How Environmentalism and Global Warming Advocates gave Putin Free Money to build up his Military and go on the Offensive.

While I support the efficient, non wasteful use of Petroleum resources, the reduction of U.S. production of Petroleum helped pave the way for oil prices to rise. Since Russia's economy and military economy rely on oil and gas exports, the higher the price of petroleum, the more export profits Putin can put into his military.  While the U.S. created inflation with more and more trillion dollar bailouts, Russia was creating higher profits from higher priced tangible oil exports.

Putin is playing with free petroleum money as Russian petroleum export profits continue to rise. While petroleum conservation can actually lower petroleum prices, as petroleum suppliers other than Russia drop out, Putin and the Russian military, win. Russia's war in Ukraine was funded by the ever increasing profit margin Russia gets from exporting Petroleum. 

In 2016 Barack Obama said....Russia “doesn’t produce anything that anybody wants to buy except oil and gas and arms. They don’t innovate.” - Barack Obama

When one considers that George Soros funds most of the adrenalized, anti-America sentiment in the United States, including ending the use of Petroleum, the anti-petroleum sentiment has now brought the world, war. If oil prices keep going up, this will continue to fund Putin's War efforts going forward.

Petroleum consumption reduction in the U.S. while exporting more oil at lower prices could help reduce Russia's profit margins from their oil exports, otherwise Russia's big three exports of Petroleum, Natural Gas, and Arms will apparently be enough for Putin to profitably continue his war efforts.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Whenever the Media calls Trump's claim of a rigged 2020 election false, they always say there was no "Widespread" Voter Fraud.

This CNN Quote "Trump and his allies in Congress, including Miller, have attacked the legitimacy of the 2020 election despite there being no evidence of widespread fraud" is why I think there was 2020 Voter Voter Fraud.

I have noticed that every time the Mainstream Media accuses Trump of Falsely claiming that there was "widespread 2020 Election Fraud",  they use the word "widespread".

But what about "Targeted" 2020 Election Fraud? There were around 155 million votes cast in the 2020 Election, less than 100,000 targeted votes could have changed the outcome. 100,000 targeted votes is .000645 of the total votes cast. Is .000645, or .0645% of the 150 million votes cast really considered widespread vote fraud? 

.0645% is one vote out of every 1,500 votes cast could have changed the Presidential Election outcome. Is altering one vote out of every 1,500 votes considered Widespread Voter Fraud? And, if a vote was simply flipped from Trump to Biden, then one in 730 Trump votes would be needed to be flipped to give the Election to Biden. I just don't consider flipping one vote from Trump to Biden out of every 730 Trump votes widespread fraud when one Ballot Harvester could have been harvesting dozens of ballots in Sanctuary cities for Biden.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Seattle eliminates bicycle helmet law because it allegedly is a form of racial or economic profiling.

Hearing the pro's and cons of eliminating the Seattle, Washington bicycle helmet law is something a fan at a tennis match would appreciate.

On first glance many might say it is ridiculous to not enforce a bicycle helmet law that apparently has cut bicycle head injuries in half, and to then blame the removal of the Bicycle Helmet Law on racism seems even more appalling. However, Police apparently pull over and cite minorities at a significantly higher rate than White Bicyclists.

Before going back and forth on this issue, let's go to the end game, the kids. Kids ride bikes. When kids see many adults not wearing helmets when the Adults are riding their bikes, the kids may wonder why they have to wear a helmet. This to me is the number one issue. A head injury to a child may be more lethal than to an adult because a kids skull is still maturing and thickening up. The neck muscles of a kid are not as strong as an adult, so when a kid falls off of a bicycle, the damage and medical cost may be extraordinary. Think of the kids as the cons of the Helmet law are discussed below.

Homeless and Minority bicyclists are cited by the Police at a much higher rate than White Bicyclists for not wearing a helmet. What if a bicycle helmet citation had no financial penalty, but was more of a pep talk to encourage the cyclist to wear a helmet and "by the way, if you can't afford a helmet, here is this nifty coupon you can redeem at the bike store for a free helmet"? Would that be so terrible? Some would still yes because it would still give the Police an opportunity to "snoop", "harass", or monitor the comings and goings of minorities who ride without wearing a bicycle helmet.

So Law Enforcement actually positively acting to help ensure the safety of minorities would still be considered a bad thing? Perhaps some Racial Justice Advocates may believe that if the same un helmeted minority is repeatedly cited for not wearing a helmet, even if there is no actual fine imposed, it still be a way to track the helmet less cyclist's movements and could be used to profile the helmet less cyclist as evidence of a lifestyle that is short on safety and long on carelessness? 

Or perhaps the helmet less homeless cyclist might keep selling their free helmet for food, clothing, bike repair, or drugs?

Strangely, this situation reminds me of Voter ID laws. For some reason requiring everyone to have a Photo ID who wants to vote is considered racist, even if the Photo ID were given out for free and even though ironically a Photo ID is required to apply for any Government related entitlement or program.

