Click to Sign Petition.

Click to Sign Petition.

Friday, August 18, 2017

Progressive Media stepped in and on everyday person's toes with their ongoing racism accusations against Donald Trump.

The Progressive led media would have us believe that "Jews won't replace us" is the same as "Kill all …." Sadly, everyone else is following this ridiculous missive. Don't fall for it. DailyPUMA has railed against Donald Trump on many issues, but on Charlottesville, Trump was not that far off, and certainly does not deserve the relentless bashing he is getting.

So some misguided white people wanted to hold a rally. They wanted to beat their chest and say "I am White Man, hear me roar". Who really gives a shit? The Progressive Media never presented any timeline that showed the Marcher's starting attacking others first. Nor can the Progressive Media state that only the marchers committed violence. Obviously the idiot who murdered Heather Heyer with his car is in another realm and happened after violence had already commenced.

Sadly, the media appears to be led by some faction that has over reacted to a bunch of white marchers, many who probably don't have jobs and might live in the basement of their parent's home.

The answer the world needs is not from the Progressive Media which has its own ongoing axe to grind against Donald Trump's prior mistreatment of them. 

Yet the Progressive media is keeping the pressure on Trump and in the process de-emphasizing the voices and actions of the public at large. The answer my friend is blowing in the wind. The answer was in Los Angeles where thousands showed up hoping to grab a few 10 dollar tickets for Hamilton. The answer was in the Charlottesville candlelight vigil for Heather Heyer, and perhaps other vigils may sprout up as well, such as the one in Akron Ohio. The answer was in the identifying of the marchers by their own Tiki Torch lit faces,  and then being fired from their job.

DailyPUMA predicts that in less than 10 years time as many as ten thousand jobs a day will be lost to robotics and automation. And when the chants of "Robotics will not replace us" are heard in marches all over the country by people of all races, remember it was the Progressive Media that first coined the concept of "_ _ _ will not replace us" as being racist and fascist. The issue of being replaced has been neutered by the Progressive Media. Heaven help us if it turns out that the majority of the looming robotics economic take over are owned by anyone group.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Not all Nazi / KKK Protests are the same, unless one is bigoted against them.

The Progressive media has managed to blast Trump over the Charlottesville conflict to the point where even spineless Republicans won't defend Trump's comments.

Question number one, are KKK and Nazi's allowed to hold a march? The Progressive Media has never answered this question. DailyPUMA will answer it. If the march does not have, any signs that threaten, banners that threaten, or verbal threats or taunts that advocate the harming of any group of people, and the marchers are not recruiting new members, then yes,  even Nazi's and KKK's can march if they have a permit. The Progressive Media has conveniently sidestepped these guidelines.

The Progressive Media first blamed Trump for taking two days to condemn the violence in Charlottesville, then blamed Trump when Trump claimed that both sides were guilty of violence. The Media, rather than prove Trump's statement wrong, simply ganged up on him for defending groups that most of America dislikes and wishes did not exist.

Don't be suckered by a Progressive Media power grab against the Executive Branch of our country. First the Progressive Media must answer when and how a group like the Nazi's and KKK can march. Then the Progressive Media needs to show a timeline that the KKK and Nazi's attacked others first and that others responded to defend themselves. PROVE this before condemning the president of the United States for his comments. So far, the president has been condemned without any proof that the marchers started the violence.

DailyPUMA sees these Media power grabs from time to time, Marco Rubio was the victim of a power grab to get him out of the 2016 Republican Presidential nomination race, all because he repeated a meme three times in the same debate. Football genius coach Pete Carroll was victimized by  a same social media frenzy because he called a pass on third down (the right call by the way) with the clock winding down and Seattle at the one yard line in the Super Bowl. Howard Dean was drummed out of the 2004 democrat nomination race because the second audio track of the audience responding to his own speech filled with whoops and cheers was blunted, making him sound insane since no audience could be heard cheering in response to his words and over the top actions. And of course, the month long assault against Hillary Clinton during Oct. 2016 was probably the longest and largest media power grab against a leading presidential candidate from any era.

