Was Doctrine of Prior Restraint Illegally circumvented by Nancy Pelosi and the House of Representatives to both Impeach and Obstruct Trump from digging for evidence in Ukraine regarding the Biden's?

At best, sketchy evidence was provided by Nancy Pelosi and the House of Representatives that Donald Trump engaged in an illegal activity when he was digging for evidence against Joe Biden in Ukraine. 

It appears Nancy Pelosi and the House of Representatives Illegally exercised Prior Restraint by Impeaching Donald Trump which directly obstructed Donald Trump's right to investigate Ukraine. The Illegal actions by the House may be considered an act of Prior Restraint against a sitting President. 

Prior Restraint against a sitting President may be considered an act of Sedition, Insurrection, or Treason.

If in fact Nancy Pelosi and the House of Representatives are guilty of Prior Restraint against a sitting President, then Trump's impeachment and all additional confrontational actions and charges filed against the President would be null and void. 

Action's taken by Pelosi, the House, friends of Pelosi and House members would be the result of a Fruit of the Poisonous Tree series of obstruction activities Pelosi and the House themselves continuously perpetuated.

Please explain why Pelosi and the House of Representatives should or should not IMMEDIATELY be charged with the ILLEGAL act of Prior Restraint against the President of the United States for the purpose of destabilizing the President, the Presidency, and the United States so Pelosi and the House could install their own person in the White House in the next Election.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.