Why did John McCain Go Insane when Questioning James Comey?

Update: July 20, 2017, 6:10pm  DailyPUMA originally wrote this story on June 10, 2017. Apparently the answer is, Brain Cancer. DailyPUMA hopes the 40 days that have elapsed since this article was written does not reduce John McCain's recovery.  -end of update

Just google "Why did John McCain Go Insane when Questioning James Comey". Oh, DailyPUMA already did it for you.

why did John McCain go insane when questioning James Comey?

DailyPUMA was going to post a transcript of John McCain's rather illogical griping that Hillary Clinton got away with a slap on the wrist in 2016 from James Comey.

Is McCain serious? Does McCain not comprehend that Comey's second letter just 10 days before the November 8, 2016 presidential election most likely cost Hillary Clinton the election?

Why did John McCain flip over to the guy who insulted McCain's five year prison stay by stating "I like heroes who don't get caught", or some similar nonsense.

McCain's public disdain for Trump seems to have mellowed. It would not surprise DailyPUMA if Donald Trump has hinted at additional funding for Arizona if they vote for his wall.

McCain had an amazing chance to prove he is a Maverick by asking Comey why Hillary Clinton was publicly investigated by the FBI while Trump and Sander's FBI files remained mysteriously locked during the 2016 campaign. 

Too bad Hillary Clinton did not ask McCain to ask those questions, but then again she has commencement speeches to give and book conventions to attend to hype her next book. Gasp.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Team Trump's most significant lie about the James Comey June 08, 2017 hearings, and Donald Trump Jr Slam Dunk Tweet, that wasn't.

Comey's leaking of documents through another party happened 3 days AFTER Donald Trump tweeted that Comey had better "hope" there were no audiotapes of their private meetings. Team Trump pounced on the Comey leaking as if it proved that James Comey was culpable of leaking classified documents and therefore possibly indictable.

Yet it was Trump's innuendo about tape recordings of their meetings, implying they would prove Comey a liar, that was the root cause of Comey's leak. It appears that Mr. Trump "HOPED" that by implying there were audio recordings of his meetings with Comey, that Comey would back off.

Funny how that works, sometimes when Trump HOPES, it apparently means back off, but then other times when Trump "Hopes", we are to believe there was no implied order. How convenient for Donald Trump. 

But then again, when does No mean No to someone like Donald Trump. It stands to reason that hope does not mean hope, but means expect, as in an expectation. I'm pretty sure that if Donald Trump says "I hope I get two scoops of ice cream with my pie", he has an EXPECTATION of getting two scoops of ice cream with his pie.

Trump's use of the word HOPE goes down as one of the biggest litigious cannards, ever. The use of the word Hope can masquerade for the word Expect, but in a court of law, the word hope could probably not be viewed to mean "expect", the perfect anti litigious Scam. Donald Trump has invented the perfect escape word for himself, Hope, and he's never gonna Change.

Donald Trump Jr may have had the tweet of the century, but it was for completely missing the mark…

"I'm pretty sure that Comey's testimony put his own "character" on trial. Leaks, admitted weakness, Lynch double standard. Come on now".

Lets go through Donald Trump Jr's tweet point by point.  The leak. As stated above, was only done after Donald Trump publicly impugned Comey's character and the FBI's character as well. Or do we continue to live in a world where Trump punches, and everyone else simply takes a step back? Admitting a weakness, as Comey did when he felt intimidated by Mr. Trump, is not a weakness. However,  posing with slain exotic animals from canned hunts in which the animal is drugged so it poses no threat before it is shot is a pretty fucking big weakness, no?

Lynch Double Standard, are you kidding me? Lynch never mentioned that both Trump and Sanders were either under investigation, or that the FBI was looking into a "matter" regarding either candidate during the 2016 race. Only Hillary Clinton was "mattered".  When do we ever get the media to ask, Why was Hillary Clinton publicly mattered, while Trump and Sanders were being privately mattered.

Team Trump's knee jerkiness tweet responses that fall well short of victory that are then self adrenalized into "in the moment" victories, which are then followed by cries of crucifixion to their supporters, is a recipe DailyPUMA can do without. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

James Comey, June 08, 2017 Testimony will most likely ignore pertinent questions about issues that occurred BEFORE Nov. 8, 2016.

