Lack of context regarding emails keeps nullifying anyone who is sane from having a legitimate opinion.

Context, Context, Context. Where is it?

I can't recall the FBI releasing even one email of any prior Secretary of State prior to Hillary Clinton for everyone to compare to Hillary Clinton's emails. Were there similar emails to what Hillary Clinton sent, were there emails sent "unsecured"? Haven't allegedly hack proof government servers been hacked? Are we to believe that our government officials don't mix in erroneous info on their computer devices so that if they were hacked, it might actually derail the hackers moreso than help them.

Now it's the Democrat Convention. I can't recall one email from the Republican National Committee to compare to the Democrat National Committee's emails.

Are we to believe that not one Republican National Committee email exists that asks how to derail Donald Trump? To continue to tarnish Hillary Clinton?

Where is the context between the focus on the Democrat National Committee emails, and the Republican National Committee emails?

Ah, but this all falls into what Trump and Sanders were saying about each political party not wanting outsiders to win. Both Sanders and Trump used out bounds methods against the more mainstream candidates, so of course the party is going to be concerned.

The long list of campaign wrongs by Donald Trump are well beyond my scope, but a few to point out would be his fraudulent use of Trump Steaks, (as if they actually existed) during a press conference after he had won a very early primary. Trump made it sound like Trump Steaks actually existed and he was offering it up as proof that America can be great again and that we can make things again in this country, just like his fake Trump steaks.

Trump should have been censored and not allowed to run in the next set of primaries for that gaffe. The fact that he was let alone and allowed to use that fraudulent press conference to INCREASE his momentum dwarfs all the disdain that was directed at him. If Trump had been sanctioned for his steak fraud presser, he would not have become the Republican nominee.

Trump's attacks against Cruz's wife in which he used a picture that depicted Ms. Cruz as having just finished off a raw prarie rabbit without any utensils other than her teeth, also fell out of the bounds of decency. Trump was outraged because a picture of his wife in a negligee had been tweeted. I still can't figure out how a super hot picture of one's wife, a picture she voluntarily posed for and was probably paid to pose for, equates with showing a picture of his chief competitor's wife with what looks like blood streaks streaming down from her mouth and lips.

As for Bernie Sanders, his ongoing and repetitive insinuation that Hillary Clinton would be beholden to Wall Street was an unprovable accusation, and in light of the very off hands treatment Sander's own wife got for what looks like gross mismanagement of college funds, was an accusation he never should have made.

And Sanders also kept touting his caucus wins as being equivalent to Hillary Clinton's primary wins, which is fraud in my opinion since it takes 90% less votes to win a caucus then if that same state had held a primary instead. And then to top it off, the Sander's people said it was unfair that independents could not vote as democrats in the primaries. This stuff is just so beguiling that neither the Republican party nor the Democrat party should be apologizing to either Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders. Yes, the entire email issue has been trumped up.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Did Wiki Leaks leak info to Sanders people well ahead of everyone else?

I smell a double leak from Wiki Leaks. 

I smell a pre-leak to Sander's people several months before the leaks were leaked to everyone else. 

Is it ethical for a leaker to pre-leak hacked emails to some, while hiding the leaked documents from others? 

Is it ethical for the receivers of the leaked email documents to use the information while promising to stay quiet about the leaks?

When did the Sanders people know about the leaked emails?  

Are there no ethics among leakers?

Didn't Bernie Sander's people smear Hillary Clinton personally with conjecture while the Clinton campaign basically took it on the chin and kept going? I think so.

If at some point DNC people saw the Sander's group overstating caucus wins as being as significant as primary wins, then I have no problem with them trying to level the playing field.

Did you know that Hillary Clinton won 28 primaries and Bernie Sanders only won 12 primaries? You probably did not know Hillary Clinton won 70% of all democrat primaries because the Sander's people kept mixing in all those tainted caucus results to make it look like Sanders won almost as many contests as Hillary Clinton.

Please, lets not make out the Sander's people as victims when they implied Hillary Clinton would not be a reasonable president based on wall street donations.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Chris Christie and Donald Trump play the Buffoon Card at the Republican Convention.

Chris Christie is the governor of New Jersey who apparently purposely delayed traffic on the primary bridge leading into and out of New Jersey. 

We will never know if Chris Christie's Bridge Gate actions led to any deaths, loss of job prospects, perhaps a business owner going out of business because inventory never arrived or arrived too late for a public event. We'll never know if Chris Christie's ogreish actions created car engine  overheating malfunctions such as ruining a car engine that could have been avoided if the car had not been idling for several hours because of Christie's churlish actions. Shouldn't this level of economic and health related callousness mean Chris Christie be locked up?

Now that it is evident that both Donald and Melania Trump lied about plagiarizing parts of Michelle Obama's speech, we can call him Lyin Donald and Lyin Melania. 

Not to be outdone, can't Donald's sons be called Lion Kings for shooting Lions in canned hunts in which the Lion has been drugged so it cannot defend itself. The Lion's head is usually then illegally sent back to the U.S. as a trophy.