DailyPUMA once again asks the progressive media, SHOW ME THE CHARLOTTESVILLE TIMELINE that proves the KKK and Nazi Protestors actually started the violence, or shut the fuck up.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Charlottesville March of the intolerants reveals both sides have issues.

DailyPUMA is confused. Did the Krazy KKK's and white supremacists attack others first, or were they impeded from marching first? 

Obviously the idiot who used his car to mow down several dozen protestors and kill one person can pretty much plead insanity as their action was indefensible by any measure of civility, but what about what happened before?

Were the groups advocating their own views of pride and intolerance of others, blockaded by others, or not? 

If the intolerants opponents had let the intolerants march, what would have happened? The intolerants would have been all over social media. Isn't that the best course of action, to actually let those be seen who have views that are most likely intolerant and unacceptable to the majority? Do we really want the intolerants of the world to scurry around in the dark and not be known?

If 100 intolerants march, and there are 10,000 people on the sidelines with their thumbs down, booing them, and capturing the intolerants on social media, would it be such an awful thing to show that the vast majority disagree with the intolerants?

Are intolerants supposed to assemble in private, or in public, because to say Intolerants cannot ever assemble (this rule would not apply to pedophiles, hackers, serial killers, drug dealers or murderers) is to become even more intolerant than the intolerables.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Sunday, August 13, 2017

DailyPUMA wonders if Shooting down a nuclear warhead may be next to impossible.

Think about all the obstacles one would have to overcome to shoot down a nuclear warhead. What if a nation says they will launch a nuclear warhead against another country. The other country scrambles all of their defensive methods and makes sure they shoot down the incoming weapon.

But what if the incoming warhead was a decoy? Just how much muscle should the military use to down one incoming warhead? If too few attack missiles are deployed and the warhead slips through how could the military justify not using massive defensive strategies to down that first incoming warhead, especially after being warned.

What if after the decoy warhead was launched and destroyed, 40 minutes later another warhead is launched? What if the country defending itself overused its defense just to down the lead dud warhead and suddenly a couple more warheads are launched? What if the few warheads are all downed, does the second country then retaliate if they successfully downed a couple of warheads they were forewarned about?

What if several dozen warheads are launched all at once, but each travels at a different speed, pace and direction? What if the speed demon of the group is a dud but because it leads the pack it attracts massive amounts of firepower to make sure it is destroyed? It seems like a giant rubik's cube puzzle to figure out how much firepower can be used to destroy each and every incoming warhead along with the priority as to which missile should be destroyed first. Dare the military ignore the closest, fastest but smallest warhead to make sure they get a slower moving, larger warhead that is among a group of secondary warhead, but more likely to carry an actual nuclear warhead?

It seems like the fastest warheads would attract the most firepower, possibly leaving too little remaining firepower to down the slower moving warheads that may actually have a nuclear weapon. And if it turns out that one of the fastest warheads actually has a nuclear weapon, and it detonates, the ability to then destroy other targets may be compromised as well.

And what about where the defensive missiles are stored that can be loaded onto our own fighter planes. They are stored in bunkers mere yards apart. It seems line one or two well placed bombs could destroy all the bunkers as the first bunker epically explodes upon being struck.

What if nuclear warheads and dud warheads are sent in all directions, how does the U.S. prioritize which missiles to shoot down? What if duds are sent to the U.S. but real warheads are sent to Australia, Guam and Japan? Does the U.S. scramble additional firepower to down warheads headed at locations not within the U.S. ?

If Kim Jong-Un successfully launches a nuclear warhead and due to errors on all sides the warhead detonates, what are people to think that a mad man can pre announce his nuclear launch desires, and then see them fulfilled?

If Kim Jong-Un were to be assassinated, does that not send a message to other dictators with nuclear weapons to never announce their intentions ahead of time? Assassination would make Kim Jong-Un a martyr and possibly create splinter groups within North Korea who will want to carry on Jong's wishes.

