EARNED ENTITLEMENTS vs INSTANT ENTITLEMENTS, once this issue is stated this way, Trump should win in 2020.

Come join me on Quora as I explore the achilles heel facing Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden, and even Donald Trump.

Nobody has yet to make the direct comparison between EARNED ENTITLEMENTS and INSTANT ENTITLEMENTS. Once this issue hits the media, whichever Party embraces prioritizing EARNED ENTITLEMENTS over INSTANT ENTITLEMENTS, should win the Presidency in 2020.

Even Warren's tax on the rich would be accepted if voters knew the proceeds were going to shore up deficient Medicare Reimbursements AND EARNED ENTITLEMENTS, especially all of the EARNED ENTITLEMENTS Barack Obama managed to remove from Baby Boomers and Seniors during his time in office.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Lies the Media keeps repeating about Myles Garrett.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

A Censure of Trump is the right move.

While Trump has mixed in personal agendas with Government decisions, it should be noted that almost anything he does can have a personal agenda attached to it just because he has business dealings in many parts of the world.

It would not surprise me if the Ukraine impeachment Inquiry is a smoke screen for other charges that the Republicans have no idea are coming.

However, I think Nancy Pelosi refusing to allow budgeting for the Border wall is the offset. If Pelosi had granted budgeting for the border wall, and then Trump went around making his deals, then she would have fairness and decency on her side.

Pelosi's condescending smirk about a border wall, the very issue that got Trump elected, is worthy of impeachment of Pelosi.

I would like to see the Dems and Republicans agree on specific presidential actions that are impeachable and warn Trump via a united censure this time that he can't make backroom deals in the future.

However, I think Trump had the right to investigate the Bidens, as long as the investigation was not publicized and if the investigation exonerated the Bidens, Trump could not hide that result.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The Trump / Ukraine cliff notes by DailyPUMA.

Forget all the media memes that have been used from day one regarding Trump, Ukraine, and quid pro quo's for a moment.

The following is the most important thing to keep track of.

Did Donald Trump demand that Ukraine not only start any kind of investigation related to American citizens, but did Donald Trump also demand that the investigation be publicly announced by Ukraine. If the answer is yes, then at the very least Trump would need to be censured.

However, if Trump did not demand that the names of those being investigated be publicized, then he did little wrong since the purpose of an investigation is to fact find and the result is unknown until the investigation is complete.

If you have been following the news you have heard various people say "there was no quid pro quo," "there was a quid pro quo", "quid pro quo's are acceptable", there was a "pro quo", and "all that is needed is a quid".

"All that is needed is a quid" was said by Nancy Pelosi and she is completely wrong. "All that is needed is a quid" means as long as Trump asked for anything in return for the Ukraine Weapons deal to go through, then Trump has done wrong according to Pelosi. That is an incorrect perspective. A President is allowed to create an investigative path as long as it ends with objective, verifiable fact finding, and as long as the investigation itself while it is ongoing is not used to impugn the reputation of any one that is being investigated.

As long as the Investigation is neither publicized while it is ongoing, nor is the result tampered with or pre determined, and the result is credible, then Trump has done very little to nothing wrong.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Media bias called Trump's fact finding, "dirt", they would have never done this during the Obama Administration.

The Ukraine situation was an ethical and logical progression. Rudy Guiliani looks for dirt. Guiliani reports his findings to the White House. Of course the White House knows that the dirt is just a starting point and has no value.

The White House goes on a fact finding mission by asking Ukraine to investigate the dirt to see if there is actual substance, aka truth or not.

The quid pro quo is basically, verify or deny dirt so the White House knows the truth. That's it. 

Yes, there CAN be quid pro quo and still not violate anything.

For some strange reason a very skittish Democrat led Congress freaked out, as if they had something to hide, and went with the dirt having value meme and a whole bunch of accusations about what Trump was going to do, not what he actually did.

So far I see lunancy, or using a false poisoned tree to create enough interrogations to find something, which is exactly what the Dems and the Media accused Trump of planning to do, except the Dems are actually doing the very thing they are accusing Trump of doing. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Who is supporting the Taliban, who is against the Taliban, Don't you want to know?