Is this how we make America Great Again?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

A question for all of the Sanders Supporters, the Trump Supporters, and those with Clinton Derangement Syndrome about the alleged email fracas.

It's the summer of 2017 and your favorite political candidate has become president. The president's SOS is on an important political trip to Europe concerning European Union chaos. The Media takes photos of the SOS holding a blackberry and talking into it, and the photos go instantly viral.

What happens next, and why?

Please feel free to post a link on your favorite political site back to this topic, I am sincerely curious.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

The FBI's Misogynistic treatment of Hillary Clinton.

The FIB, er FBI seems comfortable letting out all kinds of classified secrets in publicly rebuking Hillary Clinton.

Actually naming the amount of classified documents sent on an unsecured server, are you fucking kidding me. It's as if Mr. Comey keeps sending out hints to hackers worldwide for them to keep looking until they find this exact number of classified emails etc. etc.

Why give any hints out regarding how many allegedly classified emails were sent on an unsecure server? FBI director James Comey needs to shut the fuck up. 

Apparently Mr. Comey answers to nobody, that is what I find galling. Once again Hillary Clinton is put in the position of, if she doesn't answer questions over the past year, she is hiding something, if she does answer questions and isn't 100% accurate, she is then of course willfully lying? Nobody in the media should have asked her anything until the investigation was done, because it's an investigation.

If Hillary Clinton had admitted to possibly sending out classified emails on a non secure server, she would be guilty of the same idiocy that James Comey has shown in detailing top secret information and trumpeting it to the world in specific numbers.

Mr. Comey needs to be put on the hot seat for blurting out information that should never have been blurted out, but there is nobody out there to do it.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders supporters are LIVID Hillary Clinton, who they hate for not being transparent, was not indicted by the FBI for being transparent.

And that is how Clinton Derangment Syndrome works.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Dick Morris parrots Bernie Sander's followers strategies about how the super delegates won't vote for Hillary were she to be indicted.

In DailyPUMA's opinion, there is something really strange going on about the FBI's role in emailgate, which apparently now, according to Dick Morris, has become Blackberry gate because Hillary Clinton was warned not to use a Blackberry in other countries because they can be easily hacked but did so anyways. 

Morris's conclusion is using the blackberry in foreign countries allowed foreign countries to actually listen in on conversations and even have access to data on the blackberry, and therefore that is an indictable offense.

First question, so it's not emailgate, it's free blackberries for other countries, gate.  Why is it ok for Dick Morris to lie about what the FBI investigation was about for the last year or two, then when something different comes up, suddenly Morris shifts to that new issue? Does Dick Morris expect to be pardoned for the last year or two of his lying about the FBI investigation being about emails?  

If Dick Morris is a lying ratfucker for saying over and over and over again that the FBI probe was about emails, but then suddenly changes his tune and now says its now about Blackberrys, shouldn't Dick Morris be indicted for attempting to manipulate a political candidate's future with lies that he portrayed as fact? Does Morris get to call politicians liars while lying about knowing what the probe may be about?

Enough of the feckless Morris, here's the things that I find hypocritical and actually points to a neutered FBI that can't even do its job. If the FBI warns Hillary Clinton to not use a Blackberry in another country because it could be used as an eavesdropping device, but she does so anyways, who is to say if Hillary Clinton is not using the possibility of the blackberry being hacked, to the United State's advantage? 

If the trolls in the room scoff, have you scoffed every time a television show storyline is about people discovering there is a bug in their room, so they visually warn each other the room is being bugged and then begin giving out false or confusing information. It's called counterintelligence and the belief that Hillary Clinton is incapable of counterintelligence is just another form of misogyny. 

Another question, if the FBI knows Hillary Clinton's blackberry is hackable, then why not create functional,  counter intelligence protocol for hackable gear? The FBI would simply load counter intelligence information, aka incorrect information, on the blackberry. The FBI could also load reverse hacking software on the blackberry that would go back to the hacker and spy on the hacker.

It is DailyPUMA's opinion that it is not FBI protocol to first warn a political figure not do something that technically is not illegal, and then when the FBI warning is not followed, to indict that person. 

The FBI protocol would be to first warn the political figure not to do something that is not illegal but could be dangerous, and then when they realize their warning is not being heeded, to come up with a plan B. Yes, that's right, a plan B in which the hackable Blackberry which is publicly known as an easy hackable target is loaded with incorrect data and software that hacks the hacker. If the FBI is not capable enough to do that, then we need to indict the FBI for being, stupid.

Succinctly put, if the FBI cannot load in reverse hacking software into a blackberry, then they need to find another line of work.

There is still another issue to contend with. Most Clinton Derangement Syndrome fanatics who are praying for an indictment have accused Hillary Clinton of being a secretive, non-transparent politician. Those same fanatics who will be praying and hoping for an indictment are basing it on the premise that Hillary Clinton is being indicted for actually being transparent! Can you see  the irony in the Clinton Derangement Syndrome Crowd celebrating Hillary Clinton being indicted for being transparent, when their Clinton Derangement has all along been based on the notion that Hillary Clinton is not transparent.

