NBC News Exclusive: Comey Gives First Interview Since Mueller Completed Investigation, Comey Defends how the FBI turns non law violators are turned into Indicted Defendants.

An intriguing part of the Lester Holt / James Comey Interview occurred when James Comey validated criminally charging people who had broken no laws but would not speak out because it might harm the reputation of others. Comey admits that the FBI forces people to answer questions that will devalue their place, or their families place, or their businesses place in society even if the activity in question did not break a law, wow.

CLICK HERE TO GO TO 4MIN AND 51 SECOND STARTING POINT.

Click here to go directly to 4 min and 51 seconds.

Meanwhile, the FBI won't investigate Patient Dumping, aka a FEDERAL Law Violation called EMTALA that involves seniors and can lead to their death, as is what happened to my Mother at West Hills ER in Los Angeles CA. FBI Los Angeles did not even know what EMTALA was. 

So to conclude the Federal Bureau of Investigation won't investigate a Federal Crime against Seniors, but will indict innocent Americans who are not guilty of a crime, because they don't want to ruin the reputation of others who also have not have committed a crime, wow.

Comey's Quote "People are prosecuted for obstructing justice to avoid embarrassment, to avoid harm to their business, to avoid threats to their families, where there isn't an underlying crime that they committed...and you wouldn't want it any other way"....

Um, yes I would.  When Bill Clinton was asked if he had sexual relations with Monica Lewnisky, it was an inappropriate question. The question should have been, did you have non consensual relations with Monica Lewinsky, Bill Clinton says "no", they ask Monica Lewinksy, she says "no", end of that line of questioning. 

Instead, Bill Clinton was basically forced into revealing a consensual act that did nothing to prove an illegal act. When Bill Clinton refused to divulge details of a consensual act, he was ultimately found guilty of lying about a consensual act. This is why these investigations don't get to anything, the investigators thrive on getting the person being questioned to lie about a legal consensual situation, the media runs it as earth shattering news, the FBI then hands out Indictments as if they accomplished something of importance, meanwhile my Mother's West Hills ER Nurse in my opinion broke several laws that DIRECTLY led to my Mother's death and no one in Law Enforcement from any agency would investigate.

Below is Lester Holt / Jim Comey Partial Transcript....

05:07     and that's just not been my experience

05:10

as a prosecutor for decades every day in

05:12

this country people are prosecuted for

05:14

obstructing justice to avoid

05:16

embarrassment to avoid harm to their

05:18

business to avoid threats to their

05:19

families where there isn't an underlying

05:22

crime that they committed and you

05:24

wouldn't want it any other way because

Collusion vs Consulting Confusion has Probably created a Mess of the Mueller Investigation.

Defining Collusion as getting feedback or intel from Russia regarding a Presidential Election is most likely a double standard. If a Russian Politician wanted U.S. Help, I am presuming we would give it, and if found out, our government would state they were just acting as consultants.

One day we make look back at the Russia Investigation as a McCarthy like situation in which admitting to interacting with any Russian Person meant violation of the law, a ludicrous Investigative Standard to be adhering to. And, what is even more ironic, making everyone afraid to even admit they talked or interacted with a Russian person just meant that nothing could ever really be uncovered that might actually lead to a third or fourth party collusion.

I define collusion as actual Vote Tampering. Anything that actually disrupts or alters how votes are created, counted, tabulated, interpreted, or presented would be Collusion. Anything that prevents a person from having access to other political points of view could also be considered tampering. So if Russia had boots on the ground creating political voting flyers, or misrepresenting themselves as a political party and then  doing something offensive that would harm the entity they were purposely falsely representing, that would be collusion.

But if Russia GAVE Trump valuable intel on what Americans wanted or what would sway an American's vote, as long as the information did not involve or lead to fabricating lies or vote tampering, there is no Collusion, it's CONSULTING.

There was such a rush to see if Trump or people from his administration consulted with Russia that apparently nobody bothered to differentiate Collusion from Consulting, and we are all the more mixed up and divided because of it.

