Donald Trump's Insane Rant about being Phone Tapped during the Presidential Election.

I wonder if Donald Trump has some kind of imaginary time machine that makes him believe he can intertwine the past with the present in a cataclysmic storm that makes things sound much worse then they were, um, are, um, werare. 

From the man who invited Russian hackers to hack into the DNC (which he probably already knew had been done through his own sources but wanted to use his announcement as ground zero for such a hack that  had already occurred, for one to occur, once again, his imaginary time machine at work), Donald Trump is demanding an investigation into the possibility that as an un vetted private citizen who may have paid for his entire presidential campaign with Income Tax Evasion Money, or who may have had a secure server hooked up to Russia, or who may have bribed IRS officials, and who probably violated FCC rules when he falsely and repeatedly called Hillary Clinton a criminal for personal and political gain, that he was targeted!

DailyPUMA started a Change Dot Org Petition requesting Donald Trump be "Reaudited" BEFORE he took office. Of course Donald Trump needed to be vetted, and if took wiretapping his phones to make sure he did not have a secret server hooked up to Russia, or possibly bribed IRS officials with escorts and other amenities such as staying at Trump Hotels for free or next to nothing, or was accepting Russian Intel to discredit the DNC and Hillary Clinton, or funded his entire presidential campaign with income tax evasion money, or was fraudulent using the airwaves to call Hillary Clinton a criminal when she has never been convicted of a crime, then of course the FBI / CIA and the Department of Justice had the right to wiretap private citizen Trump.

Trump  has somehow created the fantastical Jesus Persecution fantasy that as president, Trump was wiretapped by a prior president while he was still pre-president. The mind snaps not only at the level of such incredulously mind numbing interplanetary time warped string theory imagination, but that conservatives are somehow taking seriously the man who repeatedly called Hillary Clinton a criminal and demanded the fourth person in line for the presidency be put in jail for maybe, maybe declassifying intel that was within her right to declassify.

The correct answer from the FBI and CIA and the Department of Justice should not have been to deny wire tapping accusations, but to simply state that "anyone who may be breaking the law is subject to investigation, if Mr. Trump feels he broke the law while he was running for the presidency, than it is possible he was wiretapped. If Mr. Trump wishes to elaborate any illegal activity he may have been involved in while running for president or before he ran for president, the FBI / CIA or Department of Justice can conduct a search to see if he was wiretapped regarding illegal activities Mr. Trump may have participated in".

The idea that the same entities who overly and improperly vetted Hillary Clinton, costing her the 2016 presidential election, may have also wire tapped private citizen Trump for illegal activities, yeah, that's outrageous in Trump's mind, and that does concern DailyPUMA. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Cannonfire with Explosive Revelation, Hillary Clinton had the Power to DeClassify anything, therefore the entire Email Scandal was a Scam.

Quoting Cannonfire… 

"The "illegal leak" bit is a reference to the Obama "tapp" claim. The counterargument here would be that Trump has the authority to declassify anything he likes. 

You know who else had the authority to declassify material (within her department)? Hillary Clinton. Thus, even if she had sent messages containing classified information -- which she did NOT, despite Mike Pence's recent repetition of that false claim -- so what? She had the authority to declassify. " - End of Quote.

DailyPUMA hinted at the same concept last year but did not make it in such a clear and concise manner. DailyPUMA's point was that the sending of any email by Hillary Clinton can only result in an investigation if the email information is either intentionally sent to someone who then acts on the information for the singular purpose of personal gain, or the info is used to damage the U.S., AND the S.O.S. had to know that that was the intent of the intel they were sharing.

DailyPUMA also made the point that the sending of email could simply be a ruse to fool others that might be trying to hack info from the U.S., that the FBI was actually the entity giving out classified intel by claiming that all email transactions are 100% truthful, and if the FBI knew that all email transactions are not necessarily truthful, then the FBI falsely investigated Hillary Clinton by conveniently forgetting the possibility of false intel being transmitted via email for the purpose of tricking prospective hackers.

DailyPUMA also made the point that Hillary Clinton, as a woman, had a smaller circle of independent female thinkers who had worked as S.O.S. accessible to her than if she had been a man, and by now ostracizing her over basically nothing, aka attempting to have her own inner circle people to learn from, it was sexism at play because if Hillary Clinton had been a man, she would have had a much bigger pool to pick from. 

