There cannot be a legitimate Presidential Recount if the Precinct Signature Book that each voter signs prior to voting is not being Reexamined.

Once Again the media does not do it's job in regards to explaining how the recount works. First there was the posturing from several different media groups that the recount should not be done.  

Now that the recount is simply a verification that each candidate got their correct share of ballot votes, the media has once again ignored the elephant in the room, literally I might add.

The total number of votes per precinct should match up with the total number of signatures in the signature precinct book that each voter signs when they vote.  Maybe each state does it differently, but in California each voter first signs the precinct signature book and then they are handed their ballot. They then walk directly to a voting cubicle, slide the ballot into an ink a dot receptacle, and fill out their ballot. The voter then inserts their ballot into a machine that registers their vote.

The recount reporting has been so atrocious that DailyPUMA has no idea if the three states being recounted use signature books, or perhaps each voter signs the actual ballot or the paper holder that each ballot is placed inside? I am presuming the voters use precinct signature books to sign that they voted.

Are the total number of signatures from the Precinct signature books matching up to the total number of ballots being cast for that precinct? And, were the rest of the unused ballots returned so that each precinct returned the exact same number of ballots that they received?

Simply having volunteers inspect a ballot and then count that ballot completely misses how voter fraud would occur. 

Fraud happens when one person fills out multiple ballots. Simply verifying that a potential fraudster filled out the multiple ballots correctly, without comparing signature totals per precinct to the number of ballots filled out per precinct, does not promote voting integrity.

Furthermore, the signatures in the books need to be evaluated to see if a certain handwriting style may have signed on behalf of several people who may not have voted.

There is also the issue of the NRA being allowed to volunteer on November  8th, 2016. Since the NRA was one of Trump's biggest PAC's, their members should not have been allowed within a hundred feet of any voting location unless it was to vote, and then leave.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

What Voter Fraud really looks like.

Look at the Voter Signature books that every Voter signs. Look to see if different signatures look like they could have been signed by the same person. Add up the signatures in the voter signature books, compare that total to the total votes cast at that precinct.

My vision of 2016 voter fraud is an NRA member sitting off somewhere in a corner filling out ballots, and the above scenario is one way to verify that no one was stuffing the ballot box.

And once again DailyPUMA asks, why were NRA members who all belong to a pro Republican PAC that raised 31 million dollars allowed to be volunteers at voting stations?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Recount Volunteers needed, Deplorables need not Apply.

Please go to this link to get more info on how you can be a Recount Volunteer.  

If you are an NRA member and worked at a voting booth on November 8, 2016, or the days leading up to November 8, 2016, and definitely if you were still there November 9th, 2016 ginning the vote, please go to your local police station and turn yourself in for being within one hundred feet of a voting location for purposes other than voting, while also belonging to the biggest Anti Clinton PAC in the country.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

NRA ReCount Smoking Gun. How many NRA members were allowed to work at voting locations for the 2016 Presidential Elections?

NRA members should not have been allowed to work at any voting locations since they were dedicated to defeating Hillary Clinton and even had their own Anti Clinton Super PAC that raised well over 10 million dollars.  Wait, make that 31 million dollars.

How many NRA members were permitted to work in some capacity at ballot locations? There are approximately 4 million to 5 million NRA members. The NRA membership represents about 1 in 15 Trump Voters. The typical voting location requires between 5 to 10 people to operate. So statistically speaking, if we use 7.5 people per voting location, one out of every two voting locations would have one NRA member!

Jill Stein should petition each state that they have the right to know if NRA members were manning voting locations and the right to review and recount the results from those locations.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

How Hillary Clinton could win the three recount states and still lose the presidency, Remember Florida and Michigan in 2008?

If there were voting "errors" in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and the "errors" either tip each state to Hillary Clinton or the totals become so ridiculously close as to be nothing more than a tie, one solution could be to split each state's electoral college in half. 

But without recounts in North Carolina and Florida as well, where there may have been some type of ginning of the vote, splitting the electoral college in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin would still give Donald Trump a victory, while wink, wink, nudge nudge, North Carolina and Florida are left alone.

