Reason Number 6 why we need a Clinton Media Channel, Exposing the Trump Trap.

Donald Trump appears to be creating parallel universes from which he can bounce back and forth from in an effort to make his supporters believe he is protecting them, even when Trump Policies may likely make his billionaire friends wealthier. DailyPUMA calls it the Trump Trap, in which the public views Trump's actions as pro middle america when they first and foremost benefit Trump's billionaire buddies.

Mr. Trump probably believes that slowing down migration intake into the U.S., both legal and illegal, is protecting U.S. Citizens from migrant terrorists, drug cartels, along with donor recipients being prioritized over U.S. Citizens. 

Mr. Trump might also believe slowing down Foreign migration coming to the U.S. may also help slow down Foreign Students from first taking enrollment opportunities from U.S. Citizen Students, then enabling those same foreign students to use their education to take high paying U.S. Jobs from U.S. Citizens. But the parallel Trump Trap truth is that most of Trump's policies will create obscene wealth for the top 1%. 

The Trump Trap allows Trump to take actions that help his billionaire friends while simultaneously looking like they are actions being taken to protect American Citizens from Foreigners. The Trump Trap creates the appearance that Trump is protecting American Citizens from a Migrant Invasion and that those rabidly opposed to Trump are part of the problem as well, whereas Trump detractors see Trump's actions as a con designed to give his own billionaire club untold future riches.

Without a Clinton Media Channel to identify the Trump Trap strategy, Progressive Democrats are running the risk of creating enough backlash from their rabid early hate of any action that Trump takes. This may cause Trump to be seen as a hero by his very loyal supporters as he fights against all odds to preserve economic opportunities for americans. 

Without a Clinton Media Channel to innovate better ideas than what Trump is supporting, Democrat Moderates are blindly following the wrath of the Democrat Progressives who in turn create a backlash of stronger and stronger support of Trump from Trump supporters. Trump may only need to swing 10% of his detractors by next election to win re-election.

Is Hillary Clinton's next gambit, writing a book? 

DailyPUMA was incensed by many of the accusations thrown at the Clintons from the Sander's camp during the 2016 democrat nomination race. But one thing that I am concerned about, it seems as if Hillary Clinton is attracted to high paying gigs either on Wall Street or through book deals more so then other options open to her.

Perhaps one critical difference between the Clinton's and Trump is how they use their lawyers. DailyPUMA's theory is that while Trump uses his lawyers for economic gain and has apparently filed over 4,000 lawsuits prior to running for president, perhaps the Clintons forage for money wherever they can get it in the event they need to hire lawyers to defend themselves from generally malicious shot in the dark lawsuits.

But this would just be another reason to start a Clinton  Media channel in which the Clintons put their ideas, their experience, their intelligence and their vision out in full view so the masses can actually become passionate Clinton supporters, rather than fans who can manipulated by rapidly changing social media winds.

DailyPUMA would like to point out that everything is more interrelated and complicated then is being currently portrayed by the mainstream media, which can't seem to get beyond documenting the protestors and into the core issues regarding both migration and illegal immigration.

Below is a list of questions regarding migration and illegal immigration that the media has not been able to focus on and address because of the constant protests against Trump  they are instead following, aka the Trump Trap.

1. Do Foreign Students take away college enrollment positions from U.S. Citizens?
2. Do Foreign Students from wealthy families spoil U.S. colleges into charging higher tuition to all? 
3. Does Foreign Student enrollment subsidize U.S. College Enrollment costs for U.S. Citizens?
4. Do Foreign Students who remain in the U.S. steal jobs from U.S. Citizens, or do their innovations create even more job opportunities and more than make up for the jobs they acquire?
5. Is the U.S. actually stealing the brightest and best minds from other countries and then further enriching itself when those minds become working, Naturalized Citizens in the U.S.?
6. Are other countries losing their best students to U.S. colleges and gaining no benefit once those students matriculate and stay in the U.S.?
7. Is it true that newly immigrated or illegally immigrated residents cause U.S. citizens to wait longer before receiving an organ transplant?
8. Do U.S. citizens share state & federal funding programs with newly immigrated or illegally immigrated residents, in some instances causing U.S. citizens to be denied state and federally funded programs because funds have dried up?
9. Is it possible that educated immigrants are a huge plus to the U.S. economy and basically offset any potential negative costs that uneducated, illegal immigrants might be creating?
10. Was NAFTA really a disaster, or did it just need some tweaking as time went by?

A Clinton Media channel could tackle migration and illegal immigration questions and issues head on and in the process establish itself as the moderate liberal position that the MAJORITY of citizens in the U.S. clamor for.

Once the above ten scenarios are explored, the Clinton  Media Channel could then address the U.S. role in providing guns and armament to  the Middle East that could be one of the ongoing reasons that the region is so destabilized.

But then there's that book deal Hillary Clinton has to tend to. 

Sigh.

I am curious if Donald Trump's family or friends of Trump have benefited from Foreign Doctors and Physicians who are now Naturalized Citizens.

                     Click here to go to above website. Click on Image to Enlarge. Add three zeros to the number totals on each line when reviewing the above graphic.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 5 - Why we need a Clinton Media Channel. Use it or Lose it.

I am momentarily upset with the Clintons for just not getting the Internet and its role in politics and history. 

DailyPUMA had the Clinton backed site "Correct the Record" on here via an RSS feed. Today I noticed it was in what I think was Japanese or some other language that I just don't recognize.

