crime.
Props to Beyonce for inviting Taylor Swift back on stage when Beyonce was receiving her own award. Once again, the women behave correctly, the men behave badly.
Labels:
assault,
Beyonce,
Daily PUMA,
interruption,
Kanye West,
MTV awards,
sue,
Taylor Swift,
upstage
Friday, September 4, 2009
SOCIALISTIC NEWS ARTICLE RIPS BARACK OBAMA WITH SOME ACCURATE CRITICISM'S.
This is getting confusing. The Republicans are trying to gain a stronghold in the 2010 election cycle by calling Barack Obama a socialist, meanwhile the Socialist movement rips Barack Obama on many fronts and wants nothing to do with him!
However, I still think that the people that used to like Barack Obama also don't see the republicans doing anything to deserve huge gains in next years election, and these swing voters don't want socialism either.
This is getting really weird.
Here is the rather powerful one paragraph critique of Barack Obama's Jekyll and Hyde economic vision.
What is interesting about this second article is that all the actions taken, that the article condemns, were taken under the George Bush Administration. However, the article explains how it was the Wall Street Veterans that Barack Obama happily embraced that have allowed the power of the banks to grow by leaps and bounds AFTER Barack Obama became president.
HOW YOU CAN HELP! MAKE A DAILY-PROTEST.com sign and put it where others will see it. Daily-Protest.com signs can be placed in a storefront window, a bulletin board at work, or a countertop. Raise curiosity and awareness about how Chase Bank is harming a LOT of of their BEST customers by making a Daily-Protest.com sign.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Daily PUMA,
Economic front,
Republican,
Socialism
Saturday, August 29, 2009
KENNEDY'S PASSING MAY RESULT IN A MORE "BANK FRIENDLY" CONGRESS, ARE YOU KIDDING ME, Tim Johnson from SOUTH DAKOTA to head Senate Banking Committee???
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENGORGE.
A Sea of Red in this picture foreshadows the financial consumer terrorism democrat Tim Johnson from SOUTH DAKOTA might bring if appointed head of the Senate Banking Committee. South Dakota is only one of two states that allows banks to rape their customers with unlimited interest rate charges.
What happens when you live in the Twilight Zone, and then you enter another Twilight Zone from the Twilight Zone you were already in?
What happens when you live in the Twilight Zone, and then you enter another Twilight Zone from the Twilight Zone you were already in?
You get the Senate possibly appointing a senator FROM SOUTH DAKOTA to head the BANKING COMMITTEE now that Ted Kennedy has passed! South Dakota is one of ONLY TWO STATES in the entire country that has no USURY LAWS on the books, and is specifically why credit card companies can charge WHATEVER INTEREST RATE THEY WANT!
The passing of Ted Kennedy could result in Senator Tim Johnson of SOUTH DAKOTA HEADING the BANKING COMMITTEE! SOUTH FRICKIN DAKOTA! THE LAND OF USURY! HOME OF THE ECONOMICALLY ENSLAVEABLE (LINK).
Would Hillary Clinton have even allowed the discussion of Tim Johnson of South Dakota as the next head of the banking committee? Will Barack Obama allow this to happen? When do the "progressive democrats" say anything about this?
HOW YOU CAN HELP! MAKE A DAILY-PROTEST.com sign and put it where others will see it. Daily-Protest.com signs can be placed in a storefront window, a bulletin board at work, or a countertop. Raise curiosity and awareness about how Chase Bank is harming a LOT of of their BEST customers by making a Daily-Protest.com sign.
Monday, August 17, 2009
DailyPUMA Slightly shifts some blogs from the inner right column to the outer right column.
In case you are used to looking at one column for a specific blog, I noticed that the inner right column was "descending" topics at a much faster rate than the outer column over the first several hours. This was due in part to my adding some new blogs in the past couple of weeks to the inner column.
If I shifted your blog to the outer right column it was entirely to help ensure that your blog wasn't descending too fast by being in the inner right column.
---------------------------------------------
Two blogs were recently dropped for their "handling" of the Hillary Clinton Congo incident. Their criticism of Hillary Clinton's response to the what would Bill Clinton think question revealed them to be PUMA's that are not for Hillary Clinton. I am not against criticizing Hillary Clinton, but when it is so obviously either another media attempt to "put her in her place", or a republican led assault, then why go along if you really are a PUMA?
The Media treatment of Hillary Clinton is basically one of the primal tenets that caused PUMA's to be born, no?
I will also issue this request, If ANYONE can come up with what Hillary Clinton should have said when she was asked "What Bill Clinton thought about China and the World Bank's involvement in Congo" question, that would not have resulted in Hillary Clinton being skewered by the media or her political opponents, please, put it in the comments section.
I don't believe an answer exists that would have allowed Hillary Clinton to get away unscathed from that question. It is what used to be known as a "wife beating" question.
In the earlier days of our court system, lawyers would ask an opposing defendant, plaintiff or witness "if they STILL beat their wives".
No matter how one answers the question, they are made to look as if they beat their wife at one time or another. That is the type of situation that Hillary Clinton was put in, in Congo.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
Bill Clinton,
Congo,
Daily PUMA,
dumb question,
Hillary Clinton,
no win,
response,
snapped
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Share Gadget
CHECK OUT HILLARY CLINTON FORUMS
Hillarys Village.net (down for now) - Hillary's World - Hillary Villagers.net - Women in Politics