Trump could also demand that New Hampshire's electoral college be split as well since that was a very close result in Hillary Clinton's favor.

The Republicans have postulated that the purpose of the three recounts is to delay the electoral college ratification long enough so that Trump does not have enough electoral college votes by the electoral college deadline. 

However the Republicans could have a "plan b" if something  and "generously" offer the three recounted states electoral college votes be split in half were a recount to show significant movement in Hillary Clinton's favor. This "split the recounted states" electoral college votes could also take scrutiny off of why the original vote totals were so far off to begin with.

What would the math look like if the electoral college votes were split in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Florida, North Carolina and New Hampshire. 

So lets do it. Where we stand right now is Clinton has 232 Electoral Votes, Trump has 306.

If the 3 state recount of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania resulted in an electoral college split,  the new totals would be 255 for Clinton, 283 for Trump. This would allow the Republicans to claim they have bent over backwards to accommodate the democrats and independents while diverting attention away from the possibility of who actually initiated the original inaccurate vote totals.

If Florida were recounted and were Clinton to barely win,  t thus splitting the electoral college vote in Florida, the totals would be 269.5 Clinton, 268.5 Trump.

However Trump could legitimately demand that New Hampshire's 4 electoral college votes be split because it was closer than every other state except for Michigan, and that would give Trump 270.5, Clinton 267.5. (Although one could argue New Hamsphire might not have been as close if a recount were done).  

This would leave North Carolina. If NC had a recount and it was deemed either a Clinton victory or too close to call, and its electoral college were split, that would give Clinton 275 and Trump 263.

So the Republicans have a failsafe back up plan in which they can simply offer to split the electoral college in the event the results become so agonizingly close in the three states that apparently are going to be recounted. 

The conclusion is, without North Carolina and Florida being recounted as well, Hillary Clinton may not win even if she barely squeaks out recount victories in the states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania because the Republicans can counter by "Magnanimously" offering to split the electoral college votes in the three recounted states.

I would like to see Florida, North Carolina and New Hampshire added to the recount because without Florida and North Carolina, splitting the electoral college gives the Republicans a false flag of magnanimosity to wave while drawing attention away from what caused the inaccurate tallies that originally favored Trump. Please add Florida and North Carolina to the recounts.

Or…what I would like to see is the democrats do specific precinct recounts in a multitude of states, even in red states that had no chance of going for Clinton. Part of a winning the electoral college strategy is to make sure the popular vote is not too far out of balance.  

If a pattern emerges in which each state had precincts in which more votes were cast for Trump than the total number of voters in that precinct, that would help with the vote your conscience meme that is being floated out to the electoral college community.

For that reason, I would like to see targeted recounts in North Carolina and Florida just to make sure there was no funny business going on, and I would even consider a red state or two as well.

Lets face it, there was so much hate heaped upon Hillary Clinton from the truly vast conservative blogosphere, a conservative blogosphere that is easily 20 times as big as the pro Clinton blogosphere, along with Trump repeatedly calling Hillary Clinton a criminal, and along with the crazy arse stuff that the National Enquire and Globe came out with on average 2 out of every 4 to 6 issues during the campaign season, plus NewsMax and Newsbusters, that DailyPUMA believes there could have been motivation to gin the vote in the rural parts of certain states.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Presidential Concession speeches are based upon a gentleman's and gentlewoman's agreement that there was no electoral college changing mistakes made in the initial election results, to imply otherwise is to be a typical Republican.

The more the Republicans and the Media protest the recount votes, the more I wish recounts could be done in North Carolina and Florida as well. The gentleman's and gentlewoman's agreement is OBVIOUSLY voided if a recount proves the original vote was tampered with to a point that it changes the outcome of a particular state, or, if it changes the result a significant amount.