I clicked on the RSS feed link for Correct the Record, and my computer was attacked by malware or ransom ware. I can't say for sure it was because I clicked on the site, but the site really wasn't working correctly and the little that was on there took forever to load, and then the ransomware note came up when I clicked the facebook icon located at the top of the page. 

Why I am upset?  The Clinton Campaign apparently had 1.5 billion dollars to spend, and apparently none of it is available after the election to either Correct the Record or Protect the Record???

If indeed it was Malware on the Protect the Record site that ransomed me, then I have to say that this is the type of stupidity that is just not permitted in this day and age from anyone who wants or wanted to be president, or, who simply wants history to not be altered to continually paint them in a worse and worse light.

Basically, any former Clinton URL that was not or is not being renewed is probably going to be purchased by some entity and then targeted with malware. The ultimate F.U. to the Clinton supporters hoping the Clinton's rebound in some way to re harness the power of moderate liberal reasoning and action.

This is just another REALLY BIG REASON why we need a Clinton Media Channel, the CNMC would be the vanguard to preventing these types of slip-ups from occurring while preserving the truth of what was good about the 90's.

So, Correct the Record is no longer on DailyPUMA because there is no Clinton Media Channel to Vanguard it from desecration.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 15 - Why we need a Clinton Media Channel - Humorous responses to Sean Spicer's Alternative Facts and Math.

I would love to turn to a Clinton Media Channel and see a headline like this… "Donald Trump merges The Ministry of Silly Walks with the Department of Alternative Facts", says "its going to be great". Show a short clip from the following video.

Then show pretty much any clip of Sean Spicer speaking about Alternative Facts and Alternative Math. Then show the following clip from the Netherlands.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 14 as to why we need a Clinton Media Channel. First it was Hand Size, now it is Crowd Size, we need a Clinton Media Channel before we get to Mushroom Cloud Size, Lies.

First it was Hand Size, now it is Crowd Size.  

DailyPUMA worries about size when we get to Mushroom Cloud Size. Will we get the reverse lie about size, "It was just an itty bitty size Mushroom Cloud", or "Mushroom's are delicious, I eat them all the time".  This is not not meant in jest, I'm seriously concerned specifically because of what Greg Sargent writes in his Washington Post Crowd Size article.

DailyPUMA is also worried that when...

Trump forces his spokespeople turned minions to spit out lies about the size of the Inauguration Day Crowd, or that nobody cares about Trump not revealing his income tax returns when the public actually does care, that these fabricated versions of what actually is the truth can be seen as a form of Trump brain washing his spokes people.  

Spicer and Conaway may only be following orders, but looking the media in the face and saying "One plus One equals whatever Donald Trump says it is", is not a good thing. 

Reason number 14 why the Clintons need to start a Clinton Media News Channel, to fight back against Trump lies about  Math, be it I.R.S, Crowd Size, or number of jobs being "saved".

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 13 why we need a Clinton Media Channel, The Day the Music Died for Moderate Democrats, February 7, 2011.

Approximately February 7, 2011 was the day that the Democratic Leadership Council died.  This has in turn led to the growth of intolerant progressivism and the Progressive revisionist view of the Clinton Accomplishments of the 90's.

The Progressive revisionist rhetoric caused Hillary Clinton to keep quiet about the 90's during the 2016 campaign which in turn led to the charge that she had no message.

If you voted for Hillary Clinton, if you seethe at the thought of Sanders running in 2020 and not Hillary Clinton, you are probably a moderate democrat, not a progressive.

Reason number 13 why a Clinton Media Channel is needed.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA declares 2017 Inauguration day, Free TV day, aka Free Antenna TV Day, because...

There are so many channels that don't have any newscasts on them.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 12 why the Clintons should create their own Media Channel, The Inaugural Boycott,

John Lewis inadvertently started an unplanned but growing boycott of the Trump Inauguration. Lewis's main reason was how the election was stolen from Hillary Clinton by the second James Comey letter AND the FBI not notifying anyone from the Democrat Party for a YEAR that they were being hacked!

However, it was Trump's Twitter response to Lewis which got the Democrat boycott going. So even tough Mr. Lewis was boycotting out of respect to Hillary Clinton and the illicit method's used to treasonously steal the presidency from her, the boycott message has been altered to Trump insulted Lewis. The problem with that meme is that Trump supporters can correctly state that "Lewis started it".

See what a mess gets created when democrats rely on MSNBC and CNN and other media to shape the Inaugural Boycott meme?

Hillary Clinton does not get the credit for the democrat boycott of the Trump Inauguration as a sign of respect, but she may get blamed for any inappropriate protesting that may occur. Snowball anyone?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason Number 11 why the Clintons need their own Media Channel.

Via Cannonfire, the New York Times is reporting that the White House Media may be moved. If ever there was a vacuum for counteridiocy news, this is the time. 

The Clintons, in DailyPUMA's opinion, and if they are up to the challenge, do owe their supporters a more transparent method of reporting their endeavors. aka, the Clinton Media Channel.

DailyPUMA craves for an intelligent review of NAFTA, Don't Ask Don't Tell, the Super Predator comment, Why its ok to have personal beliefs that differ from public positions, Why the Clinton's laid low during Barack Obama's second term in office, Explanations about how some legislation was veto proof during Bill Clinton's terms in office and the best move was to get the bill modified rather than simply veto it and have it approved anyway, and so on.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Barack Obama picks up dropped ball and begins to dribble it!

