How Donald Trump and James Comey May Have Rigged the Election by having Trump Claim the Presidential Election would be Rigged.

March 31, 2023 Update: The suggestions DailyPUMA gave in 2016 would have most likely PREVENTED the possibility of ballot tampering that probably occurred in 2020 and may have changed the outcome of the Presidential Election. End of March 31, 2023 Update.

In DailyPUMA's opinion, there is definitely a Triangulation of strategy between James Comey & Donald Trump, classic Russian Diplomatic Strategy, and Russian Revenge that occured when Donald Trump stated during the third Presidential Debate that the upcoming Presidential Election was going to be rigged.

When Donald Trump warned everybody that the upcoming presidential election was going to be rigged, it was incumbent upon SOMEONE to do SOMETHING to ensure a fair election. The Department of Justice can't really spring into action since no crime has yet happened. So that would leave either the FBI or CIA to ensure an unrigged election.

Since James Comey of the FBI had already stepped into the presidential race once with his Hillary Clinton email investigation press conference during the summer of 2016, the logical assumption would be that James Comey would follow through on Donald Trump's accusation of an upcoming rigged election and put boots on the ground to assess Voting Stations all over the country and help assure a fair election, for all.

While the task of putting boots on the ground all over the country may seem daunting, each boot could have easily visited a dozen precincts and left contact information to report any suspicious activity to a central number where the call could be assessed.

If Boots all over the ground would prove too daunting a task, then the FBI STILL could have focused on specific groups that might be motivated to do vote manipulation. 

Perhaps both political sides have factions that do more than they should when it comes to voting regulations, but one thing is painfully clear, the NRA PAC, the NRA, and Hillary Clinton sparred several times during the campaign. The NRA's involvement with Russia well before the presidential election CLEARLY makes the NRA a group that needed to be watched to see if they were volunteering on election day at out of the way voting locations.

5,000 Rogue NRA members out of 5 million members is a small percentage of just 0.1% of total NRA membership, but that would be a large enough group to do whatever was needed to cast ballots in Trump's favor or make Clinton ballots not count in a myriad of ways in key battle ground states.

So what did James Comey do once he heard Donald Trump state during the third presidential debate that the presidential election was rigged? Comey basically did nothing in regards to Trump's concern. That's strange, don't you think? A presidential candidate makes a very public claim that the upcoming Presidential Election is going to be rigged, and Comey does nothing? Really?

Comey took several weeks in October getting a search warrant so e-mails on Huma Abedin's old computer could be viewed. Literally at the exact time that Comey should have been assessing and ensuring a fair election based on Donald Trump's rigged election claim, Comey was instead preparing for a second press conference about Hillary Clinton's emails just 10 days before the election.

This is beyond suspicious. 

How did Comey know he could go ahead with the second Clinton email press conference and basically do nothing about ensuring an unrigged election when Donald Trump had already stated on national television during a live presidential debate that the upcoming elections were rigged?

Comey could only choose to prioritize the Clinton email press conference over preventing the Rigging of an election if he knew the rigging of an election allegation was a clever strategy of accusing an opponent of the very thing one is doing themselves. Comey could only know to not take Trump's Rigged  Election accusation seriously if Comey knew the ulterior motive for Trump making the rigged comments, which was the defiant response from democrats and the media that such a claim could not be taken seriously.

When Fox News shows clips of Hillary Clinton at the third debate berating Trump for claiming the upcoming presidential Electon would be rigged, and then Fox uses that clip to ridicule anyone who ridiculed Trump's claim that the upcoming presidential would be rigged, keep in mind that at that time, when everyone ridiculed Trump for his accusation of a rigged election, the election had not yet been rigged!

This type of false regurgitation of facts in an incorrect sequence is what we have to look forward to for the next four years if the Electors don't change their votes on Dec. 19, 2016.

James Comey, who clearly influenced the election in Donald Trump's favor with his second press conference about emails, and who suspiciously knew he could ignore Donald Trump's rigged election accusations, is still in hiding until after the Electoral College Electors have voted on Dec. 19, 2016.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

RSS site makes copies of everybody's blog.

Dear RSS site that has stored all of my DailyPUMA articles without my permission, please stop.

1UpMGCZkXTFXfqCkb6cD  (that is the Ransome code Number they gave me to put into an article. Yep, I have been ransomed, but given the ransome code by the ransomers to stop being ransomed.

I am in a quandry, if I give out the link so others can see if their blogs are being copied without their knowledge, that is free advertising for that RSS siphoning site, if I don't, then people who read this will get annoyed because I have not linked to the site.

On the one hand, it's kind of cool that a back-up exists of DailyPUMA articles. On the other hand, that can undermine knowing if anyone is reading content since anyone can go there and never come here.

Weird, huh?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

What if the Reason Donald Trump wants Melania Trump to stay Behind at Trump Towers is to Guard their Secret Encrypted Server to Russia?

It kind of makes sense….  

….Mabye Donald Trump is freaking out over leaving Trump Towers "Unguarded" and someone accidentally discovers his Secret Encrypted Russian Server, therefore Melania Trump will stay behind to make sure nobody accidentally hits the lever that exposes the Secret Encrypted Russian Server.

But even if a Secret Encrypted Russian Server was the reason that Melania Trump is staying behind at Trump Towers, and even if a search warrant caught Trump off guard and The Secret Encrypted Russian Server turned out to really exist, Trump would just deny it, tell everyone to leave, and that would be that.

