Daily PUMA Column - Commentary by Alessandro Machi

Monday, March 29, 2021

2004 TV show "Strong Medicine", episode "Quarantine", discusses the Dangers of Coronavirus.

If the Coronavirus has been around for decades, why was COVID-19 represented as some type of new virus when the world was first shut down?

In a 2004 episode of Strong Medicine, called "Quarantine", there is a scene where the Coronavirus is succinctly explained and that it is dangerous. So why did it take another 16 years before serious work on a Coronavirus vaccine was completed?

The 2004 scene from Strong Medicine where Coronavirus is explained is CHILLING for anyone watching the scene who is unfamiliar with, or never saw the show before, because they would just assume that the episode was recently made.

And if it "just took that long" to develop a Coronavirus Vaccine, why didn't the Medical Community do ongoing clinical trials to see what could be given, even if it was a natural remedy, to reduce the overall impact of Coronavirus when the symptoms were caught early enough?

Update June 13, 2021:  Sometime in early May of 2021,  Strong Medicine was REMOVED from the StartTV line-up, about 4 to 5 weeks after this article was written? Coincidence?  Who knows.



Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Wednesday, March 17, 2021

Can Shark Tank Raise money for Charity by auctioning off their Shark Tank scribbles?

I was watching a Lori Grenier Instagram Post and it dawned on me that the scribble notes the Sharks write during their Tank investment interviews might be worth something to respectful fans of the show.

If the Sharks and the Shark Tank show are amenable to the idea, why not auction off the various Shark's scribbles / notes that they write during their Tank investment Interviews and donate the proceeds to charity?

How much is that investment scribble worth to a Shark Fan for charity?



Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Thursday, March 4, 2021

Has Citi Credit Card bait and switched millions of their credit card customers during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

(Update: Friday, March 19, 2021 2:15 am). I thought I had a good talk with the Citi Executive representative who called me, but when their PDF arrived it basically stated nothing would change and Citi is doing nothing wrong, so I have doubled down on my belief that Citi is wrongly posting to the credit bureaus the total amount owed by waiting until a new bill is generated which automatically amplifies the customer's borrowing amount by several hundreds of dollars. Once a new bill is posted a customer has 20 days to pay down the amount owed and what should be being reported to the credit bureaus is the amount owed just prior to a new bill being generated, NOT the amount owed as soon as the new bill is generated. And, the additional overage charges when a new bill is generated are illegal in my opinion since they are not allowing the customer to pay down their debt even though the customer has 20 days to do so and was actually under the credit limit just prior to a new bill being generated. (End of Friday, March 19, 2021 2:15 am update).

(Update: Wednesday, May 17, 2021, 2:42 am) I filed a complaint with the CFPB and yesterday I received a call from Citi's Executive Office. I agreed to recuse my claim of a "pre-ordained conspiracy in which Citi overcharges on their monthly minimum payment which leads to a chain reaction in which the customer calls in to ask why their monthly bill is radically higher than normal...and without asking the customer who called in is then offered a lower interest rate for 6 months which in turn triggers a reduce customer's credit line "trap" the next the time the customer makes a large payment" if.... the executive assistant would forward my request to the powers that be that Citi customers be given their "real" credit limit (which is actually approximately 1.5% lower than the written credit limit) so the customer knows approximately how far below the actual credit limit they need to be so they don't suddenly incur an inflated monthly minimum bill even when they were actually below the credit limit just prior to their new credit card bill being generated.  (End of Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:42 am update).

I had called Citi customer service asking why my monthly credit card bill which is normally a certain amount, was suddenly 160 dollars higher.   
The customer service rep seemed to instantly know, as if many customers were experiencing the same situation. Without my even asking, the customer service rep offered me a six month, 7.99% percent interest rate. I was shocked, I was humbled. I felt like I was in a Honda Commercial where they perform a Random act of Kindness. Silly, foolish, Alessandro Machi. This is a credit card company, any kind hearted move has to have an ulterior motive.