Ultimately, this may be less about race and more about the right to live among those who comply with bicycle helmet laws while not complying with those same laws. It appears that the goal is to be less traceable in public, and I believe that is proverbial elephant in the room that hides under the cover of racial profiling where none was intended.

When Racial Justice Advocates lobby for the rescinding of laws and ordinances that actually do reduce accidents and serious head injuries, I think mostly of the kids and how they will be influenced to be less careful because the rights of less responsible adults have to be respected.

However, not requiring a bicycle helmet DOES become a teachable moment for responsible Parents regarding a discussion they should have with their kids..."Whenever you see someone riding a bicycle without a helmet, either they are too poor to have one, or they don't want to do their part to avoid tragic head injuries. Either way, you wearing your helmet helps the Hospitals to afford taking care of those who don't wear a helmet and get injured."

I am not sure reducing Head injuries by wearing a helmet allows resources to be spent on the more careless, but at least it's an explanation in a world where adults just don't care how their actions negatively influence kids.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

COVID gut, Flu gut, and Virus gut have been ignored for the first 2 years of the Gutdemic.

Oct. 26, 2022 update. I forgot I had written this article. I just went through a 2 week stomach flu / food poisoning gut battle. I may write a book about it. I ended up losing 15 pounds over a 2 week period of time.  Once I recovered I only gained back about 2 to 3 pounds max. The rest was fat, most from my gut. Here's the weird part, I have lost all desire to eat anything sweet. I was once told that our gut actually influences our desire for sweet food. I think it may be true. The only thing sweet I have eaten once I recovered has been watermelon.

End of Oct. 26, 2022 update.

 

If you have excess belly fat you may have COVID gut, Flu gut, or Virus gut. While a vaccine may help reduce your chance of getting COVID-19, fat gut may mean you have to keep taking new vaccines as new strains of COVID come out.

This Nobel Peace Prize winning virologist discusses fat gut and its role in COVID-19. I already started my fat gut reduction diet when I discovered this article but for me it reaffirms my beliefs. I personally created a diet that works great for me. Although I have only lost four pounds so far, none of it is water loss and it is all from my gut and I already feel a lot better.

For just 100 dollars I will send you my secret COVID-gut diet. 

KIDDING! Here it is. I start my day by drinking at least 2 eight ounce glasses of water in the morning. This does several good things. It washes out any toxins that may have built up from the day before. The 2 glasses of water keep me from feeling hunger pangs. When I do eat my first meal some time after the noon hour I am not thirsty so I am not co mingling fluids with the eating or digesting of my meal, yet I am already well hydrated from having my morning water.

My second meal is several hours later, and that is it, I basically substituted one meal for at least 2 full glasses of water (not necessary to take them at the same, I space them out). As people age, too much water becomes less water than at a younger age so know your limits when it comes to drinking water because the heart doesn't pump as strongly the older we get. Drinking too much water can be dangerous among the elderly.

Although I have only lost four pounds so far, I can tell it is all from my gut and none of it is water loss because I am drinking two glasses in the morning of water, plus another two glasses throughout the day, but never during or within two to three hours after eating.

Sadly, people with too much belly fat have been the unwitting troops of Government Vaccine regulators who like to point out how only drug and vaccine care can save the humans and that a fat, vaccine compliant human is to be lauded while a healthy, non overweight, non vaccinated human is the devil; when it is possible that food care, health care, and fat care also matter just as much, and maybe more, than if one is vaccinated or not.

Our Government's Vax centric mentality is so tunnel visioned that nobody knows how fat gut works to make someone vulnerable to COVID-19. It may be possible that a person does not even have to lose all of their fat gut to fight off future attacks of COVID-19, but what might be certain is losing some belly fat could make a big difference.

To reiterate, it's not just the drinking of water that can help one lose belly fat, it is strategically separating drinking water with eating and then separating drinking water with the digestion of the food that makes the water before noon diet work so well.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Arbery, Chauvin and Potter Murder trials expose a flaw in our judicial system, Vengeance Masquerading as Justice trumps Intent..

In the Ahmaud Arbery, Kim Potter and Derek Chauvin murder trials the judicial process was not based on finding the truth, the judicial process empowered Vengeance masquerading as Justice at the expense of the Truth.

In each of these three murder trials, yes, I think all three parties were guilty, but, not guilty of murder, and there in lies the problem. The Prosecutor sets the charges and the Defendants must fight for acquittal against these charges.

While innocent until proven guilty has been the de facto belief system in the United States regarding our court, the U.S. court system is actually based on the Prosecution setting the parameters for the trial that is to go forth, while the defense gets no say in what the Charges could be. This seems more like, guilty and good luck being found innocent because we stacked the charges in such a way that the jury must find the defendants guilty of inflated charges because there is no other option being presented.