If Trump Pardons those indicted during the Mueller Investigation, the more salient point that the people indicted were being asked to admit to a crime that wasn't a crime, will be lost. Let's hope someone has the sense to challenge the Mueller indictments as being based on an incorrect interpretation and differentiation between consulting and collusion, call it what it was, Consulting/Collusion, Confusion.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Gavin Newsom takes another page from the Trump handbook, will require that Potential Burn Areas be Raked, just like Trump suggested last California Fire Season.

The Progressive Party is so out of control. Last Winter Season they ridiculed Trump for suggesting that raking the forests of dead brush and foliage could help reduce forest fires and how fast they travel.

California Governor Newsom will be directing Border Patrol and First Responders to take pre-emptive action before 2019 California Fire Season starts, a pre-emptive action that will include the Raking of Dead Brush and Foliage, aka Dead Brush and Foliage Abatement.  Wow.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Gavin Newsom pulls a Donald Trump Border Wall Directive, Makes Personal Decision to stop all Executions.

One has to wonder about the timing of Gavin Newsom's decision to cease all Executions and to Dismantle the Execution Room. Donald Trump is taking all kinds of heat for wanting to go forward with his Border Wall Funding. 

Meanwhile Governor Gavin Newsom does the exact same thing in regards to Capital Punishment. Will someone in the media at least acknowledge the timing of Governor Newsom's Mirroring of Trump's Executive Action?

Republicans still have no clue just how devious California Democrats have become at diluting Senior Benefits and diverting the money to undocumented issues. So while Trump is excoriated for using his Presidential clout to declare a Border Emergency, Trump fails to tie the ends together in a bow that lack of a Border Wall is crippling California's Budget.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Bribery Denied College for the More Deserving, but did it have to? Meanwhile 500,000 Annual Undocumented Dilutes California Senior HealthCare.

There is a correlation between Bribery being a pathway to a prestigious College Enrollment, and 500,000 Annual Undocumented Eventually Resulting in Diluted Healthcare For California Seniors and higher taxes for all.

Democrats refuse to admit that Trump is right regarding a Border Wall. California Democrat Politicians expose their own form of Bribery when they support compassionate issues in exchange for the votes they receive in return. These same California Politicians then conceal who is being hurt by their compassion, namely California Baby Boomers and Seniors through the Dilution of Healthcare programs so funds can be "redistributed" to Immigration related issues.

As for the College Bribery "Scandal" it's sad to see every swallow the FBI's version of events. There is something else going on here that of much greater importance.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Wow, AIPAC really does Run Congress.

I have mixed feelings about Muslim Religious Influence on Politics in America. While I have trouble with any religion that forces its members to dress a certain way in public at all times, I recognize it's a way of being authentic and open about how they believe. The difference when Nuns do it is Nuns actually live separate lives because they are Nuns.

Forcing a Hajib on women when in public seems to be a defiant reminder that there will aways be a difference between Muslims and others.

In the case of Ilhan Omar's recent allegedly controversial remarks about Israel, I didn't see the remarks as being controversial since ALL lobbying groups use money to do their talking.

Here is a review of the alleged controversy regarding Ilhan Omar's recent comments that have been overblown by politicians from both parties. Clearly AIPAC reaches into both parties, which is exactly the point that Omar was making.

There is a lot of posturing going on among the Media and Politicians over Omar's remarks. The ironic part is, Sharia Law gives me the creeps, big time, bigly even. Yet in this instance Omar has been treated unfairly by all.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Why did Trump's Associates lie about Russia when there was no reason to do so?

Someday people may look back and wonder how the media created so much fear regarding talking to anyone from Russia among Trump's higher echelon associates. I am not understanding how consulting with Russia over the 2016 Presidential Election equals collusion.

According to 60 Minutes, Trump might have won the 2016 Presidential because Facebook was literally at Trump's Headquarters educating members of Trump's campaign ad team on how to use Facebook Micro Targeting Ads during the 2016 Presidential Elections.

Hillary Clinton refused to advertise on Facebook. If Hillary Clinton had matched Trump's marketing efforts on Facebook, she would have probably won the popular vote by at least 5 to 6 million votes and most likely also won the Electoral College vote.

It seems like the Russia collusion bar has been lowered below ground level. As long as Mueller can show interactions between Russia and Trump's people, it will somehow mean collusion when the reality is it might just have been consulting work, just as Manafort, Devine and Stone did in Eastern Europe 10 years ago.