Hey, at least Trump hasn't shot someone in Times Square in the middle of the day in front of cheering schoolchildren, so we all have that to be grateful for.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Nate Silver Twitter Bombshell, Hillary Clinton would Almost Certainly be President if Elections had been held one day before James Comey's Second Press Conference".

Remarkably, Nate Silver has twittered that if the 2016 Presidential Election had been held one day before James Comey's second press conference, Hillary Clinton would Almost certainly be president. Please sign the James Comey Petition Demanding he hold a press conference before the Electoral College Voters, Vote.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Breaking News, Republicans May Have Forced FBI Director James Comey into Hiding until After the Electoral College Voters have Voted.

The Republican National Party may have forced James Comey into hiding until after the Electoral College Votes have been cast. Here is a link to the Electoral College Timeline.  There are several key dates, Apparently Dec. 19, 2016 is one key date, but Electoral College votes may attempt to have Electoral College Votes cast before that day as well?

Perhaps the Republican National Party will attempt some end around to try and get the Electoral College Votes passed ahead of the December 19, 2016 date.

The Republicans know that if FBI Director James Comey were to answer questions about his second press conference concerning Hillary Clinton's emails that he held just 10 days before the election, his honest answers could sway more than enough Electoral College Voters away from Donald Trump to deny him the presidency.

Questions the Republicans don't want FBI director James Comey to answer before the Electoral College has voted include:

1. Was Donald Trump being Investigated for anything, or was only Hillary Clinton under Investigation?

2. Once Donald Trump declared during the third presidential debate that the Upcoming Presidential Election voting was rigged, did the FBI put boots on the ground for the Presidential Election Process to ensure a fair election?

3. Did the FBI have boots on the ground for the Presidential Election Process knowing that the biggest anti Hillary Clinton Pac, the NRA PAC, would be volunteering at Voting Locations in several key battleground states?

4. Was assigning FBI agents a second batch of emails to investigate so close to election day more important than ensuring an unrigged election by having FBI agents on the ground actually profiling if the NRA had infiltrated the voting polling locations as volunteers?

5. Are you aware of the close relationship between the NRA and Russia?  Did that you give cause for concern?

6. Do you agree that Hillary Clinton had built up a considerable lead prior to your second email press conference that you held just ten days before Election day?

7. Who do you think would have won the 2016 presidential election if you had not called a second press conference so close to election day? Do you think your second press conference changed the vote totals for either president in any way?

8. Why was Donald Trump not being investigated for anything?

9. Did you consider the possibility that Donald Trump's Income Tax Situation, which he refused to publicly release, could have meant that he FUNDED his entire presidential campaign with Income Tax Evasion money?

10. Are you familar with U.S. vs Irby?

11. If you could do the Election Year over again, what would you do differently?

12. Would a Electoral College Elector be within their rights as a reasonable person to undo the damage that your second press conference about emails may have caused?

13. Donald Trump repeatedly called Hillary Clinton a criminal during the campaign even though Hillary Clinton has never been charged with a crime nor convicted of a crime. Did it concern you at all that Donald Trump was enriching himself and his chances for the presidency by intentionally lying about his opponents record to such an inflammatory extent. and using the public airwaves to do so?

14. Were you investigating ties between Donald Trump and the National Enquirer, which repeatedly made outrageous Headline Claims about Hillary Clinton. The Enquirer even reported their version of the future as fact in their Headlines. Considering that perhaps 10 million supermarket customers see those lying, damaging headlines every week, should not someone from the government stepped in and done something?

Calling James Comey, your country needs you to do the right thing and come out from hiding and hold a press conference where you answer questions rather than make accusations.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Was Comey's second press conference about Hillary Clinton's emails 10 days before the presidential election just a ruse to keep FBI Agents waddling in emails rather than observing the NRA's potential infiltration of Voter Polling Stations on Election Day?

Just how much damage did James Comey's second press conference actually do to Hillary Clinton's presidential chances? Perhaps even more than has been conveyed up until now.

Besides instantly reversing the upwardly trending popularity for Hillary Clinton and instantly increasing the popularity trend for Donald Trump, Comey's second press conference just 10 days before the 2016 presidential election may have had other deep consequences as well. While Comey made the Abedin emails a top FBI priority, FBI manpower that could have been deployed for election day fraud prevention was instead pulled, to check emails.

Hillary Clinton's feud with the NRA was known by everybody. The NRA PAC had raised 31 million dollars to defeat Hillary Clinton. Did the FBI deploy any manpower to make sure that Rogue NRA members, (we're literally talking less than .1% of NRA membership), were not volunteering at voter polling stations in key swing states on election day to possibly fill in ballots before the opening of voting, or to simply add votes for Trump or exclude votes for Clinton in other nefarious ways?

It would not take that much effort to add an extra 100 votes here and there at some of the thousands of precincts throughout several key states. Now comes word that the NRA had cozied up with Russia well before the presidential Elections. Forget internet hacking, what about just infiltrating voting locations on the day of the presidential election!

Was any FBI manpower devoted to checking into an alliance between the NRA and Russia?

We now find out that Michigan won't allow recounts to count if it is discovered that a precinct recount does not render the same vote totals that were tallied on election day! This basically means that any fraud done on election day at any precinct becomes valid once the fraud is counted on election day, and can never be undone!