"But it's the pandemic, it must have softened the hearts of the Credit Card companies, that has to be it".  Gasp. Silly, foolish, Alessandro Machi. Are you really trying to see the good when it comes to a credit card company?  Really?

I had called simply asking why I was being charged an extra 160 dollars for my monthly Citi Credit Card bill and instead of giving me an answer, my interest rate was lowered to 7.99% for six months, which could save me several hundred dollars in lower interest rate charges. How could I be so fortunate?

When a short time later I had the chance to do a zero percent balance transfer offer from a different credit card, I chose to pay down my Citi credit card because having some elbow room on the card would be of benefit to me.

The moment the balance transfer went through, Citi gobbled it all up by lowering my credit line an almost equivalent amount to the balance transfer. Now, this is not necessarily a bad thing since a lower credit limit means I have lower monthly payments and less going towards interest rate charges. However, in this particular instance it would mean I would now lose some of the 7.99 low interest savings I had just been awarded for six months, by at least one hundred dollars, maybe more.

However, specifically because of the pandemic I needed my credit limit and the gap I had just created through a balance transfer from another card. I needed the credit line max to remain as is. Once the 6 month, 7.99% offer had expired, if Citi wanted to lower my credit line that would be totally fine by me.

So as I retrace my steps what basically happened was this...

I called before my credit card due date to see if I needed to make any payments to ensure I was below my credit limit. I followed the automated information I was given over the phone and made two small payments to put me below my credit line limit. However, my next credit card bill triggered that I was over my limit even though I had made the payments necessary to get below the credit limit and had made them before the due date and they were credited before the due date. Instead of being hit with the standard 1% of what is owed, plus interest, I was hit with 2% of what was owed, plus interest AND my account was flagged as making insufficient payments even though I made the payments as suggested when I called in to check if I was below the credit line limit. Afterwards, when I called in to ask why my bill was 160 dollars higher than normal my call triggered an offer by the Citi rep to lower my interest rate for six months to 7.99%, which in turn triggered an AUTOMATIC lowering of my credit line the moment I made a large enough payment to do so.

I have no problem with Citi wanting to lower their credit line, I do have a problem with Citi giving out false information as to how much one should pay to avoid inflated payment due amounts that  also create a red flag scenario of insufficient payments being made that was caused by incorrect info Citi is giving their customers.  

Citi, it's this easy, when customers call in to check their credit card balance to make sure they are under their credit limit, use the following recording when giving out credit limit information, "To avoid a higher monthly payment due amount, please pay down your account by the amount of ____________ before your due date", and then actually give the CORRECT AMOUNT needed to ensure the credit card balance remains below the credit limit even when the new bill is assessed.

What Citi basically did was give inaccurate credit balance info so that a higher payment due amount would be triggered, which is then used to DOWNGRADE a customer's payment history and assess the customer as a risk, even if the customer has NEVER been late with a payment.

If Citi used bait and switch strategies against their own customers during the COVID-19 pandemic, something should be done about it by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.



Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Monday, February 22, 2021

The Australia Media Freeze by Facebook exposes the selfishness of both Mark Zuckerberg and Rupert Murdoch.

It seems as if behemoth companies like Rupert Murdoch's Media Empire and Mark Zuckerberg's Facebook Empire are thriving by depriving the every day mere mortal.


Zuckerberg employs minimal real time customer assistance other than sometimes access to chat. Meanwhile Murdoch refuses to prop up broadcast television news with a conservative slanted evening and nightly news show. Nor is there a late night conservative talk show that could dovetail off of the evening and nightly news conservative talk show.

Australia is turning out to be the petrie dish by which we can judge how out of touch both Facebook and Murdoch's Media empire have become with the viewers of their product. While both Murdoch and Zuckerberg probably did the right thing from their own perspectives, their inability to see they are throwing the proverbial baby out with the bathwater is somewhat alarming.

If Facebook employed a cadre of people running into the several thousand whose job it was to actually talk to the public, the present situation would either have been avoided, or at the very least, there would have been Facebook employees already up to speed who could have literally one by one determined which sites from Australia could do what and with whom and be manually notated so the proper Facebook department could implement a new rewiring of what is allowed and what is not allowed.