There are so many players in Syria one wonders how the U.S. and the Kurds are on one side and everyone else is on the other side.

If the Taliban is hated by all, then the Kurds should have been protected.

If Russia, Sytria, Turkey, Taliban, Iran and The Kurds are all involved, would not Russia, Syria, and Turkey side with the Kurds over the Taliban?

So doesn't this prove that Iran is supporting the Taliban?

The press is spending all of their time assailing Trump yet the other question they won't ask is, if a country had to pick between the Kurds and the Taliban, who would they pick?

Other than Iran, who else is supporting the Taliban? Don't you want to know?

As bad as it sounds about Trump pulling out Troops, there are other questions that should be asked and answered by the media, but why do that when they can just blame Trump.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The false narrative being spun by the Media and Dems regarding Investigations having "value".

An Investigation has no value until it is either publicized or completed. The media publicized the Ukraine investigation, not Trump. The Ukraine Investigation was never completed, so it has had no value.

The media tried to trick Trump into publicizing the Investigation before it was completed. When Trump refused to answer, his refusal was posited by the Media as a sign of guilt.

The Trump impeachment hearings are a pre emptive cover up by Democrat Higher ups of past Democrat wrongdoing involving offshore employment opportunities being given to their sons and daughters.

The attempt to try and spin the attention onto the Trump Children, all who had their businesses before Trump became President, is clearly a red herring.

Private business dealings are not the same thing as being a politician who uses their political connections to garner a favorable outcome for their own Children.

Might be a bad idea to hate Trump so much that anything that is done to him is acceptable in your eyes when the pre emptive actions being taken are to deflect attention from "an Investigation" into past actions by American Politicians in other countries.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Media falsifies Headline claiming Trump was wrong about raking the forests, yet the quote from the article describes Raking the Forest to prevent Forest Fires!

This is just stunning.

Trump is wrong about Finland's Forest Management, Finnish Scientist says.

Here is the quote from the scientist...""According to him, (the Finnish Scientist) Finland actually prevent fires through forest thinning — where dead natural material is removed — and through early warning aerial surveillance systems, where local aviation clubs are paid to fly over forests to spot fires before they get out of control".

What do you think raking the forest is? It's preventing fires through forest thinning, where dead natural material is removed.

California wildfires that spread like wildfire usually are caused by high winds. And this "scientist" is claiming early warning aerial surveillance clubs are paid to fly over forests to spot fires before they get out of control.

If California does not clear out the dead natural material, then sparking power lines and power transformers need mere minutes to start fires that will take days to put out. This article did nothing to prove Trump was wrong other than a false headline.

Some days I think Trump has done a lot of wrong things, then other days, I realize the Progressive FAKE media is even worse for not giving Trump credit for anything he says or does, even when he is 100% right.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Looks like Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers cost California Billions with their Trump Mocking about Raking the Leaves in the Forest comment.

When Trump stated that California needed to rake their forests, Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers mocked Trump on Late night Television. 

Just tonight, a resident of Sylmar, California was mentioning that at first they were grateful that the power company did not turn off power to their community because of the high winds, until a neighbor noticed a sparking Utility Pole that started shrubs at the base of the Utility Pole on fire and may have been the catalyst for a wildfire that roared out of control and is still burning 2 days later.

Instead of mocking Trump's "raking the leaves" comment and heavily profiting from the comment, an intelligent, caring late night show host would have studied the comment and concluded that at the very least, keeping brush clear of power utility poles makes sense. But why try to construct something of value from Trump's basic "raking the leaves" comment?

Isn't this the Progressive way? Say nothing when residents are fined and forced to clear their shrubs to help prevent fires, but then ridicule the President for proposing that additional brush management also be done by State Government. 

Anytime Trump has gone after California for not doing their part over a myriad of issues, Colbert and Meyers are sure to take State Government's side.

If Colbert and Meyers are so smart, how come they did not come up with the obvious conclusion that all power lines and poles be inspected and kept clear of brush on a weekly basis.

Whenever we read about a public rampage shooting, Trump is immediately blamed. I would suggest it is the constant ridiculing of Trump that is antagonizing a small small group of people. First Late Night Talk show hosts like Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers make fun and mock practically anything that Trump does, then when a tragedy happens, they once again profit via their TV ratings while mocking Trump again.