An SOS cannot take all of their enrichment from the FBI and the President, they need to have some level of independence so that they can present outside the box thinking, and for that, the Male dominated political system made Hillary Clinton pay.

And therein lies the irony of Cannonfire's premise, Hillary Clinton was fourth in line from the presidency when she was Secretary of State, since when do we allow underlings to have status over the Secretary of State? Imagine owning a donut shop and the head chef fires you for giving away a recipe of theirs that is not even going to a rival! The chef has other options available to them, they can sue, or they can quit, or ask for a raise to compensate the loss of intellectual property, but they cannot fire the owner. Hillary Clinton was the owner, but being in a male dominated echelon, the males were able to keep her off balance regarding this salient point, and Hillary Clinton had no female inner circle to draw upon.

In the TV Show, "Castle", there is an episode in which Kate Beckett, (played by Stana Katic) is interviewed for the position of Commander of her precinct. The interview goes horribly as she is basically "manhandled" by the men interviewing her. She walks out of the meeting basically petrified, then suddenly she has a revelation, comes back into the interview room, and basically tells the men to eff off. It turns out that was the test, to see if she would cowtow to the male establishment, or not. By not cowtowing to the male establishment, she proved her mettle and was awarded the promotion to commander. wow.

Unfortunately, if Hillary Clinton had had the "balls" to tell everyone to fuck off, that she was fourth in command and an underling cannot have supremacy over her, the media would have gone nuts and declared her a power hungry bitch. It would have taken Hillary Clinton having her own media channel to defend her for her to have fought back in the manner that she should have fought back.

Meanwhile, we now have a power hungry super bitch in the oval office who is declassifying everything in sight even after condemning Hillary Clinton by convincing his "Gullibles" that it was illegal for her to do back then what Trump is now doing at supersonic speed.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

President Trump Full Speech on USS Gerald R. Ford 3/2/17 Equates War with Sports, and "Winning".

Donald Trump equated War with Sports, promising that America would either prevent War, or Win when engaged. When Sports Heroes equate playing football with War, they are admonished. 

Is it any different when our president equates War with Sports by claiming we would win? War should never be equated with sports since the goal of war is to kill the opposing side, not outscore them.

The video link below is basically cued up at the four minute mark once the commerical finishes or you click skip commercial. I can't figure out how to make it stop after his winning comment so you will need to hit stop unless you are a glutton for punishment. 

Keep in mind that Robotics and Drones are the future of War, so I'm not exactly sure how building more and more aircraft carriers makes us safer when in a couple more years a well placed drone or two with a bomb on it will probably be able to cripple an aircraft carrier.

https://youtu.be/S4MAjNfqVZk?t=4m

And lets also remember that the next war may be fought in space in which satellites are either hacked or attacked.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump has a Conflict of Interest Issue when it comes to curbing the EPA.

Regarding the EPA, Donald Trump, You can't gut this.  

If Donald Trump cuts EPA funding or regulations in any way, Trump basically risks a conflict of interest charge regarding his business relations with China. 

China struggles with making U.S. EPA compliant products on a daily basis. I can attest that I have noticed a foul smell that permeates at least some products that are made in China that are black in color. Be it fabric, plastic, or metal, if it is black in color and made in China, it possibly has a foul odor. Put another way, if that same product was same in the exact same way in the U.S., that product would possibly be sanctioned, augmented or rejected until whatever was causing the foul smell was fixed.

If Donald Trump rescinds any part of the present EPA regulations, he makes it easier for China to pass EPA inspections. This can only be seen as a quid pro quo simply because Trump has business interests in China.

Trump would be better off maintaining EPA policy and simply enforcing that China follows the same policy for any product they plan on importing into the U.S.

By lowering EPA standards, Donald Trump catapults China much closer, or into suddenly being compliant regarding future products they plan on importing into the U.S.  

Ironically, Lowering EPA standards will make China MORE Competitive with U.S. Manufacturers, who will still face legal action for production methods and products that are known to cause cancer.

If Donald Trump has any debt or business dealings with China, rescinding the EPA, or weakening the EPA, becomes a conflict of interest because China benefits if EPA regulations are relaxed. I have read that presidents cannot be accused of conflicts of interest, I doubt that applies to the trading of the health and welfare of U.S. citizens so a president's Chinese / International business dealings thrive.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump's Twisted Plan to "be better than China" by relaxing EPA guidelines even as China realizes their environmental mistakes.