The Sham against Hillary Clinton continues. One would think that with Donald Trump openly lying when he wrote "that on three occasions Comey had stated that Trump was not under investigation", that the issue of whether or not the FBI was investigating Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders during the 2016 campaign remains the really big white elephant in the room that continues to go unobserved.

Once again the Democrat party gets fooled and schooled by the classic "Screen Play" in football. The Screen Play is when the quarterback drops back in the pocket as his blockers apparently do a poor job blocking and just as the defenders run past the blockers, the quarterback lobs an easy pass over the oncoming defender's heads and the Quarterback's receiver, with the blockers who let the defenders past them, run alongside the receiver to block the remaining defenders upfield.

The Democrats so want to prove that Donald Trump did something worthy of impeachment they will ask no questions that may sully the reputation of their new hero, James Comey.

Yet the question needs to be asked tomorrow, June 8, 2017, of Mr. Comey. 

Was Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders under FBI investigation during the 2016 presidential race? 

If the answer is yes from Comey that Trump and Sanders were also under investigation by the FBI, then the follow up question becomes... 

Then why was Hillary Clinton the only major presidential candidate that was worthy of publicly rebuking, twice? 

If the answer is...

"No, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders were not under investigation in 2016 by the FBI", 

then Misogyny and Sexism was quite alive and thriving in 2016, and James Comey loses some credibility. DailyPUMA hopes someone will stand up for Hillary Clinton tomorrow and ask these questions of James Comey. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

National Enquirer, Globe Magazine, and Donald Trump, Just How many BackChannels does Donald Trump Have?

Does Donald Trump have a backchannel to the National Enquirer and Globe Magazine? Does Donald Trump possibly consult with the National Enquirer and Globe Magazine regarding their Headlines? Every now and then, the anti-Clinton or Pro Trump headline wording on a National Enquirer and Globe Magazine seems to sound like a Donald Trump Tweet.

DailyPUMA believes the National Enquirer's headline  regarding Megan Kelly is off the charts Misogyny. Notice the not so subliminal hint she may be a secret lesbian? Trump has tussled with lesbians in the past such as Rosie O'Donnell. Coincidence?

And the Globe is not to be outdone.

Don't the following Headlines sound like a Donald Trump tweet? Does Donald Trump have a backchannel to either or both the National Enquirer and Globe Magazine?

The Most recent Globe headline…More escaping by Hillary Clinton...

If you are an alleged Hillary Clinton supporter, have you ever flipped these outrageous headlines onto their back cover while waiting in the checkout line?  DailyPUMA has.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DailyPUMA wonders how an Islamic Terrorist is being defined.

How is the media verifying that those committing acts of public terror are Islamic Terrorists?  Saying one is an Islamic Terrorist does not mean one is an Islamic Terrorist.

In DailyPUMA's opinion, an Islamic Terrorist would be a frequent practicer of the Islamic faith. The Islamic Terrorist would pray frequently, presumably several times a day, and would attend their local mosque on a regular basis.

All DailyPUMA is asking is that all terrorists not first be labeled an Islamic Terrorist, then verified at a later date, no matter who is taking credit for an act of terror.

If it turns out that a Terrorist is indeed a Practicing Islamic, and a Terrorist, then call them an Islamic Terrorist. If however, the Terrorist is simply a rogue entity, or one falsely claiming to belong to a religion when they do not keep up with what is considered that religion's norm, then come up with a new name, one that no Terrorist group can take credit for.

How about calling a terrorist a "Supplicant" instead. "The attack was carried out by three Supplicants. Suddenly no terrorist group can take real claim for an act of terror. If later on the Supplicant's are found to be practicing Christians, Catholics, or the Islamic faith, then come up with a more accurate term.

Lets not feed the Terrorists, er, Lets not feed the Supplicants.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump misuses statistics he cites from the National Economic Research Associates to justify withdrawing from the Paris Climate Treaty.

DailyPUMA wonders if anybody in the media has even bothered to read the National Economic Research Associates report that Donald Trump refers to below.

"Compliance with the terms of the Paris accord and the onerous energy restrictions it has placed on the United States could cost America as much as 2.7 million lost jobs by 2025, according to the National Economic Research Associates.

This includes 440,000 fewer manufacturing jobs -- not what we need. Believe me, this is not what we need -- including automobile jobs and the further decimation of vital American industries on which countless communities rely -- they rely for so much, and we would be giving them so little.