Good for Barack Obama. Faced with the mounting evidence of just how truly deplorable Don's Deplorables really are, the Department of Justice internal Investigation arm will be investigating itself and James Jesus Comey over Comey's role in getting Donald Trump elected by sending out a second, needless letter about emails to nowhere.

Hopefully Donald Trump's income taxes will be vetted as well since Donald Trump may have funded his entire presidential campaign with Income Tax Evasion money.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Yes, Barack Obama dropped the Ball by not Vetting Donald Trump's Income Tax Filings.

Back in 1992 during the final week of the Clinton / Bush race, Lawrence Walsh filed charges against members of the Bush Administration regarding Iran/Contra. This apparently was a politically motivated move to help quell Bush's momentum. Most think Bill Clinton would have won anyways, but the timing made Bill Clinton's victory probably larger than it would have been.

So, is it tit for tat now? 

Did Comey do to Hillary Clinton in 2016 what Lawrence Walsh did to George Bush in 1992? Perhaps it is tit for tat, but the elephant in the room is still Barack Obama. Obama basically did not vet Donald Trump and the reason that is unacceptable is specifically because Trump was a private citizen who could easier hide illegal or unacceptable behavior versus what a politician can hide or be adversely judged upon.

The difference in effectiveness between the Trump Foundation and the Clinton Foundation is of Trumponian measures, yet the Clintons took far more heat than Trump did for his apparently ineffective Foundation versus the Five Star rating the Clinton Foundation received.

DailyPUMA believes that Donald Trump should have been vetted, at the very least, over his IRS filings.

Even if others were "doing it", (Donald Trump's excuse for 20 straight years of filing deductions that may not have actually been legal), the "others" Trump speaks of were not funding their own presidential campaign with what could be income tax evasion money.

Barack Obama is a stickler for rules and regulations, yet he let Trump walk without first vetting him. The investigation did not have to be a ploy to target Trump, it just needed to clear him of income tax evasion shenanigans that a private billionaire citizen could get away with, but not a political candidate for president.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Reason number 10 why the Clinton's need their own Media Channel.

Please go to the comments section of the article found on Nate Silver's Polling Website, 538. The Anti-Clintonites not only come out to post their vitrol, but they suspiciously use the same three word phrase under multiple names.

DailyPUMA wrote the "Comey turned the election" comments.  Clinton Supporters never really show up to fight in the comments section because they didn't hear the truth, they don't hear the truth because there is no Clinton Media  Channel, but there should be.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Change Dot Org Five Million Signature Petition asking Electoral College Electors to Change their Vote from Trump, a Fail being spun as a Victory by the Petition Creator.

DailyPUMA contacted Daniel Brezenoff, the creator of the almost 5 million signature petition on Change dot org (a petition that was asking the Electoral College Electors to change their vote away from Donald Trump to Hillary Clinton), asking that he encourage his petition signers demand that James Comey answer certain questions at a press conference before the Electoral College Electors voted.

DailyPUMA even created an article and a Change dot org petition with the 14 questions Mr. Comey must answer before Electoral College Electors Vote, and sent Mr. Brezenoff the links. Mr. Brezenoff, a Bernie  Sanders supporter during the primaries, only responded to my original request to submit my idea to him. After that, DailyPUMA never heard back nor was DailyPUMa's Facebook friend request acknowledged.

For those of you who think Mr. Brezenoff is a Hillary Clinton supporter, DailyPUMA's own opinion is that he is a Sanders Supporter who wants to hold on to his almost 5 million petition signers so he can at a future date enlist them to vote for Sanders in 2020. His Petition may be just another instance in which what appears to be a grand gesture on Hillary Clinton's behalf is really not that at all. DailyPUMA just can't believe the Clintons are that obtuse when it comes to political media and how the media is not their friend and never really has been.

If the Clinton's don't get involved in political media, the democrats will probably lose in 2020 to Trump or any other Republican presidential candidate as the democrat party splinters between Biden, then an independent pretending to be a democrat named Sanders, a prominent african american candidate, and Hillary Clinton supporters who won't forgive or forget.

DailyPUMA begged Mr. Brezenoff to message his almost 5 million petition signers and demand that James Comey answer questions before the Electoral College Electors voted, but he was either not interested in that idea or did not read it on his facebook page where the message was left a week or more prior to the electors voting. DailyPUMA thinks the Electoral College Petition movement was a failure simply because Comey is THE reason that Hillary Clinton lost the election and Mr. Brezenoff never conveyed that message to  his followers.

However, Mr. Brezenoff is still claiming victory? Hillary Clinton actually lost by a BIGGER Electoral College margin because of Brezenoff's petition, yet Mr. Brezenoff is trying to champion his petition as a win. DailyPUMA stayed quiet but hopeful that the Brezenoff Petition was a penetrable brick wall that would consider outside ideas through private channels. That brick wall proved not to be made of glass, that is for sure.

DailyPUMA believes the loss of votes for Clinton because of Comey’s "second email letter about nothing" 10 days prior to the election, when the final 10 to 20% of voters were making up their minds is UNPRECEDENTED.

Clinton not only got ZERO percent of the final 10 to 20% of the voters casting their votes, she actually went backwards, the catalyst being Comey’s second letter and then The FBI twitter account suddenly activating with tweets praising Trump’s father and other tweets slamming the Clintons, triangulated with Trump calling illegally calling Clinton a criminal on a daily basis to top off the deceit.