Donald Trump appears to be salivating with the idea of besting China to the point that he is willing to relax EPA guidelines so that America can be Great Again. 

Trump refused to apologize for his McCain not being a War Hero comment because Trump "gained seven points" in the Republican presidential race after he made his McCain comments.

If Trump is fueled by numbers, then he will probably feel emboldened to relax EPA standards just so a year or two from now he claim victory in creating American Jobs and besting China. I routinely return products made from China that are black in color. The black products from China seem to all emit a foul odor. I don't know for sure that that means the product has toxins in it, but I doubt that a bad smell is a good thing. 

So I guess in the future when I proudly buy a Made in America product, I can expect more of the same foul smell? Or maybe the foul smell will be muted with some other chemical compound that makes the bad smell, smell good?  Either way, Trump's promise to bring jobs back to America may really be nothing more than bringing China's overly toxic practices back to America.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

In Donald Trump's World, being a POW is not Heroic, but dying for one's country is.

In Donald Trump's World, being a POW is not Heroic, but dying for one's country is. And the Media ate it up last night and today. 

But wait, didn't Mr. Trump rise to prominence during the Republican debates when he chided John McCain for not being a War hero because McCain was a POW? 

Did not Donald Trump previously state that not being caught was the goal?  Trump Proudly crowed on the Don Imus show that he gained 7 points in popularity when he disagreed that John McCain was a War Hero? So now Mr. Trump gets to flip flop on his position and declare William Ryan Owens a War Hero, but John McCain is not?

The Media really has lost its compass and Donald Trump now sees that whether he chastises John McCain and claims McCain is not a War Hero, or Trump eulogizes a deceased soldier as a War Hero, thanks to the media, his popularity rises.  This is not a good thing.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 16 for a Clinton Media Channel, Trump Invokes "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Regarding his Income Tax Returns.

DailyPUMA finds Donald Trumps Invocation of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" regarding his own past income tax filing a direct betrayal to Trump's ongoing claim that the Clinton brand did nothing when they were in the Oval Office.

Reason number 16 why the Clintons need their own media channel, to point out the hypocrisy of those who condemn the Clintons while borrowing from past Clinton successes.

Could you imagine if Hillary Clinton had responded to Donald Trump's condemnation of her 30 years in public service by reminding him that he was using "Don't ask, Don't Tell" as "the" reason to ignore his Income Tax Returns.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

How Democrats become Republicans, Students violently Protest Anaheim Officer who fired Warning Shot.

Another reason why Progressives should not lead all Democrats down the path of crazy, they cause life long Democrats to suddenly turn Republican. Check out the Warning shot story, How an off-duty cop telling teens to stay out of his yard escalated to gunfire, protests and outrage, if you don't believe DailyPUMA's warning about Democrats shifting to vote Republican over these types protests.

What is now emerging, in DailyPUMA's opinion, is a travel and immigration movement that does not respect property rights. This will simply shift 10% of Democrats to vote Republican in 2020 while present Trump supporters stay the course.

Besides the link above, many interviews were done with the Anaheim protestors, the main thing they cared about was that the off duty home owning police officer fired a warning shot. Absolutely no importance was placed on property rights by these protestors, even though the background to this story includes a neighborhood history of graffiti on homeowners fences and simply invading people's yards and messing them up, as just being no big deal.

The mindset to simply want to walk on people's property and deface it is disturbing. When I went to school and it had just rained, I would throw worms that had gotten stuck on the sidewalk back onto the grass so they would not die. The idea that youngsters nowadays simply want to damage the property of those they walk by, destroy rather than nurture, is basically the act of a future criminal.

Once the Trump Administration figures out how to better align their message, that illegal and rampant immigration is creating a society that disrespects home property rights, Trump will regain his footing.

This is just another reason why Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton need to re-establish their own successful record of the 90's rather than fall in line with the progressive crazies of today.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Clintons at the Crossroads.

The rift within the Democrat Party (yes, its democrat, not democratic, and gasp, DailyPUMA heard the democrat vs democratic take on Rush Limbaugh's show several years ago, the one time every six months DP listened to him) could produce a second Trump term. Already Progressives are bandying about names for 2020, Biden, Michelle Obama, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren to name the frontrunners.

The problem is Clinton Supporters may not take kindly to Hillary Clinton not being given another chance in 2020, IF SHE IS UP TO IT.  