The list of shady vote counts grows, Wisconsin, Michigan and North Carolina all LOWERED Donald Trump's vote count total once it was known that the recounts were going to happen. 

We now find out that the same Detroit area that had a notoriously low vote turnout in the Michigan primary, also may have had dozens of broken voting machines in the actual presidential election. And if any new votes are found, then the new results are invalidated because it changes the vote total from election day and the prior vote results are the ones that are counted instead!

Meanwhile, James Comey is analyzing redundant emails. Apparently, whether it's wabbit season or duck season, for James Comey and the FBI, it's always email season.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

NRA Russia connection would mean no Internet Hack of 2016 Presidential Election Required to Alter Vote Counts.

All three Recount States reduced Donald Trump's victory margin by tens of thousands of votes before the Recount began.

The NRA has 5 million members. The NRA PAC raised 31 million dollars to defeat Hillary Clinton. Why were NRA members allowed to volunteer at the precinct voting stations the day of the Presidential Election?

It would literally take just a few thousand Russian/NRA members out of Five million NRA members to volunteer at key precinct stations to each add an extra 100 votes to various out of the way precincts in favor of Trump. 

The ballots would be filled out before the voting locations opened, and the votes added at some point early on or any point during the day when the station had no voters to observe the fraud. Could have even  happened after the polls closed.

Perhaps there is no direct evidence of an NRA/Russian connection, but if nobody looks for a possible connection, they won't know if one exists.

If Russia, through the NRA, was able to stuff ballots in small out of the way precincts, then the last laugh is on the U.S. for the accusation that Russia hacked the election. The stranger than life comedy is Russian NRA members could have just walked right in and done it as volunteers via the NRA on election day. It would only take .1% of NRA members (5,000 members) to alter the 2016 election results.

So when does the FBI investigate how many NRA members volunteered to work at a precinct voting station on November, 08, 2016? Were there precinct voting locations that featured a cluster of NRA members? It would actually take an incredibly small amount of Russian NRA members (500) to lead other NRA members who truly believed that Hillary Clinton wanted to take their guns away. 500 Russian NRA members out of 5 million equals .01% of the NRA membership.

We already know that Wisconsin had to reduce Trump's votes by a total of 5,000 votes because some precincts had more votes for Trump than the precinct had voters. If that isn't a smoking gun, than what is?

Doesn't anyone investigate anything anymore?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

ReCounting the Votes in Wisconsin apparently only involves recounting ballots. Deplorable Ballots that may have been fraudulently filled out will simply be counted again as being valid.

According to Wisconsin Recounting Rules, Recounting Wisconsin Votes simply means re-checking all the ballots that were submitted as votes. However, a fraudulently filled out ballet will look no different from a valid ballot using this rather simple recounting method.

The NRA had a PAC that raised 31 million dollars in support of Donald Trump and the idea of just one percent of NRA membership being able to tilt the election to Donald Trump is beyond alarming.

If just one percent of the NRA membership had served as precinct volunteers on election day and engaged in vote fraud by filling in ballots with Donald Trump as president, those votes would simply be counted again in a recount. And, if rogue NRA members had disposed of Clinton votes, those votes would not exist in the recount either!

DailyPUMA strongly suggests that ALL NRA Members who volunteered on November 8th, 2016 to serve at precinct voting locations be tallied up to see if there were clusters of NRA members at any precinct voting locations.

One percent of NRA membership serving as rogue volunteers would mean FIFTY THOUSAND members participated as volunteers. Considering the vote differences from the three states being recounted is barely over one hundred thousand votes, that would mean a mere five extra votes by each NRA rogue volunteer would have EASILY changed the results in the swing states, the states Trump had to win to win the election.

Why is DailyPUMA harping on the NRA? Hillary Clinton openly went after them during the campaign, and it's just not a stretch to imagine one percent of the NRA being Deplorable enough to engage in illegal voting activity.

The Precinct Signature books MUST be analyzed to verify the voting totals match between signatures and ballots cast. And then, the signatures need to be checked to make sure one person didn't sign the book on behalf of others who didn't bother to vote.

And then, the unused ballots must be added into the total to make sure that all ballots made it back.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

There cannot be a legitimate Presidential Recount if the Precinct Signature Book that each voter signs prior to voting is not being Reexamined.

Once Again the media does not do it's job in regards to explaining how the recount works. First there was the posturing from several different media groups that the recount should not be done.  

Now that the recount is simply a verification that each candidate got their correct share of ballot votes, the media has once again ignored the elephant in the room, literally I might add.

The total number of votes per precinct should match up with the total number of signatures in the signature precinct book that each voter signs when they vote.  Maybe each state does it differently, but in California each voter first signs the precinct signature book and then they are handed their ballot. They then walk directly to a voting cubicle, slide the ballot into an ink a dot receptacle, and fill out their ballot. The voter then inserts their ballot into a machine that registers their vote.

The recount reporting has been so atrocious that DailyPUMA has no idea if the three states being recounted use signature books, or perhaps each voter signs the actual ballot or the paper holder that each ballot is placed inside? I am presuming the voters use precinct signature books to sign that they voted.

Are the total number of signatures from the Precinct signature books matching up to the total number of ballots being cast for that precinct? And, were the rest of the unused ballots returned so that each precinct returned the exact same number of ballots that they received?

Simply having volunteers inspect a ballot and then count that ballot completely misses how voter fraud would occur. 