If Kim Jung-Un is not assassinated, he cannot stay in power AND keep his nuclear arsenal. And that leads back to a suggestion that DailyPUMA has made on a few occasions in the past. Reward Kim Jung-Un for his countries advances in nuclear weapons technology by welcoming North Korea as a  Major non Nato Ally in exchange for the dismantling of North Korea's nuclear weapons program.

It appears that a MNNA Invitation for North Korea regarding their public statements about an inevitable launching of nuclear weapons is preferable to simply kicking the nuclear can down the road.

For Kim Jong-Un to stay in power, he would have to give up his nuclear weapons. Assassinating Kim Jong-Un would simply prove he was right about America as being a threat to North Korea. Kim Jong-Un would have to be promised his own safety and acceptance as a Major non Nato Ally might be the safest course of action for the rest of the world.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Dishonor, Disrespect, Destroy Diplomacy is not an acceptable solution in regards to North Korea by the rest of the world, DailyPUMA proposes another Option.

DailyPUMA believes in backwards engineering solutions to grave political situations such as the present Nuclear Weapons proliferation by North Korea versus most of the rest of the world.

Backwards Engineering requires we start at the result we desire, and work our ways backwards to either achieve that result, or prevent a result we do not want.

  • Backwards Engineering Scenario Number One. North Korea is decimated by weapons of mass destruction to ensure they have no ability to return fire, probably not a desirable option since it means the death of millions and makes the U.S. look like the bully who blinked first. The world condemns the U.S. for the use of Nuclear Weapons that kill millions of people all because of one apparently deranged or motivated world leader.
  • Backwards Engineering Scenario Number Two. The U.S. keeps waiting and waiting and suddenly the U.S. is faced with the actual launch of a North Korea nuclear weapon, except that along with the actual nuclear weapon duds are launched at the same that must also be tracked and attacked just to make sure. The U.S. scores a remarkable 80% destruction of dozens of missiles, but the dilution caused by the fake missiles launched at the same time allow the nuclear weapon to make it through and destroy either Japan, Hawaii, Guam, or the U.S Western Coastline. This of course results in a massive annihilation of North Korea and condemnation of the U.S. for not coming up with a peaceful solution.
  • Backwards Engineering Scenario Number Three. North Korea agrees to dismantle their entire Nuclear Weapon's research program and the key North Korean people in the nuclear program agree to come to live in the U.S. as "friendly" captives where they can live out their lives in an amenable fashion while being monitored in a non-aggressive manner. In exchange for dismantling their nuclear weapon's program, North Korea would be granted MNNA status, Major Non Nato Ally, with NATO.
(Updated August 12, 2017, 10:32am, DailyPUMA apologizes for leaving out the final sentence in Backward's Engineering Scenario Number three, it has now been added.) end of update.

Of the three Scenarios above, clearly number three would be the most appealing to probably a very high majority of level headed people. While Scenario number one or Scenario number two appear to be the world's destiny (which is unacceptable to DailyPUMA), Scenario number three cannot be achieved by Dishonoring, Disrespecting or Destroying Kim Jong-Un's reputation or that of the country he leads, North Korea.

If Dishonoring, Disrespecting, or Destroying North Korea are not ideal solutions, then what is left? DailyPUMA believes the answer is to convert North Korea's petulant Nuclear Weapon's Launch threats and rantings into some form of acknowledgement that can be seen as honorable and crediting of the North Korea regime. Otherwise, the Dishonoring, Disrespecting and Destroying scenarios presently in play by the rest of the world towards North Korea, were they to work for now, could simply delay an inevitable Nuclear Weapons Launch at a later date as those who were under Kim Jong-Un's spell vow to make the U.S. pay sometime in the future. 