Not to be outdone, Murdoch's insistence regarding new legislation that forces Facebook to pay a fee for news links that appear on Facebook should have also come with a mandate that Murdoch creates a free tv broadcast TV conservative evening, nightly news and conservative late night talk show program. In the United States, people have become so polarized over Donald Trump not because of Trump, but because of a one sided nightly news that portrayed anything that Trump did in a bad light.

Of course, Murdoch has no obligation to do something that might prove positive. Thus Murdoch becomes another Zuckerberg (Zuckerberg could be providing thousands more jobs making Facebook more interactive with the public but instead makes machiavellian decisions on the spur of the moment and more profits as a result) by eating the top of the muffin (his non broadcast, non free tv, cable empire), while discarding the muffin stumps (the hard work; a nightly, free tv conservative evening and nightly broadcast news show and late night conservative talk show).

We are in a time and a space where triangulation is needed to solve problems in which the third side is an outsider who is thinking about the bigger picture rather than choosing sides.







Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Saturday, February 13, 2021

Biden signs bill paying Refugees high wages to be Nurses instead of expanding cost neutral In Home Supportive Services program that pays American Families to keep their Parents out of Nursing Homes.


This is the type of Progressive hyperbole that kills Americans and demoralizes the Family. The favoring of Paid Refugees over Americans struggling to get by and who could be getting by as a paid live-in caregiver for their own parent instead of having them whisked away to a barricaded Nursing home is ramping up now that Biden is in charge.
Biden's plan to let more refugees into the country is a great way to solve the COVID recession
As industries are struggling to find enough workers, Biden has a chance to undo the Trump administration's strict policy on refugees.

Now more than ever I.H.S.S. could have been EXPANDED to keep Seniors in their own home with their own family member as a PAID caregiver.

I.H.S.S. is considered a revenue neutral Government program because it LOWERS overall Medicare Costs for all Americans. The link above champions the idea of more refugee Nurses so our Seniors can live out their lives away from their families in what for many seniors becomes the saddest time of their lives because they have been ripped away from all they knew and all who knew them.

Family members who could not split their time between work and caregiving for their parents are now out of work and their parents have been forced into Nursing Homes and then barricaded from visits.

This is the typical, destructive, Progressive mentality that breaks apart the family unit and replaces it with higher healthcare costs, more taxes for Americans, and grateful Refugees who then vote Democrat. It is sinister beyond comprehension that Dems are focusing and prioritizing those outside of our borders while our own families struggle at everything because of all the work restrictions put in place by DEMOCRAT Politicians and Policies.

During the time of COVID-19 when Democrat Politicians demand we all stay home, the ONE Program that could have provided income for families while also LOWERING HEALTHCARE COSTS FOR TAXPAYERS is the I.H.S.S. Program.

Although the paid live-in caregiver income is at a VASTLY LOWER amount because the overhead for being a live-in caregiver is much, much lower than having to go to an office by car to work and in home caregivers are not required to be as skillful as a certified nurse, I.H.S.S. has been shunted aside by the same Political Party that always has to help itself first and foremost before helping the people they swore to serve.



Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Monday, January 25, 2021

63 Hydroxy Clinical Trials, 23 of which are focusing on the potential preventative aspect of COVID-19.

My research shows as of January 25, 2021 there are 63 Hydroxy Clinical Trials. Of those 63, there have been ZERO peer reviewed Hydroxy Studies that did not use Hospital Patients. 
Presently there are 23 Hydroxy Clinical trials that are focused on preventative aspects of Hydroxy. Of those 23, only 2 use Zinc even though Hydroxy proponents have been stating for the past 7 to 8 months that zinc is an essential component of Hydroxy when used as a preventative against COVID-19. 

None the less, at least the focus is on preventative aspects of Hydroxy instead of it failing as a super cure for those on their COVID-19 Hospital Death Beds.