Fraud happens when one person fills out multiple ballots. Simply verifying that a potential fraudster filled out the multiple ballots correctly, without comparing signature totals per precinct to the number of ballots filled out per precinct, does not promote voting integrity.

Furthermore, the signatures in the books need to be evaluated to see if a certain handwriting style may have signed on behalf of several people who may not have voted.

There is also the issue of the NRA being allowed to volunteer on November  8th, 2016. Since the NRA was one of Trump's biggest PAC's, their members should not have been allowed within a hundred feet of any voting location unless it was to vote, and then leave.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

What Voter Fraud really looks like.

Look at the Voter Signature books that every Voter signs. Look to see if different signatures look like they could have been signed by the same person. Add up the signatures in the voter signature books, compare that total to the total votes cast at that precinct.

My vision of 2016 voter fraud is an NRA member sitting off somewhere in a corner filling out ballots, and the above scenario is one way to verify that no one was stuffing the ballot box.

And once again DailyPUMA asks, why were NRA members who all belong to a pro Republican PAC that raised 31 million dollars allowed to be volunteers at voting stations?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Recount Volunteers needed, Deplorables need not Apply.

Please go to this link to get more info on how you can be a Recount Volunteer.  

If you are an NRA member and worked at a voting booth on November 8, 2016, or the days leading up to November 8, 2016, and definitely if you were still there November 9th, 2016 ginning the vote, please go to your local police station and turn yourself in for being within one hundred feet of a voting location for purposes other than voting, while also belonging to the biggest Anti Clinton PAC in the country.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

NRA ReCount Smoking Gun. How many NRA members were allowed to work at voting locations for the 2016 Presidential Elections?

NRA members should not have been allowed to work at any voting locations since they were dedicated to defeating Hillary Clinton and even had their own Anti Clinton Super PAC that raised well over 10 million dollars.  Wait, make that 31 million dollars.

How many NRA members were permitted to work in some capacity at ballot locations? There are approximately 4 million to 5 million NRA members. The NRA membership represents about 1 in 15 Trump Voters. The typical voting location requires between 5 to 10 people to operate. So statistically speaking, if we use 7.5 people per voting location, one out of every two voting locations would have one NRA member!

Jill Stein should petition each state that they have the right to know if NRA members were manning voting locations and the right to review and recount the results from those locations.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

How Hillary Clinton could win the three recount states and still lose the presidency, Remember Florida and Michigan in 2008?

If there were voting "errors" in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and the "errors" either tip each state to Hillary Clinton or the totals become so ridiculously close as to be nothing more than a tie, one solution could be to split each state's electoral college in half. 

But without recounts in North Carolina and Florida as well, where there may have been some type of ginning of the vote, splitting the electoral college in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin would still give Donald Trump a victory, while wink, wink, nudge nudge, North Carolina and Florida are left alone.

Trump could also demand that New Hampshire's electoral college be split as well since that was a very close result in Hillary Clinton's favor.

The Republicans have postulated that the purpose of the three recounts is to delay the electoral college ratification long enough so that Trump does not have enough electoral college votes by the electoral college deadline. 

However the Republicans could have a "plan b" if something  and "generously" offer the three recounted states electoral college votes be split in half were a recount to show significant movement in Hillary Clinton's favor. This "split the recounted states" electoral college votes could also take scrutiny off of why the original vote totals were so far off to begin with.

What would the math look like if the electoral college votes were split in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida, North Carolina and New Hampshire. 

So lets do it. Where we stand right now is Clinton has 232 Electoral Votes, Trump has 306.

If the 3 state recount of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania resulted in an electoral college split,  the new totals would be 255 for Clinton, 283 for Trump. This would allow the Republicans to claim they have bent over backwards to accommodate the democrats and independents while diverting attention away from the possibility of who actually initiated the original inaccurate vote totals.

If Florida were recounted and were Clinton to barely win,  t thus splitting the electoral college vote in Florida, the totals would be 269.5 Clinton, 268.5 Trump.

However Trump could legitimately demand that New Hampshire's 4 electoral college votes be split because it was closer than every other state except for Michigan, and that would give Trump 270.5, Clinton 267.5. (Although one could argue New Hamsphire might not have been as close if a recount were done).  

This would leave North Carolina. If NC had a recount and it was deemed either a Clinton victory or too close to call, and its electoral college were split, that would give Clinton 275 and Trump 263.

So the Republicans have a failsafe back up plan in which they can simply offer to split the electoral college in the event the results become so agonizingly close in the three states that apparently are going to be recounted. 

The conclusion is, without North Carolina and Florida being recounted as well, Hillary Clinton may not win even if she barely squeaks out recount victories in the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania because the Republicans can counter by "Magnanimously" offering to split the electoral college votes in the three recounted states.

I would like to see Florida, North Carolina and New Hampshire added to the recount because without Florida and North Carolina, splitting the electoral college gives the Republicans a false flag of magnanimosity to wave while drawing attention away from what caused the inaccurate tallies that originally favored Trump. Please add Florida and North Carolina to the recounts.

Or…what I would like to see is the democrats do specific precinct recounts in a multitude of states, even in red states that had no chance of going for Clinton. Part of a winning the electoral college strategy is to make sure the popular vote is not too far out of balance.  

If a pattern emerges in which each state had precincts in which more votes were cast for Trump than the total number of voters in that precinct, that would help with the vote your conscience meme that is being floated out to the electoral college community.

