Why does the Republican Party refuse to highlight the damage the liberal media and higher democratic officials did to Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign?

(Edit note - April 07, 3:22 pm pst, 2012. After posting this article on March 22, 2012, Obama has now aggressively reached out to women!  Obama Attacks GOP on women's rights )

The Republicans could win the 2012 presidency by reminding the american people of the media and talk show host abuse that Hillary Clinton was exposed to in 2008. 

However, It appears that the republicans would rather lose the 2012 presidential election than remind the world how the 2008 democrats, the male dominated news media, and the corrupt higher echelon of the democratic party ridiculed both Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin.

In case republicans have not noticed, democratic women voters fervently believe that democratic spokesholes like Michael Moore, Bill Maher, Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews and on down the line are somehow more pro women than republican spokesholes are.

In 2008 Hillary Clinton was treated so shabbily by her own democratic party that the media had to resort to pretending that none of it  happened. Keith Olbermann looked right into the camera and actually said...

"I never told senator Clinton to get out of the campaign, I never even suggested it....go back and read your talking points carefully, again".

Here is a partial list of the political atrocities Hillary Clinton had to face in the 2008 democratic election.

Political Favoritism: The democratic higher ups froze delegates from the Hillary Clinton strongholds of Florida and Michigan because both states moved up their primary dates. Meanwhile, Illinois, the state that gave Barack Obama his biggest margin of delegate victory in the entire country, was allowed to move up its primary date from the end of March 2008 to the beginning of February 2008 with no sanctions! North Carolina, another Obama stronghold, was given an extra 28 delegates FOR NOT moving up their primary date.

Move On Dot Org's caucus caper. This will go down for me as one of the all time "Who let the children out" moments in politics. Move on Dot org was founded by George Soros specifically to protect democrats from the kind of ridiculous impeachment attacks that Bill Clinton was put through. 

Move On Dot Org's growing clout was used against Hillary Clinton by steering the caucus contests to Barack Obama by a massively inaccurate 2-1 margin. Read the comments sections here to see how delusionial the Move On dot org people are in defending what they did to Hillary Clinton in 2008.

ACORN probably also had a hand in 2008 as well, especially in the caucus contests.  Check out this image of how the precincts that bordered Illinois all went for Obama, lending some statistical credence to the allegation that Obama supporters were bussed into Iowa to vote in the caucus contests.

Credit Card Gate:  Nancy Pelosi received a VISA IPO and in return appeared to table the credit card reform bill act of 2008. At the same time, Barack Obama was accepting prepaid credit card donations with false names and addresses, and was the only candidate to do so. After Barack Obama was elected in 2008, Obama took credit for the passage of a weakened credit card reform bill act that should have been passed a year earlier. One key element to the weakening of the credit card reform bill act was the deletion of a consumer's right to opt out of a change in terms.  Apparently Barack Obama's admiration of Jamie Dimon of Chase Bank, who is a fellow Chicagoan, lobbied to take have the opt out right removed from the credit card reform bill.

Republicans may have some women bashing spokespeople, but the democrats have more! The list of supposedly "nice democratic men" who used their position of influence to both ridicule Hillary Clinton and hype Barack Obama is A LOT LONGER than the list of backwards thinking republican men who have recently bashed women over reproductive issues. How about people like Michael Moore, Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, Tim Russert, Jimmy Kimmel, Jon Stewart, Jay Leno, David Letterman, all of whom were pandering to their younger viewers back in 2008.  

Then there was Al Gore and Edward Kennedy who did not back Hillary Clinton nor remain neutral either.  Kennedy went as far as to deny Hillary Clinton a chance to work on a health care reform committee were Hillary Clinton to stay in Congress after Obama was declared the democratic nominee. Each one of these men used their bully pulpit to make jokes about Hillary Clinton while trying to look cool in their support of Barack Obama.

Even the women ganged up against Hillary Clinton in 2008. The irony for me in the number of highly influential women who went against Hillary Clinton is not that they should have automatically supported Hillary Clinton, it's that they could have remained neutral until the 2008 democratic nomination race was decided by democratic voters.

Here is the short list of prominent women who caved in to George Soros, Barack Obama, and the billionaire elite who were afraid of having a women as president. Arianna Huffington, Maria Shriver, Oprah Winfrey, Nancy Pelosi, Rachel Maddow, Taylor Marsh even Elizabeth Edwards, rather than simply support the democratic party nominee as decided by the democratic voters, went out of their way to support Barack Obama BEFORE DEMOCRATIC VOTERS HAD VOTED.  

