Rachel Maddow doesn't understand latest Hillary Clinton Instagram commercial, so she puts on her Progressive holier than thou frock and keeps repeating over and over how obtuse she is, er, how obtuse the Clinton campaign must be for a joke she does not get.

Poor Rachel Maddow, salivating for an ultra progressive candidate, yet having to "settle" for Hillary Clinton. Maddow lambasts the latest Hillary Clinton ad, a very funny, REAL, ad.

I'll explain it for the progressives out there who think they get it, and don't. Two guys have been going around to all the non Sanders candidates events and getting in the background or even next to the other candidates to ridicule them in one way or another.

In the case of Hillary Clinton, they previously wore shirts that said they would "settle" for Hillary Clinton. A mendacious insult if ever there was one. This time around, the Clinton people CAUGHT THEM and said they had to leave, or they could stay if they took off their shirts.

So the joke is CLEARLY ON THESE TWO DOOFUSSES WHO STAYED at the Clinton rally, shirtless. They were then featured in the Hillary Clinton Instagram ad, and the ad is funny. But Rachel Maddow, who is just so much smarter than the rest of us she barely has time to interact with us commoners when she could be having more meaningful conversations with herself, just keeps repeating how obtuse the Clinton campaign is for not getting it, and she repeats it over and over and over and over again. Got Dementia, Rachel?

Um, the Clinton people get it Rachel. They totally get it, and they made fun of these guys in a nice way, and Hillary Clinton  came up with some nice, off the cuff moments. All of it went right over Maddow's head. It's embarrassing to watch her wax on and on and on, as if she's in on the joke, when she has become part of the joke for not getting it.

Wow. Here is the link to see Rachel Maddow in definitely one of her most forgettable performances.

And once again, Clinton Derangement Syndrome at work. Now the Clinton campaign can't come up with anything clever unless a Progressive like Rachel Maddow approves of it. I hear one of Bernie Sanders demands is that all future Hillary Clinton commercials must have an "approved by a progressive" lead in or they can't be aired. (Whisper aside to Rachel Maddow, that was a joke).

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

What Donald Trump might say about Bernie Sanders rejoicing after Golden State Warriors 3 game comeback to defeat Oklahoma City and Bernie possibly winning California in the Democrat Primary.

What Donald Trump might say about Bernie Sanders after Bernie was seen rejoicing over the Golden State Warriors comeback conference championship series win against The Oklahoma Thunder. 

"Can you believe this Sanders guy. The state of Oklahoma votes for him over Hillary Clinton, and he returns the favor by rejoicing when Golden State beats Oklahoma in the NBA conference finals. A back stabbing Socialist Peacnik celebrating the WARRIORS victory." "Nobody can twist the knife like Bernie can, I may have to hire him to help take out ISIS when I'm president."

"If Bernie is calling his chance for victory in California a comeback victory like the Warriors over Oklahoma, then clearly a California comeback is in play for the Republicans as well. Thank you Bernie for pointing that out."

"What's next Bernie, you just broke the collective hearts of the state of Oklahoma by cheering Golden State's victory over them, what about the state of Ohio, as in the Cleveland Cavaliers? Are you still rooting for Golden State to be beat Cleveland in the Finals? Oh, wait, Golden State will probably be the favorite, so does that mean you will switch your alliances AGAIN and root for the underdog Cleveland Cavaliers?"

The anchor calls Bernie Sanders attending Golden State's game seven playoff aligning himself with Golden State's comeback "political pandering", the exact phrase DailyPUMA used in a recent article.

Bernie "anti-fracking" Sanders continues to run a Slash and Bern race and in one news clip has actually given the Republicans fuel to use in three states, California and Ohio represent a total of 73 electoral college votes.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders busts a move in California and why Hillary Clinton should care. Meanwhile Move on Dot Org email, Hillary Who?

(Friday May 27, 4:12pm update: Hillary Clinton ads did start appearing this morning. Yeah. However, I would strongly recommend an ad that is specific to California, California people, places and things, and it should be in color. Right after I posted this I saw a second Hillary Clinton ad, this one in color, about a young girl worried her parents are being deported. I hope there is one more coming where Californians see California in the ad, we're funny that way.)

DailyPUMA leaves a comment on Cannonfire about Bernie Sanders trying to finish with a lot of momentum by winning California and about half an hour later Move on dot org sends an email basically stating Bernie Sanders is trying to win strong on June 7th as a way to ensure the progressives dominate the democrat platform committee and agenda. 

