LINKS BETWEEN ACORN, BARACK OBAMA, JAMIE DIMON & CHASE BANK GROWING by the DAY.

You may recall that about

7 weeks ago I suggested a huge link between JP Morgan Chase Bank, Barack Obama and ACORN.

This article was even earlier.

There was also the APRIL FOOLS DAY "ONE MILLION DOLLAR REWARD" for any ACORN member willing to admit what went on during the 2008 democratic elections involving fake credit card name donations and caucus cheating, article.

Most recently, on August 13th DailyPUMA wrote about the Jamie Dimon, Barack Obama, Chase Bank, ACORN connection that is deserving of an investigation.

I just became aware of an article from August 10, 2009,

a book from an insider who knew about the Bernie Madoff, Chase Bank connection, and who also is claiming huge connections between ACORN and Chase Bank.

My claim from August 13th still stands, The FBI is afraid to take down Jamie Dimon because it could mean charges being filed against either Barack Obama, or members who directly report to Barack Obama.

In the misguided words of George Bush, "Bring it on".

HOW YOU CAN HELP! MAKE A DAILY-PROTEST.com sign and put it where others will see it. Daily-Protest.com signs can be placed in a storefront window, a bulletin board at work, or a countertop. Raise curiosity and awareness about how Chase Bank is harming a LOT of of their BEST customers by making a Daily-Protest.com sign.

IT IS TIME for an INVESTIGATION to FIND OUT WHY BARACK OBAMA LIKES JAMIE DIMON of CHASE BANK SOOOOOOO MUCH.

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE

CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE

Is it possible that both Jamie Dimon and Barack Obama are so dirty that one cannot be taken down via investigation without the other going down as well? Is there too much fear in doing the right thing and really getting to the bottom of the democratic campaign donation fraud of 2008 because it might have involved both Jamie Dimon and Barack Obama?

How can Barack Obama stand idly by Now while Jamie Dimon ruins the lives of americans that actually pay their chase credit card bills on time! One answer is, Barack Obama is so beholden to Jamie Dimon, he has no choice.

Could Jamie Dimon be the smoking gun who could have assisted Barack Obama in 2008 by helping to connect campaign donors who had maxed out on credit card political campaign contributions, with ACORN, so that FALSE NAMES could be used with valid credit card accounts to continue to pad Barack Obama's 2008 campaign account?

Could Jamie Dimon, by helping Barack Obama and or ACORN last year during the 2008 election, be the reason Barack Obama is perfectly fine with letting a MILLION CHASE BANK CREDIT CARD HOLDERS FACE DEFAULT for doing nothing more than ALWAYS PAYING THEIR LOW INTEREST CREDIT CARD BILL ON TIME, EACH AND EVERY MONTH!

How can Barack Obama look anybody in the eye and demand they take responsibility for their own "hood" when he lets Jamie Dimon hoodwink the american people and people who do the right thing every month and pay their bills?

Check out Consumer Affairs dot org for an ever expanding and exploding list of Chase Bank complaints in just the past three months alone.

Jamie Dimon and Chase Bank are under investigation for possibly planting "moles" into WAMU before the takeover in which Chase Bank bought WAMU for approximately 2 cents on the dollar.

Jamie Dimon and Chase Bank are being investigated for their part in aiding and abetting Bernie Madoff.

Jamie Dimon and Chase Bank are being sued for artificially lowering home equity lines to way below fair market value.

Jamie Dimon and Chase Bank are raising the monthly minimum payment on a MILLION CHASE BANK CREDIT CARD CUSTOMERS WHO HAD A LOW INTEREST RATE LIFE OF THE LOAN AGREEMENT, NONE OF THESE CUSTOMERS WERE EVER LATE PAYING THEIR BILL TO CHASE BANK!

The New York Times has stated that Jamie Dimon is Barack Obama's favorite Wall Street Banker, WHY?

JAMIE DIMON uses QUESTIONABLE second quarter Chase Bank "PROFIT STATEMENTS" to help sell several hundred thousand expiring stock options just FIVE DAYS LATER!

Can Barack Obama stand up to Jamie Dimon, or we can rightfully assume that Barack Obama is beholden to Jamie Dimon on matters that if disclosed to the public, could mean the end of Barack Obama's presidency?

You can't have it both ways Barack Obama, you can't be chummy with a banker like Jamie Dimon while claiming you believe in change. Jamie Dimon is as old school as they come, how about you, Barack Obama?

If Barack Obama is being investigated but there is too much fear to do anything about it, lets not forget, Barack Obama could probably write such an amazing resignation speech he probably will still have an opportunity to run again, preferably AFTER Hillary Clinton gets a second chance to make a first impression.

HOW YOU CAN HELP! MAKE A DAILY-PROTEST.com sign and put it where others will see it. Daily-Protest.com signs can be placed in a storefront window, a bulletin board at work, or a countertop. Raise curiosity and awareness about how Chase Bank is harming a LOT of of their BEST customers by making a Daily-Protest.com sign.

Peanut Salmonella and FOOD SAFETY, FDA Apparently has very little power over the conduct and practices of food suppliers IN THE UNITED STATES.

Safety of Food Supply 2nd meeting by the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee over the Peanut Salmonella outbreak revealed several interesting things. 9 people died from salmonella that was apparently linked to the recent peanut salmonella contamination.

The FDA has little power to investigate companies such as PCA (peanut corporation of America) peanut processing plant. Corporations
that sent their own quality control food inspectors to PCA and found the conditions deplorable, kept their discoveries "in house" and did not share the results with anybody else.

PCA was required to conduct their own investigation, hired a private company to do it, and magically received an A+ rating along with a certificate proclaiming PCA as a company in excellent standing.

John Dingall, a congress person from Michigan, took a swipe at the Bush administration by stating in the last 8 years nothing was done to improve the FDA's ability to prevent what happened at PCA.

I kind of wonder what the Clinton administration did in the area of food safety. I could see the issue being lost during Bill Clinton's first term in office because of the attempt at healthcare reform, two Republican led congressional shut downs over the budget, and then the Republicans contract with America. During the second term, Bill Clinton's hands were tied his final two years while Republicans witch hunted him.

Prior to Bill Clinton there was 12 years of Republican rule so probably more food safety inactivity could be found. Yet here we are in 2009 and food companies that violate health and safety practices are required to pay for their own investigation. It seems like the less money they spend, the less will be found "wrong", and that is exactly what happened in this instance.

Did MSNBC & POLITICO.com CIRCUMVENT IRS TAX LAWS by BARTERING?

Sure looks to me in the image above that MSNBC and Politico.com are bartering their services back and forth, but are they reporting this barter to the IRS? MSNBC gets an "authority" on a subject to appear for free on their television station, and in turn the guest pimps the name of their website in the background the ENTIRE TIME the guest is shown as seen above. This appears to me to be bartering, an exchange of services, which can be construed as income and therefore taxable.

I believe in live and let live, but the method above was one of the prime ways that MSNBC defeated Hillary Clinton this year. Pundits from Huffington Post, Daily Kos, Time, and Newsweek would appear on MSNBC and act like they were an impartial observer when they usually had a preordained position of supporting Barack Obama or slamming Hillary Clinton and her supporters. Many times, it appears that in lieu of being paid, the "Pundit" had a book they had written that would be publicized during their appearance, and on top of that the company they worked for (such as Time or Newsweek) was publicized by MSNBC as well.

This is a form of bartering, and since this privilege was abused by MSNBC to help Barack Obama defeat Hillary Clinton, I think payback, IRS payback, is in order. What do you think? If you know somebody who works for the IRS, ask them what they think.