For that reason, I would like to see targeted recounts in North Carolina and Florida just to make sure there was no funny business going on, and I would even consider a red state or two as well.

Lets face it, there was so much hate heaped upon Hillary Clinton from the truly vast conservative blogosphere, a conservative blogosphere that is easily 20 times as big as the pro Clinton blogosphere, along with Trump repeatedly calling Hillary Clinton a criminal, and along with the crazy arse stuff that the National Enquire and Globe came out with on average 2 out of every 4 to 6 issues during the campaign season, plus NewsMax and Newsbusters, that DailyPUMA believes there could have been motivation to gin the vote in the rural parts of certain states.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Presidential Concession speeches are based upon a gentleman's and gentlewoman's agreement that there was no electoral college changing mistakes made in the initial election results, to imply otherwise is to be a typical Republican.

The more the Republicans and the Media protest the recount votes, the more I wish recounts could be done in North Carolina and Florida as well. The gentleman's and gentlewoman's agreement is OBVIOUSLY voided if a recount proves the original vote was tampered with to a point that it changes the outcome of a particular state, or, if it changes the result a significant amount.

Furthermore, if a recount proves that Wisconsin, Michigan or Pennsylvania shows a significant shift in vote totals, then other recounts for North Carolina and Florida should also be done as well, even if they are after the deadline, they would be triggered by a situation never encountered before. This would give grounds for legal arguments involving equitable estoppel and or tolling to allow additional recounts to occur if the first three recounts reveal anything noteworthy.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

How to catch North Carolina's alleged DMV voter suppression tactics over the past several months.

Cannonfire links to a disturbing letter from a DMV worker in North Carolina who claims DMV offices with higher minority  percentages had trouble re-registering voters due to fax machine errors, yet the fax machines in the non-minority districts worked fine.

There may be a way to determine if intentional voter registration fraud occurred at North Carolina DMV offices. A properly functioning fax machine that is sending an applicant's voter representation data will require a certain amount of time to transmit the data. If the voter registration applications are similar in nature, then the actual time to transmit each fax correctly may be a constant.

However, an improperly working fax machine may either take much less time, or much more time, than the acknowledged average for a functioning fax machine while attempting to send the same data.

Perhaps simply comparing the fax machine times between the districts where the voter registration by fax machines were working properly versus the districts where the fax machines were not working properly might reveal if in fact there was an ongoing scam to thwart voter registration in the districts more likely to vote for Hillary Clinton.

Remember, DMV workers complained incessantly about the problem and were told to ignore the fax error warnings, and that is why criminal actions and intent could be involved if those faxes never made it through. Here is a direct link to the story.

And I recall in 2008 Bill Clinton making the rounds in the small towns of North Carolina, towns that on average had 8,000 to 10,000 populations. If there was voter fraud in Wisconsin, then there probably was voter fraud among all that sea of red in the smaller towns of North Carolina.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Wisconsin Recount a go...

(Update, Dec. 02, 2016, 2:45 am). What is the worst that can happen? The ballots get recounted while no one compares those totals to the signature books. 

So what is the worst that can happen, 2 of the 3 states up for recount swing to Hillary Clinton, Trump barely wins. I would like to see Florida and Arizona recounted as well.

Instead of Exit Polls, how did the Presidential Candidates do when compared to how the Governors did from the same state?

I find it suspicious that North Carolina voted for a democrat governor over an incumbent Republican Governor, but voted for a Republican President by over a 100,000 vote plurality. There may be something going on. 

Instead of just focusing on the exit polls, I would be curious to see how the presidential candidates did as compared to the candidates for Governor in the same state, and then compare those comparisons with previous presidential elections.

However, the fact remains, Hillary Clinton was REInvestigated by the FBI, and Trump was not even Investigated once.  Please sign the Change dot org petition if you want to make sure that Donald Trump is vetted.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Change dot Org ReAudit Trump Petition reaches 100 signatures in less than a day.

Please share and promote the ReAudit Trump petition.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

DailyPUMA Dredges its Swamp, adds a favorites column on the left side top of the page.

Don't give up, please support the Change dot org ReAudit Trump Petition, and keep writing. 

If you are not listed in the Newly Created DailyPUMA favorites section, but are an alleged Hillary Clinton supporter, you can ask to join, however, if you are a douche that has banned DailyPUMA from posting on your site, well, you know what to do before asking to be added.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

ReAudit Trump is now a Change dot org Petition and a Facebook Page.

The Change dot org ReAudit Trump Petition just started, so the petition has one signature, mine. Won't you be the second?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

James Comey FBI Press Conferences about Hillary Clinton's emails, why did all the reporters present miss the Bigger Picture?

During the first and second James Comey FBI press conferences about Hillary Clinton's emails, something didn't seem right. I felt as if the reporters were being one tracked. They were at the press conference to hear about one of the presidential candidates emails.

But what about the other presidential candidate. Are we to believe that the FBI was not investigating Donald Trump about Trump University, about his blatant lying over the airwaves whenever he called Hillary Clinton a criminal, an FCC violation, what about the possibility that Donald Trump may have funded his entire presidential campaign with income tax evasion money? 

Lets not also forget possible FTC violations by the National Enquirer, an avowed ally of Donald Trump that repeatedly flouted their own headlines with over the top, outlandish statements that the Enquirer represented as fact rather than their own opinion. 