Move on Dot Org professes to now have a progressive majority on the Democrat 15 person committee and are encouraging members to help Bernie finish the remaining Democrat Primary races on a very high note to reinforce the concept of "Hillary who?".

Sanders has been on a whirlwind tour in California, hitting 3 or more locations a day while also running television ads strategically placed just before Memorial Day and probably through Memorial day weekend on all the local news broadcast stations in Los Angeles. I believe Bernie Sander's goal is to pack the 15 person democrat planning committee with a majority of progressives (which Move on Dot Org claims they now have) and basically bypass Hillary Clinton and the direction of the democrat party even if she is the nominee.

This is not the time for Hillary Clinton to be cobbling together money to use against Trump with the rationalization that Sanders is irrelevant. If Sander's wins California and does well in the other states on June 7th he will just become a bigger and bigger fly in the ointment and will give more fuel for Sanders followers to believe he was robbed even though he will still be a couple million votes behind in the popular vote.

Plus, if Sanders wins more pledged delegates on June 7th he gets to proclaim that he is the more popular candidate with growing momentum because it means Sanders won the last two months (May and June) of the democrat nomination season after losing the first four months (January, February, March, April). Sanders will probably be able to create a graph that shows he actually cut into the percentage of Hillary Clintons lead by a bigger and bigger margin with each passing month until he inevitably started actually winning the pledged delegate race once May hit, implying that he really is on a six month momentum bender.

In professional team sports, teams that have big leads but then barely cross the finish line ahead of their rivals usually don't win championships. A team wins championships by finishing the regular season strongly rather than ignoring their rivals because their rivals have too much of a gap to make up. Ignoring a rival as if they don't exist is a form of taunting, and fans don't like that, especially from the team being ignored/taunted. Yes, ignoring is a form of taunting.

If a baseball team is ahead of the second place team by 9 games with 10 games left to play in the season but then loses the final 10 games of the season and finishes just one game ahead at the end of the season, that's actually not a cause for a first place victory celebration. 

Fans of the losing team don't like it when an opposing team knows they are going to win first place in their division even as they keep losing the individual games leading up to the playoffs. This is where being a woman who probably doesn't follow team sports hurts Hillary Clinton. She has a lead and is content with that lead, even if it keeps shrinking, as long as she wins. That's actually an unacceptable premise in both team sports, and in politics.

What does Hillary Clinton want, an extra 25 to 50 million dollars in her political coffers to battle Donald Trump, or soundly beating Bernie Sanders in California now? Let's not rationalize losing to Bernie Sanders by 10 points in California as being irrelevant if at the same time the California delegates Hillary Clinton does win puts her over the top for the democrat nomination, as it will truly be a pyrrhic victory. And Donald Trump will be all over it as well..."Talk about entitlement, she lost the last 10 of 15 democrat contests and she's the democrat nominee!…" "She went splat and her guts rolled over the finish line ahead of a hard charging Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton calls that a victory." Trump can wax on and on about how Hillary Clinton had to keep losing so she could win the nomination.

Hillary Clinton is probably being advised by former Barack Obama campaign people to "stall and ignore" like Barack Obama did near the end of the 2008 democrat campaign when he ignored Hillary Clinton and basically used the same speech day after day, that approach may backfire in 2016. I hope Hillary Clinton sees through this year's wall of male consulting incompetence better than she did in 2008 when  her political advisor told  her that California was a winner take all delegate state, and SPENDS SOME FUCKING MONEY in California on commercials, preferably starting this memorial day weekend. 

Hillary Clinton not spending money with the local news channels means she is not ingratiating herself to them in terms of how they cover her California campaign activites. The local Los Angeles news reports are basically having a Bernie Love  fest which goes like this…"Bernie Sanders held rallies today in T,U,V,W,X,Y,Z locations"…."meanwhile Hillary Clinton held two fund raisers". The LA News reporting just sounds so crass and elitist, yet, apparently that is the truth. "Bernie is working his butt off" (AND paying the television news stations commercial advertising money), while "Hillary Clinton keeps fundraising" is the not so subliminal message I am witnessing.

I hope the Clinton campaign runs television commercials about why people like Hillary Clinton, not why Hillary Clinton wants to be president.

If Hillary Clinton limps to victory, she may be ceding too many progressives on the democrat platform committee and find her power usurped even if she is the nominee. Hillary Clinton may not convince a significant portion of the Sander's followers that Bernie Sanders was truly beaten if Bernie does better than Hillary Clinton on June 7, 2016 since we all know that Super Delegates ride around on winged unicorns trumpeting bad publicity about Bernie and good publicity about Hillary.