Ultimately, Trump's personal drive to always be the winner is bad for what it mean to be President of the United States. Trump is ok with losing as long as publicly he can say he won, this is a very dangerous psychological trait to have as the President of the United States. 

But I agree the Border Wall is necessary to prevent the ongoing dilution of Healthcare Services in California along with the ongoing desire to create more and higher tax revenue streams in California. Just recently Democrat Presidential Candidates sided with the Striking Teachers in California. Now a new Parcel Tax is on the ballot in California to pay for smaller classrooms, a situation directly related to 500,000 undocumented coming into California on a yearly basis.

So what may be called Russian Collusion, may actually be Consulting, and that concerns me, it should concern you as well. Hillary did an amazing job in 2016 considering she did have some health issues, was trying to keep Obama's coalition intact by not attacking Sander's per Obama's request. But Hillary Clinton probably chose to not surround herself with non yes people who could have given her cutting edge advice.

Twice now Hillary Clinton was in part defeated by opponents who latched on to Media Disruptors. By not admitting she erred by not using Facebook Micro Ads, we may see another Trump term because Democrats are too focused on rewriting 2016 rather than reaching out to rural America, and agreeing that a Border Wall would curb undocumented entry and allow for America to Breath again without having to keep raising taxes to accommodate all within our borders.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Seth Meyers confuses Collusion with Consulting.

https://youtu.be/lik8EYGBmXw?t=373

Seth Myers Confuses Collusion with Consulting. It's only collusion if actual ballots or votes were tampered with by Politicians or Russian Consultants.

Seth Myers on his Valentines Day, 2019 Closer Look...

This isn't just some sort of so-called process crime.....

06:16.  that has nothing to do with
06:18.  the core question of Russian collusion.

06:19.  Mueller's office said Manafort's lies go to the heart

06:22   of what the Special Counsel's office is investigating.

06:25.  For example, Manafort lied about the fact he shared

06:28.  Trump campaign polling data with a longtime associate of his

06:31.  who the FBI thinks has ties to Russian intelligence.
06:33.  He shared polling data with a guy
06:35.  tied to Russian intelligence

06:37.  while Russian intelligence was helping Trump win the election.

06:40.  That is the definition of collusion.
06:41.  If someone said, "I don't understand collusion."

06:43.  Can you give me an example?" You could say that.
End of Myers Commentary.

Meyers is mixing up Consulting with Collusion. It's only collusion if actual voters or votes were tampered with. While a case could be made that if Russia paid for facebook ads to help Trump win, might be considered collusion, the problem is Hillary Clinton did no Facebook ads, and should have. 

If Hillary Clinton had done Facebook ads, and lost because both Trump and Russia were doing Facebook ads, then that could be seen as collusion by Russia. 

Unfortunately Hillary Clinton refused to do Facebook Targeted Micro Ads. It's like a golfer forgetting their putter, but because the other golfer was given golf clubs by Russia, the other golfer is disqualified. If Hillary Clinton had her putter, and still lost, then maybe make a case that Trump got help he was not supposed to use. But if Hillary Clinton did not put forward the logical counter move, then too bad for her. Take responsibility for not being able to be agile enough to understand the value of Facebook targeted micro ads.

The bottom line, in my opinion, is Hillary Clinton would have won the popular vote by 5 to 6 million votes if she had done Facebook Targeted Ads.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Steve Kornacki with Amazing Hardball Editorial from February 27, 2019 Explains Donald Trump to the Befuddled.

Kept waiting for the Hardball February 27, 2019 episode so I could view Steven Kornacki's editorial close. Was unable to find just the Editorial only but I did manage to get a Transcript of it. Kornacki's Editorial explains Trump and his supporters exceedingly well. Kornacki only said his name at the very beginning of the Hardball episode, then. never said it again. I had never seen him before and didn't know who he was. Incredible how protective Chris Matthew's people are over not allowing a guest to even say his name or have it flashed on the screen. Best Educational and informative Editorial goes to Steve Kornacki while filling in on Hardball on the February 27, 2019 episode.

.......Welcome back. 