Yet none of the reporters present had the presence of mind to enlarge the scope of the James Comey, FBI Hillary Clinton email press conference to ask the million dollar question, are you telling us that Hillary Clinton is under investigation by the FBI, but that Donald Trump is not? Just this one question, one question, would have created a more balanced press conference because as soon as Comey answered it, either way, it would have opened up the floodgates as to the possibility the FBI was targeting Hillary Clinton while giving Donald Trump a free ride.

Why was the media so caught up in the feeding frenzy of the moment to not ask the bigger picture presidential question, on two different occasions? The Answer is probably Social Media. Social Media seems to have created a publicity feeding frenzy in which the reporter who firstt reports about a press conference is considered the winner, irrespective of how poor a job that same reporter did trying to scope out what is being bypassed at the press conference.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Donald Trump Fires Chris Christie for Prosecuting Tax Evading Son-in-Laws Father.

The Plot thickens as Donald Trump, the possible billion dollar tax evader who would have been able to fund his entire presidential campaign with that tax evasion money, fires Chris Christie for prosecuting his son in law's tax evading father back in 2004. 

Firing a man for doing his job, when that job was going after a Tax Evader, sure points a smoking gun at Trump's own income tax peccadilloes.

ReAudit Trump is now on facebook, please like us.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

How to Delay Donald Trump's Inauguration, yes, it's possible.

The IRS may have let Donald Trump walk away with a billion dollars of taxpayer money. Donald Trump may have funded his entire campaign with tax evasion money. This too needs to be audited by someone outside of the IRS. Reaudittrump

The FBI had no investigations on Donald Trump? Is that possible? If the FBI had an investigation on Donald Trump, why did not James Comey mention that at his press conference on Hillary Clinton's emails? If the FBI had no investigations on Donald Trump, then, WTF!

Donald Trump most likely violated FCC rules when he kept stating that Hillary Clinton was a criminal. This like yelling fire in a crowded room when there is no fire, Hillary Clinton has never been charged nor convicted of a crime. The FCC must be prodded into action over what Trump did.  

Please don't rely on the Occupy Movement to help, they don't give a crap about Hillary Clinton, those protests have very little to do with Hillary Clinton. YOU have to make a difference by joining the ReauditTrump Movement.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

ReAudit Trump is now online on Facebook, Please Join.

Most of the info shared here will also be shared on ReAuditTrump. Please click the link and like the Facebook page.

Lets create a constructive movement with a tangible mission, did Donald Trump bully his way into almost a billion dollars worth of IRS income tax evasion deductions, more than enough money to fund his entire presidential campaign?

If the answer turns out to be yes, then the FBI must then explain how Hillary Clinton was being investigated in regards to her emails while Donald Trump was not being investigated regarding his income tax issues.

Please share this article and join on facebook.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Donald Trump puts on his Poker Face during his Sixty Minutes Interview, states nobody cares about his income taxes.

Donald Trump bluffed his still losing hand on Sixty Minutes last night. Trump stated that nobody cares about his income taxes.

Of course it's hard to care about Donald Trump's Income Taxes when he refuses to make his IRS filings public, just as it is easier to care about Hillary Clinton emails when FBI director James Comey twice calls out Hillary Clinton as being under investigation and holds a press conference each time to do it.

Write letters to Loretta Lynch, ask her to have Donald Trump's Income Taxes Audited by an Independent Tax Committee. Whether or not Trump is found to be a tax evader, immediately write James Comey asking why the FBI either suppressed their Income Tax Investigation on Donald Trump from being made public while Hillary Clinton's email investigation was made public, twice, or…. why did the FBI perhaps not even have an investigation on a possible tax dodger who used his potentially tax dodge money to run for the presidency of the United States.

Also ask Loretta Lynch, why is it ok for a candidate running for president to openly lie about his opponent by calling her a criminal when she has never been indicted or found guilty of a crime. Yelling fire in a crowded room when there is no fire is supposed to be illegal, what Donald Trump did was the same thing, he called his opponent a criminal even though she has never been indicted or been convicted of a crime.

The Tempered Glass Ceiling is to some degree shatter proof when the good old boys network stands on it from above. To shatter the Good Old Boys who stand above the Tempered Glass Ceiling, it will actually require women to break through, not the men who are already in power.

Please Share this article.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Occupy Protest against the 2016 Presidential results and Donald Trump need a Next Step, as in Protesting the IRS and the FBI.

One problem I have always had with the Occupy Movement is the inability to manifest empathy for others, someone not exactly like themselves. The Occupy Movement is first fueled by personal anger at a perceived injustice, but that anger does not seem to translate in such a way that truly creates change.

Lost among the Occupiers who feel personally threatened by Donald Trump is their lack of empathy for the slander that Trump projectile vomited on a speech by speech basis at Hillary Clinton. Calling someone a criminal, when that person has never been convicted of a crime, is basically a slanderous and possibly criminal act if either the projectiler is rewarded by their act of slander, or the recipient of the slander is harmed in some way.

The real threat to all of us, including Trump voters, is the possibility that a very wealthy man may have paid for his entire presidential campaign with what could actually be tax evasion money, while simultaneously being buttressed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation that saw fit to report on the Hillary Clinton email investigation, twice. The FBI never mentioned if they  had even bothered to investigate Donald Trump's potential tax evasion money that so significant it was more than enough to run for president.

People talk about Trump being given 10 million dollars by his father 50 years ago and how he then turned that 10 million into billions of dollars as not being much different than taking the original 10 million and simply putting it into stocks and bonds back then and letting it multiply.