In the sports world, when fans truly believe their team was the best team and if they had just had a few more contests to play they would have caught and surpassed the leader, those types of supporters won't settle for supporting the team that barely beat them, even if winning team makes it to the Super Bowl or the World Series. The fans whose team finished second but in their hearts believe were the better team and just needed a few more games to play to prove it, may actually support the other league's playoff team out of spite or disgust rather than the team that they were still gaining on as the season ended.

Here is Move on Dot Org's "Hillary who?" email in which learn that the goal is to make Hillary Clinton and her ideas, irrelevant even if she is the nominee.

Dear MoveOn member,
Bernie Sanders won "unprecedented say over the Democratic Party platform" this week and named progressive powerhouses, including climate change author and visionary Bill McKibben and Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chair Keith Ellison, to the party's platform drafting committee.¹
Progressives now hold a majority of seats on this committee, which will set the Democratic Party's policy platform for the next four years.²
Every vote and every delegate that Bernie wins will give Bernie's committee members more leverage to write the "strongest progressive agenda that any political party has ever seen” at the Democratic convention.³
Will you join other MoveOn members this weekend to help get out the vote? Click here to search for the nearest volunteer event.
Or click here to sign up and make calls from your home.
Democratic Party operatives typically appoint the 15-member drafting committee. But the strength of Bernie's political revolution forced party officials to the table to negotiate with Bernie’s campaign.
Bernie was able to appoint five members, who will be fighting for the Democratic Party to officially embrace a $15 minimum wage, break up big banks, ban fracking, and end our corrupt campaign finance system.
If Bernie wins big on June 7, his team will have the momentum and power to shape the Democratic Party platform for the next four years and beyond.
Will you join other MoveOn members this weekend to help get out the vote? Click here to search for the nearest volunteer event.
Or click here to sign up and make calls from your home.
Thanks for all you do.
—Matt, Mark, Hannah, Emily, and the rest of the MoveOn for Bernie team
Sources:
1. "Sanders wins greater say in Democratic platform; names pro-Palestinian activist," The Washington Post, May 23, 2016
https://act.moveon.org/go/3928?t=4&akid=165434.3448084.kWAvm_
2. "The Democratic Platform Committee Now Has a Progressive Majority. Thanks, Bernie Sanders." The Nation, May 24, 2016
http://act.moveon.org/go/3909?t=6&akid=165434.3448084.kWAvm_
3. Ibid.

Want to support our work? We're going all out to help Bernie Sanders win the Democratic nomination and change the Democratic Party. But we can't do it without small-dollar donations from people like you. Click here to chip in.

---

PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

This email was sent to Alessandro Machi on May 27th, 2016. To change your email address or update your contact info,click here. To opt out of "MoveOn for Bernie" emails, click here. To remove yourself from the MoveOn.org list, click here.   end of email.

I still don't understand how Move on dot org can reach out to all democrats to get as big of an email list as possible and then take their full email list and simply start supporting one democrat candidate over another while maintaining their non-profit status.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders and his Unconditional Political Pandering Promises.

DailyPUMA has yet to witness Bernie Sanders promise anything and add a condition to it. DailyPUMA believes that Bernie Sanders and his unconditional promises are the lowest of the low political pandering.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hillary wins the 2016 Washington Democrat PRIMARY after Bernie Sanders won the Washington cacas er, caucus.

In 2008 Hillary Clinton made up NOTICEABLE ground on Barack Obama in the three states that held both Democrat caucuses and Democrat primaries.

In  2016, Hillary Clinton, after losing both the 2016 Nebraska and Washington caucuses to Bernie Sanders, has actually won both the 2016 Nebraska Primary and the 2016 Washington Democrat Primary, lending further credence that Hillary Clinton is more popular than any other democrat candidate when voters have a primary to vote in versus a caucus to navigate.

Primary voting is the way that votes are cast for the actual presidential race in November, Caucuses are not.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, play the "Mommy Card".

If we take a step back, the "Donald Trump attacking Hillary Clinton regarding Bill Clinton" strategy is rather odd. The same Donald Trump who invented a new hue of facial red out of protective anger for his wife and retaliated by posting a picture of Ted Cruz's wife with melted lipstick next to a picture of his own trophy wife, attacks Hillary Clinton for protecting her man from attacks. 

Is the pedantic Mr. Trump so obtuse that he can't see his own shadow regarding protecting his wife as being no different than Hillary Clinton protecting her husband? Is Donald Trump the pimp, who may have been associated with Trump Escorts, and who REGULARLY trades in his late 30 something wife for a 20 something replacement, that obtuse?

