Is Judicial Watch committing fraud by not including the word Partisan in their name?

Update, March 19, 2023. I LOVE JUDICIAL WATCH. Judicial Watch has uncovered MASSIVE Voter Roll Fraud which was making it harder to recall Political Candidates. End of March 19, 2023 Update.

 

When George Bush Jr. and his staff simply ignored subpoena requests from congress, did Judicial Watch comment about the uncooperative nature of the Bush Jr. Administration? DailyPUMA thinks the answer is no.

Judicial Watch has not only hounded the Clinton's since the 90's, but they attempt to sell info about the Clintons for their own financial gain.

In DailyPUMA's opinion, Judicial Watch is committing fraud by not adding the word Partisan to their name. Judicial Watch should be called Partisan Judicial Watch since that is what they are and that is what they do. 

Did you know that there is precedence for requiring a preposition describing an entity. KABC had coined the phrase Talk Radio when KFI started using it as well. KABC sued KFI and the judge ruled that KFI could only use the term Talk Radio if they described what kind of Talk Radio they were. KFI settled on "More Stimulating Talk Radio". Judicial Watch should be sued and required to add the term Partisan to their name, Partisan Judicial Watch.

Entities invoking Partisan viewpoints and or opinions on judicial issues should not be allowed to invoke the name Judicial in their name without use of the word Partisan in front of it.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.