Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Tiger Woods appeared to suffer financially and publicly, why does Jamie McCourt get to win no matter how she behaves?

In Case you are not up to date on the divorce between Los Angeles Dodgers owners Frank McCourt and Jamie McCourt, here is a review link.

It seems as if the affair between a Los Angeles Dodger's employer (Jamie McCourt) and an employee, (the limo driver) was viewed as irrelevant by the court.

That basically means that Jamie McCourt is free to act as inappropriately as she wishes with no consequences. Lounging around the mansion pool with your lover while Frank McCourt was out of town? Then calling the police because she was in fear that the 60 year old husband was going to manhandle her 40 year old stud lover? Really?

No matter what Frank McCourt did at that moment, the result is Jamie McCourt would either continue to draw a huge salary as a Dodger employee while publicly humiliating her husband, or Jamie McCourt get a huge settlement if her irresponsible actions initiate divorce actions.

I feel that poor behavior by a married adult female that results in their getting a lucrative financial reward keeps other women down. It certainly does not help main street women. A man may be reluctant to marry simply because of how somebody like Jamie McCourt is getting rewarded for her questionable behavior.
Yes, many men may be afraid of commitment, but it may be what they are actually afraid of is a legally binding financial commitment should their marriage go south, especially if they are not even the reason the marriage went south. Once married, it seems as if poor behavior by a woman may spell a financial albatross for the man, and that is unfair to the many women who would never behave in an irresponsible manner the way it appears that Jamie McCourt has.
Tiger Woods lost big time for his behavior, but Jamie McCourt seems headed to a lucrative financial reward no matter how she behaves, and probably another million men have sworn off marriage as a result.

Monday, June 27, 2011

Keith Olbermann relieved of his old timer's day broadcasting duties, should we be surprised?

In less than one year's span, two different corporate entities have felt the need to fire Keith Olbermann, the first time (MSNBC fired Olbermann) I entirely agree with, the second one the Yankees should be fined 10 million dollars for firing Olbermann.

In the first case, Olbermann was fired from MSNBC for donating money to democratic politicians whom he had interviewed or was going to interview on his MSNBC TV show. It was also an excellent way to get out of a huge possibly 16 million dollar contract that Olbermann apparently received for his 2008 democratic nomination efforts.

In the second case, Olbermann tweeted a photo of a New York Yankee staffer apparently stealing signs and sending them to the yankee hitters on deck. That pretty much means Olbermann was exposing the New York Yankees cheating, and he should not have been fired for that.

However, I'll never forget his badgering and pummeling of Hillary Clinton during the 2008 democratic presidential nomination race, Olbermann and Arianna Huffington played pivotal roles in overriding blue collar democrats choice for president (Hillary Clinton) as the democratic nominee, and neither have ever been brought to justice for their crimes against the american voter.


Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Flooding Along Missouri River, Barack Obama blameworthy.




Um, the Mississippi River is one of the United States' most lucrative economic thoroughfares. How does cutting the Mississippi River dredging fund almost in half, as Barack Obama did, allow for the Mississippi River to double its exports?

If you are planning on creating or broadcasting a commercial and want an objective, outsiders point of view about your commercial, contact Alessandro Machi about his consulting services at...
info at alexlogic.com
You can also view more
commercial critiques
by Alessandro Machi at

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Where is Hillary Clinton's WoMAN Cave?

Once Hillary Clinton cuts down her trips around the world, it would seem to me she should have her own WoMAN cave in Washington where she can be seen around the world via satellite and conduct her meetings with foreign political leaders without leaving Washington.

Being up in the air so much can eventually cause health issues.

Sunday, June 12, 2011

I tried to avoid all information about Weiner, but it's just too hard.

(Edit note update June 14, 2011), I just heard a few minutes of the John and Ken KFI radio show and they were mentioning that congressperson Weiner may have a true psychological disorder. If this is the case, should we all be this against him, especially if he is actually seeking help? end of update.
---------------------------------

While trying to avoid any and all references about Mr. Weiner, some pictures of his abs and chest were suddenly paraded on one of the television news stations.

The picture of Mr. Weiner's abs and chest made me realize something, the guy appears to be very slender, yet muscular, and, he is really proud of his body. I just want to suggest that the only people who should really be judging Mr. Weiner are other's who have taken the time to keep their bodies chiseled the way that it appears Mr. Weiner has.

The point is really simple, it's easy to judge someone else's narcissism when we haven't taken the time to be in the same physical shape as they. For those of us who can't match up to Mr. Weiner's pecs or abs, we all should just lighten up and let those who also have well toned pecs and abs decide Mr. Weiner's fate.
I'm curious if we'll ever see a twitter controversy over twittered pictures of a portly congressman with more hair on his back than front, balding, blubbery, and proud of it.
One of the reason's Barack Obama survived a real vetting in 2008 was that people were attacking his supporters, and in many instances Obama's supporters were of a different ethnicity than the person doing the attacking or accusing. This racial difference between the attackers and those under scrutiny allowed for the cry of racism to be made.

Let no portly, balding, harried back person out there have their voice heard when it comes to opposing what Weiner did since their opinion is completely irrelevant because they can't match up physically to Mr. Weiner's physique.



Wednesday, June 8, 2011

The Middle on ABC, where PUMA Parents dare to tread in an episode called "Catering to the Kids".


The ABC television show The Middle, episode called Catering to the Kids, (aka catering to the Obots) is not only hilarious, it actually conveys the state of the political vacuum that presently exists in the United States.

In this 2 minute clip from "Catering to the Kids", the broken clock represents the loss of news reporting from ironically enough, The Middle, resulting in the Obots having taken over the asylum.

Scene after scene from the Catering to the Kids episode is an unintended political narrative of what happens when the younger Obotic crowd takes over.

Isn't it time to admit the obvious, "Don't trust anybody under the age of 30".

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Daily PUMA responds to Salon's John Edwards article "How John Edwards nearly ruined everything". Nearly?

"John Edwards and Barack Obama DID ruin everything. Barack Obama has helped engineer the biggest banking homeowner theft in the history of the United States.

Barack Obama has sanctioned that only homeowners who drop to their knees and hand over the keys to their home to the banks be the ONLY ONES remotely eligible for a mortgage rate reduction, a practice known as parallel foreclosure and dual track foreclosure.

Barack Obama may have cheated in the Iowa primaries as well. A look at Obama precinct wins in Iowa shows an overwhelming victory total from precincts directly touching Illinois plus precincts next to those touching Illinois. In other words, Obama supporters from Illinois may have infiltrated the Iowa caucuses.

Barack Obama also accepted millions upon millions of dollars in pre-paid credit card donations that required NO donor identification, so names like Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck were used in thousands of instances. ONLY Barack Obama had such lax donation acceptance practices.

Illinois was allowed to move up their democratic primary date from the end of March 2008 to the beginning of February 2008, even as Michigan and Florida democratic voters were disqualified from having their votes mean anything.

For Salon to have the gall to imply that it was Edwards who "almost" ruined the democratic party when Barack Obama's cheating ways continue to trumpet key policy making decisions is, insane.

Both Edwards AND Obama HAVE ruined the democratic party for at least the next decade."
- End Quote.

Furthermore, Salon is implying that bad behavior is ok as long as it was suppressed long enough for the democrats to win. Sorry Salon, but the wrong democratic presidential candidate won in 2008 and we are all paying a price as a result.


Share Gadget

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from FABULOUSLY40.com

10,000 Dollar Grant! Another Great Find from FABULOUSLY40.com
Would this be a good way to win funds for Louisa's Law ?