Donald Trump, a man, attacks Hillary Clinton, a woman, for standing by her man even though he did the same thing as Hillary Clinton. Trump thinks that another man's boorish behavior should determine whether Hillary Clinton is qualified for office. Does this mean if any of Donald Trump's former wives ALLEGEDLY did something unacceptable that Donald Trump would back out of the presidential race? What about any of Donald Trump's relatives, like his canned hunt killing sons?

Bernie Sanders, a Man, verbally assaults Hillary Clinton (she can take it, I get that) and financially assaults Debbie Wasserman Shultz. Hillary Clinton has  had to play the boys will be boys card while Ms. Schultz has also played the adult card and by granting that 5 of the 15 democrat platform committee members be selected by Bernie Sanders. 

Why stop at spouses, what about son's and daughter's behavior, shouldn't that matter as well? What about Donald Trump's sissy sons engaging in the most cowardly act of all, canned hunts, aka shooting a SEDATED Lion at close range and then having the Lion's head imported into the United States? 

If family behavior matters so much to Donald Trump, George Bush senior probably has the most baggage of all. His son's wife accidentally killed a former boyfriend when she drove through a stop sign and hit his car. George Bush Sr. was alleged to have had a very young protege who he took massages with. One masseuse mysteriously died not too long after giving Mr. Bush and his protege a massage just hours before the debate he won against Bill Clinton. 

Mr. Bush's grand daughters have had numerous run ins with the law and behaved badly in public on numerous occasions and I think have been to rehab. When Mr. Trump brings up alleged crap about the Clintons, it simply becomes a gateway media stunt that gives opponents the opportunity to air dirty secrets about ANY prior Republican president and their families as well. The fact that Mr. Trump has no visionary skills to see beyond his nose is the fear factor many moderates have in this country.

While Donald Trump accuses Hillary Clinton of playing the woman card, Debbie Wasserman Schultz has had to play the adult card to a childishly bombastic Bernie Sanders. It's pretty evident to me that Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump are playing the "Mommy Card" as they throw tantrums and accusations and false innuendo towards women politicians in an effort to get their way without caring about the consequences, and that indeed is playing the "Mommy Card".

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Minnesota moves fast, Changes from Caucus to Primary for the 2020 Presidential Race, will keep caucuses for local races.

Minnesota has done the right thing. Seeing the overwhelming voter turnout for the 2016 Presidential caucus races, Minnesota will switch to a Presidential primary system for the 2020 Presidential race.

One assumes that both the Minnesota Republican Presidential Race and the Minnesota Democrat Presidential Race will be primaries. And, those voting in 2020 will have to declare as either supporting a republican or democrat party credo. That may drive Sanders supporters nuts.

Eventually I can can envision the Republican and Democrat parties splitting into two additional categories, Independent Democrat, Independent Republican. Presidential Candidates can register in one of the four categories and then the top Republican and top Democrat category vie for the presidency in November.

If this scenario had been in play this year, Trump would have been the Independent Republican candidate, Sanders the Independent Democrat Candidate. Based on vote totals, the fall presidential election would pit Independent Republican Donald Trump against Democrat Candidate Hillary Clinton.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Lost me when….

According to Daily News Bin, "Bernie Lost me when"….. is trending on twitter.

Although DailyPUMA was never a Sanders supporter, "Bernie Lost me when"…. I realized Bernie doesn't understand how Credit Card Debt actually works, used having unnecessary Credit Card to "carny" his followers into making them believe he had no wealth, his wife may have embezzled funds from the college she was president of, and Bernie had a knack for handsomely paying his close relatives and friends and hiding his wealth in his wive's IRS filings, which they never released.

lease consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hillary Clinton wins her 22nd Primary, Bernie Sanders well behind with only 9 Primary Wins.

Many Clinton supporters realize that Bernie Sanders does better in the caucus contests because his supporters are younger, more aggressive, and are willing to put in the many hours it takes for a caucus to run its course. 

Many Hillary Clinton Voters have other people in their lives who rely on them and can't afford to take all that time to travel extra distances for a "caucus", to caucus, and then to vote, in many instances with either not enough chairs, or no  chairs at all.

A primary contest allows these same Clinton Voters all day and more locations to fit in among their other responsibilities when they vote. For Clinton Supporters, Primaries cast a fairer reflection of how democrats vote. Closed Primaries an even fairer reflection.