Lets examine all three trials one at a time. Kim Potter mistakenly shot and killed Daunte Wright once Mr. Wright escalated the situation by trying to flee in his car. Clearly Kim Potter did something wrong, but the prosecution set the case up as either Murder, or Officer Potter walks. What if Officer Potter's defense could have presented their own Defense platter of charges and the Jury chooses which set of charges they will consider once all the evidence has been presented. Now we are talking dimensional chess in which both sides can legitimately convey their version of events and let the jury choose which set of charges they wish to consider.

Potter's defense could have offered the following three lesser charges, 

• unlawful pull over, 
• dereliction of duty after a tragedy has occurred, 
• Improper series of actions that allowed the defendant Wright access to his key and the driver's seat.
• Not guilty on the above charges

Meanwhile the Prosecution powers forward with their manslaughter and Murder charges.

Suddenly, the jury has a real choice. Obviously the three charges the Potter Defense could have put forward would be a reasonable alternative for the jury to consider if the jurors truly believed the shooting incident was an accident.

Instead, the jurors were caught in the unenviable situation of either innocent, and Officer Potter walks, or guilty of charges that maybe the Jurors thought were excessive but without any other choice, would go for the excessive charges because no other guilty options exist.

I will add to this topic later today.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Kyle Rittenhouse entire interview creates radically different vibe than shortened 10 second segment being used by Progressive Media that shows Kyle saying F.U. Lebron.

This can be a learning opportunity for the public. When news sites pull a very short clip from the middle of an hour long interview and pump it as showing Kyle Rittenhouse as being...whatever, whatever, Remember this is what was done to Donald Trump over and over.

Don't show a longer version of the clip, don't show that there were actually four people and a dog in a room, make it look like Kyle was running the show with a female side kick instead.

here is the REAL VERSION of the interview....

Progressive media is kicking around a version that basically shows a few seconds of Kyle before he says F.U. Lebron. The difference between watching the show, and watching just that short segment, is mind bending.

Now you know how Progressives cheat when they want to assassinate someone's character, they cherry pick a short enough clip that changes the narrative of what actually happened.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Kyle Rittenhouse Trial reveals how Armed Protectors of Property in the future can remove all doubt about carrying weapons

As I watched the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial, day 7 (November 10. 2021) it dawned on me that there was one point the Prosecution has repeatedly made...Lawbreaking Protestors should be afforded the identical rights that a lawful Protestor is entitled to, a point the Defense apparently was unable to challenge while Kyle Rittenhouse was repeatedly called a Killer by the Prosecution.

Going forward and in the future if there are identical types of Protests in which the Police have stood down and the Lawless Protestors have hidden among the Peaceful Protestors, and then peel off in small groups to vandalize, terrorize, commit arson and looting, Armed Volunteers may need to do something BEFORE they brandish weapons.

Volunteers who are committed to protecting property may need to have two types of Volunteers, the Unarmed Camera Volunteers who carry video cameras and not weapons, and the Armed Volunteers who carry actual weapons. Before the Armed Volunteers can brandish their weapons, the Camera Volunteers will need to document situations in which the non Peaceful Protestors are not heeding lawful orders designed to stop lawless behavior, lawless behavior being defined as behavior or actions that result in property destruction, rioting, looting, vandalism, or the building of fires or gathering of projectile objects.

To repeat, in the future, Volunteers will need to show video evidence that an escalation from Camera Volunteers to Armed Volunteers was necessary to protect property and prevent arson, looting, weaponizing, vandalism and rioting from occurring.

Volunteers will need to have two different units, an Unarmed Camera unit, and an Armed unit. The Camera unit can gesture they have armed back up if unlawful acts continue, but documentation  needs to exist that the Lawless Protestors were not complying with orders to not cause damage, mayhem, and fires BEFORE the armed volunteers can come forward to the edge of the properties being protected.

As abusive and somewhat ridiculously premised the Prosecution was towards Kyle Rittenhouse not needing to use his weapon when it was obvious Mr. Rittenhouse was dealing with Lawless Protestors who wanted to harm him, something positive can be taken from the Rittenhouse trial going forward. Armed Volunteers CANNOT be the first line of defense if Police are not present. Unarmed Camera Volunteers have to try and keep the peace and once it becomes evident they are in danger or are having to put themselves in danger to prevent fires or damage to property, then Armed Volunteers can come forward to stop illegal protesting that is going to lead to loss of property and the endangering of lives by starting fires or lobbing projectiles.

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial MUST BE ABOUT MORE THAN GUILTY OR INNOCENT, sensible rules need to be put in place going forward so we don't allow Big Government to make a proclamation that the mentally unstable have the right to destroy property without impunity from anyone who is not the Police even when the Police have had to stand down because they were the cause of the Protesting to begin with.

The real danger for Society from the Rittenhouse Trial is the Government using whatever verdict is reached to outlaw the armed protection of private property when Police are not present.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

New York Times fails to mention from where infrastructure components will be purchased.

Just curious where the components needed for all of the infrastructure projects just approved will be purchased from. Equally important, how much money will go towards bloated salaries during delays caused by lack of necessary components?

The California rail project has pretty much been a financial boondoggle for a decade as people who oversee the project get paid very handsome salaries even when nothing is built.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.