The key here is come up with a North Korea solution for now that does not simply kick the Nuclear Weapons can down the road for a future North Korean leader or rogue group within North Korea to follow through with their prior leader's goals. The other key goal is to not make Kim Jong-un into a martyr since most rogue groups thrive on having a martyr to inspire their vengeance.

All this leads to the same conclusion, Kim Jong-un and North Korea MUST be honored for their Nuclear Weapon's research and development accomplishments BEFORE they actually launch or detonate a nuclear weapon in a method that kills people either in North Korea or any other country. This type of diplomacy, honoring the squeaky wheel leader when the squeaky wheel leader has already behaved in a manner that some would find reprehensible, versus "Sanctioning" that leader's country, is a method that needs to be prioritized.

So far, no one has thanked or respected Kim Jong Un's nuclear weapon's research and development, and the longer the world goes without speaking well of Kim Jong Un, the more the only option that looks feasible to him is to use his Nuclear Weapons.

It may actually be easier to not have to deal with stock piling and storing nuclear weapon, it may actually become more cost effective to actually use their darn nuclear weapons to a country like North Korea that is struggling economically. So the rest of the world should be warned that once built, the maintenance and upkeep of North Korea's Nuclear weapons could prove economically bothersome to Kim Jong-Un and his advisors, assuming he has some.

North Korea and Kim Jong-Un must first be approached with a "rewards" package BEFORE the Threatening or Sanctioning of North Korea. Since economic sanctioning has already been initiated DailyPUMA believes that diplomacy has already started down the wrong road, the road of Dishonor, Disrespect, and the Destruction of North Korea that could also boomerang and adversely affect the rest of the world.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Sunday, August 6, 2017

The Russia, China, North Korea Nuclear Weapon Collusion the Press won't discuss.

There are similarities to Donald Trump's desperate desire to be president (Trump apparently owes Russian Oligarchs 3 billion dollars), and Kim Jong-un's desperate need to successfully develop a nuclear weapon that can reach the U.S. 

Kim Jong-un most likely owes Russia and China tens of billions of dollars, maybe even hundreds of billions of dollars, and apparently so does Donald Trump.

Enough pieces for a Russia, China, North Korea Nuclear Weapon collaboration fit together that the possibility of collusion among the three nations must be considered.

Questions that have not been answered about Russia, China and North Korea working together include…

  • Russia and China do not feel overly concerned about an errant North Korea missile launch. Isn't North Korea close enough to both Russia and China that either or both countries would frown upon North Korea's continued development of a nuclear weapon, unless Russia and China were somehow assisting in the development and launching of a North Korean nuclear weapon.

  • Russia and China also do not feel overly concerned about a U.S. hack into a North Korea nuclear launch that "accidentally" causes a missile launch to either return to where it was launched, or end up deploying in Russia or China. It would be an understandable response for the U.S. to hack into North Korea's launch platform and perform a "Return to Sender" missile launch accident, no? For Russia and China to not be concerned about the Return to Sender possibility seems to indicate they are more involved in North Korea's nuclear proliferation process then anyone knows about and they would know how to unhack the hack.
  • Kim Jong-un's ongoing rush to fulfill his Nuclear Weapon's program. Why? Nobody has directly threatened North Korea prior to his escalation in nuclear launch capability. In a similar matter, Donald Trump, in very late October of 2016, made a passing remark as he was getting on his Private Jet and with his back to the camera, "I am going to win this election"…(a slight pause and then), "I HAVE to win this election". It seems as if Kim Jong-Un and Donald Trump both have some type of personal mandate to achieve a goal, perhaps both may have huge debts with Russia, China, or both and in their own way have to do certain things to appease their debt holders.
Rather than the U.S threaten Kim Jong-un by publicly wondering if Kim Jong-un thinks he should be sleeping peacefully at night, DailyPUMA has suggested in the past that including Kim Jong-un as a NATO satellite in exchange for the dismantling of North Korea's nuclear weapon's program might be a better path to take. Plus, if Kim Jong-un refuses such an offer, then that too could be a signal that he is already in bed with Russia and China.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

Is Russia already meddling in the 2020 race with the ridiculous Clinton Popularity poll and Sanders Concern Troll Articles?