Hysteria breeds hysteria. We can credit Andrew Cuomo with his hysteria engorged proclamations early on, "We need 40,000 ventilators" when improper and over use of ventilators was actually killing patients. Cuomo's refusal to use the Trump provided Mercy ships as a way to evacuate healthy seniors from their nursing homes so the Nursing Homes could house COVID-19 Seniors only may have been well hidden disaster.

Cuomo's zero philosophical discussion about what could prevent or reduce the impact of COVID-19 if treated early enough may have thwarted an intelligent analysis regarding how to use anti malaria drugs as a preventative against COVID-19. 

Lagos, Nigeria has 4 million more people than Los Angeles, CA. Lagos, Nigeria had less total COVID-19 deaths in the entire year of 2020 than Los Angeles has had in ONE day in 2021. Lagos, Nigeria supplies anti malaria drugs to its citizens and sells them over the counter.

Below is my research on Preventative Hydroxy Clinical Trials that do not use COVID-19 Hospital Patients since those Patients are already sick from COVID-19.

61 Clinical Trials…


As of January 25, 2021,ALL peer reviewed Hydroxy clinical trial results used hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. 


Below are 23 Hydroxy Clinical Trials that do not involve COVID-19 Hospital Patients or those who are already infected with COVID-19 but instead focuses on preventative measures using Hydroxy. 


Only 2 of 23 Hydroxy Clinical Trials are using Zinc, which is an alarmingly low number.   


Use of Zinc in Hydroxy Clinical Trials….https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987720306435

———————————————————————————————

ACT: Asymptomatic COVID-19 Trial


A Study of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo to Prevent COVID-19 Infection in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy


CROWN CORONATION: Chloroquine as COVID-19 Prevention in Healthcare Workers


HCQPreP: Hydroxychloroquine as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers


HELPCOVID-19: Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and Zinc for the Prevention of COVID-19


HERO: HEalth Care Worker pROphylaxis Against COVID-19


Hydroxychloroquine and Zinc With Either Azithromycin or Doxycycline for Treatment of COVID-19 in Outpatient Setting


Hydroxychloroquine as Chemoprevention for COVID-19 for High Risk Healthcare Workers


Hydroxychloroquine COVID-19 PEP for Household Contacts


Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 PEP


Hydroxychloroquine in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Pneumonia Trial


Hydroxychloroquine in the Prevention of COVID-19 Infection in Healthcare Workers


Hydroxychloroquine PrEP for SARS-CoV-2


Hydroxychloroquine to Prevent COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers


Military COVID-19 Hydroxychloroquine Pre-exposure and Post-exposure Prophylaxis Study


Novel Agents for Treatment of High-risk COVID-19 Positive Patients


PATCH: Prevention And Treatment of COVID-19 With Hydroxychloroquine


PATCH 2 & 3: Prevention & Treatment of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) With Hydroxychloroquine


Treat Now: Trial of Early Therapies During Non-hospitalized Outpatient Window for COVID-19


WHIP COVID-19: Will Hydroxychloroquine Impede or Prevent COVID-19


(COVID-19 PEP Canada) Preemptive Therapy for SARS-Coronavirus-2


Efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine Prophylaxis for Health Care Workers at High Risk for COVID-19


A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Aerosolized Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate in Healthy Adult Volunteers


-Alessandro Machi. January 25, 2021 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Pence pulled and tugged from both sides while Mainstream Media shirks responsibility for their one sided newscasts.

The mainstream Media has done massive damage to themselves and half of the Country with their spiteful reporting over the past four years. Rather than take any responsibility, the Mainstream Media has quintupled down that it is all Trumps fault. EVERYTHING is Trump's fault, the MSM chortles. 
I wonder if one of the rich elite has secretly died and unbeknownst to anyone a 10 year old with a dictionary has taken their place, or their offspring regularly hacks into their email account and sends out the most idiotic instructions that are baselessly followed by their MSM minions.