The scene the whole world

40:49

witnessed in front of the House

40:50

Oversight Committee today would have

40:52

rocked any other presidency to its core

40:55

Michael Cohen called Donald Trump a

40:58

criminal a fraud and a racist and

41:00

suggested federal prosecutors may be

41:02

putting a case together from a legal

41:04

standpoint there are obvious open

41:07

questions here we will see what special

41:09

counsel Robert Muller does or doesn't do

41:11

we will see what if anything emerges

41:14

from federal prosecutors in New York

41:16

maybe even from the New York State

41:17

Attorney General action on any of these

41:19

fronts could dramatically change Trump's

41:22

presidency but when it comes to the

41:25

politics it is still far from clear what

41:27

effect if any a day like today will have

41:30

the charges from Cohen were absolutely

41:32

explosive no question but were they

41:35

actually surprising this is one of the

41:38

things that makes the Trump presidency

41:39

so different from those that came before

41:41

it most voters including many of trumps

41:44

own supporters already believe that

41:47

Donald Trump had exceptionally low

41:49

character even before he became

41:51

president in the 2016 exit poll just 33

41:54

percent of voters said they considered

41:55

Trump honest one in three of his own

41:58

voters considered him dishonest only 35%

42:01

said he had the temperament to be

42:03

President just 38 percent said he was

42:05

even qualified for the office in polling

42:08

before the election only one-third of

42:10

Trump's vote of voters said that Trump

42:12

shared their values 59% said they agreed

42:15

that quote Trump talks in a way that

42:17

appeals to bigotry 44% said they

42:20

considered him an out-and-out racist

42:22

remember the Access Hollywood tape

42:24

Trump's comments about what he could get

42:26

away with because he was famous that

42:28

tape played for the whole world to hear

42:29

just weeks before the election and yet

42:31

here we are by the slimmest of margins

42:34

and with huge numbers of Americans

42:36

convinced he was a lousy person Donald

42:38

Trump was still elected president and

42:40

while there is no evidence he has gained

42:42

any support since becoming president his

42:44

numbers have been pretty stable an

42:46

approval rating that never really falls

42:48

lower than somewhere in the high 30s

42:49

never really gets hire than the mid 40s

42:51

just like his support in the polls

42:53

during the campaign so yes the kinds of

42:56

things we heard today would probably

42:57

have been ruinous for

42:59

past-president but what was shocking in

43:02

the past may almost be expected in the

43:06

Trump era that's hardball for now

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Cortez hits it out of the Park in her Demeanor, Follow up, and Focus during Michael Cohen's 2019 Congressional Hearing.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was brilliant throughout her entire five minute Screed.  Her focus on "if not you, then who", was refreshing. Her follow ups to prior comments from before the break were powerful. I can tell Cortez knows how to use a phone, and that talent lent itself well during her five minutes questioning Michael Cortez.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Summing up the Morning Session of the Michael Cohen Congressional Testimony.

Here's what we know and may have learned regarding Michael Cohen's February 27, 2018 Testimony. 

Donald Trump will stop at nothing to win, even if it means lying, cheating, bribing, deceiving, or publicly posturing being victorious no matter what actually happened.  Democrats see themselves as the good guys trying to save the World from Trump, by opposing everything Trump stands for and condemning his behavior. Democrats think they have right on their side, what they have are policies that invite the youth vote, at all costs to Baby Boomers and the Elderly.

Meanwhile Trump is in Viet Nam, probably watching the Michael Cohen Congressional Hearings at 1 am in the morning rather than prepping for his talks with Kim Jong Un.

Gasp.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

How Donald Trump could blow Everyone's Mind.

Donald Trump could blow everyone's mind if he asked for an Investigation into Fox Televisions Contracting practices. There appears to be an obscenely wide chasm between what African American Actors and Caucasian Actors are paid on Fox Television. 

Even when ratings favor the African American Show, and the show is twice as long, as in sixty minutes versus thirty minutes, the Caucasian Actor will get paid significantly more for a lower rated, 1/2 hour show than the African American Actors will get paid for their hour long show that also has higher ratings.

I'm not talking 10% or 20% more, I am talking a few hundred percent higher. A recent example would be the cast of Empire, Fox's highest rated Show for several years until it was bumped to second highest rated this past season, versus a show like Anger Management that was also on Fox, which was only half an hour long, and starred Drug and Prostitute compromised Actor Charlie Sheen.

