Republicans want you to believe that their People paying for Dirt on Hillary Clinton is no different than Steele Dossier that was first funded by a Republican, then the DNC & the Clinton Campaign, and eventually the FBI.

The Republicans want to know why is it not ok for Jared Kushner or others in Trump Land to pay a foreign source for dirt on Hillary Clinton, yet it is ok for the Clinton Campaign to purchase or initiate dirt Intel on Trump for foreign sources.

So focusing on whether or not the Clinton Campaign funded the intel is important, However the distinction between the Steele Dossier and what the Trump Campaign set out to do are so different that DailyPUMA will list them  below. 

If it's true that the Steele Dossier was initially funded by a Republican Operative, and then taken over by the Democrats or the Clinton Campaign, that is WAY less of a controversy since there is a Republican at the root of the original search. Without the original Republican, there would be no Steele Dossier. The Washington Post tried to infer that the Democrats and Hillary Clinton created the Steele Dossier in the twisted headline used with their article, yet in their own article they admit the Democrats and the Clinton Campaign did not initiate the Steele Dossier, a Republican did. But hey, let's blame Hillary Clinton.

The Democrats have a second firewall in terms of the radical difference between the Trump Campaign soliciting dirt on Hillary Clinton and the Steele Dossier, Trump refused to disclose his Income Tax Returns, making Trump the first presidential candidate in DailyPUMA doesn't know how long to refuse to release their tax returns, so even as Sander's was blasting Clinton over the release of her Income Taxes and her Wall Street Speeches, Trump was hiding his own Income Taxes, and STILL is hiding his own income tax returns.

Speaking of Sander's, Sander's and Trump were using Political Operatives who both worked in Eastern Europe for a decade at the same time and were most likely in contact with each other, so that would be a third firewall to do research on Trump versus simply looking for Dirt on Hillary Clinton as was done in Trumpland.

Then throw in Trump's BLATANT LYING about Trump Products over the airwaves. Trump alleged that a table full of Trump Productions were in production at his Press conference after his Michigan Primary Win when it was all FICTION. The Democrats had every right to Investigate Trump over what other lies he was telling, thus a fourth firewall. 

A Fifth Firewall of difference between Kushner paying for dirt on Clinton versus the Steele Dossier would be that the Dossier went to the FBI who reviewed the Intel and wanted more, and the FBI was going to pay for more intel, until Steele was exposed. 

There is a Sixth Firewall as well. The FBI Director and Republican James Comey managed to twice disclose in public that Hillary Clinton was under investigation, yet the FBI Director Republican James Comey never disclosed if Donald Trump was under investigation for Income Tax Irregularities, lying over the airwaves regarding Trump Products, Deliberately lying over the airwaves for political gain, such as stating that Hillary Clinton was a criminal when she had never been convicted of a crime.

DailyPUMA suggests further discussion be focused on how the Steele Dossier PALES in comparison to simply paying foreign governments for "Dirt" on Hillary Clinton as the Trump Campaign did. 

More Importantly, DailyPUMA continues to wonder why the FBI either refused to Investigate Donald Trump over the myriad of issues mentioned above, or why the FBI refused to publicly acknowledge that Donald Trump was also under Investigation during the 2016 Presidential Election.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump is Probably Clueless about how easy it has become to disable another country's economy through nuclear warfare in the upper atmosphere.

Back on March 12, 2017 DailyPUMA's sister blog, AlexLOGIC, warned that the disabling of a country's satellites could produce crippling and deadly results on the ground below.

CannonFire has just released it's own warning about an EMP Attack from North Korea. If North Korea were able to do incomparable damage to our Electronics, Satellites and Electrical gird, Trump's only counter move would be to annihilate North Korea, assuming our missiles could still be accurately launched.

What would result is a small country playing mayhem with our "satellites and things", while we in turn would be killing, maiming and destroying millions of North Korean lives instantly, because Trump's only counter move would be to drop nukes on North Korea.

Who would get the rest of the world's sympathy in the above scenario, the country that played a very dangerous prank, or the country that simply nuclearized tens of millions of people.

The reason we know that Trump is not up to the challenge at hand is TRUMP DEFUNDED, or let lapse, the department that actually studies defending against Electro Magnetic Weapons, as Cannonfire has pointed out.     

North Korea's bluster over launching a nuclear weapon into the U.S. may very well be a real threat, but exploding a nuclear weapon high up in the sky, where it will decimate satellite transmission and possibly our entire electronic and electrical gird could be North Korea's stealth plan.