There are plans a foot to quash Hillary Clinton and elevate Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris for the 2020 presidential election. 

From Hillary Clinton's Progressive media detractors who are actually Sanders Concern Troll supporters in disguise... 

         -end of Sanders Supporter Concern Troll quote.

Be it a Bernie Sanders supporter spamming 15 different Reddit forums with a pro Sanders propaganda piece that presents itself as a "which way" should the democrat party go forward thesis, to the Bloomberg Poll that claims Hillary Clinton is less popular than Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton supporters should be demanding she get back on her feet, dust herself off, and get in fucking cardio physical shape and stop talking, and be more physically active and involved in the world around her. 

The Bloomberg poll tried to make a big deal out of 20% of Clinton voters not liking her, or, also known as the Sanders Thug voters. Who cares about the 20% number, there are probably 50% of Hillary Clinton voters who won't vote for Sanders in 2020, but that data was conveniently left out of the Bloomberg poll.

Hillary Clinton has the Clinton Foundation she can access to actually do projects here in the U.S. There is a Girl Power movement afoot and it probably has some roots in watching an intelligent woman who is no longer aging gracefully but rather accepting her physically declining fate as if it is an inevitably. 

The Girl Power movement thrives as Donald Trump continues to use Hillary Clinton as a punching bag whenever he needs to deflect his attention away from his inevitable impeachment over owing Russian Oligarchs 3 billion dollars and thus being in their stead.

Hillary Clinton has to get out of victim mode, and I told you so mode, and this is why I list mode, and get it in gear. It will be interesting to see what she focuses on with her new book "What Happened" scheduled for release in the next couple of months.

In the meantime, don't be surprised if the "Clinton is Snowball" (from the book, Animal Farm) attacks probably have some connection to Russia.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Saturday, July 15, 2017

Backwards Engineering the entire From Russia with Love, Trump Imbroglio. Is the Hunting for Digital Dirt Lawful in any way?

As more and more Russian pieces become exposed, it looks like Digital Dirt is going to hit the fan when this is all done. But DailyPUMA wonders, is Digital Dirt protected under the law? 

For instance, if it is proven that Trump, or his campaign, or friends of his campaign were indeed hunting for and paying for "digital dirt" on the DNC and Hillary Clinton, DailyPUMA wonders if it matters whether or not the digital dirt was simply exposing digital dirt that had already been created   by the DNC or Hillary Clinton, versus actually creating new or false digital dirt.

Does the exposing of truthful digital dirt mean illegality? Certainly creating fraudulent digital dirt would be illegal, but what about truthful digital dirt? Does one's right to  secrecy end when one digitizes the dirt themselves?  If so, then is it possible that at the end of a very long investigation, the wiggle room the Trump team will use to get out of their very big mess is to simply state, "We did everything we were accused of, but it was all done in search of digital dirt, dirt that already existed and that had been created by the very people now claiming they were hurt by their own digital dirt being exposed to the world".

If defining the right to use Digital Dirt is the end game, what are the parameters that need to be considered? If Person A says says to Person B in the privacy of their own residence that they think person C smells bad, drinks too much, and needs to take more showers, and person A and B never mention the conversation ever again, then it can never be uncovered by the digital dirt diggers. 

But if Person A digitally sends that same message to just one other person, perhaps even encrypted, and then Russian hackers figure out how to un encrypt that message, just what law has been broken? Sure hacking into anyone's email system  would obviously be bad, but if the digital information culled by the hackers is authentic, perhaps that does not rise to the level of actual theft of a digital document since the original digital document remains in place. Think of it as using a powerful microphone outside of a building that can pick up conversations within the building. Or think of it as rummaging through someone's garbage, which is legal. A digital document can simply be copied, leaving the original as is. If a Hacker in anyone altered existing digital content, or deleted anything, then that action is certainly illegal.