Furthermore, if a recount proves that Wisconsin, Michigan or Pennsylvania shows a significant shift in vote totals, then other recounts for North Carolina and Florida should also be done as well, even if they are after the deadline, they would be triggered by a situation never encountered before. This would give grounds for legal arguments involving equitable estoppel and or tolling to allow additional recounts to occur if the first three recounts reveal anything noteworthy.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

How to catch North Carolina's alleged DMV voter suppression tactics over the past several months.

Cannonfire links to a disturbing letter from a DMV worker in North Carolina who claims DMV offices with higher minority  percentages had trouble re-registering voters due to fax machine errors, yet the fax machines in the non-minority districts worked fine.

There may be a way to determine if intentional voter registration fraud occurred at North Carolina DMV offices. A properly functioning fax machine that is sending an applicant's voter representation data will require a certain amount of time to transmit the data. If the voter registration applications are similar in nature, then the actual time to transmit each fax correctly may be a constant.

However, an improperly working fax machine may either take much less time, or much more time, than the acknowledged average for a functioning fax machine while attempting to send the same data.

Perhaps simply comparing the fax machine times between the districts where the voter registration by fax machines were working properly versus the districts where the fax machines were not working properly might reveal if in fact there was an ongoing scam to thwart voter registration in the districts more likely to vote for Hillary Clinton.

Remember, DMV workers complained incessantly about the problem and were told to ignore the fax error warnings, and that is why criminal actions and intent could be involved if those faxes never made it through. Here is a direct link to the story.

And I recall in 2008 Bill Clinton making the rounds in the small towns of North Carolina, towns that on average had 8,000 to 10,000 populations. If there was voter fraud in Wisconsin, then there probably was voter fraud among all that sea of red in the smaller towns of North Carolina.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Wisconsin Recount a go...

(Update, Dec. 02, 2016, 2:45 am). What is the worst that can happen? The ballots get recounted while no one compares those totals to the signature books. 

So what is the worst that can happen, 2 of the 3 states up for recount swing to Hillary Clinton, Trump barely wins. I would like to see Florida and Arizona recounted as well.

Instead of Exit Polls, how did the Presidential Candidates do when compared to how the Governors did from the same state?

I find it suspicious that North Carolina voted for a democrat governor over an incumbent Republican Governor, but voted for a Republican President by over a 100,000 vote plurality. There may be something going on. 

Instead of just focusing on the exit polls, I would be curious to see how the presidential candidates did as compared to the candidates for Governor in the same state, and then compare those comparisons with previous presidential elections.

However, the fact remains, Hillary Clinton was REInvestigated by the FBI, and Trump was not even Investigated once.  Please sign the Change dot org petition if you want to make sure that Donald Trump is vetted.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Change dot Org ReAudit Trump Petition reaches 100 signatures in less than a day.

Please share and promote the ReAudit Trump petition.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

DailyPUMA Dredges its Swamp, adds a favorites column on the left side top of the page.

Don't give up, please support the Change dot org ReAudit Trump Petition, and keep writing. 

If you are not listed in the Newly Created DailyPUMA favorites section, but are an alleged Hillary Clinton supporter, you can ask to join, however, if you are a douche that has banned DailyPUMA from posting on your site, well, you know what to do before asking to be added.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

ReAudit Trump is now a Change dot org Petition and a Facebook Page.

The Change dot org ReAudit Trump Petition just started, so the petition has one signature, mine. Won't you be the second?

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

James Comey FBI Press Conferences about Hillary Clinton's emails, why did all the reporters present miss the Bigger Picture?

During the first and second James Comey FBI press conferences about Hillary Clinton's emails, something didn't seem right. I felt as if the reporters were being one tracked. They were at the press conference to hear about one of the presidential candidates emails.

But what about the other presidential candidate. Are we to believe that the FBI was not investigating Donald Trump about Trump University, about his blatant lying over the airwaves whenever he called Hillary Clinton a criminal, an FCC violation, what about the possibility that Donald Trump may have funded his entire presidential campaign with income tax evasion money? 