Letting Comey off the hook from answering any questions about what he did and why he did it, then allowed the republicans to simply view the Electoral College petition and the Russia Hacking protests as sour grapes.

DailyPUMA just don’t understand how the populist political petitions are the ones that don’t follow the logical events needed to make their petition successful. The Electoral College petition might have actually been successful if the almost five million members had pressured James Comey to hold a press conference where the press actually asked hard hitting questions. Comey most likely would have muffed his answers and that might have actually created a torrent of media focus on why Comey manipulated the presidential race to Trump.

DailyPUMA's own petition, demanding that James Comey answer specific questions before the Electoral College Electors voted, may have only gotten 480 signatures, but in DailyPUMA's heart it was the correct next step BEFORE the Electoral College Petition would have a chance to succeed.

Instead Comey has been let off the hook and in turn the Electoral College Electors STOOD strong, posting an even bigger Electoral College differential between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump versus if the Electoral College petition had never existed.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Poland Amps up Volunteer Servicemen in the wake of Trump Putin Love Fest.

With Mr. Trump's apparent retreat from NATO, Poland is now restocking their volunteer military forces.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

If only Hillary Clinton had said Gullibles in a Basket instead of Deplorables in a Basket.

Gullibles in a Basket, it has a nice ring to it. Deplorables in a basket, makes it sound like the voter is beyond redemption. Even "Don the Deplorable" or "Deplorable Don" would have been fine. Just sayin.

However, the second James Comey email letter that turned into a media frenzy did prolific damage to a Hillary Clinton presidency. If 10%-20% of the voters had not yet decided who to vote for at the time that Comey wrote that second letter about emails, then it's OBVIOUS that the second Comey letter had a monstrous impact because Clinton's numbers went down over the final 10 days of the campaign.

If all four candidates had turned into rocks over the final 10 days, most of the final 10% to 20% of the voters would have still picked somebody. I would estimate if all four candidates had done nothing that Trump picks up 37%, Clinton picks up 37%, Anderson picks up 16% and Stein picks up 10% of the remaining 10% to 20% of the voters. But that's not what happened, Clinton actually LOST support after the second Comey letter when she had actually be on an upward curve.

The final percentages after the Comey letter may have been Trump picked up 65%, Johnson 20% and Stein 15%, with Clinton actually LOSING votes over the final 10 days. 

Hillary Clinton would have won the battle ground states and won the popular vote by 5 to 8 million, easily, if not for that second James Comey email Letter about nothing.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Another Example of why the Clinton's need their own Media Channel, even the fiercest headline compliment about Hillary Clinton is accidentally made to sound like an insult.

A DailyKOS headline that was posted on a DailyPUMA RSS reddit feed stated "North Carolina Christian pastor writes piercing open letter to Hillary Clinton". I was hesitant to read the article since the headline made it sound like an attack on Hillary Clinton. Instead, the article was the complete opposite, a glowing attribute about Hillary Clinton that in many ways mirrored what DailyPUMA stated a few months ago about how the men could never stand up to what Hillary Clinton did during the 2016 campaign.

Here is what the headline title URL originally looked like….. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/12/26/1614654/-NC-pastor-writes-stunning-op-ed-to-Hillary-You-shouldered-expectations-no-male-has-endured

Somebody replaced the word stunning in the headline with piercing, and then shortened the headline as well, thereby making the headline sound like an attack against Hillary Clinton when it was the opposite.  

Very strange, and just another example of why we need to See Clinton Media gain traction. The U.S. needs liberal moderates to stand up and be counted, or we will continue to get ultra right and left candidates like Trump or Sanders who are able to sue the conservative and progressive media to trash a superior moderate liberal candidate like Hillary Clinton.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Breaking News, Ivanka Trump Airplane Incident may have been staged so she would have an excuse to never fly on a commercial airplane again.

Oh wait, my mistake. If that had been Chelsea Clinton on the plane with her child, and a Trump supporter had antagonized her, the crazy conservative meanstream media would have accused the Clintons of staging the event so that Chelsea could ride private airplanes from now on at taxpayers expense.

Just because Donald Trump has possibly hired more lawyers, or initiated more lawsuits than Jesus, does not in anyway make it suspicious that the person who allegedly verbally assaulted Ivanka Trump was an Attorney in New York.

And of course, no one will background check the story to see if there would be probable cause for a quid pro quo in which each side got something in return for the alleged airline verbal assault. 

I do find it odd that both parties had their kids right there when the alleged verbal assault occurred. Normally affluent, well educated, responsible parents try to avoid confrontation when their own children are involved, or nearby.

So if we don't see Ivanka Trump on commercial flights in the future, but we do see her on private flights paid in full by taxpayers, we won't think this entire incident created a convenient solution at taxpayers expense going forward.

to Ivanka's credit, she actually did look like a deer in the headlights during the airplane incident, which leads me to think it was either real, or staged without her knowledge. I could envision Mr. Trump staging the event without Ivanka's knowledge so that going forward taxpayers would pay for her private planes.

This article is just the tip of the icicle garbage of the kind of fake media news that the Clintons deal with on a daily basis from the conservative meanstream media and why the Clintons really need to create their own news network.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

How the Clintons can re-energize Democrats by Creating a Moderate Liberal Media Brand.

Four Years Ago DailyPUMA begged the Clintons to become involved in media. The Clinton Brand of Moderate Liberal  Politics has an audience, but the Moderate Liberal Media Brand has to be built before anyone will come.