DailyPUMA would probably vote Trump over Sanders in 2020, since Sander's prolonged screeds against Hillary Clinton in 2016 damaged her just enough to make her vulnerable to the on going fake news attacks she endured. 

Plus, Sanders had a way of publicly supporting Hillary Clinton while using body language that seemed to say "what a tragedy that I did not win" even as he was supporting Hillary Clinton.

There are several things the Clintons should do if Hillary Clinton wants to run again in 2020. 

1. The first is for Hillary Clinton to get in bad ass shape. I mean run a half marathon shape, or at the very least, exercise on an elliptical exercise machine for half and hour to 45 minutes and be able to do a phone interview at the same time. The jury is out as to why Hillary Clinton was never shown being physically active during the 2016 campaign. Surely Hillary Clinton's personal videographer must have suggested some type of millennial recognized and approved physical activity, no?
2. Hillary Clinton needs to stop being seen in all the right places and instead focus on Jimmy Carter style of social interaction. Use Clinton Foundation opportunities and meld into the U.S. and into the red states with projects that help people and communities.
3. Debunk the fake Clinton Derangement Syndrome news stories. Explain Haiti. Make documentaries that show why several policies from the 90's were the best move for that time period.
4. Fund documentaries that will establish the success of the 90's. 
5. Learn to not fall in love with the perfect 30 second political ad and instead learn to blitz the opposing side with literally dozens upon dozens of political commercials.
6. Start a Clinton Media Channel.

If the Clintons don't initiate some of the preceding suggestions and somehow Hillary Clinton gets another chance in 2020, she may lose again to Donald Trump because she will just come off as an even older version of the same candidate who isn't physically fit enough to handle being president. 

If Hillary Clinton does not run in 2020, Donald Trump may win again as it will take a mere 10% of the Clinton voters from 2016 to protest and either stay out of the 2020 race or vote Trump out of spite to the inevitable 2020 Democrat Progressive Candidate.

If Hillary Clinton takes some of the suggestions outlined above, and shows up in 2020 physically fit, she would still be a viable presidential candidate.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Snowden Effect and Hillary Clinton's Emails.

Assuming Russia has access to Edward Snowden's stolen NSA information, what if Russia was able to discover that there were secret agent moles in high Russian places? Rather than simple removing the moles immediately, what if Russia sat on the Russian Mole information and instead started giving out disinformation to the newly discovered Russian moles, actually keeping them in the loop, but in a controlled, disinformation manner?

What if the FBI or CIA, concerned that their Russian moles had been comprised, but unsure, came up with the Hillary Clinton email scandal in an effort to keep the media narrative off of the issue of compromised Russian Moles and onto something that was actually much more mundane?

What if Russia then used their ongoing relationship with Donald Trump and simply started feeding him intel obtained through Snowden's stolen NSA information?

Could the entire 2016 presidential race have been a spy vs spy motif in which the FBI uses Hillary Clinton's emails to subvert discussion about more serious matters while Russia shares their secret intel with Trump, feeding Trump secrets and leaking DNC email in an effort to ensure his 2016 victory?

Was 2016 the year of a Spy vs Spy presidential race? Cannonfire suggests that Trump is in trouble with U.S. intelligence and believes that Trump or persons within his administration gave up several moles within the Russian Government once Trump became president.

Or did those moles outlive their usefulness once Trump was elected president since both Trump or people within his inner circle, and Russian intel already knew they were moles?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 8 Why we Need a Clinton Media Channel, Meet the Press makes Solid Points about the Progressive left leading the Democrats to Doom.

Meet the Press, February 12, 2017 program. One of the final segments of the show basically support the need for a Clinton Media Channel by stating that the Progressive portion of the Democrat party is leading the charge against Trump. Here are portions of the transcript to ponder.

CHUCK TODD:

Welcome back, my next guest is part of a rare and dying breed, a centrist and a moderate. A moderate Democrat. Jim Webb was secretary of navy under Republican President Ronald Reagan. He voted for George W. Bush over Al Gore. But by 2006 he had switched parties to become a Democrat and he won a U.S. Senate seat in Virginia. Jim Webb takes a somewhat more optimistic view of the potential for a Trump presidency. And he joins me now, Senator Webb, welcome back to the show.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

Well, nice to be here.