Many Independent Voters are put into an oxymoronic situation of automatically voting anti-establishment, which makes the term "independent" rather an inaccurate term since many independents simply are looking for a third party candidate to vote for, they are equal parts protest votes and independent vote.

As of May 18, 2016, Hillary Clinton has won 22 Primaries, Bernie Sanders has won 9 primaries. However, Sanders has deluded his supporters by claiming that primaries are inaccurate representations because Independents can't vote for Sanders if they are registered Independent.

It appears that between Sanders and Trump there are actually more Independent voters than either Republican or Democrat voters, yet that is an oversimplification since the two candidates appear to be so far apart on many issues that what we probably have are independent democrat and independent republican. So the reality is the Republican party and the Democrat party still would probably finish top two in votes, with two independent factions finishing 3rd and 4th. Keep in mind that Trump was only around 40% of the Republican vote total for quite awhile and if he had run as an independent other republicans would have stayed in longer and kept Trump at 40% or lower of the total republican vs independent republican vote totals. 

So when voters have all day to vote but don't have to take all day to vote, aka a Primary, Hillary Clinton is clearly the more popular candidate than Bernie Sanders, and she is doing it while spending less money than Bernie Sanders has month after month after month.

lease consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hillary Clinton wins 2016 Kentucky Primary, CNN illustrates no matter how the SuperDelegates are allotted, Bernie Sanders would still be many hundreds of Delegates behind.

Hillary Clinton has won Kentucky despite the Sander's supporters criticizing Hillary Clinton talking tough about coal even though Sander's supporters are vehemently against fracking. So are Sander's supporters for coal production? They make no sense, all they care about is repeatedly criticizing Hillary Clinton.

CNN Super Delegate article exposes Sander's Super Delegate complaints as being red herrings. Even if the Super Delegates were allocated the way that Bernie Sander's wants, he would still be hundreds of delegates behind Hillary Clinton.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Time to re-edit Bernie Sander's "America" commercial.

Esquire writer Charles P. Pierce says this is the best political ad he's ever seen in regards to Bernie Sanders "America" commercial. I'd love to see an update which starts out the same for the first 7-8 seconds then shows the Bernemies literally assaulting Hillary Clinton supporters at various Clinton rallies, all done to the same piece of music used in the original commercial.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Clinton Derangement Syndrome and Clinton Concern Trollism both found in the same short article, Amazing.

Sometimes you have to take a step back to really digest the garbage disposal shrapnel that doubles as news commentary. The headline reads…

CLICK HERE TO GO TO ARTICLE.

No need to show anymore of the article. The headline alone accomplishes the task of "Concern Trollism." Why is this Hillary Clinton's problem? 

Isn't opposite gender appeal also Donald Trump's problem since he does even more poorly among women voters? Shouldn't the article headline have been, "Just like Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton may face a battle of the sexes problem".

The original headline inflames the haters to make hostile attack comments in the comments section against Hillary Clinton. 

But wait a minute, Hillary Clinton wasn't interviewed for this story, it's just the opinion of the writer that is in play here. Yet the Clinton Derangement Syndrome crowd spews hostile comments in the comments section. 

If you click on the comments section you will see that I personally responded to the Clinton Derangement brigade.  You can too.

Awesome Pantsuit color, by the way.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Independent Voters who only Vote Independent, an Oxymoron, no?

The complaint from Sander's supporters that they were shut out of closed Democrat primaries otherwise Bernie Sanders would have won more states fascinates me for the oxymoronic underpinnings that the Sander's supporters don't seem to grasp.

When Sander's supporters do the math, they basically are calculating that almost 100% of Independents would vote for either Trump or Sanders, whereas a significantly lower percentage of Republicans and Democrats vote for a Republican or a Democrat candidate. 

In other words, the so called Independent voters are blindly and fastidiously voting for any non Democrat or non Republican, whereas both Democrats and Republicans are actually taking the time to think it over and possibly cross over their votes to non-Democrats and non Republicans such as Trump and Sanders.

So the Independent voter is dependent on voting for Independents every step of the way, whereas Registered Republicans and Registered Democrats have crossed over in larger percentages. 

Just who are the real Independent Voters?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Google Search Suppresses 2016 Hillary Clinton Nebraska Primary Victory over Bernie Sanders.

Try googling and finding any result that shows Hillary Clinton beating Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democrat Nebraska Primary. Even when I added a minus sign in front of the word caucus in my search, Google still forced me to look at the Nebraska Democrat Caucus results. 

No mention of Hillary Clinton's 2016 Nebraska Primary Victory over Bernie Sanders can be found anywhere, at least not without having to go through 2 different links to find the results.