In the newest version of that scenario, how about being given close to one billion dollars to run for president, money that was not earned, but money that was actually deducted from 20 straight years of income tax filings. It appears the FBI is ok with a potential tax cheat recycling money to run for president, money that maybe was never really theirs, with nary a peep as to whether or not such an act would be a cause of concern to the FBI.

A tempered glass ceiling pattern does emerge. Martha Stewart, a female, went to jail when a male acquaintance encouraged her to invest in his company, then allegedly warned her to sell her stock just before the stock crashed. Meanwhile Donald Trump may have bullied his way into an almost 50 million dollar a year tax deduction for a 20 year period of time, and there isn't even an investigation by the FBI?

It seems like a tempered glass ceiling does exist, one which allows males to bully their way until they get what they want while woman continue to walk on egg shells when they are under investigation.

If the Occupiers know how to pivot, they would be pivoting to the IRS and the FBI, demanding a new audit of Donald Trump's entire 20 year, almost one billion dollars in income tax deductions. They would also want to know why the FBI did not feel it necessary to vet Donald Trump to make sure he was not funding his entire presidential campaign on what could turn out to be a phony tax deduction scheme.

The IRS Statute of Limitations has not run its course from Trump's original 1995 filing simply because the IRS statute of limitations clock does not begin until the last tax deduction benefit that is in question, has been taken. In Trump's case, that may be just a year or two ago and therefore still subject to review.

Just look at the facts, Martha Stewart goes to jail when a male business owner first confides in her to invest in his company, then warns her when things go South. According to Donald Trump (another male), claims Hillary Clinton is a criminal even though she has never been convicted of a crime. Meanwhile another male, James Comey of the FBI has to literally trump up the Hillary Clinton email investigation to the public on two separate occasions. Yet Donald Trump may be the one who committed such an outlandish act of Income Tax Evasion to the point where he was able to fund his entire presidential campaign, and Comey is nowhere to be seen when it came to notifying the american people if Mr.Trump was under investigation.

The Good Old Boys Network continues to rule if protestors don't get focused on the core issue, has Trump been properly vetted over his IRS tax filings and why wasn't the FBI letting the American People know that Mr. Trump was also under investigation.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

The Good Old Boys Network at the IRS and the FBI Gifts Donald Trump the 2016 Presidential Election.

Are you curious how the IRS vs Donald Trump, 50 million dollar a year, 20 consecutive years tax deduction write-offs negotiations were conducted?  

Some good old boys tax attorneys from the IRS mingled with Donald Trump's good old boys attorneys. They discussed, they laughed, they agreed that Donald Trump can deduct close to 50 million dollars a year for the next 20 years, starting in the mid 90's and ending perhaps around 2015. Was an investigation ever done to make sure no quid pro quo occurred? I bet Martha Stewart would interested considering she went to jail for a far less egregious act then possibly tax evading 50 million dollars a year for 20 straight years.

Donald Trump was basically able to run his entire 2016 presidential campaign on what might actually be tax evasion money that the Good Old Boys Network agreed Donald Trump should have. 

Meanwhile the average American cannot restructure a debt without first being placed into default, forced to pay penalties, and then have their credit rating hurt for seven years and interest rate charges amped up for a new loan. Do you think any of those things happened to Donald Trump?

But the Good Old Boys Network was just beginning. The FBI twice exposed Hillary Clinton's FBI email dossier during the presidential campaign, the second one actually destroyed all the momentum Hillary Clinton had attained from her three debates with Donald Trump. 

Yet the good old boys network at The FBI suppressed their Donald Trump IRS dossier.

Oh wait, maybe you think there isn't a Donald Trump FBI dossier on his possibly using close to one billion dollars in tax evasion money to fund his entire presidential campaign. 

If there is no FBI dossier on Donald Trump's close to 50 million dollars a year tax deduction for 20 consecutive years, that would just prove there is a Good Old Boy's Network. If there is a Donald Trump FBI dossier on his close to one billion dollar possible tax evasion, then why was it suppressed during the presidential campaign while Hillary Clinton's FBI email dossier was twice exposed? The Good Old Boys network, that's how.

Women in Obama's administration better stand up and protect Hillary Clinton, because Barack Obama probably won't go against the Good Old Boys Network. Instead of waiting for orders from Barack Obama, orders that may never come, Attorney General Loretta Lynch should order a review of how the IRS and Donald Trump's attorney's handled Trump's almost one billion dollars in tax relief. 

No, the IRS statute of limitations has not run out in regards to Trump's close to one billion dollars in Questionable Tax Relief. U.S. vs Irby found that the statute of limitations clock begins after the last tax evasion has ended. If Donald Trump has been taking close to 50 million dollars a year in tax deductions starting around 1995 and continuing through 2015, then all of his claimed deductions can be revoked, and he would have to pay fines and penalties as well. He could possibly face criminal charges as well.

Loretta Lynch, don't wait for a male to tell you when to do an investigation against other males. It's bad enough that the FBI suppressed their intel on Donald Trump's massive IRS tax break, what's worse is they felt no reticence when it came to twice publicly reporting their investigation of Hillary Clinton emails while suppressing their dossier on Donald Trump's IRS tax dodge.

The Good Old Boy's Network doesn't think its a big deal that the FBI suppressed Donald Trump's FBI dossier over his possible one billion dollars in tax evasion money, enough money to run for president of the United States. Yet the Good Old Boy's Network twice exposed their internal investigation into Hillary Clinton, and put Martha Stewart in jail for simply selling stocks at the advice of the person who first sold her the stocks.