Lets not also forget possible FTC violations by the National Enquirer, an avowed ally of Donald Trump that repeatedly flouted their own headlines with over the top, outlandish statements that the Enquirer represented as fact rather than their own opinion. 

Yet none of the reporters present had the presence of mind to enlarge the scope of the James Comey, FBI Hillary Clinton email press conference to ask the million dollar question, are you telling us that Hillary Clinton is under investigation by the FBI, but that Donald Trump is not? Just this one question, one question, would have created a more balanced press conference because as soon as Comey answered it, either way, it would have opened up the floodgates as to the possibility the FBI was targeting Hillary Clinton while giving Donald Trump a free ride.

Why was the media so caught up in the feeding frenzy of the moment to not ask the bigger picture presidential question, on two different occasions? The Answer is probably Social Media. Social Media seems to have created a publicity feeding frenzy in which the reporter who firstt reports about a press conference is considered the winner, irrespective of how poor a job that same reporter did trying to scope out what is being bypassed at the press conference.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Donald Trump Fires Chris Christie for Prosecuting Tax Evading Son-in-Laws Father.

The Plot thickens as Donald Trump, the possible billion dollar tax evader who would have been able to fund his entire presidential campaign with that tax evasion money, fires Chris Christie for prosecuting his son in law's tax evading father back in 2004. 

Firing a man for doing his job, when that job was going after a Tax Evader, sure points a smoking gun at Trump's own income tax peccadilloes.

ReAudit Trump is now on facebook, please like us.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

How to Delay Donald Trump's Inauguration, yes, it's possible.

The IRS may have let Donald Trump walk away with a billion dollars of taxpayer money. Donald Trump may have funded his entire campaign with tax evasion money. This too needs to be audited by someone outside of the IRS. Reaudittrump

The FBI had no investigations on Donald Trump? Is that possible? If the FBI had an investigation on Donald Trump, why did not James Comey mention that at his press conference on Hillary Clinton's emails? If the FBI had no investigations on Donald Trump, then, WTF!

Donald Trump most likely violated FCC rules when he kept stating that Hillary Clinton was a criminal. This like yelling fire in a crowded room when there is no fire, Hillary Clinton has never been charged nor convicted of a crime. The FCC must be prodded into action over what Trump did.  

Please don't rely on the Occupy Movement to help, they don't give a crap about Hillary Clinton, those protests have very little to do with Hillary Clinton. YOU have to make a difference by joining the ReauditTrump Movement.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

ReAudit Trump is now online on Facebook, Please Join.

Most of the info shared here will also be shared on ReAuditTrump. Please click the link and like the Facebook page.

Lets create a constructive movement with a tangible mission, did Donald Trump bully his way into almost a billion dollars worth of IRS income tax evasion deductions, more than enough money to fund his entire presidential campaign?

If the answer turns out to be yes, then the FBI must then explain how Hillary Clinton was being investigated in regards to her emails while Donald Trump was not being investigated regarding his income tax issues.

Please share this article and join on facebook.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Donald Trump puts on his Poker Face during his Sixty Minutes Interview, states nobody cares about his income taxes.

Donald Trump bluffed his still losing hand on Sixty Minutes last night. Trump stated that nobody cares about his income taxes.

Of course it's hard to care about Donald Trump's Income Taxes when he refuses to make his IRS filings public, just as it is easier to care about Hillary Clinton emails when FBI director James Comey twice calls out Hillary Clinton as being under investigation and holds a press conference each time to do it.

Write letters to Loretta Lynch, ask her to have Donald Trump's Income Taxes Audited by an Independent Tax Committee. Whether or not Trump is found to be a tax evader, immediately write James Comey asking why the FBI either suppressed their Income Tax Investigation on Donald Trump from being made public while Hillary Clinton's email investigation was made public, twice, or…. why did the FBI perhaps not even have an investigation on a possible tax dodger who used his potentially tax dodge money to run for the presidency of the United States.

