Monday, November 29, 2010
I regret not snapping a picture of the Hillary Clinton Soda Head Poll about running for president in 2012 when the results were around "350, YES, disappointed Hillary Clinton would not run", and only about "20 people who said no".
Suddenly, two days later, and Hillary Clinton went from 92% yes, to 32% yes, this after several hundred votes had already put her in the plus 90% percentage yes ranking.
I really hate Obots and wish Hill Bots were ten times tougher, and as unified.
Friday, November 26, 2010
Nancy Pelosi is only one of 8 DEMOCRATS that increased their margin of victory in 2010 from 2008 within their own voting district.
This helps explain how one becomes a narcissistic power monger in Congress. Gerrymander your own district to the point where you could win under almost any circumstance, grab power by intimidating those around you because they all know you will be back term after term, and then do whats best for yourself and your political cohorts even if it hurts millions of american homeowners being victimized by the very president she helped cheat to get into office in 2008.
Nancy Pelosi's sidekick, Harry Reid, was also able to win against a somewhat scatterbrained, fast talking unknown who actually should have won, and no doubt, once again, gerrymandering made the final difference as the race was not even that close. (edit update: Nov. 28, 1:53pm, 2010 lol, I just realized that gerrymandering doesn't affect the Senate, only the house.)
Nonetheless, Democrats are dumbocrats for allowing gerrymandering to continue as it allows the truly crazy to stay in power for far too long.
Posted by Alessandro Machi at 11:41 AM
Labels: gerrymandering keeps Pelosi and Reid in office in 2010, Pelosi increases her win total in 2010 versus 2008
Sunday, November 21, 2010
I'm not sure what you feed the guests at a vegetable concert, but might throwing veggies at the performers please them?
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
Pelosi, Reid retain their leadership seats, Pelosi minority mode style, but something just does not make sense.
Pelosi is beyond narcissism. Just today she talked glowingly about JFK, and how Barack Obama was like JFK. It is so clear that Pelosi, like Arianna Huffington and Oprah Winfrey, could not stand the idea of another female, Hillary Clinton, one upping their places in history.
But besides that, can someone, ANYONE, explain why the democratic LOSERS are determining next years minority leader of the house, NOW? Does that make any sense to anyone?
When there is upheaval in congress, I can see the "winning" side voting before the newer party members arrive next year because the argument can be made that it was the work of those already in that helped pave the way for their gains (although this year it was more the democrats dropping the ball then the republicans earning it).
But the democrats LOST. They lost BIG TIME.
Why is the democratic party voting before next years democrat herd comes in? Why are the SAME DEMOCRATS who helped LOSE the House Majority getting the opportunity to vote on who runs things for the NEXT 2 YEARS?
I don't know how long this style of voting has gone on before next years class of politicians comes in, but it is clear to me that the winning side should go before the new class comes in, and the LOSERS wait until next term to select their minority "winner".
I wonder if that is the way it used to be and somewhere along the way somebody just changed it.
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Hero dog named Target, who stopped a suicide bomber in Afghanistan mistakenly euthanized in Arizona at animal shelter.
A tough story to read about over at Yes But However. I Keep hoping for a different outcome. One wonders why the dog left the family residence, but that is still not a reason to euthanize the dog so quickly after the dog was caught and taken to the local animal shelter.
Posted by Alessandro Machi at 10:04 PM
Labels: dog who stopped suicide bomber in Afghanistan accidentally euthanized in Arizona., hero Dog euthanized, Target Euthanized
Saturday, November 13, 2010
This four minute video of Jeremiah Wright talking about the plight of the black man versus the white privileged Hillary Clinton was minimized by the media back in 2008. Yet two and a half years later and the racist, misogynistic message has been upstaged by something else.
What the heck does ANY OF IT, have to do with being president of the United States?
Ask yourself that question as you watch this video, what does any of the blather by Reverend Wright have anything to do with being president, and being a GOOD president.
I seem to recall that Caroline Kennedy is seen as "privileged". Is Reverend Wright putting Hillary Clinton into the same class as Caroline Kennedy? Really? Can there be a bigger slap in the face then to imply that Hillary Clinton and Caroline Kennedy are the same type of people when they have led entirely different lives?
Who is Reverend Wright to start lumping entire races of people into one type? And to do it to the Clintons, of all people, is just beyond insane verbosity.
It saddens me that some PUMA's, rather than fight for their own party, chose to switch, and in the process, allowed lunatics like Wright to continue to win.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Taylor Marsh, almost as bad as wonkette, a disaster who faked support for Hillary Clinton in 2008 and then turned against her PUMA supporters.
It's important to remember the 2008 Hillary Clinton poser supporters who to this day won't apologize for their stupidity in supporting democratic fraud in high places regarding the 2008 democratic nomination race.
Taylor Marsh can't seem to recognize her own duplicitous demons, so she attacks PUMA's instead. Her premise in attacking PUMAs is they so hate Barack Obama, and have so idolized Hillary Clinton, that PUMA's can't think logically or reasonably anymore.
The problem with Taylor Marsh's position is that it involves "moving on" and forgetting criminal behavior from 2008. I think the past two years have demonstrated that "moving on" only postpones the inevitable backlash that cheaters, liars, and exaggerators, aka Wall Street, bankers, and their minions subject their targets to.