According to the same study, by 2040, compliance with the commitments put into place by the previous administration would cut production for the following sectors: paper, down 12 percent; cement, down 23 percent; iron and steel, down 38 percent; coal, and I happen to love the coal miners, down 86 percent; natural gas, down 31 percent."

Donald Trump seems to be cherry picking his statistics in a way that needs to be rebutted. The idea of a more efficient economy is that less equals more. As SOLAR ENERGY usage increases, Of COURSE coal production would drop. Trump does not mention that petroleum production is UP. So between Solar Energy and an increase in Petroleum production, the U.S. is doing fine when it comes to energy creation.

As automobiles become lighter and more economic to run, Of COURSE iron and steel production will decrease. The internet has allowed for massive recycling of EXISTING parts for cars from the last 50 years, this too has allowed less steel to and iron to be needed.

Paper usage is down because of the internet and emails, is that really so hard to understand? 

As for coal miners, apparently Trump loves his coal miners with lung cancer and shorter life spans than the average American. Message to Trump, the idea is to move as much mass as possible with the fewest amount of energy and use of original raw resources. 

Trump also fails to acknowledge that the other reason for the reduction in mining of coal, steel, iron, natural gas, paper is because of Rare Earth materials. Rare Earth Resources allow for everyone to have smart phones, which is the EXACT reason why the use of all other resources have been reduced.

People can now use their smart phones to PINPOINT what it is they are trying to do, or where they are going to go, and how they are going to get there, and this has created a concept called, efficiency. To blame the reduction in raw materials on the Paris Climate Accords is somewhat idiotic. 

If Trump really wanted to help his Basket Full of Gullibles, he would INCREASE MediCAID home healthcare jobs funding, and Trump would create a program to help americans reduce their credit card debt by reducing the interest rate charges on accumulated credit card and student loan debt while rewarding those who kept lowering their overall debt load.

One other thing that DailyPUMA does not understand, how does America opting out of the Paris Climate Accords actually reduce the amount of ongoing development that growing industrialized nations will be allowed to do?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Hillary Clinton still doesn't get it…"Hillary Clinton: 'I take responsibility for every decision I made, but that's not why I lost'.

DailyPUMA is so exasperated with Hillary Clinton and her followers who protect her from the truth. Hillary Clinton was probably our best presidential choice in 2016, but what hurt her chances to win was she did not properly prepare during the prior four years when she was not working, thus leading to her inability to fight back against charges of bad health, and greed.

Just what was Hillary Clinton doing during those four years from 2012 to 2016? Was she helping out with Clinton Foundation projects in the U.S.?  Nope.

Was Hillary Clinton doing any type of cardio to keep in tip top physical shape?  Nope.

Hillary Clinton is making excuses she does not need to make.

Was Hillary Clinton being paid hundreds of thousands of dollars per Wall Street Speech to Investment companies who are despised by many?  Yep.

Was Hillary Clinton regularly enjoying the finer things in life, like sugary coffee drinks and her favorite form of alcohol whatever that might be?  Apparently yep.

That's why Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, too much greed, too much indulgence, not enough working hard, as in literally helping on Clinton Foundation projects in the U.S, or actually being able to conduct an interview while exercising on an elliptical.

DailyPUMA witnessed multiple men talking smack about Hillary Clinton as if they had nothing to fear. Nothing would have pleased DailyPUMA more than to see Hillary Clinton punch one of the bad mouther's in the nose. Except that it takes a person who regularly achieves an endorphin high from exercise to understand the idea that when a fellow politician disrespects them in public, it's not such a bad idea to intimidate them in real life.

During the 2016 prime time television season, TWO different young girls, one a pre-teen actor, the other a young female teen, both solved a problem by punching a male in the nose. DailyPUMA believes this may have been a subliminal reaction to the no fear attitude filthy mouths like Donald Trump and Louie Federet projectile vomited towards Hillary Clinton. 

Will someone close to Hillary Clinton PLEASE WAKE HER UP! Quit focusing on public speaking, quit being videotaped way too comfortable in a seating position, as was the case at the recent tech conference she spoke at,  quit talking about a book you are going to write, and get out into the REAL WORLD and do something physical. Get in shape. I mean get in cardio shape. Hillary Clinton has been around male dominated politics for so long she has lost sight that many successful men in politics actually spend some of their spare time working out.