Also ask Loretta Lynch, why is it ok for a candidate running for president to openly lie about his opponent by calling her a criminal when she has never been indicted or found guilty of a crime. Yelling fire in a crowded room when there is no fire is supposed to be illegal, what Donald Trump did was the same thing, he called his opponent a criminal even though she has never been indicted or been convicted of a crime.

The Tempered Glass Ceiling is to some degree shatter proof when the good old boys network stands on it from above. To shatter the Good Old Boys who stand above the Tempered Glass Ceiling, it will actually require women to break through, not the men who are already in power.

Please Share this article.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.

Occupy Protest against the 2016 Presidential results and Donald Trump need a Next Step, as in Protesting the IRS and the FBI.

One problem I have always had with the Occupy Movement is the inability to manifest empathy for others, someone not exactly like themselves. The Occupy Movement is first fueled by personal anger at a perceived injustice, but that anger does not seem to translate in such a way that truly creates change.

Lost among the Occupiers who feel personally threatened by Donald Trump is their lack of empathy for the slander that Trump projectile vomited on a speech by speech basis at Hillary Clinton. Calling someone a criminal, when that person has never been convicted of a crime, is basically a slanderous and possibly criminal act if either the projectiler is rewarded by their act of slander, or the recipient of the slander is harmed in some way.

The real threat to all of us, including Trump voters, is the possibility that a very wealthy man may have paid for his entire presidential campaign with what could actually be tax evasion money, while simultaneously being buttressed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation that saw fit to report on the Hillary Clinton email investigation, twice. The FBI never mentioned if they  had even bothered to investigate Donald Trump's potential tax evasion money that so significant it was more than enough to run for president.

People talk about Trump being given 10 million dollars by his father 50 years ago and how he then turned that 10 million into billions of dollars as not being much different than taking the original 10 million and simply putting it into stocks and bonds back then and letting it multiply.

In the newest version of that scenario, how about being given close to one billion dollars to run for president, money that was not earned, but money that was actually deducted from 20 straight years of income tax filings. It appears the FBI is ok with a potential tax cheat recycling money to run for president, money that maybe was never really theirs, with nary a peep as to whether or not such an act would be a cause of concern to the FBI.

A tempered glass ceiling pattern does emerge. Martha Stewart, a female, went to jail when a male acquaintance encouraged her to invest in his company, then allegedly warned her to sell her stock just before the stock crashed. Meanwhile Donald Trump may have bullied his way into an almost 50 million dollar a year tax deduction for a 20 year period of time, and there isn't even an investigation by the FBI?

It seems like a tempered glass ceiling does exist, one which allows males to bully their way until they get what they want while woman continue to walk on egg shells when they are under investigation.

If the Occupiers know how to pivot, they would be pivoting to the IRS and the FBI, demanding a new audit of Donald Trump's entire 20 year, almost one billion dollars in income tax deductions. They would also want to know why the FBI did not feel it necessary to vet Donald Trump to make sure he was not funding his entire presidential campaign on what could turn out to be a phony tax deduction scheme.

The IRS Statute of Limitations has not run its course from Trump's original 1995 filing simply because the IRS statute of limitations clock does not begin until the last tax deduction benefit that is in question, has been taken. In Trump's case, that may be just a year or two ago and therefore still subject to review.

Just look at the facts, Martha Stewart goes to jail when a male business owner first confides in her to invest in his company, then warns her when things go South. According to Donald Trump (another male), claims Hillary Clinton is a criminal even though she has never been convicted of a crime. Meanwhile another male, James Comey of the FBI has to literally trump up the Hillary Clinton email investigation to the public on two separate occasions. Yet Donald Trump may be the one who committed such an outlandish act of Income Tax Evasion to the point where he was able to fund his entire presidential campaign, and Comey is nowhere to be seen when it came to notifying the american people if Mr.Trump was under investigation.

The Good Old Boys Network continues to rule if protestors don't get focused on the core issue, has Trump been properly vetted over his IRS tax filings and why wasn't the FBI letting the American People know that Mr. Trump was also under investigation.

Please consider signing the Debt Neutrality Petition by by clicking here.