When Sheen is on, he seems to have keen awareness of both sides of most issues, and Sheen's acting for both 2 and 1/2 Men and Anger Management seems to reflect an awareness of both sides of an issue. I'm ok with Sheen being number one. The problem is African Americans are so much farther down the contract scale one has to wonder if some of their contract goes to pay Sheen's contract.

It appears that Jussie Smollett made less money over the first 54 one hour shows covering three seasons of Fox's Number one rated Empire, as a co star, than Sheen made for ONE half an hour episode of Anger Management. The pay disparity was so great it most likely played a hand in Smollett's alleged recent actions regarding reporting a hate crime.

Fox may be tap dancing into the area of Financial Abuse in the case of Smollett, and President Trump could really make a name for himself if he ordered an investigation into why there was and is such a financial disparity between Caucasian Actors on Fox television shows versus Minority and Women Actors on Fox television shows.

There may be obvious demographic reasons why a Caucasian Male Actor might make the Most money, but left unchecked, it appears the disparity between ethnicities, women and caucasian men has reached incomprehensible levels on Fox.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Why Jussie Smollett is Innocent in my Eyes.

Jussie Smollett was apparently being paid peanuts for his recurring role on Empire. According to a Newsweek article from October, 2016, Smollett was being paid 20,000 dollars per episode, which sounds like a lot, but for having a recurring role in one of the most Popular Prime Time Fox shows, it's actually Peanuts. 

In my opinion, if Smollett's Character is recurring, he should be making at least 50,000 per episode, not 20,000. Lead Actor's salaries range from 100,000 to 800,000 per episode, so 40,000 to 50,000 per episode for a recurring co-star role seems reasonable.

Charlie Sheen got more money in one episode of Two and a Half Men during his final season than Smollett's has been paid over the first three years worth of Empire Episodes. If Sheen's 1.8 million per episode is not the epitome of Racism in Hollywood, than lets all be grateful that Sheen never Drank, Smoke, did Drugs or hooked up with Prostitutes and possibly gave some Women HIV, and made more money in one episode than Smollett has made over the first three years of Empire.

and, we should all be grateful that after Sheen was run off of Two and a Half Men for his Drinking, Smoking, Drugging and possibly giving women Aids, he was NEVER offered another show nor crazy money ever again. (this is snark)

1. Charlie Sheen: The Two and a Half Men alum was the highest paid actor in television during his reign. He earned $1.8 million per episode in the show's final season and then took home $2 million per episode of Anger Management after it passed its 100th episode.

If Mr. Smollett was being paid just 20,000 per episode (that's TWO LESS Zeros than Sheen got from the SAME NETWORK that Smollett's show runs on. After being fired from 2 and 1/2 Men Fox then hired Sheen for Anger Management). 

After taxes, agents fees and other associated expenses with being a celebrity, not to mention higher costs for clothing, grooming, and where he lives, perhaps even security detail for public visitation, Chicago area taxes, Smollett's take home pay per year might not have been more than 150,000 to 200,000 TOTAL, a ridiculously low figure for any performer who manages to get a recurring role in any Prime Time TV Show that has at least 20 episodes per year.

While it appears that Smollette got raises at some point, because the original contract was for such a low amount per episode, a rather nominal raise will look like a very large raise in terms of percentage.

What is being perceived as selfish, "how could you do that behavior" is really defiance towards a Hollywood system that year after year purports to try and level the Diversity playing Field while still discriminating and dragging its feet, rewarding White Actors who behave very badly while financially punishing an African American Actor for finally lashing out after years of financial abuse from the same Network that paid Sheen 2 million per episode.

Yes, it matters that Smollett was obscenely underpaid, it matters greatly. Smollette wanted to be paid more for his work and when no one took him seriously, he didn't give up. 

I bet EVERYONE being Interviewed who is ridiculing or judging what Smollett allegedly did, makes more money per year than Smollett does, and for that reason, and that reason alone, they should either shut up, or acknowledge that he was underpaid and was being taken advantage of by the same system that Paid Charlie Sheen more money for one episode of Anger Management than Smollette's total Salary over his first three seasons of Empire. 

Wow. Wow. Wow. Wow. I can't fathom this, it's beyond comprehension to me. People, learn Simple Math, please.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.