If Hillary Clinton had been in fine cardio shape in 2016, she could have lobbed one liners on a daily basis at Donald Trump over his belly and lack of physical fitness. Instead, we actually had to witness a SNIFFLING Donald Trump challenge Hillary Clinton to a drug test prior to one of the debates, and Hillary Clinton simply ignored the request, she backed down because she was not in shape.  And, at Hillary Clinton's age, continued abstinence from real cardio will soon lead to thickening ankles, a sign that the heart is weakening even if her mind stays strong. 

There is a humility to exercise that cannot be replicated by the brilliant minded and the wordsmith's amongst us, including Hillary Clinton. Sometimes, it really is just about how well one who professes to be about health care, is actually physically fit, one who cares about young people, the poor, the aged, actually goes into society and proves it via the Clinton Foundation.

DailyPUMA still believes Hillary Clinton could be a viable presidential candidate in 2020, but it will take starting now to go into society via the Clinton Foundation projects, and at the very least, also becoming physically fit.

I would love to hear a reporter ask Hillary Clinton, "Are you physically fit? Once again, just as when no reporter had the presence of mind to ask James Comey before the 2016 Presidential Election if the FBI was also investigating Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, a question that might have instantly taken away the email controversy once and for all, no reporter now will ask Hillary Clinton if she is physically fit or why she doesn't help on U.S. projects regarding the Clinton Foundation.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Does Russia control the U.S. weather?

DailyPUMA is simply throwing the Mother nature, Mother Russia theory out there for people to think about. 

Several years ago a Weather Channel on air talent quit to investigate if Russia had learned how to manipulate certain aspects of the weather such as how low pressure systems and high pressure systems move. (upon further review DailyPUMA discovered the name of the person is Scott Stevens, who seems to be caught up in several rogue ventures all at the same time. Even though Mr. Stevens seems to be on the edge, DailyPUMA believes it is possible to manipulate low pressure cells and high pressure cells). 

What if Russia had been able to divert low pressure systems away from California that can typically bring rain to California?

Perhaps now that Trump is president, might Russia rather give more rain to California and the U.S. to help buttress Trump's claim that global warming is not real? DailyPUMA can personally attest to the COUNTLESS times Los Angeles area weather forecasters would explain that a low pressure front would be missing Southern California, Probably hundred times DailyPUMA heard this during the last couple years of the California Drought.

But then October 2016 happened, and it most definitely started to rain in Southern California, eventually almost destroying the Oroville Damn Run off system in Northern California. Perhaps Russia's real goal was to help Texas, but to help Texas they had to also help California. Donald Trump would have fallen short of having enough electoral college votes if he had lost Texas. Texas apparently had some intense flooding after having been through a severe drought as well.

The October 2016 timing of California's remarkable improvement in weather came at a crucial time for the Trump 2016 presidential campaign. The rain in California made Global Warming seem less likely. California proceeded to have the most rain then the State has had in either 50 or 100 years. Although most of the rain came after Trump was elected, a significant amount came in October, 2016, well before the November 8, 2016 election. The October 2016 rains could have helped convince voters that Global Warming is a hoax, aka, no drought, no Global warming, and therefore Donald Trump was right.

Perhaps helping Donald Trump is not enough reason to change the U.S. weather patterns, perhaps Russia producing the most petroleum in the world in 2016, is. Apparently Petroleum is considered the number one or number two reason for global warming, so ending a drought is a good way to numb concern about global warming.

So, if Trump is removed from office, will we feel the wrath of Mother Nature, perhaps aka Mother Russia?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Now we may understand Jill Stein's role in ruining Hillary Clinton's chances, and Stein's role in the Three Recounts.

Based on the photo below that comes with the Mother Jones article you can find here, 

Click here to go to Mother Jones  Article.

now it becomes clear to DailyPUMA why Jill Stein wanted those silly recounts which Trump's lawyers then cut off at the knees with an overwhelming amount of objections. The biggest scam about the recount was if the recount vote total in a precinct was different from the prior, already established vote total, then the original vote count would remain valid!

So basically, if one wants to screw up a Presidential Election and has figured out how to change, alter, subtract or add votes to gin the vote for a specific candidate, all one would have to do is then add in a few more uncounted votes into the voting box, thus ruining the validity of ANY recount! 