The Clinton Derangearoooos should be demanding Hillary Clinton not be indicted for being transparent, but their Clinton Derangement is so grand all they want to hear is "indicted".

To all the females out there, you really should consider being ready to march on an FBI location near you if Hillary Clinton is indicted because based on what is going on, there is nothing going on other than an attempt to not allow a female the right to deceive her political counterparts by using transparent electronics as a ruse, it's as if only a man can use electronics devices to fool a political rival.

And finally, assuming the FBI does the right thing and there is no indictment, the FBI then needs to investigate ALL the accusers who stood to gain politically by continually spreading false rumors over what the FBI investigation was about by claiming to KNOW what the investigation was about when they did not. Unless the FBI rumor mongers specifically stated they were speculating, they should be charged with treason for attempting to change the outcome of a political candidate by presenting their own FBI investigation opinion, as fact.

As for you Bernie Sander's supporters hoping for an Indictment, just remember, it would be an indictment based on Hillary Clinton being transparent, the very thing you have accused her along of not being. Good luck with that.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

So just how did Bernie Sanders Pandering to Golden State Basketball fans turn out?

What Bernie Sanders did in California recently would be comedy gold for the Republican party if Bernie had become the democrat nominee. First Bernie Sanders actually won a primary in Oklahoma, which sets up the rest of the joke.

Oklahoma then faced Golden State in the NBA western finals and Bernie showed up in Golden State for the seventh and deciding game. When Golden State won game seven over Oklahoma, Bernie celebrated with Golden State by first attending the game and then celebrating afterwards while chortling that everyone loves a comeback, as Golden State had come from 3 games to 1 down, to win the series in seven games. I doubt that went over big in Oklahoma. Sanders only won 12 primaries to begin with, so to rub it in the faces of Oklahoma fans that they lost to Golden State after being ahead 3 games to 1, not a smart move at all.

Which now brings us to the finals. In an historic sports twist, the Cleveland Cavaliers were the first team to ever win an NBA championship when down 3-1 in the finals. So, was Bernie Sanders suddenly rooting against Golden State and now rooting for Cleveland when the Cavs were down 3 games to 1? Bernie probably kept his mouth shut, which probably would have deeply offended Cavaliers fans if Bernie had still been relevant because the Cavs come from behind 3 games to 1 deficit to win an NBA championship had never been done before, and, the Cavs were the underdog whereas Golden State had been the favorite against Oklahoma and simply fell behind 3 games to 1 before winning that series. If anything, Golden State was the overdog that came from behind, so Bernie got that wrong as well.

Bernie managed to offend the state of Oklahoma, then by not rooting for the Cavs when they were down 3 games to 1, has also offended the state of Ohio, where the Republican party is holding their convention this year. And frankly, Golden State probably looks at Bernie as a jinx since they were heavily favored to win the championship this year and didn't.

Nice job Bernie, you managed to offend millions of sports fans in both Oklahoma and Ohio, and Golden State fans probably think you jinxed them as well. Not bad for a months work.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders "Stuff" starts hitting the fan.

The Republican party is crowing over raising more money than the Democrat party. Well, when one has a half in, half out political gadfly buzzing around named Bernie Sanders, what can one expect? 

Sanders and Clinton combined easily outdistance the Republican party fundraising efforts, Sanders and Clinton separated finish 2 and 3 behind the Republican party and allow the Republican party bragging rights to donation momentum which they actually don't have, but will develop the longer Bernie Gadfly Sanders does his thing.

Nice Job Bernie. 

This is why DailyPUMA thinks Hillary Clinton should seriously consider Newt Gingrich as her Vice Presidential Candidate.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

"Did Google Manipulate Search for Hillary" is the latest example of Clinton Derangement Syndrome by Source Fed's Matt Lieberman..

This latest foray into Clinton Derangement Syndrome comes courtesy of "Source Fed" and Matthew Lieberman. Matthew Lieberman appears to be the latest strain of Sanders Disciple who wants to calmly explain to his audience how evil the people around Hillary Clinton are for possibly squashing Hillary Clinton cri and Hillary Clinton ind google searches. At the very least, an investigation is needed, Lieberman surmises.

Lieberman is not directly accusing Hillary Clinton of doing something wrong, but SOMEBODY probably did something unethical on her behalf whether she knew about it or not. Or, as I call it, the Derangement of Matthew Lieberman of Source Fed regarding Hillary Clinton is in full force. 

First off, why are people searching for Hillary Clinton cri? Why are people searching for Hillary Clinton ind? The answer is there are significant amounts of unobjective, non-professional, anti Hillary Clinton videos on youtube, and youtube is owned by Google. 

If Google has tempered phrases like Hillary Clinton cri, or Hillary Clinton ind, its only after their bastard child youtube channel has ENFLAMED curiosity by broadcasting unobjective, completely hostile and void of legal clearances for use of video footage that features unauthorized use of Hillary Clinton images that then pop up on youtube ANYTIME ANY search for Hillary Clinton is done on youtube. 