CHUCK TODD:

So let's put some context to your words when you wrote an op-ed right before, literally the day before the inauguration in the Wall Street Journal. And it was mostly on foreign policy where you were saying, "There's something about his election is a jolt the system needed or a shock that it needed." What --explain.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

Well, you know, in so many words here. I didn't say that the system needed a President Trump. But I've been saying for a long time that the system that we're operating under needs some sort of a, you would call it, jolt. You know, I think both parties have sort of gotten calcified.

And let's remember that if Hillary Clinton had won you would be seeing the same sort of activities that you're seeing now. They would just be focused on different things. There would be people out there saying she belonged in jail. There would be people talking about corruption. Turnstile government, et cetera, et cetera.

So what we're seeing playing out right now, first of all, as the governor mentioned this is a new administration, you know, getting its wheels under it. But at the same time, this is an attempt by President Trump to pull different types of people into the system from the old turnstile government. There's a lot of Republicans that are mad at him who are sitting out there in the think tanks thinking that they were going to come into a Republican administration.

And also he's got a payback I think that he feels strongly about in terms of the people who actually put him over, these voters that were alienated, were not voting. And these issues, controversial issues, that he's putting out in a wrong kind of forum I think are issues of credibility. On the Democrats, first of all, they're looking at 2018. And they don't have a message. They don't have a--

CHUCK TODD:

Speak to them as they, by the way.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

--well, you know.

CHUCK TODD:

You don't say we. Is there a reason?

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

I'm not in the system right now as, you know, I'm over here with you right now--

CHUCK TODD:

Fair enough. Okay.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

--bit of my life as a writer and a journalist. And it's a good place to be about making these observations.

CHUCK TODD:

Then welcome back. And finish the observation.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

Well, you know, there is a campaign going on on the Hill, in the media, in the academia to personally discredit not only Donald Trump but the people who are around him. And, you know, the end result of this really is try and to slow down the process, by the way. You and I were talking a minute ago about the confirmation process, it's slow it down so that by 18 when the Democrats are very vulnerable particularly in the Senate they will not be a record of accomplishment that they can run against.

And at the same time the Democratic Party over the past five or six years has moved very far to the left. You know, when you can't have a Jefferson/Jackson dinner which was the primary, you know, celebratory event of the Democratic Party for years because Jefferson and Jackson were slaveholders, they were also great American in their day, something just different has happened to the Democratic Party.

CHUCK TODD:

You think that they're too focused on identity politics?

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

Well, I think that the message that has been shaped by the Democratic Party has been shaped toward identity politics. And they've lost the key part of their base, the people in, you know, my family history goes back to the Roosevelt Democrats, the people who believed that regardless of any of these identity segments you need to have a voice in a quarters of power for those who have no voice. And we've lost that with the Democratic Party. I'm not saying the Republicans have it. But--

CHUCK TODD:

I was just going to say the center's been hollowed out. You can make an argument that the political center in both parties, because right now if you espouse that you were running for reelection, any Democrat were espousing what you just espoused which is, you know what, look, essentially you're saying, hey, start working with him a little bit, accept the fact that he's President, you'd get primaried. And you'd probably lose.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

Well, true. Well, I don't know about--

CHUCK TODD:

I understand you, but I'm saying Democratic incumbent.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

Generally, you know.

CHUCK TODD:

Fair enough.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

That is a danger to people who would say those sorts of things. But the Democrats have not done the kind of self-reflection that they should have starting 2010. And I was talking about this in the '10 elections. You've lost white working people. You've lost flyover land.

And you saw in this election what happens when people get frustrated enough that they say, "I'm not going take this aristocracy." You know, Bernie, good friend of mine. Bernie can talk about aristocracies all he wants. You know, the fact that you've made money doesn't make you a member of that philosophy. Look at Franklin Roosevelt. But there is an aristocracy now that pervades American politics. It's got to be broken somehow in both parties. And I think that's what the Trump message was that echoed so strongly in these flyover communities.

CHUCK TODD:

Let me ask you on the election, you stayed away from saying who you supported in the election. I know that Tim Kaine is somebody you have a lot of respect for. I can't imagine you didn't vote for him.

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

I voted for Tim Kaine for Senator.

CHUCK TODD:

For Senator. At the end of the day, are you comfortable with your vote, with whoever you voted for?

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

I'm comfortable for my vote and my vote is private to me. But at the same time, you know, I will say that I did not endorse Hillary Clinton. I had a lot of the concerns that, you know, people in my group that I've grown up with have. And the Democratic Party's got to do some real, hard looks at whether or not they are going to expand and get back working people who used to be the core of their party.