One wonders how many satellites it would take to re-establish a satellite network and one wonders how many replacement satellites the U.S. has ready to relaunch at a moment's notice. Probably nowhere near enough.

When Trump talks of InfraStructure, Trump visualizes big heavy dump trucks pouring asphalt, when DailyPUMA thinks of InfraStructure, Images of triple the number of satellites needed to maintain an economy and buildings being built round so they can withstand hurricane force winds while also being elevated to prevent flood damage.

Trump is so outmatched right now it truly scares DailyPUMA.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Has the U.S. ever launched missiles towards itself to see if they can shoot them all down?

DailyPUMA is wondering if the U.S. Military has ever fired off dozens of missiles at the same time from different locations, at the U.S., to see how many they can effectively shoot down without detonating. Simply having a bunch of military ding a lings say they are ready for any incoming missile attack is WORTHLESS. PROVE IT.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders was big on Coal, Global Warming, and Pot for all, now his own State of Vermont wants to proceed with caution regarding Pot, Just like Hillary Clinton advocated during the 2016 Presidential Campaign.

It's really important to keep reminding the World how full of shit Bernie Sanders really was during his 2016 Presidential Campaign. And I say this with the acknowledgement that Bernie Sanders is a fine speaker and a solid thinker. 

But when a 2016 presidential candidate can be for Coal yet acknowledge Global warming at the same time, we basically have a rope a dope candidate who did nothing more then alienate a few million Democrat Voters who would have voted for Hillary Clinton until Bernie's B.S. began to propagate for far too long.

Speaking of Dope, Bernie Sanders was for Pot for all, yet now his own State of Vermont has taken a cautionary approach regarding the free and easy use of Pot. Vermont has has taken exactly Hillary Clinton's position in 2016, that the States that had already legalized Marijuana should be studied for a couple of years to see what the cumulative effects of legalized pot were producing.

So to repeat, Bernie Sander's own state of Vermont is basically giving Bernie Sanders a no confidence vote in regards to Sander's position on marijuana while giving Hillary Clinton's 2016 position of caution on marijuana a super big thumbs up.

If anyone out there wants to blog, DailyPUMA would encourage a Bernie's Bullshit blog that would go back in time and point out how Bernie kept going to the left of Hillary Clinton so that he could paint her as a Washington Insider, yet how foolish many of his going to the left of Hillary screeds really were. DailyPUMA will even give you a top spot on one of the DailyPUMA columns for free. (Ok, their all free but a top spot is even better than free).

And if someone were take on this Bernie's Bullshit Blog, don't forget to take a few shots at the Bern Report as well.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Did 60 Minutes Hide Harvey Weinstein's reputation over 2 decades ago when they Interviewed Joel Thurm for a piece on Hollywood?

DailyPUMA recalls Joel Thurm once state during a Sixty Minutes interview back in either the 80's or early 90's about how Hollywood Actors and Actresses were treated, "One Actress had to masturbate in front of an executive in exchange for a part in a movie", he stated. I think that ended the 60 Minutes Segment.

DailyPUMA wonders, what if it was Harvey Weinstein that Joel Thurm was talking about? If it was, would that not make 60 Minutes somewhat responsible for not going further and finding out who it was that Joel Thurm was talking about?  Would not 60 Minutes be responsible for Mr. Weinstein's additional 20 years or more as head of a Production Studio?

Everyone is wondering how Mr. Weinstein got to flourish as a successful Producer and possible sexual predator for so long. Well, if 60 Minutes had the goods back in the 80's or early 90's, and did nothing, then we have our answer, don't we?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Pence denies leaving NFL game was a publicity stunt, but something does not make sense about Pence's Denial.

On Sunday, October 8, 2017, Mike Pence not only went to watch the Indianapolis Colts play the San Francisco 49's, Mr. Pence also claims he went to the game to watch the half time festivities honoring former Colts QB and future Hall of Famer Peyton Manning. Mike Pence ended up leaving soon after the National Anthem when some of the San Francisco 49's players kneeled during the National Anthem. 

However, there has been no reports that the Indianapolis Colts football players kneeled during the playing of the national anthem.

So lets review, Mike Pence went to the Colt's Home Game vs 49's game in particular so he could witness the honoring of Colt's great Peyton Manning at halftime. The Hometown Indianapolis Colts players did not kneel during the National Anthem, only some of the visting 49's players knelt.