Mr. Lieberman has simply line jumped his google criteria issue by never asking first, should youtube and the unobjective, many times slanderous, unprofessional videos about Hillary Clinton be allowed to then skew future search results? In essence, the trash videos create more hits to the very same entities that are not following all the rules and using agendas other than truth for making their videos.

Not only has Matthew Lieberman line-jumped his complaint without seeing what came before that could have caused google to limit cri and ind to not give the result HE WANTS TO SEE, Lieberman did not do any tests to see if Hillary Clinton's ACHIEVEMENT'S are being fairly represented by Google.

So I have done what the allegedly fair and unbiased Matthew Lieberman could not do, I did a test using Hillary Clinton's 20 times being voted Woman of the Year. 

I started by typing in Hillary Clinton Wom, Google did not suggest Woman of the Year. Here is what Google suggested.

And then I tried Hillary Clinton Woma

And then I tried Hillary Clinton Woman, and Hillary Clinton woman card and woman card meme came up, but no Hillary Clinton Woman of the Year.

 And then I tried Hillary Clinton Woman of

 And then I tried Hillary Clinton Woman of the

And then I tried Hillary Clinton Woman of the Y

And then I tried Hillary Clinton Woman of the Ye

And then I tried Hillary Clinton Woman of the Yea

                                        

And then I tried Hillary Clinton Woman of the Year

and nothing still came up about Hillary Clinton being voted Woman of the Year 20 times. Google filled in with "Year of the Woman Trap", but nothing about Hillary Clinton being voted Woman of the Year 20 times, including 14 times in a row.

You can watch below Matt Lieberman postulate about the possibility that a Hillary Clinton advisor or advisors possibly diverted incomplete search words from leading to hints, yet Mr. Lieberman never once considers the possiblity that google tends to not base their searches on non professional, unobjective, probably sexist media viewpoints, which seems to beguile Mr. Lieberman no end.

Is Matthew Lieberman upset because politically and sexist based assaults against Hillary Clinton's character can't in the easiest and fastest method possible be exculpated so he can inhale the bile and venom against Hillary Clinton to a much faster broil? 

Perhaps the most disturbing of all, Matthew Lieberman seems to be devoid of any concern that Hillary Clinton's achievements such as Hillary Clinton being voted Woman of the Year 20 times and 14 times in as row are not being recognized by Google Search while he remains 100% concerned that every last Hillary Clinton accusation foisted by unobjective non-professionals is not fully scoped out in the fastest manner possible for his consumption.

In 2009 I broke a story on www.daily-protest.blogspot.com The story was never picked up by anyone in the media and did not make it onto google search engine because even though it was a huge breaking story, I am not a recognized member of the media. Mr. Lieberman apparently does not understand that aspect of google searches. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hillary Clinton should seriously consider Newt Gingrich for Vice President.

DailyPUMA would like to see Hillary Clinton take an edgy chance and interview New Gingrich for her possible Vice Presidential running mate. 

There are reasons going back to the 90's as to why Newt Gingrich might make a surprisingly good, combative but interactive V.P. for Hillary Clinton. The Barack Obama league of rivals that Barack Obama assembled for his inner circle probably featured too many Wall Street people on one side and too many progressives on the other who were systematically shot down by the conservative media who effectively took the progressive's most controversial statements to create malfeasance towards them.

What I like most about New Gingrich right now as Hillary Clinton's running mate is how he deftly held his ground against Donald Trump (who was considering Mr. Gingrich as his own running mate while simultaneously verbally assaulting the judge who was handling the Trump University case) and said it was racist to use a judge's ethnic background to create a public consensus against that judge. 

Most politicians who were being considered as a V.P. would have kept their mouths shut if their prospective presidential running mate did something that universally is being perceived as bullheaded and wrong by Mr. Trump. Newt Gingrich spoken openly and publicly about Mr. Trump's anti judge actions right at the time when Donald Trump was considering Newt Gingrich for his V.P., DailyPUMA rates that a giant wow.

Newt was one of the few Republicans back in the 90's who ABSTAINED from the Clinton witchhunt of the late 90's. Newt had the good sense to let witchhunt go because he apparently had had an affair with an intern and felt it would be hypocritical to go after a president when he himself had done similar things.  And if you don't think that is a big deal, there were rumors that as many as HALF of the original 12 republicans who started their witch hunt of Bill Clinton were all having affairs and it was only when 2 of them were publicly outed that they recused themselves.

Newt was the reason Bill Clinton grew and became tougher as president as the Newt led contract with America attempted to thwart Bill Clinton's power. There is even an allegation that Newt tried to punish Bill Clinton with a budget discussion freeze because Newt had to leave Air Force one through the back door rather than the front door where he would have had a moment to talk to Bill Clinton after a trip back from the Mideast. It doesn't sound like much, but apparently that can be construed as a huge slight and Newt took it badly. Fortunately, Bill Clinton did not give in and their feisty relationship seemed to make them both better politicians.