So why would Russia want recounts? Perhaps to cover their tracks?  Jill Stein (pictured in the photo with the Russian diplomats and politicians) asks for the recount (and where did all that money come from so fast to pay for the recount, will we ever know?), then Trump's lawyers simply ask to disqualify the recount vote if the vote totals don't match the original vote total, thus burying the talk of voting inaccuracies that never seemed to match the polls. 

Another reason the pre-election polls may have never matched up more closely in certain states was that people went to vote only to find they were not on the voter rolls because they had moved, something that may have happened more often in predominantly democrat precincts. Considering that 45 governors out of 50 were Republican, gerrymandering voting qualifications cannot be ruled out.

Remember how Hillary Clinton did not want the recount but was dragged into it, then disparaged by Fox News and other conservative media types, perhaps that too was part of a plot to further discredit her.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

DaiyPUMA suggests U.S. should Offer North Korea Special NATO Status.

If North Korea agrees to end its nuclear weapons program and disarm, the U.S. should offer North Korea special NATO status, one in which North Korea could attend NATO meetings, speak at NATO meetings, but not be allowed to vote on NATO issues. Involving North Korea in NATO would give North Korea the stature they are in search of and presently think can only find by launching weapons. Speaking at NATO would be huge for North Korea as it would allow North Korea a method for creating a connection, and possibly commerce for their country.

In exchange NATO would agree to protect North Korea in the event North Korea is ever attacked and did nothing to provoke the attack. 

While there could remain the threat of North Korea becoming a "double agent" and reporting what goes on at NATO to both Russia and China, that could be defused by not allowing access to the sub committees of NATO where raw data is analyzed. Once a final decision is made, North Korea would simply be privy to the information before it is made public. DailyPUMA does not see any other way short of assassinating the North Korean leader, but even that approach would not guarantee disarmament.

Keep your friends close and… see if common ground can be achieved with non friends, after all, that is what our government expects of its own citizens.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Fun Game to play. Can anyone remember why Bill Clinton was Impeached?

I can't remember why Bill Clinton was impeached, can you? 

Something about the Republicans demanding that Bill Clinton admit to a private, consensual affair that he did not even initiate, even though the affair had nothing to do with anything other than to embarrass and destabilize his presidency, which was actually an act of treason by Kenneth Starr and the Republicans that went un prosecuted.

Yet Trump thinks he is the most harassed president, everrrr? Heck, Trump falsely harassed Hillary Clinton at virtually every campaign stop when he called her a criminal even though she had never even been charged with a crime.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

There Goes the Progressive Media, Shilling for Elizabeth Warren in 2020.

Sigh, here we go again, the same Progressive Media that is demanding Trump go, now is chortling about Elizabeth Warren winning against Donald Trump in 2020. Apparently Hillary Clinton was not even considered for the poll! 

Progressives assuming that Moderate Democrats agree with them on every issue may lead to a Trump, or, a different Republican's second term.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

One Similarity between Trump's letter firing James Comey and the JonBonet Ramsey Ransom note.

JonBenet Ramsey's Ramson Letter included the following excerpt...

"You will withdraw $118,000.00 from your account. $100,000 will be in $100 bills and the remaining $18,000 in $20 bills"...

What makes that part of the Ransom letter so strange is the amount of the ransom money being asked for was identical to a bonus that JonBonet's father had recently received.

Donald Trump's firing of James Comey included the following,

"While I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgment of the Department of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the Bureau"...

There is much subversive content within that one sentence that a college instructor could probably conduct an entire class session on it. For starters, the FBI has apparently already admitted that Donald Trump was under investigation. Most frustrating is the fact that the FBI did not publicly mention that Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders were under Investigation during the 2016 presidential race, and that not one reporter had the brains to think to ask the Trump / Sanders Investigation question of Comey at some point during his press conferences during the 2016 presidential race. 

Trump then brings in the Department of Justice, as if it was the D.O.J. that came to him and pulled Trumps arm to fire Comey. Is that really how it happened? It appears that after James Comey asked for more money for his Russia influence peddling probe that Trump may have gone to the D.O.J. to come up with reasons to fire Comey. If true, this level of disingenuous is disturbing. Usually Trump just says what he means, here, he appears to mimic the writing style of the JonBonet Ramsey Ransom note writer, and DailyPUMA finds that disturbing.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Russia watches via DailyPUMA.