The 2019 California Wildfires are on Stephen Colbert and Seth Meyers for their being so over the top a year earlier with their ridiculing of Trump's "rake the forest" comment.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Madam Secretary TV Episode invokes Executive Privilege so Elizabeth McCord can ignore Congressonal subpoenas, but when the Trump Administration does the exact same thing, it's Obstruction of Justice according to Adam Schiff.

In what has to be one of the most timely ironic twists for late night syndicated TV mirroring real life events, the TV show Madam Secretary literally did EXACTLY what the Trump Administration is now trying to do in regards to subpoenas. 

The Madame Secretary episode, "But for the Grace of God go I" literally aired at 2 am Monday, Oct. 7th, 2019, approximately 15 hours after a slew of Democrat charges about the Trump Administration obstructing justice by ignoring subpoenas from Congress by the power of Executive Privilege.

Below is the transcript from Madam Secretary, Episode 22 from season 1 which aired in syndication Oct. 7, 2019, 2 am in the morning on CBS late night...

Regarding your situation, good news.

White House Counsel has made a legal determination, and they're going to invoke executive privilege in response to the subpoena, so, you're off the hook... for now.

Fantastic.

This is the part where you say, "Thank you, Russell, for your topnotch voodoo."

Of course I mean prowess.

I hate the way this looks.

It looks like Christmas morning.

It looks like I'm hiding behind some vague assertion of executive power because I have something to fear from the truth.

She has a quirk about principles.

Oh, we appreciate that about her.

As do I, but moderation in all things.

I understand how hard you must have worked to make this happen, Russell, but I can't fall in line.

I can't take the easy way out.

I don't need to invoke anything but the truth.

Facing the music is the right call, and the administration will be stronger for it.

(sighs)

Mr. President?

I'm here with Elizabeth.

She's declining executive privilege.

Sure. Hang on.

Hello, Mr. President.

Elizabeth, I am strongly advising you to take executive privilege.

(continues indistinctly)

Yes, sir. I... Yes, sir.

Dalton: Do we understand each other?

Yes, sir.

Dalton: Good.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Good-bye.

So, it looks like I'm gonna take that executive privilege.

I love it when it all works out.

(sighs)

(microwave beeps twice)

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump being Investigated for wishing Bernie Sanders a speedy recovery, Dems claim he profited off of the get well wish and must be impeached.

I hope when this insanity is done the idiots who tried to claim that a president asking for intel is an impeachable offense are charged with some type of crime.

I can't believe how the Dem's hatred for Trump has lowered their own IQ by about 50 points.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

It doesn't matter what Joe Biden did or didn't do...is what is known as Progressive Fascism on Twitter.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Understanding what Progressive Fascism is and how it relates to Ukraine and Donald Trump.

Was Donald Trump on the path towards an impeachable offense when he asked about Dirt on Joe Biden's son? Absolutely.

Had Donald Trump done anything impeachable yet, most likely no.

Did the Democrats pounce too soon, absolutely yes.

A president can ask for "details" with any country. A president can ask for details about any country the U.S. has trade relations with. 

What a president CANNOT do is imply that details either be created or exaggerated, nor can a President use the initiation of detail requesting to then publicize their request of details as an investigation.

And of course, the big one, a President can not deny a country U.S. Product if the country does not  produce anything the President feels is tangible regarding their inquiry, also known as a quid pro quo.

And finally, if the President asks for dirt and receives a report back that there was no dirt, the President would need to publicize the findings even if it makes the target of the Investigation look good and himself look bad.

Using a report that was done by a prior administration for whom a member of the family worked for as "proof" that there was no wrong doing is not enough to deny the next President an opportunity to revisit a situation.

What we are witnessing is Progressive Fascism.

Yes, Trump was definitely tap dancing on an ethics line, absolutely. However, Progressive Fascism has no patience and that is not enough of an excuse to justify their knee jerk reactions.

Remember, if Progressive Fascists can taunt and threaten and pronounce that Donald Trumps sons are going to jail before the Mueller report was released, then President Donald Trump can surely look into the not fully vetted business dealings of Joe Biden's son. Not understanding this type of quid pro quo is what Progressive Fascism is all about.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Garcetti Blames Federal Government for Homelessness in Los Angeles while continuing to fight for Open Borders.