It was rather ironic to see Chelsea Clinton on network television on a few occasions a few years back when Bill and Hillary Clinton should have actually started a small programming base and had Chelsea Clinton over see it, even buying time on free TV if necessary. 

Even one hour of Moderate Liberal Media News programming a day, repeated two or three times throughout the day, would have helped beat back the Conservative Meanstream Media Machine that went into overdrive the moment that James Comey re-energized them with his second press conference about emails about nothing.

Moderate Liberal Programming would also beat back the rancid brand of progressive cable television that does not actually connect with middle america, but instead connects with younger millennials and turns them against the Liberal Moderates.

Progressive Media forced the Clinton's to back pedal on Bill Clinton's record of the 90's. Issues such as NAFTA,  Don't Ask Don't Tell, Welfare Reform, comments such as Super Predator, could have all been easily and properly defended and then exalted if the Clintons had built a Moderate Liberal Brand Media.

Even Joe Biden has gotten in on the assault against the Clinton's, claiming Hillary Clinton didn't really have a message. This statement by Biden is complete garbage. First, Hillary Clinton had to tread lightly and not be an Obama basher or risk becoming a complete outcast of the democrat party. Secondly, the Progressive Media assaulted the Clintons over NAFTA, Don't Ask Don't Tell, Welfare Reform, and the Super Predator comment, leaving the Clintons with very little to hang their hat on in reference to the 90's. 

Sure Bill Clinton was the only president in the past 80 years to lower his annual budget deficit each and every year he was in office. Sure Bill Clinton was the only president in the past 80 years who left office more popular then when he went in, but those two points were never brought to light because there was no Moderate Liberal Media Brand to make those points on behalf of the Clintons.

The Clintons can still be players in the Democrat Party, Hillary Clinton can still be a viable presidential candidate in four years, but only if Hillary and Bill Clinton build a moderate liberal media base that actually produces moderate liberal news progamming on a regular basis, and Hillary Clinton gets in tip top physical shape as well. 

It would not even hurt if at some point Hillary Clinton slugs a republican male disrespecter in the chops, as there is a list of disrespecters a mile long for her to choose from.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Judge Jean Pirro MUST Apologize to Hillary Clinton for Pirro's ineptly constructed timeline editorial regarding what Hillary Clinton said about rigged elections during the third debate versus her decision to join the recount.

Is Judge Jeanine Pirro really a judge, because her comments in the video commentary link at the the end of this article are below the bare minimum of common sense and integrity. Every case she has ever presided over needs to be rechecked if she continues to stand by the gross miscarriage of truthfulness regarding Hillary Clinton's rigged election comments that Pirro brontificates about in her video. 

When Hillary Clinton made her comments in the third debate about U.S. elections not being rigged, DailyPUMA reminds its readers that those comments were TEN DAYS BEFORE FBI Director James Comey RIGGED the ELECTION in Trump's favor with his second email press conference / letter about nothing! 

FBI Director James Comey incited and rejuvenated despondent Republicans into actions ranging from 25 million dollar last minute PAC attack ads to fake news after his second email press conference about emails, a  press conference that is NOW being described as  pointless  based on the reasoning cited in the subpoena.

When does "Judge" Jeanine Pirro apologize to Hillary Clinton for not understanding the concept of time, that Comey's rigging of the election so Trump would win happened 10-12 days after Hillary Clinton spoke about unrigged elections in the third debate. That Comey's rigging of the election with his second unjustified email press conference put the entire conservative meanstream media on high alert and to do whatever it took to give Trump a victory.

There are few things more dangerous than giving an arrogant, intellectually compromised person, judicial power. Possibly one of the most important tasks a judge is supposed to master is the proper timeline of events. Lets see if Pirro stands by her ill timed commentary that doesn't relate events in the timeline in which they actually happened.

If you are a judge, you should be cringing watching "Judge" Pirro equate a comment made by Hillary Clinton 10 days prior to the actual rigging of the 2016 presidential election in which Clinton stated that our elections are not rigged, with the subsequent rigging of the election by James Comey's second email press conference letter. And if you are wondering how James Comey's election changing second press conference equates to a recount, the answer is the meanstream media went all out once Comey's second press conference happened.

The level of anger, hostility and insanity against Clinton by the meanstream media grew from the moment of Comey's second press conference about emails every day until election day. If nothing fishy really happened regarding how votes were cast and counted, then why were Trump's lawyers, 2 and 3 deep at every voting location, basically preventing the recount from occurring?

Click here to watch the mind numbing, Back to the Future Commentary by  "Judge" Jeanine Pirro.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA's most prescient Article Ever ran on Oct. 27, 2016, Just one day before James Comey's second Email Press Conference / Letter.

DailyPUMA would like to believe that after 7 years of Blogging on DailyPUMA that somebody at Hillary Clinton's headquarters was reading the articles for ideas to present to the Campaign. The ideas in this Oct. 27, 2016 DailyPUMA article proved scarily accurate as to how Hillary Clinton could lose the election, or win the election.

However, Hillary Clinton still would have won the 2016 presidential election if not for James Comey's second letter / press conference sent out on Oct. 28, 2016 followed by Comey not holding a press conference to answer specific questions about his actions.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Rudolph Giuliani, James Comey, Sheldon Andelson Triangle. How Rudolph Guiliani may have illegally interacted with James Comey, leading to James Comey's Second Press Conference and Sheldon Andelson's 25 million dollar attack ads against Hillary Clinton.

After Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton aboard Bill Clinton's plane regarding the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails, Loretta Lynch recused herself and let James Comey decide how to handle the email situation. Even though Lynch recused herself, the meanstream media continued to pile on that politicial favoritism was at work. I Ironically, the favoritism was by James Comey via his second email press conference / letter.

When Rudolph Giuliani was trying to get Sheldon Andelson to pony up the 25 million dollars in television attack ads against Hillary Clinton that Andelson had committed to in late September, but was no longer sure would be worthwhile anymore as Trump's popularity was slipping and Hillary Clinton's was rising after the third debate in mid October, did Giuliani put pressure on Comey to hold a second press conference, knowing it would serve as a form of enticement to Andelson?

Forget about Putin for a moment. If Giuliani was able to entice James Comey to perform a second email press conference regarding the dead on arrival Clinton emails, Giuliani would then be able to convince Sheldon Adelson to actually commit the 25 million dollars in anti Clinton ads over the final 10 days of the 2016 presidential campaign that Andelson had promised but was having second thoughts about. 

Why was Giuliani allowed to flit about talking to whomever he wanted whenever he wanted within the FBI when one Clinton interaction with Loretta Lynch basically raised a conservative uproar that continued even after Lynch recused herself.

Why is it the Democrats are so afraid to call any hearings when the Republicans will call a hearing at the drop of a pin?  Did Rudolph Giuliani use his FBI insider influence to let Comey know that a second email press conference would encourage other last minute Clinton attack ads? Was Comey being coerced by Rudolph Giuliani in the exact same manner that Bill Clinton was accused of when he met with Loretta Lynch? 

James Comey's second press conference fueled Sheldon Andelson's 25 million dollar commitment to proceed, which was then followed by last minute NRA  attack ads, which then led to faked media news over the final few days including PizzaGate and false allegation that The Clinton Home was being searched by the New York Police Department.

Did the final 10 days of media attacks against Hillary Clinton, all triggered by the second James Comey email press conference, make a difference in the outcome of the election? Yes, Comey's second email press conference basically gained Trump 2 to 4 million votes while subtracting 2 to 4 million votes for Hillary Clinton. And we can safely assume that the midwest battle ground states would have gone to Hillary Clinton.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Growing the Case for a Possible Donald Trump Secret Server to Russia.

There are "Donald Trump has a Secret Server to Russia in Trump Towers" dots out there that may connect. 

1. Throughout the primaries, Trump repeatedly warned about Terrorism, and then a terrorist act would occur within a relatively short time of Trump's pronouncement. If Donald Trump had a secret server hooked into Russia, maybe Russian Intel told Trump about possible upcoming acts of terrorism.

2.  Trump called for Russian Hackers to hack the DNC. This site, DailyPUMA, immediately got over 800 hits within the next day from Russia when in the past DailyPUMA barely got 10 hits from Russia per month.

 Russia started hyper visiting DailyPUMA sometime around July 22nd, 2016.

A 24 hour period immediately after Trump's July 27th, 2016 

call to action for Russian Hackers.

3.  Trump has apparently filed over 4,000 lawsuits. High end Lawyers could have advised Trump to avoid the NSA and email hacking by using private servers. Since Trump has apparently had all kinds of dealings with Russia in the past, (not to mention the possibility of Russian escorts), why not have a Secret Server to Russia, any lawyer worth their weight would have suggested it.

4.  Melania Trump is staying behind at Trump Towers. If I had a secret server to Russia hooked up at Trump Towers, I would want someone within my inner circle present at Trump Towers at all times.

5.  Melania Trump speaks six languages. This makes a secret server to Russia even more plausible since she could be the one doing the communicating and then do her own Russian Intelligence Briefings with Donald late every night.

6. Trump's Twitter binges seem to occur around 3:00 am New York Time, that would be 11:00 am in Moscow. Assuming Melania confers with Russia via the secret server from 1:00 am to 2:00 am New York Time, that would be 9:00 am to 10:00 am Moscow time, which is the perfect time to get a daily briefing from Russia, no? Melania relays the Russian intel to Trump from 2:00 am to 3:00 am. At 3:00 am Trump goes on his twitter binges.

7.  Before the New York Primary, Putin spoke blasted Hillary Clinton, calling her an imperialist. Why did Putin go to such lengths to blast Hillary Clinton before the New York primary? Could it have been requested by Donald Trump via the Secret Server to Russia? What real purpose did Putin's intrusion serve other than to possibly placate a visibly upset Trump knowing that Clinton was more popular in New York than he was.

8. A secret server to Russia would have allowed Julian Assange a perfect way to leak intel to Russia, Russia leaks the intel to Trump via the secret server, a Trump advisor leaks the intel to a Sander's advisor, and Sander's is able to take shots at Hillary Clinton while Trump stays out of it.

9. If Russia leaked Assange's stolen intel to Trump via the secret server, and Trump leaked Assange's intel to a Sander's operative, then technically speaking Russia can say they did not leak intel to the media, that it was a DNC operative, aka a Sander's operative. This would explain Trump's mocking of the CIA and the FBI over Putin's involvement. Putin and Trump both know that it was a Sander's operative who chose to leak, therefore Putin and Trump can rationalize the CIA and the FBI are basically wrong. DailyPUMA believes that Trump's bravado is usually based on some piece of intel he has that he knows he should not have, and intel that Trump believes no one else has.

