Trump's "take her out" comment about Marie Yovanovitch exonerates him.

Now we find out that Donald Trump wanted Marie Yovanovitch removed well over a year earlier than anyone knew. Has anyone noticed a pattern here?

1. Trump requests partial funding for his wall because that is why he was elected, Nancy Pelosi smugly says no.
2. The media ridicules Trump saying he was never serious about the wall.
3. The media taunts Trump stating that Mexico was supposed to pay for the wall.
4. The media does not bother to ask Trump voters if they still want a wall even if the U.S. has to pay for it because they already know that 99% of all Trump supporters who want a wall don’t care whether Mexico or the U.S. pays for the wall.
5. The irony is that the reduction in the newly arriving because of the wall will REDUCE Instant Entitlements and over time will provide savings equivalent to the cost of the wall.
6. Trump threatens a Government shutdown if he doesn’t get partial funding for his wall.
7. Trump is again mocked by the media and Nancy Pelosi.
8. Trump shuts down the Government.
9. The Media and Nancy Pelosi blame Trump for the shutdown when the resolution is very easily accomplished by providing funding for the wall.
10. The media shows families suffering, because of Trump, not Pelosi’s arrogance.
11. Trump relents.
12. Smug Pelosi and company mock Trump.
13. Media blusters that Trump is still not serious about a wall.

Now lets move forward to Marie Yovanovitch.

1. Marie Yovanovitch is a career diplomat who is loyal to the prior work she has done.
2. She resists any attempt to LEGITIMATELY investigate the Biden Family. Recently it is revealed in a new book FIVE Biden family members may have been assisted by the White House during Biden’s time as Vice President.
3. Rather than follow the wishes of her boss, she steadfastly must hold to a higher authority than the president, her own timeline of work, but no one calls her narcissistic or above the law by ignoring the wishes of her own President, which are lawful.
4. Once again time passes, nothing changes, and Trump gets annoyed and plays it heavy handed.
5. Then the people who ridiculed, ignored, and refused to compromise with Trump jump into action to hold Trump accountable for his actions while diverting attention from their own roles in how we got here.
6. Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi’s own district is being swallowed up by homelessness and lawlessness, soon in Pelosi’s District there will be NO BAIL for any criminal activity.
7. Pelosi encourages the unending undocumented flowing into California, curries favor for their vote by giving them Instant Entitlements at THE EXPENSE of long time residents and their EARNED ENTITLEMENTS that take decades to manifest.
8. And California and their dysfunctional and harmful ways for taxpayers has resulted in a super majority of 45 Dems and only 7 Republicans in California.
9. And in the rest of the country? The Impeachment vote was 190–185 NO in the House. Without Dysfunctional California added into the mix, there is no impeachment.
10. Meanwhile, California demands that Trump bail them out of their homelessness mess they created and catalyzed when they went full force against the building of a wall.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Trump supporter killed by co worker in Orange County, Florida.

Will this make the main stream media news? 


Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The NFL appears to be Gaslighting their Football Players.

Both Myles Garrett of the Cleveland Browns and Cody Ford of the Buffalo Bills have been Gaslighted by the NFL. Each was fined without an independent video forensics review that would have easily shown the NFL was full of it.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

EARNED ENTITLEMENTS vs INSTANT ENTITLEMENTS, once this issue is stated this way, Trump should win in 2020.

Come join me on Quora as I explore the achilles heel facing Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, and even Donald Trump.

Nobody has yet to make the direct comparison between EARNED ENTITLEMENTS and INSTANT ENTITLEMENTS. Once this issue hits the media, whichever Party embraces prioritizing EARNED ENTITLEMENTS over INSTANT ENTITLEMENTS, should win the Presidency in 2020.

Even Warren's tax on the rich would be accepted if voters knew the proceeds were going to shore up deficient Medicare Reimbursements AND EARNED ENTITLEMENTS, especially all of the EARNED ENTITLEMENTS Barack Obama managed to remove from Baby Boomers and Seniors during his time in office.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Lies the Media keeps repeating about Myles Garrett.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

A Censure of Trump is the right move.

While Trump has mixed in personal agendas with Government decisions, it should be noted that almost anything he does can have a personal agenda attached to it just because he has business dealings in many parts of the world.

It would not surprise me if the Ukraine impeachment Inquiry is a smoke screen for other charges that the Republicans have no idea are coming.

However, I think Nancy Pelosi refusing to allow budgeting for the Border wall is the offset. If Pelosi had granted budgeting for the border wall, and then Trump went around making his deals, then she would have fairness and decency on her side.

Pelosi's condescending smirk about a border wall, the very issue that got Trump elected, is worthy of impeachment of Pelosi.

I would like to see the Dems and Republicans agree on specific presidential actions that are impeachable and warn Trump via a united censure this time that he can't make backroom deals in the future.

However, I think Trump had the right to investigate the Bidens, as long as the investigation was not publicized and if the investigation exonerated the Bidens, Trump could not hide that result.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Trump / Ukraine cliff notes by DailyPUMA.

Forget all the media memes that have been used from day one regarding Trump, Ukraine, and quid pro quo's for a moment.

The following is the most important thing to keep track of.

Did Donald Trump demand that Ukraine not only start any kind of investigation related to American citizens, but did Donald Trump also demand that the investigation be publicly announced by Ukraine. If the answer is yes, then at the very least Trump would need to be censured.

However, if Trump did not demand that the names of those being investigated be publicized, then he did little wrong since the purpose of an investigation is to fact find and the result is unknown until the investigation is complete.

If you have been following the news you have heard various people say "there was no quid pro quo," "there was a quid pro quo", "quid pro quo's are acceptable", there was a "pro quo", and "all that is needed is a quid".

"All that is needed is a quid" was said by Nancy Pelosi and she is completely wrong. "All that is needed is a quid" means as long as Trump asked for anything in return for the Ukraine Weapons deal to go through, then Trump has done wrong according to Pelosi. That is an incorrect perspective. A President is allowed to create an investigative path as long as it ends with objective, verifiable fact finding, and as long as the investigation itself while it is ongoing is not used to impugn the reputation of any one that is being investigated.

As long as the Investigation is neither publicized while it is ongoing, nor is the result tampered with or pre determined, and the result is credible, then Trump has done very little to nothing wrong.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Media bias called Trump's fact finding, "dirt", they would have never done this during the Obama Administration.

The Ukraine situation was an ethical and logical progression. Rudy Guiliani looks for dirt. Guiliani reports his findings to the White House. Of course the White House knows that the dirt is just a starting point and has no value.

The White House goes on a fact finding mission by asking Ukraine to investigate the dirt to see if there is actual substance, aka truth or not.

The quid pro quo is basically, verify or deny dirt so the White House knows the truth. That's it. 

Yes, there CAN be quid pro quo and still not violate anything.

For some strange reason a very skittish Democrat led Congress freaked out, as if they had something to hide, and went with the dirt having value meme and a whole bunch of accusations about what Trump was going to do, not what he actually did.

So far I see lunancy, or using a false poisoned tree to create enough interrogations to find something, which is exactly what the Dems and the Media accused Trump of planning to do, except the Dems are actually doing the very thing they are accusing Trump of doing. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.