Gavin Newsom's Undocumented Healthcare Budget is Equivalent to what the Federal Government sends California in SNAP Benefits.

The quid pro quo comparison of Undocumented California Benefits to Government provided programs reveals Gavin Newsom spends as much per year on Healthcare Benefits for the Undocumented as the Federal Government gives to California for Snap Benefits.

California budgets $12B for Undocumented immigrant Healthcare. 

Meanwhile, the Federal Government provides 12 billion dollars a year for SNAP benefits to California.

This is the quid pro quo that I think concerns Donald Trump. While the US roars into record Budget Deficits, and California has been riding a monthly budget deficit of 1 to 2 billion dollars a month, the continued motivation to make California look like the West Coast version of the Statue of Liberty, thrives. 

Newsom is ready to pat himself on the back by allocating 80 million dollars in California Funds

at Trump's expense, when it is Newsom's ultra pro Undocumented Immigration stance that is the root cause of the ongoing conflict between both Political Parties. 

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Trump's communtation of George Santos, is it Trans Sympathy?

I think I understand why Trump commutated George Santos's prison sentence. The Biden administration may have been one of the most hypocritical, law and disorder Presidency ever seen. Two to three billion dollars in post George Floyd protest damage, yet virtually zero convictions. Several Million Undocumented flooded into the US during record inflation rates of 9% and 6%, which created cumulative inflation of around 16% to 17% over a 2 year time span. 

Meanwhile, Biden played pretend J-6 Investigator, circumventing common sense judicial rules such as allowing defendants access to video evidence. Every high profile trial was designed to push a Democrat Agenda. The Lawfare Judgements against Trump is used to this very day by uninformed Democrat supporters who never questioned the validity of the lawfare trials against Trump. 

I personally, would not have commutated Santo's sentence because he took financial advantage of so many people who were not wealthy. On a provocative note, Santos may be a closet transvestite based on his pre U.S. days, and in that regards, Trump has demonstrated Trans sympathy.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

When Federalizing of the National Guard makes sense, and how Trump can win in Court without having to appeal.

As Trump and Progressive States fight in court over Federalizing the National Guard, We the People have been forgotten.  

If a State is not responsive to the safety concerns of their constituents, the State has not lived up to a minimum obligation they have been entrusted to by their constituents, and thus would lose credibility in the Court's eyes if such evidence is provided. 

If residents of Portland have written to the Attorney General about safety issues, and the Attorney General has not acknowledged and replied to their constituent's concerns, the Judge would have cause for independently evaluating if the State of Oregon is living up to a reasonable standard of safety for their constituents, and if they have not lived up to a reasonable standard of safety, the Judge would then have cause to side with Trump's Federalizing of National Guards. 

Any communication that has occurred between consitituents and the Attorney General's Office of each State, or, other related offices regarding  constituent safety, that has been hidden, ignored or never responded to, could be considered obstruction of evidence by a judge.

However, it is up to the Trump Administration to ASK for copies of constituent correspondence to a State's Attorney General's Office of States the Federal Government is concerned have fallen short in the area of constituent safety.  

At some point, it is about We the People, and not about what could be gaslighting of the truth by State Goverments as they posture to a specific subset of constituents who agree with them politically, safety be damned.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Once again, the Mainstream Media attacks and mocks Trump, this time for his Aspirin and Autism Concern.

The article linked below incorporates a style of writing reminiscent of #SalonMagazine during Hillary Clinton's first attempt at becoming the Democrat Nominee in 2008. The writing has a tone to it that is difficult to assauge other than it sets up its own exaggerated premise against a specific entity, then repeatedly shoots down the exaggerated premise as if somehow their clay pigeon premise could actually fly on its own, before being shot down.

Maybe the word I am looking for is a prissy style of writing?

Comparing Trump for announcing that taking aspirin during pregnancy may cause autism; to how women were treated by a man centric medical community 70 years ago belies the fact that men were lauded for smoking back then, and professional men did now know better because everywhere they looked, were more professional men during a time when a majority of jobs required heavy lifting, making it more difficult for a woman in heels to prove she belonged.

The article could have suggested Trump oversold his concern about aspirin without providing irrefutable proof, while also expressing interest about a "what if" aspirin scenario regarding aspirin and autism.

Instead of making the article about shaming Trump, aka "MAHA" make America Healthy Again; because Trump oversold a possible link between aspirin and autism; as if Trump's message went into a time dilation transport portal and was able to once again shame women 75 years ago; the article could have admitted that finding a cause for less productive forms of autism, which has continued to grow percentage wise decade after decade, is a notably noble, goal.

But hey, the woman mentioned in the article points out her son, who was allegedly diagnosed with autism, is wildy successful today, therefore, case closed, move on, because all autism is the same?

Not all autism is the same; now that would have been a productive article to write versus BTAAA, Blame Trump Again and Again. https://19thnews.org/2025/10/refrigerator-mothers-autism-tylenol-blaming/

 

 

Alessandro Machi is involved in several mindful projects. Alessandro's Banned by LinkedIn Facebook site assists permanently restricted LinkedIn members in their attempts to be reinstated to the LinkedIn Platform, His credit card innovation concept can reverse the record consumer credit card debt of 1.1 trillion dollars. Alessandro also has several other exciting projects in the works and welcomes interested parties who believe in mindful Ideation projects that do not require investments, just the right connection.

 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.