Words like Baseless, False, Falsely, and phrases like "Falsely Accused" and "Growing Outrage" are used by the Media to attack any one who thinks differently than they do all in an attempt to manufracture news rather than fairly report it.  
The mainstream media continues to do with their word droppings what they can't do in real life, which is actually investigate issues and present well rounded perspectives rather than TRUMP BAD, Media Good. How many Thousands of Peaceful Protestors were at Capitol Hill while the Legislators mocked them by  ignoring them?


Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Saturday, January 9, 2021

Pelosi Plan to Impeach Trump will Demoralize Republican Voters into not voting for the next TWO Presidential Cycles.

If Republicans cave and vote for impeachment of Donald Trump, they will have in essence burned down their own return path to the Presidency for the next EIGHT YEARS! 

If Trump is impeached and therefore cannot run for President again, it will disenfranchise tens of millions of Republican Voters whether or not Trump decides to run in 2024, thus giving the Democrats a pathway to an 8 year Presidential Path.  

The Democrats plan to Prematurely Euthanize millions of Seniors while simultaneously opening the door for tens of millions of undocumented to stream into the U.S. and receive Instant entitlements meant for Seniors who spent decades working to EARN their own entitlements.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Sunday, December 27, 2020

Alessandro Machi: Trump 2,000 dollar COVID-19 Relief Check Demand snidely berated by corrupt News Media.

Major Barrett gets in his shot at Donald Trump, making it seem as if Trump is the bad guy for wanting 2,000 dollars COVID Relief Checks for Americans as top priority. Barrett actually makes it sound as if Americans would rather have their 600 dollar check now then a 2,000 dollar check in a few more days.


"If he wants to", CBS Evening News ends the year with one more snide, anti Trump comment that makes no sense.

Thursday, December 24, 2020

Twitter Tyranny on display. Twitter screws up story about Dec. 24, 2020 vote on Trump's 2,000 dollar check demand for the American People, no way to report Twitter Tyranny.

While Twitter will censor others, when they get it wrong, there is no option to notify Twitter they got it wrong. Twitter Tyranny lives on.

The Twitter generated lead story below is WRONG because it only tells half the story. 
                              Twitter Tyranny on display as they only post one half of the Story.

Twitter Tyranny leaves out that Pelosi refused to reconsider the other funding that was included with the COVID relief bill. The link to this Twitter Tyranny generated story has no report this tweet option because it is Twitter Generated, therefore there is no way to report it, aka Twitter Tyranny.



Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Alessandro Machi: Christopher Krebbs "I have seen some auditing that was not up to Snuff."

Isn't it time to start interviewing Christopher Krebb's field workers about 2020 U.S. Vote Tampering? 

Monday, November 30, 2020

Alessandro Machi: 60 Minutes Word Salad Defense of the 2020 Election EXPOSED.

60 Minutes Interview with Christopher Krebs refuses to mention Ballot Harvesting, the core issue that may have flipped the Election to Joe Biden.

Saturday, November 14, 2020

2020 Presidential Vote Manipulation used Voter Registration with Unapologetic Democrat Political Bias.


Edit update: Nov. 22, 2020. I just want to clarify that while I personally believe it is entirely ethically wrong to designate a voter registration location for only one political party, I most definitely think it is unethical, wrong, and possibly illegal to enlist first time voters under these types of one sided conditions.  End of Nov. 22, 2020 update.

The get out the vote campaign for younger voters worked remarkably well in 2020 and that is the real story of the 2020 Presidential Election. So why isn't anyone coming forward to claim credit or high five ing each other?

If what was reported about how voters registered to vote in Chicago was also happening in other battleground cities, especially in the densely populated Democrat centric cities, then what occurred was a violation of the spirit, and possibly the law, in terms of how people were encouraged and influenced when they registered to vote.

Unfortunately, any attempt to ensure that voter registration is done in a fair and impartial manner is most likely to be met with cries of voter suppression from the Mainstream media. 

So Republicans lose either way when it comes to Voter Registration. Either Republicans keep quiet and Democrats lure younger voters to register to vote and to fight "for hope and change," or Republicans shine a spotlight on Democrat voter registration influence peddling and the media accuses Republicans of suppressing people to register to vote.