Imagine all the ongoing banter about Hillary Clinton and the accusations that she is doing "things" in secret suddenly being eviscerated before they start because she had the guts to pick a republican for her V.P.

Should something ever happen and Newt temporarily was president, maybe language could created ahead of time in which Bill Clinton would become the new V.P.

I think its time to pull the rug out from all the lunatics out there with Clinton Derangement Syndrome, and the way to do that may be to at the very least, interview Newt Gingrich for Vice President. Be bold, be unpredicatable, and  if being bold and unpredictable also shuts up those with Clinton Derangement Syndrome, all the better.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Sanders Fanatics believe the announcement of Hillary Clinton reaching presumptive status the night before the California Primary suppressed voters, yes, Hillary Clinton voters.

There is no way fanatical Sanders voters were not going to vote for Bernie Sanders in the California primary just because the AP announced the night before the California Primary that Hillary Clinton had reached presumptive democrat nominee status. Hillary Clinton's knockout wins in the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico over the weekend prior to the California primary created the presumptive nominee.

The reality is there was more of a possibility that Hillary Clinton voters would not bother to vote since the announcement had already been made that Hillary Clinton had already presumptively won the nomination. 

Time and time again in the 2016 democrat primary, Bernie Sanders would gamble and spend more time and money in caucus contest states that feature 90% lower voter turnouts than primaries, making it easier for Sanders to jack up lopsided, non representative victories in caucus contests to re-ignite his candidacy and his fundraising. 

This time Bernie gambled by staying in California for almost an entire 3 week stretch while not paying enough attention to the other contests, and the result was Mr. Sander's was "gotcha'd" by the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico contests.

Voter suppression is just one more excuse for the Sanders fanatics to give so that they can believe Sanders receiving 3.5 million less votes than Hillary Clinton is no reason to accept defeat.

Gasp.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hi, I'm Bernie Sanders, I do whatever the heck I want as long as I keep promising free education, legalized pot, and reigning in Wall Street.

Bernie Sanders promised to reveal his May fundraising totals on Wednesday, June 8, 2016, also known as the day after the California Primary. As of 1:47 pm Eastern Standard time, no May fundraising announcement has been made.

However, I did find this on Yahoo. While the article states the total for both candidates through May of 2016, it does not state what the May total was for either Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

It's Misogynistic to discount Hillary Clinton being voted Woman of the Year TWENTY TIMES, including FOURTEEN TIMES in a row.

If you are a Bernie Sanders supporter about to vote in California, ask yourself why you don't think it matters that Hillary Clinton has been voted Woman of the Year twenty times, including 14 in a row. 

If a man had won Man of the Year lets say 10 times, and five in a row, would anyone be questioning their integrity the way many progressives and neo cons have of Hillary Clinton?  Obviously not.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Google Suppresses 2016 Democrat Virgin Island Caucus and Puerto Rico Primary Results.

Google had decided to not post their own results and graphs of the 2016 Virgin Island Democrat Caucus results and the 2016 Puerto Rico Democrat Primary Results. 

Why Google, Why?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Why the NPR radio host Terry Gross should have been kissing Hillary Clinton's shoes over Gay Marriage instead of attacking her.

This youtube video creates a gay / progressive fantasy world in which the Clinton's were the reason gay marriage didn't happen sooner. It is this type of demagoguery among the intellectual progressive gay elite that drives many moderate democrats, nuts. 

What NPR host Terry Gross fails to grasp is that "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" was the critical first step that eventually led to gay marriage. Instead of thanking the Clintons for "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", many gay elitists condemn "Don't Ask, Don't Tell". How can one deal with such elitist contempt among the progressive gay activist movement? They have screwed up history as they rewrite it.

When will gay activists take PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for never putting forth the best, most logical argument for gay marriage, "What is the difference between a gay marriage and a heterosexual marriage in which no children are procreated?" The answer is there is no real difference. 

So if the country allows heterosexual marriages among heterosexuals who either can't or won't have children, then they would need to give those same rights to gay marriages. This first gay marriage step could have been realized a decade before gay marriages were legalized, well before the plodding and confrontational manner in which the gay movement moved forward on gay marriage.  

But in the gay activist world, they are always right, and the rest of society will never catch up to their keen insight, and so the Clintons are naturally on their radar in a hostile manner when "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" actually laid the foundation for Gay Marriage to materialize.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders Fundraising Transparency suddenly disappears, won't reveal May fundraising until after June 7th.

DailyPUMA finds it hypocritical for Bernie Sanders to be a man of the people and be for transparency, and then change course and hide information because it doesn't serve his purpose. Bernie Sanders won't reveal his May fundraising numbers until after June 7, 2016. Isn't transparency what Sanders is fighting for? 

California has turned into one strange contest. Hillary Clinton, allegedly full of money at 40 million dollars after a healthy May of fundraising, is spending less money than Bernie Sanders is on commercial advertising in California, even though Bernie Sanders is apparently running on financial fumes.