DailyPUMA thinks it is possible that as long as Team Trump never encouraged anyone or paid anyone to create false digital dirt, but only to search for authentic digital dirt that came from the DNC or Hillary Clinton, that Team Trump has not actually committed an act of treason or significant crime. 

If damaging intel only existed on paper, and the intel was only presented at an in person meeting, then breaking into the physical facility and stealing or copying those documents WOULD be an act of treason. But copying and not altering digital dirt is just not the same thing as actually stealing or altering the original since no person is actually invading another's persons real space.

The simple rule is this, from your mind to your fingertips to your pen, pencil, or typewriter, to your own piece of paper, you own that intellectual property and any copying of that data by another without the writer's permission is breaking the law. But the moment that same data is then transmitted via email or cell phone, (not sure about fax or using a copy machine), the hacking of that intel is not treason. 

However, this all dovetails into another issue. By hiding his own income tax filings, Donald Trump may be hiding his business relationships with free speech groups such as The Globe, National Enquirer, or The New York Post. It is possible that Donald Trump or his team may have used the  hacked material they solicited for to create false or misleading news innuendo, and that should be considered treasonous and not protected by free speech rights. Using hacked material to create fake news to damage the DNC and Hillary Clinton is probably a treasonous offense, but no one is looking at the Weekly Mags that trashed Hillary Clinton with all kinds of innuendo because they presume its a free speech issue.

Free speech should end when the causation of the free speech has come from hacked material inspired by meetings with a political operative, otherwise free speech media becomes a great motivator for hacking, and also rewards hacking. Well why hack then if the hacked material cannot be used by news organizations? Hacking still gives insight into the opposition's motives, but when the hacking is used to politically benefit the initiators of the hacking by publicly exposing the hacked material, that most likely is once again crossing the treason line if the hacking was inspired by the Trump team. 

Put another way, hacked material that was inspired by political operatives to he hacked and distributed to the media is treason, hacked material for internal use only is probably not treason, hacked material by a third party who never had an interaction with anyone else probably is not treason.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Friday, July 14, 2017

Donald Trump's Secret Medical Episode, was it Botox, Bells Palsey, a TIA (mini Stroke), or maybe a dental procedure, and is this a Medical cover up until after the Senate Votes on HealthCare today?

(Wednesday, July 19, 2017, 1:45 am update) DailyPUMA decided to do a "Solar Energy Wall" google search and was surprised to see that a Daily KOS article had suggested the idea on April 24, 2017. DailyPUMA never saw that article primarily because DailyKOS does not have RSS feeds so their articles cannot be accessed from DailyPUMA. DailyPUMA had the idea for a solar energy wall several months earlier and decided to share the idea the June 21st, 2017 article after witnessing month after month of hostilities between both parties - end of update.)

DailyPUMA, and probaby others have noticed Donald Trump cannot smile on the right side of his face. DailyPUMA would like to know what his medical condition and prognosis was and what it cost, or is that too none of our business? 

Is this a medical scare cover-up until after the Senate Healthcare Vote is taken? If the right side of Hillary Clinton's face was having difficulty smiling, and less able to smile then the left side of the face, Fox News and the Crazy Conservative Media would be DEMANDING to know what Hillary Clinton was hiding.

Donald Trump has suddenly come out in favor of a solar energy wall, something that DailyPUMA suggested on June 21st, 2017, and then repeated the Solar Energy Wall idea  on July 05, 2017

DailyPUMA's Solar Energy Wall idea went uncredited by Mr. Trump, but it's possible someone other than Trump could have read DailyPUMA and then ran with the solar energy wall idea and pitched it to Mr. Trump's team.

Progressives will make fun of the solar energy wall idea, but it is a compromise that basically will propel the U.S. forward in the Solar Energy race and maybe educate Mr. Trump on the merits of renewable energy. Rather than attempt to force Mexico to pay for a conventional brick and mortar, or steel wall, the U.S. could actually offer Mexico 10% or 15% of the energy produced by the solar energy wall as a sign of friendship and respect.