I made this video around Oct. 16, 2020, about 18 days before the Presidential Election. I never posted it online until now, November 14, 2020 because I did not see any good coming from it as it would be viewed as more Republican attempts to stop voter registration among younger voters. 

But in retrospect my miscalculation was if voter registration partisan influencing was going on in Chicago, which contains a hot bed of Democrat supporters, then it possibly was going on in other Democrat centric cities located in Swing States.


Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Saturday, November 7, 2020

ABC News CONCERN TROLLS DONALD TRUMP SUPPORTERS. Take-1

This is Concern Trolling 101 of Donald Trump Supporters by ABC News 3 days after the 2020 Presidential Election.


Friday, November 6, 2020

Alessandro Machi: Stephen Colbert's monologue about Donald Trump's voting comments requires a Rebuttal.

Rebutting Stephen Colbert's Mr. Colbert goes to Washington moment regarding Donald Trump's 2020 voting comments.

Wednesday, November 4, 2020

Polling those who DID NOT VOTE in the 2020 Presidential Election may reveal Ballot Stuffing in specific precincts in contested States.

If a very high percentage of voters voted in specific precincts in the 2020 Presidential Election, then why not do a door to door poll in those particular districts to find out how many voters did not vote? 
If the amount of people who did not vote plus those who did vote is more than 100%, it would appear that Ballot Stuffing occurred in that particular precinct.



Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Tuesday, November 3, 2020

Could Undersampling of Landline Users cause Inaccurate 2020 Presidential Polls?

So many polls are showing Joe Biden with a stable and commanding lead it seems next to impossible that he could lose. Is there something that the pollsters missed? 

One issue that I think could create confusion is the rather remarkable difference in the Northeast, where Biden apparently holds a 56% to 32% advantage. If California and Illinois are running 2 to 1 for Biden while National polls show Biden with "only" a 5% to 6% national lead, one might wonder if Donald Trump can eeke out several close wins in key states while losing bigly in other States. 

There apparently is another issue, Trump may have improved his percentages with both Latinos and African Americans compared to 2016.

However, there is still another issue to consider....

I think there is something that the pollsters may have missed, and that is landline polling.

A quick google search claims that only 6% of homes have landlines only. However, 40% of all homes have both landlines and smart phones. Why does this matter?

The 40% landline users could be being undersampled by pollsters, here's why. The cable companies that control a significant percentage of the landline customers in the U.S. have developed possibly "over efficient" spam detectors that weed out spam calls either before the phone rings, or after one ring. Unfortunately, the landline spam blockers also weed out other calls that could include phone numbers from polling companies. I recall seeing on my TV caller ID a phone number claiming to be from Donald Trump headquarters zapped after one ring. This happened on at least two different days.

Smart phones offer similar spam block technologies as well but for some reason I don't think they are as aggressive as the land line spam blockers. Perhaps more importantly, land line users tend to need 3 to 4 rings, even 5 to 7 rings before they get to their phone. Many times the auto callers will either give up after 3 rings, or,   grab another auto call sent out at the same time that has already been picked up, thus disconnecting the landline call for being "too slow" to answer.

So, with no verifiable proof other than my own experiences with both landlines and an old cell phone, I think it is possible that a significant percentage of land line users are not being mathematically polled regarding how they will vote versus how smart phone users will vote.

So the next question is, are landline users more likely to vote for Trump, or Biden? That is the mystery question. If Trump wins the 2020 Presidential election, then perhaps it may be attributed to the forgotten landline community that still equals 40% of all households, and of course, an electoral college system that can produce a Presidential victory even if one candidate loses by 5 to 6 million votes.


Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Best Quality VHS to Digital Transfers

Best Quality VHS to Digital Transfers
Serious Customers Welcome.

Share Gadget

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from FABULOUSLY40.com

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from FABULOUSLY40.com
Would this be a good way to win funds for Louisa's Law ?