10. Trump has no interest in daily CIA and FBI security briefing's. Why should Trump have any interest in CIA and FBI daily briefings whe he may already be getting Russian intel on a daily basis!

The CIA and the FBI should do a surprise raid on Trump Towers, not to damage Trump, but to CLEAR HIM. If they happen to find a Russian Server, then that would be a win as well. In other words, raiding Trump Towers and looking for a Secret Server to Russia is a win whether a secret server is found, or not, for the people of the U.S.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

President Barack Obama last press conference Reveals his Refusal to go Back in Time and Investigate James Comey's October 28, 2016 Press Conference.

Barack Obama's final press conference of his presidency  revealed his refusal to focus on James Comey's Oct. 28, 2016 press Conference that basically instantly reversed the rising popularity of Hillary Clinton and the declining popularity of Donald Trump.

The Media also refuses to demand James  Comey come out of hiding and actually answer questions about Oct. 28, 2016.

And they all continue to talk about Putin instead of Comey.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The 14 Days of Comey. James Comey remains in Hiding while the Media Instead Fixates on Vladimir Putin.

We're witnessing an all time classic Magicians Trick of Distraction. Sure Vladimir Putin may have done a lot of crap to undermine our election, but the real story is James Comey's second press conference. 

Without FBI Director James Comey's second press conference Sheldon Andelson probably does not commit 25 million dollars for last minute money for Clinton attack ads (an FEC violation since large political donations have to give 30 days public notice).

Without FBI Director James  Comey's second press conference, Crazy story lines about  Pizza Gate and the Clinton home being invaded by Police don't get any attention.

Putin probably has very little to do with James Comey  second press conference about emails just 10 days before the Presidential Election. Below is a list of 14 questions James Comey has never answered that he NEEDS to answer before the Electoral College Electors Vote.

1. Why did the FBI email investigation need a full year before the first press conference was called in July of 2016? 

2. Why was there a several week delay before a search warrant was issued over Huma Abedin's lap top when the lap top was in the FBI's possession for the entire time? To an outsider, it looks like the second email conference was strategically delayed until it would do the most damage to Hillary Clinton's presidential chances.

3.  The CIA held back their intel on Putin's interference in our elections because they did not want to influence the Presidential Election, yet it seems like you had no conflict going forward with your second email conference. It was almost as if someone or some group pressured you into a second press conference about emails. Do you agree or disagree?

4.  If you had to do it all over again, would you have held the second press conference so close to the election?

5. It appeared as if Hillary Clinton's popularity was rising after the third presidential debate. Do you think your second press conference reversed Hillary Clinton's rising popularity?

6. Do you think your second press conference helped influence voters who had not yet made their minds to vote for Donald Trump?

7.  Why didn't you consult with the CIA as to whether or not you should do a second press conference about emails so close to the presidential election? Who did you consult with?

8. When Donald Trump stated during the third press conference that the upcoming presidential election was rigged, can you explain why you still prioritized Hillary Clinton's emails over putting boots on the ground in key areas of the country to ensure that election day voting was fairly done? 

9.  You were investigating Hillary Clinton, was Donald Trump being investigated for anything?

10. Since the NRA PAC was the biggest anti-Clinton PAC and raised the most money to defeat Hillary Clinton, and Clinton and the NRA had repeatedly sparred during the campaign, did the FBI consider the NRA and a very small percentage of its members as in as little as 0.1% of membership, could go rogue and plot as volunteers on election day and be in and around the ballots and ballot boxes even before the polls opened and after they closed?

11. Did you  look into the connection between the NRA and Russia?

12. One more time, in retrospect, was the second email press conference actually necessary?

13.  Did members of the Republican party interact with you in an effort to get a second press conference? Were you threatened in any way that if you did not have a second email press conference, something bad might happen to you, your career, or people you know?

14. Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch aboard an airplane, which resulted in her recusing herself from the FBI email investigation, yet you may have had your own interactions with political figures that influenced your decision to seek a second press conference about emails, was that fair?

If Mr. Comey answered the above 14 questions, wouldn't the Electoral College Electors have pertinent information needed to make the right decision about how they should vote on December 19, 2016?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

When the Going gets Tough, Male Politicians Stick Together, and that is why the Female Electoral College Electors should Seriously Consider Voting for Hillary Clinton.

Lost in the hyperbole that women should vote for women simply because they are women, is the reason why women should vote for women. Male politicians tend to stack the deck against some female political candidates by aligning with other male political candidates in the same race to force out the female candidate. Rather than simply compete, the male politicians actually coalesce and share strategies on how to drive out the female.

Perhaps the male politicians do it because if there is only one female candidate in a race where there are multiple male candidates, the female candidate automatically stands out, while the male candidates fragile ego's fear they may be blended together as male candidates, and thus become marginalized.

In the 2008 Michigan Primary (yes, Michigan again), Michigan moved up their primary date into January, thereby encroaching on Iowa and New Hampshire's hallowed status as the first two states to vet the presidential candidate field. Iowa and New Hampshire residents were made to feel by the media that Michigan's move was an encroachment on their status as being the first two states where presidential candidates go to establish their presidential legitimacy, and they were livid.

In an incredibly clever, but ultimately mean spirited canardly maneuever, three male presidential candidates pulled off the perfect strategy to blight Hillary Clinton's reputation. Barack Obama, Bill Richardson, and John Edwards all pulled their names from the Michigan primary on the last day one could file or unfile. Hillary Clinton was excluded from this strategy. In essence, the three democrat amigos struck a gentleman's agreement to withdraw from the Michigan primary at the last possible moment so that Hillary Clinton would not have time do the same thing. Hillary Clinton would remain on the Michigan ballot, and suffer the consequences.