CHUCK TODD:

Are you done with politics?

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

I'm over here with you right now.

CHUCK TODD:

All right. I will leave it there. Senator Jim Webb apparently coming back to the journalism world. We'd welcome you back--

FMR SEN. JIM WEBB:

Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am somewhat amazed that Mr. Webb did not understand that Hillary Clinton is a Moderate Liberal who was forced to run as a progressive because of Bernie Sanders. She could have picked Warren as her VP, instead she went with Kaine, who Webb likes, yet Webb still wouldn't vote for Clinton. This is just another man who was afraid to support a female president. But the points Chuck Todd made about a hollowed out center are correct in DailyPUMA's opinion, and point to the Clintons needing to protect their 90's achievements and then move forward from there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Later on, the following was heard….

CHUCK TODD:

And governor (Republican Pat McCrory), I want you to have the last word on this, it's something we discussed in break which is your party pulled you to the right. All right? There's plenty of evidence that says that in some of these things that hit you and cost you your reelection were not things that were priorities for you. But it was priorities for your base. You couldn't-- you felt like you couldn't fight your base. What's your advice to the Democrats?

FMR. GOV. PAT MCCRORY:

I think Elizabeth Warren's doing the same thing to the Democratic Party. I think some of the left-wing protesters, the coordination of a lot of left-wing groups are pulling the entire party to the left. And I agree with the senator that there is a purging.

I mean, look at even the Nordstrom's issue with Trump's daughter where those sales are going down because there was pressure on them not to buy that product. The pressure right now on people even attaching themselves to the president and impacting their business is so strong that it's a heck of a campaign. Whether that's a long-term strategy, I don't think it is. It's not a good one.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DailyPUMA agrees that right now what is fueling the Democrats is Progressive Outrage. Moderate Democrats who strongly backed Hillary Clinton quietly delude themselves that the Progressive outrage is over Hillary Clinton losing because of James Comey letter and fake news stories.

Sadly, the Progressives are just wildly angry and thus and will fight for anyone BUT Hillary Clinton in 2020. This in turn will offend millions of Clinton supporters who may rather vote for Trump for a second term rather than vote for Sanders or Biden or Michelle Obama. The present situation just cries out for Reason Number 8, Why we need a Clinton Media Channel.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 7 Why we need a Clinton Media Channel, ZERO Shares for One Week Old Clinton Foundation Press Release written by Bill Clinton, Millions of Supermarket checkout line views for latest Globe News Clinton Hate Headline.

Zero Shares for a Clinton Foundation Press Release one week after it was written and released by Bill Clinton, Zero Shares?  

                  Click Image to Enlarge

The RSS feed for Bill Clinton's Foundation article is listed in two different columns on Daily PUMA with an average audience of 350 to 400 visits every day. So not even Clinton loyalists feel it important to share it on their facebook page. Wow.

Meanwhile, Back at Globe Magazine, MILLIONS saw the following headline in their local supermarket checkout line.

Click Image to Enlarge

DailyPUMA was probably the only one to flip the Globe Ragazines around and show the backside of this fake news story at their local supermarket. Zero Shares for a Bill Clinton press release, millions of views at the local supermarket line regarding fake news about Hillary Clinton.

DailyPUMA warned about the corrosive effect the National Enquirer and Globe Magazine would have during the 2016 election yet the Clinton campaign did nothing to combat it.

Trump would never tolerate this type of treatment without having his own response outlet, and he became president.  

Perhaps the Clinton's are just too tired and defeated to fight back because of their own health issues. Perhaps they never learned how to truly delegate authority. Maybe they are too focused on making money rather than preserving their legacy via a Clinton Media Channel?

If you feel personally hurt about what happened to Hillary Clinton, why doesn't Hillary Clinton feel it back by at the very least defending the Clinton record of the 90's since that is what was twisted upside down and backwards by the Progressives to shut her up during the campaign. Rather than the Clintons be thanked for programs from the 90's that worked, the progressives rewrote history during the Sanders campaign and the Progressive media backed them  up. Clintons popularity, which had been at an all time high prior to Bernie Sanders, slowly sank over a several month period of time.