There is a term called equivalency that is rarely used nowadays.

When Mayor Garcetti writes to Trump and states...

"It is clear that no local government, including ours, can address homelessness on our own," Garcetti said in the letter. "For many years, the federal government has woefully underfunded our housing safety net, contributing to homelessness. The federal government cut HUD funding for the production of new housing and preservation by 31% for the 2016-2018 time period, and according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, only one in four low-income families who qualify for housing assistance actually receive it. This pressure is acutely felt here in Los Angeles, where 36,000 people experience homelessness on any given night." end quote.

One has to ask, where is the equivalency?

Can there be anything more punkish than to blame the Federal Government for LA housing policies when the same entity that is blaming the Federal Government for lack of funding also defies the Federal Government at every turn when it comes to anything to do with Undocumented Immigration? California filed papers within hours after Trump had come up with a proposal to fund the Border Wall with funds from the Military to protest Trump's move.

So as long as the Federal Government does what Garcetti wants, Garcetti never has to do what the Federal Government wants?

The same knee jerk, punkish reactions happened a year ago when Trump discussed issues like Forest Management concepts that WERE NOT BEING DONE and was ridiculed by late night TV for suggesting raking the forest would help reduce forest fires. Actually, raking the forests would not be a bad first step.

This type of Punkish BS is constantly spewing from Progressives and the Media. Take anything Trump says, and either blame Trump, ridicule Trump, or call him a racist.

This country will be in a world of hurt if Trump loses in 2020 because of the outlandish, childish, punkish, conniving actions I have witnessed over the past couple of years from Progessive politicians and the media. Rewarding Progressive behavior with the Presidency will just embolden Progs to basically destroy the quality of life for any one over the age of 60. 

There used to be a saying, don't trust anyone over 30. Pretty soon the new saying could be, don't trust anyone who is a Progressive if you are over 55.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Did Donald Trump cause the Amazon Rain Forest Fires, possibly yes.

On March 19, 2019 Donald Trump Granted Brazil MNNA status. 

MNNA means Major Non Nato Ally Status. Granting MNNA means economic priority with a country even though they are not in NATO.

I advocated MNNA status for North Korea as an inducement to curtail and end their Nuclear Weapon's Program back in August of 2017. Instead, Trump has offered North Korea nothing on the front end, yet Trump has now gone and offered MNNA status to Brazil.

There are allegations that the Rain Forest is being purposely burned so that gold can be mined underneath!  Now that IS a TRUMP thing if ever I heard of one. 

MNNA status for Brazil was announced by Donald Trump on March 19, 2019, then several months later Brazil's Amazon Rain Forest is burning with the most likely intent of mining the Gold that is underneath it.  NOW THAT is a reason for Impeachment.

The only path I can see for Trump to remain viable is if he admits he is clueless about the Heartland, Baby Boomers, and Seniors, (something Barack Obama never admitted to), and create a new bureau to deal with the Heartland, Baby Boomers and Senior Generations.

And also, please rescind Brazil's MNNA status and instead offer it to North Korea in exchange for the dismantling of their Nuclear Weapon's program.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

You say Racism, I say Ageism.

For every accusation of racism that is presently being made towards the Trump Administration, I see a counter point, the use of the Racism card to blunt what is actually an ageism issue.

The most recent accusation of racism involves vetting potential immigrants based on how quickly they may need access to social safety net resources.

While Progressives claim this proposed policy is racist, the proposal is actually anti ageist. Immigrants who came to the U.S. 30 years ago, 40  years ago, 50 years ago, 60 years ago, 70 years ago....had no internet. Immigrants back then came to the U.S. to find work and to thrive. I am pretty certain virtually no one came to the U.S. hoping for Government handouts. However, with the advent of the internet, Immigrants can now do extensive research and learn how to immediately start taking before they have given. Or have we forgotten how Chinese were spending up to 80,000 dollars to fly pregnant women to California so their children were born on U.S. soil.

Supporting a U.S entitlements program that does not vet the newly arrived is AGEIST because it will result in those who are Baby Boomers and older having to share a perpetually dwindling earned entitlement pie with those who have not yet earned their entitlement.