So basically, Mike Pence punished the home team for the actions of the visiting team, when Mr. Pence was there primarily to witness the honoring of a Hall of Fame player who had played in the past for the Home Team. For DailyPUMA, that equals, WOW.

Punishing one team, the home team, and the man being honored by the home team for a tremendous CAREER, Peyton Manning, for the one time actions of the visiting team is what Mike Pence did, and DailyPUMA thinks that stinks and that Mr. Pence owes Peyton Manning an apology.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Warning, Rush Limbaugh Radio Ad Promotion for Monday, October 9, 2017 claims Democrats want to take all of your guns.

It seems beyond belief that a goofball like Rush Limbaugh will actually expouse the narrative Monday morning in his diarrhea laced radio talk show that the democrats will use the killing of 59 people and the maiming of over 500 people via several modified semi automatic guns as an excuse to take all the guns away from Gun Owners.   

Die idiot, die.

Should gun owners really retain all the same rights regarding their guns when their guns are kept on their own property, versus when those same guns are taken off of their property?

If a gun owners owns 20 guns, does that mean they have the right to transport those 20 guns off of their own property at any time and for any reason?

Maybe we need to start the discussion of gun control with the rights of gun owners when their guns are kept on their own property versus the transporting of those same guns off of their own property. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA's biggest gripe about Progressives, Immigration, Immigration, Immigration, when do they ever talk about our seniors?

Based on a lifetime of observing people, places and things, DailyPUMA believes that most Progressives care more about strangers than their own Parents. However, DailyPUMA believes that Moderates from both parties care MOST about their Parents than either Conservatives or Progressives.

Progressives and Conservatives can deny it all they want, but the truth is on the internet. Heck it's on DailyPUMA, where DailyPUMA can count. Thousands of RSS links to Trump's racism and his immigration issues, and perhaps there have been 25, yes, 25 headlines about screwing over the elderly.

DailyPUMA does not quite understand the unbridled passion for immigration at the expense, yes, at the expense of our seniors. Maybe its a relevancy issue. Progressives and Conservatives care more about people close to their own age, who they better connect with, than their own parents. Progressivism tends to skew younger, so perhaps Progressives view their own parents as still being in charge and in their own spotlight and don't need their children's help in any way. If anything, able parents who are not seniors yet may be found helping their children. 

There is probably a higher percentage of gays among progressives than any other political group, and most adult gays probably harbor some resentment against their parents who probably wished their children would marry the same way they did, and perhaps having to hide their being gay makes gays connect more with immigrants than with seniors.  

DailyPUMA was at a Townhall meeting just yesterday with their senior adult parent. The Townhall was specially designed for seniors, and the Townhall timing was amazing as the post card announcement arrived literally 3 to 4 days after DailyPUMA had complained to their local political office that too much energy was being put on the issue of immigration at the EXPENSE of seniors. DailyPUMA is sure the Townhall was already planned when the complaint was made, so the timing was amazing in DailyPUMA's book.

One senior woman stood up and stated, "Los Angeles plans to spend money on more shelters for the homeless, will you please make sure that some of that money is spent on seniors only shelters"? The idea floored the politician, who thankfully recognized a good idea when he heard it and immediately said so. 

But it also points to how easily seniors are being forgotten by the immigration first edict that California has adopted. Governor Jerry Brown, who never had to care for a parent and has no children, tried to end the MediCAL / In Home Supportive Services program several years ago during a budget crisis that he inadvertently may have helped cause the first time he was governor, when he helped hand out what turned out to be very lavish pensions for State Employees. 

Now California is a Sanctuary State, perhaps the first in the country. DailyPUMA just finds it arrogant how Progressive politicians are so fixated on immigration over elderly issues.
This may shock progressives, but some seniors are also immigrants. Progressives claim that Conservatives only care about the unborn and once born, its every baby for themselves. But Moderates also see that Progressives basically do the same thing, fight for immigration and gay rights, but once immigrants and gays become seniors, its every senior for themselves. 

DailyPUMA brought some literature to the Townhall for the politicians and was pleased to see some genuine interest in issues like why can't seniors deduct their home property tax payments from their annual stated income when applying for the MediCAL / In Home Supportive Services program.

So maybe there's hope. DailyPUMA is not yet a senior and maybe therein lies the problem, those who should be championing senior causes before they themselves become seniors are too few and far between, whereas immigration issues are all around us, all the time sucking up some of the attention that should be going to our Seniors.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.