The Progressive backlash about the 90's probably influenced Hillary Clinton not to go to Wisconsin, spend more time in Michigan, and avoid certain  unions from other blue collar states that she lost support from because of the distorted and incorrect view of NAFTA. The unions who should have been supporting the Clintons would have supported Hillary Clinton her if NAFTA had been properly vetted by a Clinton Media  Channel, which unfortunately continues to not exist while the Clinton's slowly drift into the distance.

But hey, at least Donald Trump forgave Hillary Clinton for being a nasty and horrible woman, at least she has that to fall back on. (that was snark for those who don't get it.)

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 6 why we need a Clinton Media Channel, Exposing the Trump Trap.

Donald Trump appears to be creating parallel universes from which he can bounce back and forth from in an effort to make his supporters believe he is protecting them, even when Trump Policies may likely make his billionaire friends wealthier. DailyPUMA calls it the Trump Trap, in which the public views Trump's actions as pro middle america when they first and foremost benefit Trump's billionaire buddies.

Mr. Trump probably believes that slowing down migration intake into the U.S., both legal and illegal, is protecting U.S. Citizens from migrant terrorists, drug cartels, along with donor recipients being prioritized over U.S. Citizens. 

Mr. Trump might also believe slowing down Foreign migration coming to the U.S. may also help slow down Foreign Students from first taking enrollment opportunities from U.S. Citizen Students, then enabling those same foreign students to use their education to take high paying U.S. Jobs from U.S. Citizens. But the parallel Trump Trap truth is that most of Trump's policies will create obscene wealth for the top 1%. 

The Trump Trap allows Trump to take actions that help his billionaire friends while simultaneously looking like they are actions being taken to protect American Citizens from Foreigners. The Trump Trap creates the appearance that Trump is protecting American Citizens from a Migrant Invasion and that those rabidly opposed to Trump are part of the problem as well, whereas Trump detractors see Trump's actions as a con designed to give his own billionaire club untold future riches.

Without a Clinton Media Channel to identify the Trump Trap strategy, Progressive Democrats are running the risk of creating enough backlash from their rabid early hate of any action that Trump takes. This may cause Trump to be seen as a hero by his very loyal supporters as he fights against all odds to preserve economic opportunities for americans. 

Without a Clinton Media Channel to innovate better ideas than what Trump is supporting, Democrat Moderates are blindly following the wrath of the Democrat Progressives who in turn create a backlash of stronger and stronger support of Trump from Trump supporters. Trump may only need to swing 10% of his detractors by next election to win re-election.

Is Hillary Clinton's next gambit, writing a book? 

DailyPUMA was incensed by many of the accusations thrown at the Clintons from the Sander's camp during the 2016 democrat nomination race. But one thing that I am concerned about, it seems as if Hillary Clinton is attracted to high paying gigs either on Wall Street or through book deals more so then other options open to her.

Perhaps one critical difference between the Clinton's and Trump is how they use their lawyers. DailyPUMA's theory is that while Trump uses his lawyers for economic gain and has apparently filed over 4,000 lawsuits prior to running for president, perhaps the Clintons forage for money wherever they can get it in the event they need to hire lawyers to defend themselves from generally malicious shot in the dark lawsuits.

But this would just be another reason to start a Clinton  Media channel in which the Clintons put their ideas, their experience, their intelligence and their vision out in full view so the masses can actually become passionate Clinton supporters, rather than fans who can manipulated by rapidly changing social media winds.

DailyPUMA would like to point out that everything is more interrelated and complicated then is being currently portrayed by the mainstream media, which can't seem to get beyond documenting the protestors and into the core issues regarding both migration and illegal immigration.

Below is a list of questions regarding migration and illegal immigration that the media has not been able to focus on and address because of the constant protests against Trump  they are instead following, aka the Trump Trap.

1. Do Foreign Students take away college enrollment positions from U.S. Citizens?
2. Do Foreign Students from wealthy families spoil U.S. colleges into charging higher tuition to all? 
3. Does Foreign Student enrollment subsidize U.S. College Enrollment costs for U.S. Citizens?
4. Do Foreign Students who remain in the U.S. steal jobs from U.S. Citizens, or do their innovations create even more job opportunities and more than make up for the jobs they acquire?
5. Is the U.S. actually stealing the brightest and best minds from other countries and then further enriching itself when those minds become working, Naturalized Citizens in the U.S.?
6. Are other countries losing their best students to U.S. colleges and gaining no benefit once those students matriculate and stay in the U.S.?
7. Is it true that newly immigrated or illegally immigrated residents cause U.S. citizens to wait longer before receiving an organ transplant?
8. Do U.S. citizens share state & federal funding programs with newly immigrated or illegally immigrated residents, in some instances causing U.S. citizens to be denied state and federally funded programs because funds have dried up?
9. Is it possible that educated immigrants are a huge plus to the U.S. economy and basically offset any potential negative costs that uneducated, illegal immigrants might be creating?
10. Was NAFTA really a disaster, or did it just need some tweaking as time went by?