The implication that PUMA's exist because Hillary Clinton "lost" and they can't accept that is ridiculous. PUMA's exist because they saw how the top of the democratic party pulled strings behind the scenes to override the will of democratic voters. Lets not forget that ALL OF THE DEMOCRATIC ELITE MANIPULATION that went on in 2008 only produced a popular vote tie for Barack Obama.
Without the democratic manipulation, the final popular vote would have shown around 52-53% for Hillary Clinton, and 47-48% for Barack Obama.
Once I know that Barack Obama only won because of the disrespect that the higher democratic party elite showed Hillary Clinton and her family, I don't easily forget. For Taylor Marsh to try and spit on PUMA's at this late date just shows her to be a minion in desperate need to keep her day job being a lemming for a still corrupt, unapologetic democratic party.
And by the way, Barack Obama is now responsible for over A MILLION HOMEOWNERS losing their homes because of HAMP (Home Affordable Mortgage Protection) and the parallel foreclosure that actually accelerated the loss of homeowners homes as they tried to enroll and qualify for HAMP.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Wonkette is the worst piece of progressive arrogant trash, may you wonks rot inside your own fetid feces and enjoy it.
Edit update - January 22, 2011 9:16 am - A Wonkette reader actually copied this article without having the acumen to include the link located within the article. The link is the entire reason this article was written. Instead, a wonkette cut and pasted the article as is, rendering the link as just a sentence with no attribute. Should we be surprised that the democratic fringe that saw nothing wrong with Barack Obama supporters using pre-paid anonymous credit cards in 2008 can't even copy someone's article without altering the meaning? And when I posted a comment explaining this, the comment never appeared.
Edit update - January 22, 2011 11:48 pm - A reader from Wonkette graciously added my comment from above, something the ADM was too aloof to do by allowing my response to appear there. However, they still have not put two and two together. I was upset by the condescending comments found in the Hillary Clinton article, not the article itself.
Wonkette sucks, period. I think I recall seeing wonkette on some of the allegedly pro Clinton boards. What a load of progressive crap they are. Die, all of you wonks, the sooner the better. Seriously. You've done more to damage this country in as short of a time as possible, and you just don't get how arrogant and conceited you are.
Real PUMA's hate wonkette and the progressive idiocy they embody. And the comments section is JUST AS DESPICABLE. These are same rotten imbeciles from 2008, trying to kick anybody to the curb who supports Hillary Clinton.
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Hillary Clinton would have limited the economic devastation that has hit Main Street under Barack Obama's Guidance.
Don't give up, Hillary Clinton fans. People in high places, such as Robert Reich, are sending out public smoke signals (caution, link to goes to Robert Reich article on Huffington Post, one of Hillary Clinton's biggest enemies in 2007 and 2008) that Barack Obama is not up to the task of standing up to Wall Street. They aren't exactly saying that, but they are using statistical data to show that Barack Obama is incapable or unwilling to help main street even as wall street "recovers".
Nor does Obama even have an inkling on how a main street economy actually fuels Wall Street.Obama thinks it's the other way around, that wall street fuels main street, and millions of americans are unnecessarily losing their homes during his presidency because of his backwards thinking.
What I wrote in response to Robert Reich's article,
Thank you for speaking the truth. The HAMP program, apparently started under Bush and propagated by Barack Obama, is an illegal government program that violates the Federal Hobbs Act. Both George Bush, and now Barack Obama, should be impeached over HAMP.Taxpayer funded program requires american citizens fall behind 3-4 months on their mortgage payment, causing parallel foreclosure to kick in even for the consumer to become eligible for HAMP, and this is a VIOLATION of the Federal Hobbs Act, the extortion clause.
Friday, November 5, 2010
While Barack Obama "agonizes" over constituents letters he reads each night in the White House, he's responsible for a million HAMP home foreclosures.
CAUTION, THE 30 SECOND COMMERCIAL BEFORE THE VIDEO NEWS REPORT STARTS IS A LOT LOUDER THAN THE NEWS STORY, I ADVISE TURNING THE VOLUME ON YOUR COMPUTER LOWER UNTIL THE COMMERCIAL ENDS, THEN RAISING IT BACK TO NORMAL.
The reporter who did this story does not know about parallel foreclosure, which is the reason these home owners now face foreclosure when all they did was follow the HAMP Program guidelines. The reporter also does not know about the Federal Hobbs Act that Barack Obama has been violating for the past year and a half that has resulted in over a million homeowners prematurely losing their homes.
Isn't this kind of a giggle in a weird sort of way. This reporter spent a month or more on this story, PROVED beyond a reasonable doubt that parallel foreclosure exists and is being practiced by all the banks, yet does not know about Parallel Foreclosure nor the Federal Hobbs Act that Barack Obama and his team of rivals are violating on a daily basis.
But this reporter is not alone, and I commend this reporter for doing an excellent job of proving "Parallel Foreclosure" even if she did not know Parallel Foreclosure exists.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
It would be interesting to see if the percentage of democrats who believe Barack Obama should face a political challenge in 2012 from another democrat increases from 47% after the election results later on today, Nov. 02, 2010. If the number rises to over 50%, should not Barack Obama consider stepping down after this term?
Asked another way, what was the percentage of support all other presidents have received from their own parties voters two years before their re-election bid. It would be amazing to have a chart that compares Barack Obama's re-nomination popularity versus all other presidents from the past 50 to 60 years.
Posted by Alessandro Machi at 12:21 AM
CHECK OUT HILLARY CLINTON FORUMS