As DailyPUMA stated in the previous article, not spending money that was donated by the common folk who sacrificed to give that money, and depriving those Hillary Clinton supporters of the satisfaction of a very solid win in California will be disappointing if that is what ultimately happens.

Apparently it is possible that Bernie is ahead in the polls by one point, but not ahead amongst people who are actually going to vote on June 7. That's a new twist being put out by the media.

Either way, DailyPUMA sure wishes Hillary Clinton would release an AUTHENTIC California commercial, featuring Californians, before June 7.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders outspends Hillary Clinton in California even though he is almost out of money and Hillary Clinton has 40 million dollars.

Over the past several months Hillary Clinton followers have been reminded via email that Bernie Sanders supporters were donating more money than Hillary Clinton supporters. Finally in May, Hillary Clinton apparently has out raised Bernie Sanders and the result is Hillary Clinton now has around 40 million dollars saved up whereas Bernie Sanders is apparently running on fumes.

Yet Hillary Clinton is being outspent by Bernie Sanders in California. As a Hillary Clinton supporter I am a bit disappointed that Hillary Clinton is ok with being outspent on commercial time in California and possibly either losing California to Bernie Sanders, or barely winning the state.

At some point, one would think Hillary Clinton would want to make her supporters happy, and making Hillary Clinton supporters happy would entail significantly outspending Bernie Sanders in California on ad buys AND campaigning in California with the express purpose of beating Bernie Sanders in California by a significant margin.

Otherwise, Hillary Clinton will expose her supporters to several months of unnecessary banter by Sanders supporters who will point to how Bernie had all the momentum over the final TWO months of the 2016 democrat race.

What matters more, having 42 million dollars saved up and either losing or having a very close race in California against Bernie Sanders, or having 39 million dollars saved up and winning by a nice, significant margin in California. 

I have yet to see a Hillary Clinton commercial shown in California that was obviously shot in California about California and its people. California is something like the world's 7th or 8th largest economy, contains 12.5% of the U.S. population and 40% of the Gross Domestic Product, only Alaska and Texas are bigger size wise, and neither of those states offer the Mediterranean climate that California offers. Tell us how great we are Hillary, and spend some money in our state telling us how great we are.

Does Hillary Clinton think California is not worth fighting for now because its probably a slam dunk win for the democrats in the fall presidential race? That's all the more reason why Hillary Clinton should spend more money NOW, because she really won't have to spend that much in California for the Presidential election in November. 

If Hillary Clinton values not spending money her POORER supporters have given her, in a way that sends a clear and powerful message that Bernie Sanders DID NOT have the momentum on June 7, 2016 and going forward, then maybe some of her POORER supporters may think twice about future donations.

"She didn't spend the money when she had it, why does she need more now?" Hillary Clinton needs to start thinking more about her supporters and less about Donald Trump.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Rachel Maddow doesn't understand latest Hillary Clinton Instagram commercial, so she puts on her Progressive holier than thou frock and keeps repeating over and over how obtuse she is, er, how obtuse the Clinton campaign must be for a joke she does not get.

Poor Rachel Maddow, salivating for an ultra progressive candidate, yet having to "settle" for Hillary Clinton. Maddow lambasts the latest Hillary Clinton ad, a very funny, REAL, ad.

I'll explain it for the progressives out there who think they get it, and don't. Two guys have been going around to all the non Sanders candidates events and getting in the background or even next to the other candidates to ridicule them in one way or another.

In the case of Hillary Clinton, they previously wore shirts that said they would "settle" for Hillary Clinton. A mendacious insult if ever there was one. This time around, the Clinton people CAUGHT THEM and said they had to leave, or they could stay if they took off their shirts.

So the joke is CLEARLY ON THESE TWO DOOFUSSES WHO STAYED at the Clinton rally, shirtless. They were then featured in the Hillary Clinton Instagram ad, and the ad is funny. But Rachel Maddow, who is just so much smarter than the rest of us she barely has time to interact with us commoners when she could be having more meaningful conversations with herself, just keeps repeating how obtuse the Clinton campaign is for not getting it, and she repeats it over and over and over and over again. Got Dementia, Rachel?

Um, the Clinton people get it Rachel. They totally get it, and they made fun of these guys in a nice way, and Hillary Clinton  came up with some nice, off the cuff moments. All of it went right over Maddow's head. It's embarrassing to watch her wax on and on and on, as if she's in on the joke, when she has become part of the joke for not getting it.

Wow. Here is the link to see Rachel Maddow in definitely one of her most forgettable performances.

And once again, Clinton Derangement Syndrome at work. Now the Clinton campaign can't come up with anything clever unless a Progressive like Rachel Maddow approves of it. I hear one of Bernie Sanders demands is that all future Hillary Clinton commercials must have an "approved by a progressive" lead in or they can't be aired. (Whisper aside to Rachel Maddow, that was a joke).