Below are the 2016 Democrat Nebraska Primary results that I had to find by going to one link, then clicking on that link to go to the Nebraska Secretary of State's page and then clicking on a link to the president's race. I guess that was just too much work for Google to do themselves.

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

When more people vote, Bernie Sanders LOSES, as is the case in the 2016 Nebraska Democrat Caucus vs Democrat Primary.

A 2008 article of mine statistically shows how Hillary Clinton gets treated unfairly in democrat caucus contests. That trend continued in 2016 once again, below is the proof.

It's pretty comical watching Sander's fanatics freak out over the news that Hillary Clinton won the Nebraska primary when they are quite sure Sanders won the Nebraska caucus a few months back. 

For a Sanders supporter, it's always ok when Sanders wins more delegates while many less voters actually vote, and for a Sander's supporter it's also ok when Hillary Clinton wins the same state in a primary where many more voters voted, just as long as Nebraska doesn't redistribute the delegate wealth to Hillary Clinton. 

I guess even socialists know how to say "mine, mine, mine". 

As far as Sander's voters are concerned, Hillary Clinton can win the Nebraska primary vote by a Yuuuggge margin, as long as Bernie Sanders gets the majority of the delegates from the caucus contest that was previously held. You know, where fewer voters vote and the younger voters tend to dominate and over represent the fair reflection of that state's voters demographics.

When Bernie Sander's says "when more voters come out, he wins", he's actually wrong. DailyPUMA reported that inaccuracy six weeks ago.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hillary Clinton on Mother's Day: My mom was "the most formative influence in my life".

ReAudit Trump is now on Facebook, please Like the Page.  
Please sign the Change dot org  ReAudit Trump Petition.

For the most current DailyPUMA articles, click here.  
For the most compelling DailyPUMA Presidential Recount Articles, click here.

CLICK HERE TO SEE VIDEO.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders starring in the Pledged Delegate / Super Delegate Switcheroo.

First Bernie Sanders points out how "close" he is to Hillary Clinton in pledged delegate count, trailing by "only" around 350 pledged delegates, which just so happens to be a much larger lead than Barack Obama had over Hillary Clinton.

Then Bernie Sanders points out that the super delegates in the handful of primaries he won (Bernie likes to call it 17 primaries and caucuses he's won when it's more like 5 primaries and 12 caucuses won, a big difference because his younger, more fanatical supporters will make sure he wins the caucus state contests but they can't infiltrate a primary), should pledge for him.

But Bernie juxtaposes being behind by 350 PLEDGED delegates with the notion that if the super delegate vote were more equitably distributed the Pledged delegate differential would drop. This is patently and completely false.

Bernie Sander's mixed up message is that he could close the 345 pledged delegate lead if he got more super delegates. If Bernie Sanders were to get more super delegates, it would NOT affect the pledged delegate counts at all, it would simply cut into Hillary Clinton's plus 800 overall delegate lead a tiny bit.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Why Donald Trump being a Bi-Polar Politician probably does not affect his popularity.

Because Donald Trump is male, his Bi-Polar political behavior has been embraced by many.

It's stunning to me that Donald Trump accuses Hillary Clinton of using the Woman's card when Mr. Trump has gotten a pass on being Bi-Polar, something no woman politician would ever get a pass for.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Sanders and Kasich and Disingenuous Math.

John Kasich has 8.4 million LESS VOTES than Hillary Clinton, yet Mr. Kasich claims he would beat Hillary Clinton if he were the Republican presidential nominee.

Bernie Sanders has 3.1 million LESS Votes than Hillary Clinton, yet Mr. Sanders claims he would beat any Republican candidate by a wider margin than would Hillary Clinton, even though it is somewhat obvious that those polls are skewed by Sanders supporters purposely voting for the Republican opponent in the Hillary vs Republican candidate polls.

Kasich and Sanders COMBINED only have 4 percent more votes than Hillary Clinton. I thought men were supposed to have a more natural interest in math than women do, when it comes to disingenuous math, definitely so.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

This is what a Hillary Clinton Concern Troll Post looks like.

Red State has provided a marvelous example of a what a Hillary Clinton Concern Troll Article or comment looks like. Concern Troll Articles fake a concern for someone whom they actually despise.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hillary Clinton Action Figure! I Want One!

Hillary Clinton Action Figure.

It's a Kick Starter Project, I assume its legit.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders has yet to win more delegates than Hillary Clinton in any month of primaries and caucuses, yet somehow his supporters think he is gaining on Hillary Clinton.