Yet NONE of these women will take even an ounce of responsibility for the home foreclosure debacle that Barack Obama has done very little to stop, something Hillary Clinton vowed to solve as soon as she became president.

The allegedly liberal media was all in for Barack Obama in 2008. As a lifelong democrat, it was only by accident (literally) that I ended up watching MSNBC for 10 straight days while recuperating from an injury. I want from being completely ambivalent about which democratic candidate won the 2008 nomination, to being stunned at the level of badgering that Hillary Clinton was getting from the media, both television and newspaper. 

In my opinion, Keith Olberman, Chris Matthews, and Tim Russert did more to destroy the fabric of middle america than any other trio of personalities working for one station has ever achieved.

Huffington Post may have been the biggest Hillary Clinton detractor, actually surpassing MSNBC.

On top of what Hillary Clinton went through in 2008, Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman, who David Letterman repeatedly referred to as "O'Bachman" have also been repeatedly ostracized by a male dominated media in both news and late night television. 

The republicans nonchalance to the liberal female presidential bashing facts listed above will most likely result in defeat to Barack Obama in 2012.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGv6XBxk1IA&t=1m32s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGv6XBxk1IA These are two links to Moore's youtube Larry King youtube video, unfortunately they are not embedding properly here.

Please Download the Chase Bank Protest Flyer for FREE, and then all that needs to be done is just give a few copies out, it is really that simple.

Obama can only muster 56% primary popular vote in 2012 Oklahoma democratic primary, wow that is low!

Running primarily against himself, Barack Obama was only able to muster 56%, (NOT 57% as EVERYBODY is reporting), of the 2012 Oklahoma democratic primary popular vote.

Dennis Kucinich could have run against Obama for the democratic presidential nomination this time around and probably made a race of it! Kucinich would have made an excellent protest candidate and would have allowed democratic voters the opportunity to voice a protest vote against the foreclosure evil doer Barack Obama.

Please Download the Chase Bank Protest Flyer for FREE, and then all that needs to be done is just give a few copies out, it is really that simple.

Why can't 2012 Republicans just turn the other cheek?

There seem to be a lot of inconsistencies in the 2012 Republican presidential playbook.

Homosexuality is wrong, most republicans chortle. Yet statistics show that homosexual sex is less likely to produce homosexual offspring or offspring of any kind, so it would seem that turning the other cheek would actually be the logical course of action to take.

A person's emotional spirituality is determined by their sex organ, most republicans believe. I find it an insult to God that many republicans believe that what makes a person a person is buried within their sex organ, and not within their mind or "heart".

Abortion is murder, but plundering any and all resources that mankind can plunder is what God "wants". Really?  What about waste not want not? If you really care about abortionites, then why don't republicans support programs that allow people to work knowing that the broader community will caretake for that child while they are at work?

Oh wait, Republicans do support using insurance dollars to payoff the owner of the 911 twin towers even though insurance policies do not cover acts of war. So Republicans are for the sharing of communal resources to reimburse business owners, but not families?

Furthermore, why do Republican MALES want to make the rules regarding abortion? They already voted when they donated their sperm to the cause. Unless the sperm donor wants to raise a child they donated their sperm to help create, and it was a consensual union, it's none of their business.

Why do Republicans think it's "their money" when it comes to contraception, but don't want to hear the same type of talk from conscientious objectors objecting over their own tax dollars going towards funding wars fought over petroleum?


And finally, let who cast the first sperm NOT speak on the issue of abortion. Any male that has ever put a women into a position of having to decide whether to they should keep a child out of wedlock, should shut up, unless they were willing to caretake for the child themselves or were going to personally fund that child's well being up until adulthood and perhaps even beyond.

The bible advocates an "eye for an eye", yet I don't recall the Bush administration advocating splitting the war time budget in half, with half going towards the development of alternative energies so that those who hate us would eventually not even know who we are because we would not have to force ourselves into their country for their oil.

Why do republicans alienate women in 2012 when simply reminding women of what happened to Hillary Clinton in 2008 could swing enough voters to their side to win the 2012 presidential election?

Please Download the Chase Bank Protest Flyer for FREE, and then all that needs to be done is just give a few copies out, it is really that simple.