The Solar Energy wall does not have to be as efficient as a solar energy plant, it just has to produce enough energy to eventually pay for itself since a conventional wall will just be an expense. 

As for a Solar Energy wall being easier to disassemble, damage, or even steal the panels, two things to consider. Embedding GPS markers in the panels could prove a strong deterrent to stealing the solar energy wall panels, and because the wall will be easier to damage than a conventional wall, anyone attempting to scale or damage the wall will be hit with some type of financial liability as well, something less likely to happen with a more conventional wall.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Bernie Sander's Supporter Trolls a Dozen Reddit Forums with the same trashy Pro Sanders Article...

Bernie Sanders supporter Trolls over a Dozen, make that 15 Reddit Forums (and climbing?) …with the same Trashy Article that Concern Trolls the Democrat Party while praising Bernie Sanders. 
Click Each Image to Enlarge to see all the Reddit Forums this Pro Sanders Article has been spammed to, the numbers seems to be growing by the hour.

Meanwhile DailyPUMA was banned from posting on the most active Hillary Clinton forum on Reddit by alleged pro Hillary Clinton Moderator, who of course has left the Pro Sanders article up on the Hillary Clinton site.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

A Trump / Putin / Russia Timeline.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Monday, July 10, 2017

Why didn't the FBI investigate every Trump visit to Russia over the past 20 years during the 2016 Presidential Race? Why did the FBI not investigate Trump's income tax returns to see if he co mingled his business interests to attack Hillary Clinton?

What if Donald Trump's business ventures included some type of quid pro quo with the National Enquirer, Globe Weekly, or the New York Post? What if his media business ventures were either mentioned in his Income Tax filings, or were not mentioned and hidden? Shouldn't the FBI have investigated these issues?  

We've all seen the almost constant tabloid journalism attacks against Hillary Clinton during and after the 2016 campaign. Some of the Tabloid cover page articles almost feel like Donald Trump composed them himself.

Lets not forget Trump has been accused of faking being another person and then doing an interview as the alternative persona, who in turn of course praised Trump. Trump should have been investigated by the FBI in 2016 as to whether or not his trips to Russia were for political reasons, and if Trump has any ties to the National Enquirer, the Globe Weekly, or the New York Post.  

Was there a quid pro quo between Republican James Comey and Republican Donald Trump during the 2016 Presidential Campaign in which Comey would not investigate Trump? 

It is imperative that Trump's tax returns going back 20 years be made public, and then investigated for thoroughness and accuracy. It is also imperative that Donald Trump's visits to Russia, and possibly visits from Russian's counterparts to Trump at his various residences, also be investigated, for the first time.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

The problem with using a two year old's "mine" meme when it comes to Republican Politicians in charge of the 2017 Congress and the Presidency.

DailyPUMA has a simple question to ask. If Donald Trump is going to power through and evict 5 to 10 million people in America for not being official citizens, isn't that going to bring the cost of MediCAID down?

In California, there are over 500,000 undocumented MediCAL enrollees out of 11 million total MediCAL enrollees, or 4.5% of MediCAL enrollees in California are undocumented. If Donald Trump succeeds in reducing the ranks of undocumented in the U.S., then aren't MediCAID costs going to dip as well? Why would Trump want a cut in MediCAID when a reduction in MediCAID enrollment will achieve the same effect?

DailyPUMA thinks it may be possible to build a Solar Energy Border out of Solar Energy Panels at a cheaper overall cost then conventional brick and mortar, and that the solar energy created could actually be shared with Mexico. But once again, Trump is so fixated with a brick and mortar economy that the concept of building a wall that pays for itself and helps make the US more energy efficient while possibly reducing the flow of drugs and people into the U.S. has probably not even been considered.