The three amigos, Obama, Edwards and Richardson, blasted Hillary Clinton for validating Michigan's attempt to usurp  attention from Iowa and New Hampshire and dethrone their status as presidential candidate vetters. Obama, Edwards and Richardson told horrified onlookers in Iowa and New Hampshire that Hillary Clinton did not care about Iowa and New Hampshire's status as the first and second states in the country to cast votes for presidential candidates and that she was simply an opportunist willing to throw anyone under the bus if it would give her a political advantage.

As horrible as that sounds, that the front runnin 2008 male  presidential candidates would combine forces to damage the reputation of the front running female candidate Hillary Clinton, many saw it as cunning political strategy and that it was to be expected, therefore candidates of either sex  who couldn't predict such cunning deserve what they get. Ouch!

However, the Michigan Primary last minute withdrawal strategy required three male candidates plotting against the female candidate. The media was unwilling to call out the male politicians for excluding the female politician in their Michigan Maneuver. So much for gentlemen's agreements that include a female!  It is for this reason that I think all of the 2016 female electoral college electors should seriously consider watching Hillary Clinton's back in 2016. Once again in 2016 several males with deep, deep influence ganged up on the lone female presidential candidate and were able to bring her down in unison, yet she still got almost three million more votes than the electoral college winner.

In 2016, it may have have taken a half dozen male billionaires to bring down Hillary Clinton, with outside help from Russia's male leader in a manner which we don't exactly know. 

The Male Billionaire cohorts taking part in the stealing of the presidential election include Vegas gambling casino  magnate Sheldon Andelson, who put 25 million dollars in attack ads against Hillary Clinton over the final 10 days of the candidate, which I presume is actually a violation of FEC rules because all political donations of large amounts are supposed to be reported 30 days prior.

Additionally, Cubs ownership apparently plowed in millions as well, using anticipated Baseball Playoff Receipts profits for Hillary Clinton attack ads. Where is the Meanstream Media when it comes to pointing out that baseball enjoys  autonomy from Congress, yet they can influence our elections?  Apparently all is forgiven because it was all Males taking down a female.

But there's more, The NRA PAC put in over 30 million dollars to help defeat Hillary Clinton, I'm pretty sure that was testosterone driven as well.

Then there was FBI director James Comey, who was ground zero for reversing Hillary Clinton's surging popularity, (a popularity she earned from three solid debate performances), just 10 days before election day with his second email press conference. Just think back to the close of debate number three, when both Trump and Clinton had to ad lib why they should be president. Hillary Clinton absolutely nailed it, Trump spent a significant portion of his time berating Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton had actually EARNED her rising popularity via her debate performances, and FBI James Comey took it all away in one fell swoop.

Then there is Vladimir Putin. Ever since Hillary Clinton questioned how the voting was done in Russia in 2012, resulting in Russians taking to the streets in protest, Putin has vowed his revenge.

Ironically, even Bill Clinton, a male, played a hand in quelling Hillary Clinton's chances with his airplane meeting with Loretta Lynch. But lets not forget what happpened next, an apologetic Loretta Lynch then gave James Comey full authority to decide  how to handle the email situation! So much for the second most powerful female in the U.S. having  her authority usurped by one male so it could be handed over to another male!

The National Enquirer, a huge Donald Trump admirer, was allowed to basically take their opinion of what the future would be, and then print the anti Clinton predictions as if they were NEWS HEADLINES. 

Where is the line in sand? 

If the Enquirer had printed, "Hillary Clinton gives up and concedes the presidential race to Donald Trump" two weeks before the election, would anyone have stepped in and stopped the National Enquirer? Most likely no. That is how lazy our country has gotten. 

The list of testosterone in action against the lone female candidate is quite long, National Enquirer, NRA PAC, Putin, Vegas Gambling Tycoon, Chicago Cubs Ownership, James  Comey, but worst still, each one of these billionaires may have done something unethical as to how they attacked Hillary Clinton! and the best they could do was still LOSE by almost 3 million votes to an over attacked female presidential candidate.

Even Bernie Sanders supporters got into the act during the primary by calling Hillary Clinton a cheater for possibly using  tactics that were less vicious than the the type of tactics that were used against Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Primary! 

Once again, lets point out the irony, in 2008 Hillary Clinton was victimized by male triangulation. Learning her lesson, she was tougher for the 2016 Primary, resulting in her opposition attacking her reputation while intimating she was a cheater. 

When, what could be called collaborative acts of deceit are done against Hillary Clinton in the 2008 Primary, they are labeled clever strategy, but when Hillary Clinton perhaps does anything that even hints of being a little bit like what was done to her in 2008, she is labeled a cheater far and wide in 2016. This double standard of behavior in which boys will be boys but women are cheaters and "NASTY", WILL NOT END until females realize they need to be teammates in the same manner that men are teammates with each other.

If you are a 2016 Republican female electoral college elector, I am suggesting the glass ceiling is really a glass hurdle so high it will take other females assisting the female runner for the female runner to leap over the glass hurdle and become president. This is your time to not do what a male authority figure demands you do, but to do what you want to do with no regrets or remorse, and hopefully, that will include considering changing your Electoral College vote from Trump to Clinton.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.