As far as I could calculate, Hillary Clinton won more delegates than Bernie Sanders in February of 2016, Hillary Clinton has won more delegates than Bernie Sanders in March of 2016, and Hillary Clinton has won more delegates than Bernie Sanders in April of 2016, yet somehow Bernie Sanders supporters believe that Bernie is gaining on Hillary Clinton in the delegate race. 

It is this type of mystery math that makes me worry about Bernie Sanders or his supporters being in charge of any type of budget.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders biggest controversy regarding his tax returns for the past few years, Does he have Credit Card Debt, or not?

The issue of whether or not Bernie Sanders reported large amounts of credit card debt (apparently because of two weddings he paid for) so he could portray himself as having debt like many americans remains unresolved. Did Bernie Sanders use of a credit card debt ruse cause him to make significant interest rate charge payments to the credit card companies that could have gone to non-profits instead? 

Without costing Sanders one penny more, Sanders could have paid off his credit card debt and then used the interest rate charges he would have avoided as donations to dozens of non-profits on an ongoing basis.

If Bernie quickly paid off the credit card debt, then why even bother showing it as debt at all to the press? If the credit card debt needlessly remained long enough so he could posture to the media that he had credit card debt, then Mr. Sanders chose having credit card debt and paying interest rate charges on that debt, over having no credit card debt and using the interest rate charges he would not have to pay, to instead use as donations to non-profits.

So Mr. Sanders, how much credit card debt did you or do you have, and for how long have you had it?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Bernie Sanders Sanderism falls well short of what makes Socialism Succeed.

If Bernie Sanders actually had a realistic grasp of socialism, he would be less popular with the voters, and he knows it. Sanders brand of socialism, Sanderism, relies on giving out perks without asking for any responsibility in return.

You want a free education, you got it, and you can go on binge drinking and using unprescribed drugs at the same rate as before. In fact, now that you don't have to pay for college, you'll probably have more money for partying and recreational drugs!

Marijuana, hey, maybe it should be illegal NOT to use marijuana.

How about free education and in exchange a pledge to not go into credit card debt? Naw, Sanderism requires giving things to people without really asking that they improve their behavior or responsibility towards society.

Socialism usually has some type of responsibility attached to it. You want retirement income called social security, you work for it prior to retiring. Sanderism means getting chances without showing any type of responsible behavior before getting the chance.

Mr. Sanders, I have met Socialism, and your Sanderism is no Socialism.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

DailyPUMA to Hillary Clinton headquarters. Tried for 2 hours to get through during Sunday hours, never did, is that a good thing or not?

Either Hillary Clinton has so many calls coming into her center they just can't all be answered, or she needs more people answering the phones. I tried calling about 8 times between 3pm and 5pm Eastern Standard time on Sunday and all I got was the same slightly too friendly recorded voice telling me to try back later.

I then called after they were closed, and I could tell the ringing system had changed and I was instantly told by a recorded voice to call back during normal hours. Their password reset system once a person donates does not work either.  I can't get my password to work, and when I ask for a password reset, nothing is sent to me.

Please, fix this stuff.

lease consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Senator Bernie Sanders on Climate Change exposes his own hypocrisy about Hillary Clinton.

Bernie Sanders has accused Hillary Clinton of being bought and paid for by the Fossil Fuel Industry. Bernie Sanders states that the Republicans are bought and paid for by the Fossil Fuel Industry because not one Republican congress person will agree that Climate Change is going on. 

Bernie Sanders has lumped Hillary Clinton in with the Republicans.

And yet, Hillary Clinton disproves Bernie Sanders accusation of being bought and paid for by the fossil fuel industry because she believes Climate Change is going on, thereby disproving Bernie Sander's accusation that Hillary Clinton is bought and paid for by the Fossil Fuel Industry.

You can't have it both ways Bernie. You can't state that the fossil fuel Industry has bought both the Republicans and Hillary Clinton when the Republicans believe Climate Change is not going on, and Hillary Clinton believes that Climate Change IS going on. 

Of the money given out by the Fossil Fuel Industry to various campaigns, Republicans have received approximately 97.75%, Hillary Clinton 2%, and Bernie Sander's .25%

Link to Video Clip.








 Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

If Bernie Sanders has no Super PAC, then what the Heck is Move on Dot Org?

I get messages from Bernie Sanders via my Move on dot org email soliciting me to donate money. Move on Dot Org is a non-profit group that has a million or more members. Bernie claims to not have a Super PAC. Move on Dot Org IS A SUPER PAC pretending to be a non-profit group.