This needs to be made right. Donald Trump's income tax returns need to be vetted by an outside source, and the FBI needs to explain why they suppressed their own dossier on Donald Trump possibly using Tax Fraud to win the presidency of the United States.

Are we really supposed to believe the FBI would allow any billionaire to fund their entire presidential run on potentially fraudulent IRS tax deductions? Even the good old boys network can't be that accommodating, can they?

Please Share This DailyPUMA article.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Stunning Revelation, FBI suppressed Donald Trump's FBI Dossier during the Presidential Campaign while Publicly Exposing Hillary Clinton's FBI Dossier on Multiple Occasions.

Is the good old boys network still in play? What else can be said for the FBI suppressing their dossier on Donald Trump while publicly revealing their dossier on Hillary Clinton throughout the presidential campaign, you know, when millions of americans were trying to decide who was a more ethical candidate?

The FBI publicly revealing Hillary Clinton's FBI email dossier on multiple occasions while suppressing  Donald Trump's FBI Tax Evasion dossier created an un level playing field in which Donald Trump could chortle at every stop he made that Hillary Clinton was under criminal investigation, and therefore a criminal (a slanderous leap I might add) while Hillary Clinton could not counter that Donald Trump was under investigation as well, because the FBI suppressed their Donald Trump dossier.

In case you missed it, the IRS has apparently allowed Donald Trump's 20 year, almost 50 million dollar a year tax dodge without any real investigation. The US vs IRBY court case from 2012 specifically states that the statute of limitations for Income Tax Fraud does not start until the actual tax evasion act ends. 

So even though Donald Trump filed for his almost 1 billion dollar tax write off 20 years ago to the tune of around 50 million dollars a year for 20 years, the statute of limitations on Donald Trump's filings don't start until the last of his tax evasion efforts have been completed, which may have been in just the past year or two, well short of the six year or ten year statute of limitations that apply to most cases.

Meanwhile, FBI director James Comey suppressed the FBI dossier on Donald Trump possibly funding his entire presidential election run with tax evasion money from the American People even as James Comey was publicly  commenting on numerous occasions about an FBI investigation against Hillary Clinton.

This  has to be made to be right. You protestors need to focus your protest on the IRS building and the FBI building.  The IRS needs to be held accountable for trying to fix massive Donald Trump tax evasion fraud issues behind closed doors with a wink, wink, nudge nudge, and the FBI has to be held accountable for not publicly disclosing their dossier on Donald Trump and his tax evasion issues in a manner comparable to how they publicly "handled" their Hillary Clinton email investigation.

Don't believe the FBI when they deny they were investigating Donald Trump. Anyone who tax evades a billion dollars and then uses that tax evasion money to run for president of the U.S. has a dossier with the FBI. Why the FBI chose to suppress their Donald Trump tax evasion dossier while publicizing their Hillary Clinton email investigation is something the FBI and James Comey need to explain, immediately.

Please Share this article.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

How Donald Trump Tricked the Media and the Clinton Campaign with his refusal to accept the Presidential Voting results if he had lost.

Donald Trump used his eight years worth of experience as host of Apprentice and Celebrity Apprentice to trick his oppponents regarding whether or not he would challenge the results. Trump's actual goal was not just to reserve the right to challenge the results, Trump's other goal was to make sure that the democrats would not challenge any aspect of the campaign or the result by getting the democrats to demand that he accept the results. 

The Trump "it's rigged tactic" may protect him from prosecution in his almost one billion dollars probable tax evasion audit. The Democrats would look pretty foolish now if they did challenge any aspect of the results, so it appears Donald Trump the Billion Dollar Tax Evader who used his income tax evasion money to run for president, will not be charged with any crime even as he called his counter part a criminal over and over and over. Nor will Trump have to pay back about 3 billion dollars when IRS penalties are tacked on.

One technique that is commonly used yet never noticed on television shows like the Apprentice is the "go back" technique in which a host can ask a question days a comment was made by a respondent. The "go back" allows the host to have an intelligent question inserted preceding a comment made by a respondent. When Trump stated he felt the election was rigged, he got the media and the democrats to demand  Trump accept the results, which basically meant the democrats ceded their own right to challenge the election. Trump created a "reverse go back" in which the media and the Clinton campaign cannot challenge anything.

The reason this is a big deal now is Trump's refusal to release his income tax returns meant no one would figure out that because of U.S. vs IRBY court case of 2012, Trump was still liable for the probable income tax fraud that netted him close to a billion dollars in income tax evasion over the past 20 years.

The intertwining issue with Trump's income tax evasion that has not been brought up, why wasn't the FBI reviewing Donald Trump's probable income tax evasion since the amount of money that was evaded was MORE than ENOUGH to pay for his entire presidential campaign. One presume's income tax evading enough money to pay for one's entire presidential election would be cause for the FBI to investigate.

One would think it would behoove the FBI to monitor and evaluate if Donald Trump was using income tax evasion money to run for the presidency while making it look like he to his supporters that he was funding his campaign with his own money.

If the FBI had no dossier on Donald Trump and his Income Tax Evasion actions, why not?  If the FBI had a dossier on Donald Trump and his Income Tax Evasion actions, why did they keep quiet about it while going on and on about Hillary Clinton's emails?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.