Too bad in this country with 50 million people unhappy with Trump, only a few hundred a day keep tabs via DailyPUMA when DailyPUMA offers live, up to date RSS feeds to dozens of blogs and news sites that monitor the Trump Administration. If your blog or news site is on DailyPUMA, why don't you link here? If you like to know what the newest news is, just look to the top of each column.

Yet somehow almost three times as many Russians are interested enough to check into DailyPUMA than Americans are.  Wow. 

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Trump Loves Syrian Babies, Bombs, and Chocolate Cake. Seth Myers skewers TrumpCare and Paul Ryan.

Donald Trump likes to combine things.

1. Syrian Babies and US Tomahawk Missiles.
2. Mother of all Bombs, and the most delicious chocolate cake you can imagine.

But when it came to Jimmy Kimmel and Molly McNearney's baby, the Best Donald Trump could do was rush through a healthcare package that might not protect another American Baby born with the same medical condition as Kimmel and McNearney's baby.

Seth Myers skewers Donald Trump, and Seth Myers really skewers Paul Ryan and Ryan's topsy turvy comments about TrumpCare now versus ObamaCare back in the day.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Comey makes Capitol Hill appearance, will probably not be asked why the 2016 FBI Investigations of Sanders and Trump were kept secret while Investigation of Hillary Clinton was publicized on Two Critical Occasions.

The headline says it all, will anyone ask James Comey why he twice announced his investigation into Hillary Clinton emails while keeping quiet about both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump investigations that were going on at the same time?

(Update Wednesday, May 03, 2017, 11:11am.) Looks like Adam Schiff has mentioned the Comey Hypocrisy.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Why Conservatives are not worried about Michael Flynn's Foreign Activities.

DailyPUMA heard this on a conservative radio show several days ago. Michael Flynn was vetted during the Obama administration, twice.  Check out what Politifact has to say about the Michael Flynn situation. 

Apparently Mr. Spicer has also said the same thing recently about Michael Flynn. DailyPUMA is concerned that the ongoing liberal media eagerness to see Donald Trump fail is causing the liberal media to incorrectly stack their accusations and beliefs upon some previous beliefs that may not be as accurate as the liberal media would like them to be.

Doesn't it look like Barack Obama was bamboozled or at the very least disrespected by Michael Flynn? Once this is all sorted out what was once an allegedly clear victory against Trump could completely reverse into how duplicitous was the Obama administration in not vetting people they had given clearances to?

DailyPUMA suggests giving a little listen every now and then to conservative radio just to see if what they are saying that the national media is not saying, actually comes to fruition.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.

Donald Trump's "We've been trying to dump ObamaCare for the Past 7 Years" BattleCry makes no sense.

Why is Donald Trump including the three years of ObamaCare that happened prior to the 2012 election as years that the Republicans have "struggled" to end ObamaCare? If DailyPUMA recalls correctly, Barack Obama handily won election in 2008 which would mean the first three years of ObamaCare protests by Republicans, all prior to Barack Obama's 2012 re-election, DO NOT COUNT. 

After ObamaCare was passed under Obama's first term,  ObamaCare was not repealed in 2012 when all the Republicans had to do was defeat Barack Obama in the presidential election, which they did not.

ObamaCare continued for four more years after Obama's presidential re-election. So to count the first three years  after Obama's first election, or the additional four years of ObamaCare after Obama's re–election, as a Republican struggle to repeal ObamaCare is alternative math in its rawest and crudest form.

Has anyone in the media called Mr. Trump on his use of what can only be called inane, or alternative math?  

In other numbers, the alleged seven year struggle to get rid of ObamaCARE as Donald Trump repeatedly claims has actually been about a 90 day struggle to get rid of ObamaCare. Oh wait, perhaps Donald Trump's illogically perceived 7 year struggle in Trump Years is actually equivalent to a 90 day struggle in the Trump Time Machine. When Donald Trump talks about a 7 year struggle to take down Obama Care, he actually means a 90 day struggle.

There has been seven years of Republican dislike regarding ObamaCARE that was TWICE outvoted by those who wanted ObamaCare. From DailyPUMA's point of view, Donald Trump does not have the jurisdiction to call seven years of popular support for ObamaCARE as a seven year fight to repeal it, that goes against what the United States is all about, which is the majority rules, except when it comes to the popular vote.

Now when do you reporters DO YOUR JOB and challenge Mr. Trump's statistically fantastical view over how long the actual fight to repeal ObamaCare has really been?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by clicking here.