How the heck is Move on Dot Org using their email list so Bernie Sanders can message and ask for money any different than a Super PAC? Non Profits are NOT supposed to be for one candidate over another FROM THE SAME POLITICAL PARTY, but that is what Move on Dot Org has done.

How is the following email that I received as a GENERAL member of Move on dot org, NOT a member of any subgroup that Move on dot org may choose to start, not a Super PAC for Bernie Sanders?  Sanders and Move on Dot Org are friggin liars and I can't believe the crap they continue to say about a political candidate who has WON woman of the year 20 TIMES and the last 14 in a row!

Hi Alessandro—

Bernie Sanders won a HUGE victory last night in Wisconsin. Next up is Wyoming. And after that comes a large and important primary: New York.

Winning there on April 19 would fundamentally reshape the campaign and put Bernie on a track to win the nomination. But it's going to take more resources to compete there than in any state so far. So now is the moment to give—or give again.

Click here to contribute $3 to the Bernie Sanders campaign and MoveOn now, and help us win the Democratic nomination and the White House.

For more on this enormous victory, see Bernie's email from last night, below:

---

Alessandro—We've just won another state for our political revolution, and it's a big one: Wisconsin.

The corporate media and political establishment keep counting us out, but we keep winning states, and doing so by large margins. If we can keep this up, we're going to shock them all and win this nomination.

Click here to contribute $3 to our campaign and MoveOn now, and we are going to keep winning states by large margins until we can win this nomination and take our country back from the billionaire class.

Wyoming caucuses in just three days and New York votes in two weeks. You can bet the financial elite of this country won't give up without a fight. They're going to throw everything they can at us. But if we stand together, we're going to keep winning.

Last night kicked off the most important three-week stretch of the campaign and we're starting off with another overwhelming victory. If we can keep our momentum going through the states that vote and caucus over the next three weeks, we’re going to win this election.

We're doing so well because millions of people keep standing with our campaign. Contribute $3 to our campaign and MoveOn now, and help us win Wyoming on Saturday and New York on April 19.

Amazing win last night. It wouldn't have happened without you. That's the absolute truth.

In solidarity,

Bernie Sanders

---

PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION,http://pol.moveon.org/. Authorized by BERNIE 2016.

This email was sent to Alessandro Machi on April 6th, 2016. To change your email address or update your contact info,click here. To opt out of "MoveOn for Bernie" emails, click here. To remove yourself from the MoveOn.org list, click here.

Um, No Thanks, I'LL STICK with HILLARY  CLINTON.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hillary Clinton Spent 39% of what Bernie Sanders spent on Television Advertising in Wisconsin.

Can Bernie Sanders, the allegedly populist candidate of the people who spent 260% more than Hillary Clinton on television advertising in Wisconsin for a victory, continue to be called the populist candidate?

A candidate really can't have it both ways, if they can afford to spend almost triple than the alleged insider candidate in Wisconsin to win, they are not the populist candidate. The Populist candidate is the one who gets more votes for less money. Sanders is simply the candidate who to win has to spend double or triple, or as in the case of Washington, Hawaii and Alaska, 27 times more money than Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton continues to be the candidate that gets the most votes for the least amount of money spent, and that in my book is the populist candidate. If the News Media correctly called Hillary Clinton the populist candidate based on the exiting statistical evidence, it would put an end to the populist label Bernie Sanders continues to falsely flaunt.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Hillary Clinton voted Woman of the Year 20 Times, 14 in a row. Bernie Sanders Male of the Year, Zero Times.

Not sure why Bernie Sanders would continue to assault a woman who has been voted Woman of the Year 20 times, and 14 times in a row. Hey Bernie, how many times have you been voted Man of the Year that gives you the right to assail Hillary Clinton's character.

Oh yeah, you're a man, so it's ok to assassinate Hillary Clinton's character and imply false innuendo because she only won Woman of the year, not Man of the year. Hey Bernie, maybe Hillary Clinton bought the Women of the Year award each and every time, yeah, that's it! 

Now run with that Bernie!

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Why didn't anyone ask Donald Trump the obvious follow-up question to his "abortion should have consequences for a woman", comment?

Donald Trump apparently stated that if a female gets an illegal abortion she should face consequences, yet no one asked Mr. Trump if the male who impregnated the woman should also face a similar consequence as the woman would face.

Sure Mr. Trump has already created an absurd scenario, but it would be interesting to see how he explains if the male has or does not have any culpability as well, no?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.