This is not about racism, this is about AGEISM. Why believe the Dems are the good guys and the Republicans are the bad guys when they both basically are not doing enough for Baby Boomers and those older. 

Please don't fall for the Racism B.S., it's being permeated by idealistic narcissism that just does not give a crap about the aged.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Barr is now finding out there were irregularities regarding how Epstein was being held.

I can't imagine being a reporter for a major news source and having to legitimize the most blatant and public murder in the history of the United States. Even Lee Harvey Oswald was killed in front of dozens of people who probably had no idea Oswald was about to be shot. 

I think even protestors are perplexed at the thought of protesting the killing of an alleged pedophile billionaire who suddenly is only half a billionaire, the victim of lawlessness, and apparently dead.

After Epstein was in jail for over a month, Barr is now "discovering" irregularities concerning how Epstein was being watched. Garsh, I guess just putting a couple of cameras pointed at Epstein was just far too advanced a concept. 

What I find most disturbing is if Trump ordered all of this, then according to Muellerm Trump can't be charged with Murder, conspiracy to commit a Murder, or murder to obstruct justice, because he is President. Kind of a scary concept, no?  

I'd love to see Mueller hauled back into Congress and asked one question, if Donald Trump had ordered Epstein's death, could Trump be found liable while President? And, who would have the final say on the investigation into an investigation over Trump's possible role in Epstein's death, the answer is Trump. If Trump wanted the entire investigation into how Epstein died, destroyed, the investigation would be destroyed.

How many times did Trump tweet about Epstein over the last month? The tell is Trump kept his mouth shut and gave us that pathetic smile as he posed with the baby of the dead parents in El Paso Texas for a photo op.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

The only line longer than the one to Kill Jeffrey Epstein in his cell was the line of cocaine from all of Epstein's Pedophile Parties.

March 29, 2023 update: If either Progressives or Conservatives believe it was only the other party that imbibed on what Epstein was offering, then we are all the fools. I believe the real truth is this, back in the day anyone who worked to achieve a certain level of status or respect in the public eye just automatically assumes they deserve special privileges. With age of consent being different from State to State, and internationally, and presuming the girls were adorned with expensive wardrobe, and extensive hair and make-up, and with a woman in charge of gathering the young girls, I think those who visited Epstein Island just assumed the girls were of age. Those invited to Epstein Island just presumed it was a rite of passage and that it was the thing to do when one becomes a celebrity or a well known politician.  This was the age of Brooke Shields being openly pimped in the public eye and on Broadcast TV and the mainstream media was on the front lines lapping it all up. While monetary compensation can't remedy an accelerated childhood, any girl who was not yet an adult who ended up on an Epstein plane or on Epstein Island should be compensated a few million dollars each, from a consortium of those who visited Epstein Island. And anyone who treated their interactions with the girls in a disrespectful manner should be criminally charged.  End of March 29, 2023 Update.

Obviously Trump was worried about Epstein. Trump's lame attempt to blame Epstein's death on the Clinton's is probably the lowest level of duplicity one can imagine. Trump was obviously worried about himself. 

I am curious, did Trump ever mention Epstein's name after Epstein was arrested? 

Trump's hand about to pat girl in green's butt.

I don't recall Trump tweeting much about Epstein's arrest. The silence is the tell.

There should have been two cameras on Epstein at all times in his jail cell. The belief that Trump was trying to clean up the swamp now has no credibility.

The only good that comes out of Epstein's murder that I can see is it probably protects all the young girls violated at Epstein's parties from being hunted down and murdered so they could not be witnesses at Epstein's trial.

Maybe this was a numbers game. Easier to suicide Epstein than hunt down possibly many dozen women now in their 20's and 30's and kill them instead.

What a sad day for truth, but I am relieved if it saves the lives of all the women already victimized from being victimized again.

For those of you who believe Bill Clinton attended Epstein Parties or was serviced on Epstein's plane by under aged girls, for those of you who believe it was Trump watching out for himself, the odds are both sides are right, so no need to try and pin this murdercide on either party, this was the elites from all sides giving the middle finger to the minions of the world.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.