A Clinton Media channel could tackle migration and illegal immigration questions and issues head on and in the process establish itself as the moderate liberal position that the MAJORITY of citizens in the U.S. clamor for.

Once the above ten scenarios are explored, the Clinton  Media Channel could then address the U.S. role in providing guns and armament to  the Middle East that could be one of the ongoing reasons that the region is so destabilized.

But then there's that book deal Hillary Clinton has to tend to. 

Sigh.

I am curious if Donald Trump's family or friends of Trump have benefited from Foreign Doctors and Physicians who are now Naturalized Citizens.

                     Click here to go to above website. Click on Image to Enlarge. Add three zeros to the number totals on each line when reviewing the above graphic.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 5 - Why we need a Clinton Media Channel. Use it or Lose it.

I am momentarily upset with the Clintons for just not getting the Internet and its role in politics and history. 

DailyPUMA had the Clinton backed site "Correct the Record" on here via an RSS feed. Today I noticed it was in what I think was Japanese or some other language that I just don't recognize.

I clicked on the RSS feed link for Correct the Record, and my computer was attacked by malware or ransom ware. I can't say for sure it was because I clicked on the site, but the site really wasn't working correctly and the little that was on there took forever to load, and then the ransomware note came up when I clicked the facebook icon located at the top of the page. 

Why I am upset?  The Clinton Campaign apparently had 1.5 billion dollars to spend, and apparently none of it is available after the election to either Correct the Record or Protect the Record???

If indeed it was Malware on the Protect the Record site that ransomed me, then I have to say that this is the type of stupidity that is just not permitted in this day and age from anyone who wants or wanted to be president, or, who simply wants history to not be altered to continually paint them in a worse and worse light.

Basically, any former Clinton URL that was not or is not being renewed is probably going to be purchased by some entity and then targeted with malware. The ultimate F.U. to the Clinton supporters hoping the Clinton's rebound in some way to re harness the power of moderate liberal reasoning and action.

This is just another REALLY BIG REASON why we need a Clinton Media Channel, the CNMC would be the vanguard to preventing these types of slip-ups from occurring while preserving the truth of what was good about the 90's.

So, Correct the Record is no longer on DailyPUMA because there is no Clinton Media Channel to Vanguard it from desecration.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 15 - Why we need a Clinton Media Channel - Humorous responses to Sean Spicer's Alternative Facts and Math.

I would love to turn to a Clinton Media Channel and see a headline like this… "Donald Trump merges The Ministry of Silly Walks with the Department of Alternative Facts", says "its going to be great". Show a short clip from the following video.

Then show pretty much any clip of Sean Spicer speaking about Alternative Facts and Alternative Math. Then show the following clip from the Netherlands.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 14 as to why we need a Clinton Media Channel. First it was Hand Size, now it is Crowd Size, we need a Clinton Media Channel before we get to Mushroom Cloud Size, Lies.

First it was Hand Size, now it is Crowd Size.  

DailyPUMA worries about size when we get to Mushroom Cloud Size. Will we get the reverse lie about size, "It was just an itty bitty size Mushroom Cloud", or "Mushroom's are delicious, I eat them all the time".  This is not not meant in jest, I'm seriously concerned specifically because of what Greg Sargent writes in his Washington Post Crowd Size article.

DailyPUMA is also worried that when...

Trump forces his spokespeople turned minions to spit out lies about the size of the Inauguration Day Crowd, or that nobody cares about Trump not revealing his income tax returns when the public actually does care, that these fabricated versions of what actually is the truth can be seen as a form of Trump brain washing his spokes people.  

Spicer and Conaway may only be following orders, but looking the media in the face and saying "One plus One equals whatever Donald Trump says it is", is not a good thing. 

Reason number 14 why the Clintons need to start a Clinton Media News Channel, to fight back against Trump lies about  Math, be it I.R.S, Crowd Size, or number of jobs being "saved".

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.