About Me

My photo
Los Angeles, California, United States
I am a Product and Brand Value Accelerator with over 2 dozen IMDB Credits, Los Angeles EMMY Winner. Top 25 Lifetime Tongal Ideationist, Academy of Television Arts and Sciences Internship Scholarship Winner. Also am a Video Forensics and Video Analysis Expert for Hire.

Featured Post

My Beautiful and Amazing 91 year old Mother was refused service at her local E.R. for a wheezing chest and died three days later. I am Devastated.

91 year old Fortunata Machi was refused service for a Wheezing Chest by the E.R. even as her Caregiver Son Alessandro Machi begged  th...

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Why can't 2012 Republicans just turn the other cheek?

There seem to be a lot of inconsistencies in the 2012 Republican presidential playbook.

Homosexuality is wrong, most republicans chortle. Yet statistics show that homosexual sex is less likely to produce homosexual offspring or offspring of any kind, so it would seem that turning the other cheek would actually be the logical course of action to take.

A person's emotional spirituality is determined by their sex organ, most republicans believe. I find it an insult to God that many republicans believe that what makes a person a person is buried within their sex organ, and not within their mind or "heart".

Abortion is murder, but plundering any and all resources that mankind can plunder is what God "wants". Really?  What about waste not want not? If you really care about abortionites, then why don't republicans support programs that allow people to work knowing that the broader community will caretake for that child while they are at work?

Oh wait, Republicans do support using insurance dollars to payoff the owner of the 911 twin towers even though insurance policies do not cover acts of war. So Republicans are for the sharing of communal resources to reimburse business owners, but not families?

Furthermore, why do Republican MALES want to make the rules regarding abortion? They already voted when they donated their sperm to the cause. Unless the sperm donor wants to raise a child they donated their sperm to help create, and it was a consensual union, it's none of their business.

Why do Republicans think it's "their money" when it comes to contraception, but don't want to hear the same type of talk from conscientious objectors objecting over their own tax dollars going towards funding wars fought over petroleum?

And finally, let who cast the first sperm NOT speak on the issue of abortion. Any male that has ever put a women into a position of having to decide whether to they should keep a child out of wedlock, should shut up, unless they were willing to caretake for the child themselves or were going to personally fund that child's well being up until adulthood and perhaps even beyond.

The bible advocates an "eye for an eye", yet I don't recall the Bush administration advocating splitting the war time budget in half, with half going towards the development of alternative energies so that those who hate us would eventually not even know who we are because we would not have to force ourselves into their country for their oil.
Why do republicans alienate women in 2012 when simply reminding women of what happened to Hillary Clinton in 2008 could swing enough voters to their side to win the 2012 presidential election?

Please Download the Chase Bank Protest Flyer for FREE, and then all that needs to be done is just give a few copies out, it is really that simple.

1 comment:

Bob said...

The Clinton Question is indicative of how deep the GOPers think-- i.e. not very.

Best Quality VHS to Digital Transfers

Best Quality VHS to Digital Transfers
Serious Customers Welcome.

Share Gadget

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from FABULOUSLY40.com

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from FABULOUSLY40.com
Would this be a good way to win funds for Louisa's Law ?