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

What Donald Trump might say about Bernie Sanders rejoicing after Golden State Warriors 3 game comeback to defeat Oklahoma City and Bernie possibly winning California in the Democrat Primary.

What Donald Trump might say about Bernie Sanders after Bernie was seen rejoicing over the Golden State Warriors comeback conference championship series win against The Oklahoma Thunder. 

"Can you believe this Sanders guy. The state of Oklahoma votes for him over Hillary Clinton, and he returns the favor by rejoicing when Golden State beats Oklahoma in the NBA conference finals. A back stabbing Socialist Peacnik celebrating the WARRIORS victory." "Nobody can twist the knife like Bernie can, I may have to hire him to help take out ISIS when I'm president."

"If Bernie is calling his chance for victory in California a comeback victory like the Warriors over Oklahoma, then clearly a California comeback is in play for the Republicans as well. Thank you Bernie for pointing that out."

"What's next Bernie, you just broke the collective hearts of the state of Oklahoma by cheering Golden State's victory over them, what about the state of Ohio, as in the Cleveland Cavaliers? Are you still rooting for Golden State to be beat Cleveland in the Finals? Oh, wait, Golden State will probably be the favorite, so does that mean you will switch your alliances AGAIN and root for the underdog Cleveland Cavaliers?"

The anchor calls Bernie Sanders attending Golden State's game seven playoff aligning himself with Golden State's comeback "political pandering", the exact phrase DailyPUMA used in a recent article.

Bernie "anti-fracking" Sanders continues to run a Slash and Bern race and in one news clip has actually given the Republicans fuel to use in three states, California and Ohio represent a total of 73 electoral college votes.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders busts a move in California and why Hillary Clinton should care. Meanwhile Move on Dot Org email, Hillary Who?

(Friday May 27, 4:12pm update: Hillary Clinton ads did start appearing this morning. Yeah. However, I would strongly recommend an ad that is specific to California, California people, places and things, and it should be in color. Right after I posted this I saw a second Hillary Clinton ad, this one in color, about a young girl worried her parents are being deported. I hope there is one more coming where Californians see California in the ad, we're funny that way.)

DailyPUMA leaves a comment on Cannonfire about Bernie Sanders trying to finish with a lot of momentum by winning California and about half an hour later Move on dot org sends an email basically stating Bernie Sanders is trying to win strong on June 7th as a way to ensure the progressives dominate the democrat platform committee and agenda. 

Move on Dot Org professes to now have a progressive majority on the Democrat 15 person committee and are encouraging members to help Bernie finish the remaining Democrat Primary races on a very high note to reinforce the concept of "Hillary who?".

Sanders has been on a whirlwind tour in California, hitting 3 or more locations a day while also running television ads strategically placed just before Memorial Day and probably through Memorial day weekend on all the local news broadcast stations in Los Angeles. I believe Bernie Sander's goal is to pack the 15 person democrat planning committee with a majority of progressives (which Move on Dot Org claims they now have) and basically bypass Hillary Clinton and the direction of the democrat party even if she is the nominee.

This is not the time for Hillary Clinton to be cobbling together money to use against Trump with the rationalization that Sanders is irrelevant. If Sander's wins California and does well in the other states on June 7th he will just become a bigger and bigger fly in the ointment and will give more fuel for Sanders followers to believe he was robbed even though he will still be a couple million votes behind in the popular vote.

Plus, if Sanders wins more pledged delegates on June 7th he gets to proclaim that he is the more popular candidate with growing momentum because it means Sanders won the last two months (May and June) of the democrat nomination season after losing the first four months (January, February, March, April). Sanders will probably be able to create a graph that shows he actually cut into the percentage of Hillary Clintons lead by a bigger and bigger margin with each passing month until he inevitably started actually winning the pledged delegate race once May hit, implying that he really is on a six month momentum bender.

In professional team sports, teams that have big leads but then barely cross the finish line ahead of their rivals usually don't win championships. A team wins championships by finishing the regular season strongly rather than ignoring their rivals because their rivals have too much of a gap to make up. Ignoring a rival as if they don't exist is a form of taunting, and fans don't like that, especially from the team being ignored/taunted. Yes, ignoring is a form of taunting.

If a baseball team is ahead of the second place team by 9 games with 10 games left to play in the season but then loses the final 10 games of the season and finishes just one game ahead at the end of the season, that's actually not a cause for a first place victory celebration. 

Fans of the losing team don't like it when an opposing team knows they are going to win first place in their division even as they keep losing the individual games leading up to the playoffs. This is where being a woman who probably doesn't follow team sports hurts Hillary Clinton. She has a lead and is content with that lead, even if it keeps shrinking, as long as she wins. That's actually an unacceptable premise in both team sports, and in politics.