DailyPUMA would like to see the U.S. offer North Korea  "Major Non-NATO Ally" status in exchange for halting their nuclear research and proliferation. Yes, "MNNA" is REAL. Offer Kim Jong Un an opportunity to speak at the NATO conferences and to interact with NATO leaders regarding economic opportunities. 

Instead, it seems like the best that Trump can do is a "This is going to hurt me more than it is you" meme as he prepares to drop a nuke on North Korea, or, waits until North Korea has attacked someone and caused major damage, and then drops a nuke on North Korea.

The problem as DailyPUMA sees it is Donald Trump takes too much of a "Mine" approach towards his causes. Regarding the Affordable Care Act, which was voted in by a MAJORITY of Americans in 2010 and then revalidated again in the 2012 Presidential Election, Trump instead has taken the position that Republicans have been trying to overturn ObamaCARE for seven years. 

Isn't trying to overturn the ACA as soon as it was voted in by a majority of the people, a form of treason? Instead of seven years of unethical and treasonous battles against the ACA, it's really been just six months, so why are the Republicans exaggerating and calling it a seven years of  struggle to overturn the ACA when the ACA had the popular vote for the first several years, and probably still does…oh wait, maybe because the ACA has the majority vote is why the Republicans feel it is ok to have a seven year struggle against its repeal. Sounds treasonous to DailyPUMA to openly or privately state someone has been trying to kill a bill from the moment it was voted in. 

When Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell openly admit to a seven  year battle to repeal ObamaCare, they are in treasonous waters in DailyPUMA's opinion.

The ACA repeal sounds like the "Mine, Mine, Mine" meme at work, and if the Republicans don't succeed, they will  simply hasten its demise.

Donald Trump has yet to create a talking point on any of his issues that has garnered over 50% of the voting public, and that is why the "Mine, Mine, Mine" mentality is not working.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Monday, July 3, 2017

What Donald Trump really means when he says "Make America Great Again".

When Donald Trump says "Make America Great, Again", DailyPUMA believes Trump really means "Make America Simple, Again". The Climate Accords seems to expose that what Trump clamors for and demands is simplicity. Rather than keep improving solar and wind technology, which Trump apparently considers too complicated, lets just harvest all of our non renewable energies at a faster pace. The Paris Accords in Trump's mind were about reducing energy simplicity in the short term even though in the long term it would mean more efficiency, hence, more for all.

Investments become easier to make when it comes to knowing what simple energy company to invest in, but when it comes to non-renewable energy, there is no simplicity.

Trump might actually garner a majority of Americans to approve his wall if Trump championed a wall made out of solar energy panels. But that might prove too complicated and would compete with his agenda of simple, old school energy.

Donald Trump seems to adore simplicity. Be it getting two scoops of ice cream on his pie while his guests get just one, or using a Golf Cart in Sicily while six other leaders at a G-7 conference  (who then had to wait for Trump to catch up for a photo op) walked, Trump seems to like the simpler things.

Simplicity can have its virtue and many times does, but usually simplicity is an offshoot of hard work and results. It seems as if Mr. Trump wants to use simple sounding ideas to get tough results even when good ideas exist that would get solid results in a much less confrontational way. Trump doesn't appear inclined to waiver from his "Make America Great Again" slogan just so he can continue his own pathway of personal simplicity and largesse for his inner circle while the outer circle grimaces in frustration.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Friday, June 30, 2017

Cannonfire Schools Crawdad Whole. A look back to August 28, 2016.

Possibly Cannonfire's finest article about the Trump / Clinton 2016 Presidential Race. Joseph Cannon's eerily prescient prediction of what was happening and calling the Presidential race in Trump's favor back on August 28th of 2016 is rivaled by the Joker ridiculing him about his dire warning. Crawdad Ho ridicules Cannon's entire article.  

DailyPUMA recognizes a few names from the Crawdad   Swamp comments section who were huge Clinton supporters in 2008. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Share Gadget

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from
Would this be a good way to win funds for Louisa's Law ?