What does Hillary Clinton want, an extra 25 to 50 million dollars in her political coffers to battle Donald Trump, or soundly beating Bernie Sanders in California now? Let's not rationalize losing to Bernie Sanders by 10 points in California as being irrelevant if at the same time the California delegates Hillary Clinton does win puts her over the top for the democrat nomination, as it will truly be a pyrrhic victory. And Donald Trump will be all over it as well..."Talk about entitlement, she lost the last 10 of 15 democrat contests and she's the democrat nominee!…" "She went splat and her guts rolled over the finish line ahead of a hard charging Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton calls that a victory." Trump can wax on and on about how Hillary Clinton had to keep losing so she could win the nomination.

Hillary Clinton is probably being advised by former Barack Obama campaign people to "stall and ignore" like Barack Obama did near the end of the 2008 democrat campaign when he ignored Hillary Clinton and basically used the same speech day after day, that approach may backfire in 2016. I hope Hillary Clinton sees through this year's wall of male consulting incompetence better than she did in 2008 when  her political advisor told  her that California was a winner take all delegate state, and SPENDS SOME FUCKING MONEY in California on commercials, preferably starting this memorial day weekend. 

Hillary Clinton not spending money with the local news channels means she is not ingratiating herself to them in terms of how they cover her California campaign activites. The local Los Angeles news reports are basically having a Bernie Love  fest which goes like this…"Bernie Sanders held rallies today in T,U,V,W,X,Y,Z locations"…."meanwhile Hillary Clinton held two fund raisers". The LA News reporting just sounds so crass and elitist, yet, apparently that is the truth. "Bernie is working his butt off" (AND paying the television news stations commercial advertising money), while "Hillary Clinton keeps fundraising" is the not so subliminal message I am witnessing.

I hope the Clinton campaign runs television commercials about why people like Hillary Clinton, not why Hillary Clinton wants to be president.

If Hillary Clinton limps to victory, she may be ceding too many progressives on the democrat platform committee and find her power usurped even if she is the nominee. Hillary Clinton may not convince a significant portion of the Sander's followers that Bernie Sanders was truly beaten if Bernie does better than Hillary Clinton on June 7, 2016 since we all know that Super Delegates ride around on winged unicorns trumpeting bad publicity about Bernie and good publicity about Hillary.

In the sports world, when fans truly believe their team was the best team and if they had just had a few more contests to play they would have caught and surpassed the leader, those types of supporters won't settle for supporting the team that barely beat them, even if winning team makes it to the Super Bowl or the World Series. The fans whose team finished second but in their hearts believe were the better team and just needed a few more games to play to prove it, may actually support the other league's playoff team out of spite or disgust rather than the team that they were still gaining on as the season ended.

Here is Move on Dot Org's "Hillary who?" email in which learn that the goal is to make Hillary Clinton and her ideas, irrelevant even if she is the nominee.

Dear MoveOn member,
Bernie Sanders won "unprecedented say over the Democratic Party platform" this week and named progressive powerhouses, including climate change author and visionary Bill McKibben and Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chair Keith Ellison, to the party's platform drafting committee.¹
Progressives now hold a majority of seats on this committee, which will set the Democratic Party's policy platform for the next four years.²
Every vote and every delegate that Bernie wins will give Bernie's committee members more leverage to write the "strongest progressive agenda that any political party has ever seen” at the Democratic convention.³
Will you join other MoveOn members this weekend to help get out the vote? Click here to search for the nearest volunteer event.
Or click here to sign up and make calls from your home.
Democratic Party operatives typically appoint the 15-member drafting committee. But the strength of Bernie's political revolution forced party officials to the table to negotiate with Bernie’s campaign.
Bernie was able to appoint five members, who will be fighting for the Democratic Party to officially embrace a $15 minimum wage, break up big banks, ban fracking, and end our corrupt campaign finance system.
If Bernie wins big on June 7, his team will have the momentum and power to shape the Democratic Party platform for the next four years and beyond.
Will you join other MoveOn members this weekend to help get out the vote? Click here to search for the nearest volunteer event.
Or click here to sign up and make calls from your home.
Thanks for all you do.
—Matt, Mark, Hannah, Emily, and the rest of the MoveOn for Bernie team
Sources:
1. "Sanders wins greater say in Democratic platform; names pro-Palestinian activist," The Washington Post, May 23, 2016
https://act.moveon.org/go/3928?t=4&akid=165434.3448084.kWAvm_
2. "The Democratic Platform Committee Now Has a Progressive Majority. Thanks, Bernie Sanders." The Nation, May 24, 2016
http://act.moveon.org/go/3909?t=6&akid=165434.3448084.kWAvm_
3. Ibid.

Want to support our work? We're going all out to help Bernie Sanders win the Democratic nomination and change the Democratic Party. But we can't do it without small-dollar donations from people like you. Click here to chip in.

---

PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

This email was sent to Alessandro Machi on May 27th, 2016. To change your email address or update your contact info,click here. To opt out of "MoveOn for Bernie" emails, click here. To remove yourself from the MoveOn.org list, click here.   end of email.

I still don't understand how Move on dot org can reach out to all democrats to get as big of an email list as possible and then take their full email list and simply start supporting one democrat candidate over another while maintaining their non-profit status.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.